What html stands for Videos

HUEHEUHEUEHEUEEHEUEHEUEHEUEHEU

+CodeBabes washing powder ads also objectify women as domesticated. nobody makes a fuss about that. what about those images showing models in business suits and glasses. that is playing to a male fantasy.

+CodeBabes I wasn't aware that 10 year olds could pay adult models to teach people how to code. This is the weirdest arrangement I've ever come across.

+Daniel Grooms who cares? Since when is it our job to do any of that? Go ahead and start your own channel. Pretty sure most normal girls don't give a shit about this and find it mildly amusing. I.E. not SJW fucktards.

+Jonathan Favorite manuals are no fun :(

+CodeBabes True, I mean if one was interested in modeling, photographying hot babes and stuff he'd probably avoid sitting behind a monitor the whole day writing text on the screen.That being said, and considering I'm a web designer/photographer myself, I love coding AND hot girls so seeing people finds the combination of the two weird...well, it feels wrong. I mean, I'm pretty sure even the nerdiest dude on the world doesn't dislike girls ;) keep up the great work and congrats with the girls, they're all stunning!

Hey Andre!  We love the discussion and you make some amazing points :). The juxtaposition of very attractive girls teaching technical info does create a lot of inner conflict for people.  CodeBabes is hot, charismatic babes teaching stuff, better than just parading around in something like the Victoria's secret show.To expand on your last statement, yes, the majority of people shouting and disliking were male, probably of the more nerdy type.  We guess they want to make their beliefs on social issues known because there is a lot of pressure in the tech community to do so.It's unfortunate that the loudest people get to set the talking points in the tech industry,  because overall it's a very accepting and tolerant place.  Although a little sexually repressed ;) obviously!

Oh and sorry for the wall of text, I realized it was this long too late eheh :)

+CodeBabes Thanks for replying and yes, I agree with you :) I mean, I'm not saying boobs > nerds but one thing I can relate to is that most of my "normal" friends(because you're either tech-savvy or "normal", which most of the time means tech-dumb) dislikes the image of the nerd, computers, coding and stuff because whenever they see this world they have this image(which is mostly true) of long haired, over weight old guys sitting in front of their computers talking a weird language when they're in the "real" world(which actually works with all this technology behind but it doesn't mean they shouldn't communicate).In this channel a thing I clearly saw so far is basic code, which is something good for starters to decide if they enjoy it or not, and boobs which is 100% more appealing than your average nerd(sorry Wozniak!).Not only that, but some of my female friends thought "Wait a minute, a girl can be THAT hot AND intelligent/tech-savvy?". That's something new, as I said it's different and imho it works.I'd rather bash the fashion industry for making girls look like dolls promoting a sick image for the sake of nothing(well, beauty, but that's not something you can drive the world with) instead of one of the very few different channels when it comes to teaching coding(along with Treehouse teaching in a kids-friendly way).Last but not least, girls finding this offensive(if there's any behind all the nerds shouting this is bad) shouldn't even be taken into account: the fact they think you shouldn't show boobs so much to explain concepts further prooves we're still living in a males driven society: if a girl wants to be intelligent AND sexy she can do wathever she wants, period.

+AndreCorner amen, couldn't have said it better :) Thanks for the support! P.S. I think nerds like boobs A LOT, they just don't want anyone to know because then they'd be labeled something like 'douche' or 'misogynist'.

+CodeBabes Oh, no. There has been a misunderstanding lol.

If anybody knows any GILFs we'll line up a shoot.