Attila the Hun Reign 434 - 453 //www.cloudbiography.com Attila the Hun was the ruler of the Huns and leader of the Hunnic Empire. See a related article at ...
Huns were turkish tribes that mixed with uralic tribes.They were totally 10
tribes. 7 tribes were turkish, 3 tribes were uralics. Surprisingly, 7
turkish tribes were effected by those 3 uralic tribes in all ways. By the
way, turks come from the mixing of many finno-ugorics and some amerindians
in very old past. So turks(in turkey,caucasia,central asia,balkans,moldova,
south and east russia) are relatives of not only hungarians but also all
finno-ugoric people.
"The 147 pictures of the chronicle are great source of information on
medieval Hungarian cultural history, costume, and court life in the 14th
century".
they were made in the 1300s. Almost a 1000 yrs after Attila's death. They
arent contemporary like Priscus. Priscus describes Attila as Mongoloid
The word "Hun" comes from the word "kun" in Turkish ...It means people, or
nation. The Hunnic emp. was turkic and this map shows only europe part of
Hunnic empire. Main Hunnic people lived in Central
Assia.(Khazakstan,Kyrgzisan,Mongolia(was turkic) and Eastern
Turkistan.(today in china).
Fact1; the ring was just a reason for the revenge of the satanisation of
antedeluvian At-lantis 13000y's ago about, by the Lemurian-Soulz & At-illa.
Fact2, Buda(Bleda)was not his real neither half brother!!! Fact3; 4,...&so
on!
LOOOL, hungarians and turks here claim that Attila was turk or hungarian.
Nope, the huns were huns and nothing else. They came from what is todays
Kazahstan. So the nearest descendants to the huns are the Kazakhs.
+DJah Ganjah It is a Total War game, its the original Rome Total War which came out in 2004...This used it and there a series here in the UK called time commanders also based on it
+Cpl. Gadway USMC There is always more to history than what we read. Just because the majority say something doesn't mean it's automatically right. As we were not there we'll never really know the full truth.
+Wilson Elder Wikipedia is 5% more accurate than Encyclopedia Britannica (what used to be the go-to guide for decades if not a 100yrs). Knowledge has simply been democratized and because we have more people weighing in, we have a better input. History on the other hand has always been a consensus (as per Napoleon).
+ELISA STRANGEHUMANBEING I know right, these guys have no idea what they're talking about
Attila The Hun - The Most Evil Men In History (part 1 of 2)
Attila The Hun (406-453) Attila was Khan of the Huns. He is remembered as the epitome of cruelty and rapacity. He passed unhindered through Austria and ...
Priscus described Attila with a little bit dark skin, flat nose and small
eyes. It is not necessery a Mongoloid type, as many people wants to
believe! Mongolians like Chinese has small but not flat nose and no dark
skin, and no small eyes just almond-shaped, slanted eyes! Attila was a
Scythian-similar or even a Cimmerian originated guy!
+Friedrich Kass Mongolian are not Chinese. Have you ever seen a Monoligan? Even the Scythian mentioned themselves as slanted eye Warriors. Almond-shaped=slanted + DNA- from Siberia/Mongolia. They are decentant of Mongols.
From most of books I read, Atilla is identified with Oriental (Eastern
Asian) characters (yellowish skin, short, small eyes, flat nose as
according to Priscus's encounter with Attila).
But why then in Hungary Attila (as a national hero in Hungary) is depicted
as European like figure as well as in in this movie Attila???
Atilla was definitely eastern Asian man, belonging to Mongoloid
race(yellowish skin, short, small eyes, flat nose). Europeans have
distorted the history and now made Attila as theirs. I hope they will
reveal the truth and create new movie about Attila with Asian man.
+neonknight6 lol the tartar invasion? Clearly you copied and pasted that from some old text. Only Europeans from that era called it the tartar invasion since then we have had plenty of time to determine that they were Mongols not tartars
+limbu dilip I don't think that in Hungary anyone thinks of Attila as an European-type man. We all know that the seven united Hungarian tribes came from Asia (around 800-900 the "official" date is 896). We think of Attila and the Hun nation as an ancestor of the Hungarian nation. The Hungarian nation became less Asian-looking centuries later when it got mixed with many other nations who moved into the emptied country after the Tatar (Mongol) invasion (1241-42).