How to not pay taxes Videos

preaching to the choir bill puppies, i only use gold, get paid in gold, and spend gold to buy everything i use. i was able to buy my first house after melting down my gold medals from the 1930 games, in fact.

He's exactly right , if you want to avoid taxation , you're going to need to drop off the radar. at least untill you're ready to mount a full assault on corrupt american globerment.

A completely semi serious way to not pay taxes is to not get a Social Security Number card. Or you know, just don't pay taxes. Deal with the IRS and the guns later.

U want not to pay taxes ? Very easy solution-get a government job or better yet, get elected. or convert to Judaism, if that bothers you--apply for welfare :^(

It's a lot of fun! In fact, I even made video to show people how to do it! Search "How to Overthrow a Government" by MisterForthright

Its not hard live and work ONLY for cash, have NO bank account, don't spend your money on anything big and live under the radar.

i would definitely live in your country mr. forthright, and happily pay taxes so long as it meant more of your videos.

I'm not joking, this is literally the funniest video I've ever seen. I mean have never seen a video funnier than this.

It's a slang term signifying a "term of endearment" for an older gentlemen that has earned ones respect :)

@cryingatdisneyland He's actually doing pretty well considering he started this channel in December.

A breath of fresh air.... a tall cool glass of water that puts a smile on your face

@saunderfourtwenty amen. this guy should have way more views than he does though

Thank You So So MUCH I never laughed this hard I love grandpa

If you do not make money, you do not pay taxes! ☻

How can I start my own country? That sounds fun!

+david forster They use her for genetical experiments and to figure out how long humans can hold their breath underwater.

+Adam B You must determine whether your labor is taxable. Read Cracking the Code and look around losthorizons.com

+RetSquid I went to the irs office in San Antonio and they could not produce or even cite a law requiring a worker to pay them anything, unless he was working for the U S or profiting from them somehow., and of course the filing requirement depends on owing them. Also, I just read 6151 again . IT SAYS NO SUCH THING. It says IF you are required to file, THEN you must file and pay. Here, so you can read it yourself since I guess you haven't yet: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/6151

+Geheimish Verboten "Once you have filled out and signed the form, you have volunteered to file and pay Federal Income Tax."***Your employer is legally require to file these forms.  You are required to pay income tax because Title 26, Section 1 imposes it on 'every individual'.  You are a 'taxpayer' if you are "subject to any internal revenue tax."  So, if you have ever even bought alcohol, cigarettes or paid for a phone, you are a taxpayer, by definition.  Income tax is not voluntary.

So are there no taxes on your labor now? How?

+Laurence RillingWrong:“But natural rights, so called, are as much subject to taxation as rights of lesser importance. An excise is not limited to vocations or activities that may be prohibited altogether. It is not limited to those that are the outcome of a franchise. It extends to vocations or activities pursued as of common right.”Charles C. Steward Machine Co. v. Davis, 301 U.S. 548 (1937):

+Laurence Rilling The courts agree, and have weighed in on this, as well:"...the requirement to pay [excise] taxes involves the exercise of privilege."Flint vs. Stone Tracy Co. 220 U.S. 107 (1911); "The terms 'excise tax' and 'privilege tax' are synonymous. The two are often used interchangeably."American Airways v. Wallace, 57 F.2d 877, 880 (Dist. Ct., M.D. Tenn., 1937).//www.losthorizons.com/Documents/AllEconomicActivityIsNotIncome.htm

+RetSquid A right cannot be taxed - only a privilege or luxury. Therefore it is your choice whether to be liable for a particular tax. Thus, voluntary.

+Raul CruzEven if they never heard of you, you are legally required to file.

+Raul Cruz If you work in the private sector, and your workplace sends an information return (e.g., Form W-2, 1099) to the IRS, they do know you exist! In such cases, filing an annual Form 1040 is simply entering your testimony into the record, and you can correct any erroneous information returns, as the IRS has provided us with the forms for this specific purpose. Correcting erroneous Forms W-2 with an annual Form 1040 constitutes a lawful claim for refund, including FIT, Social Security and Medicare contributions. Follow the links below for about 1,200 examples of this lawful filing practice://www.losthorizons.com/EWWBL.htm//www.losthorizons.com/BulletinBoard.htm//www.losthorizons.com/tax/Highlights.htm

+Laurence Rilling Voluntary if they don't know you exist like those who had never filed.

+areanna beyer You should wash your mouth with soap. Repent and kneel for your king Rockefeller the Zionist the Second AT THIS VERY MOMENT over grains of uncooked rice.

+areanna beyer Taxes are not generally illegal but they are voluntary and usually collected illegally.

+RetSquid CtC Warriors make truthful declarations of income over our signatures on our annual Forms 1040, as well as accurate self-assessments based upon those declarations."And you have your excuse to lie....they don't know how much you make when you submit your fraudulent returns, when they do find out, you lose in court, 100% of the time."For those of us in the private sector, the IRS does not know, nor does it have the authority to tax "what we make," only taxable income is subject to the income tax. Conclusive evidence of the receipt of taxable income must originate from the Federal government's own records, in the form of a 26 U.S.C. § 6203 Certificate of Assessment for a given tax year.There are legal consequences for perjury in filing an annual Form 1040:26 U.S.C. § 7206Any person who—(1) Declaration under penalties of perjuryWillfully makes and subscribes any return, statement, or other document, which contains or is verified by a written declaration that it is made under the penalties of perjury, and which he does not believe to be true and correct as to every material matter...shall be guilty of a felony and, upon conviction thereof, shall be fined not more than $100,000 ($500,000 in the case of a corporation), or imprisoned not more than 3 years, or both, together with the costs of prosecution.Additionally, the Secretary would be required by law to create substitutes-for-returns if such filings were fraudulent and/or incorrect:26 U.S.C. § 6020...(b) Execution of return by Secretary(1) Authority of Secretary to execute returnIf any person fails to make any return required by any internal revenue law or regulation made thereunder at the time prescribed therefor, or makes, willfully or otherwise, a false or fraudulent return, the Secretary shall make such return from his own knowledge and from such information as he can obtain through testimony or otherwise. ..."You still can't explain how you are correct when EISNER negates your own claims about only 'federally-related incomes' being taxable."In Eisner v. Macomber, the court rendered meaningless any definitions of ‘income’ that might be floated by Congress or the IRS that are creative in character, ruling that:"…it becomes essential to distinguish between what is, and what is not ‘income’…Congress may not, by any definition it may adopt, conclude the matter, since it cannot by legislation alter the Constitution, from which alone it derives its power to legislate, and within whose limitations alone, that power can be lawfully exercised".Eisner v. Macomber, 252 US 189 - Supreme Court (1920)Our 26 U.S.C. 6203 Certificates of Assessment and IRS Account Transcripts tell us unequivocally that we did not earn "income."//losthorizons.com/PostCertsOfAssess.pdf//www.losthorizons.com/EWWBL.htm//www.losthorizons.com/BulletinBoard.htm//www.losthorizons.com/tax/Highlights.htm

+Ken Seabury ***And you have your excuse to lie....they don't know how much you make when you submit your fraudulent returns, when they do find out, you lose in court, 100% of the time.You still can't explain how you are correct when EISNER negates your own claims about only 'federally-related incomes' being taxable.

+RetSquid The manner in which you present Eisner in your posts is not consistent with what happens in IRS Administration and Procedure."Yes, we already know that is your justification for lying on your returns and claiming your employer does not know how much he paid you.  It has a 100% loss rate in court."The IRS doesn't just cut and send refund checks, simply because of declarations of income and self-assessments on an annual Form 1040. All filings, not just CtC-educated filings, requesting refunds are carefully scrutinized before being processed and prior to refund checks being sent.If CtC Warriors were "lying on [our] returns," then the Secretary would be required by law to create substitutes-for-returns under the authority of 26 U.S.C. § 6020(b)(1). 26 U.S.C. § 6020...(b) Execution of return by Secretary(1) Authority of Secretary to execute returnIf any person fails to make any return required by any internal revenue law or regulation made thereunder at the time prescribed therefor, or makes, willfully or otherwise, a false or fraudulent return, the Secretary shall make such return from his own knowledge and from such information as he can obtain through testimony or otherwise. ...We would also likely be prosecuted for perjury pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 7206(1).26 U.S.C. § 7206Any person who—(1) Declaration under penalties of perjuryWillfully makes and subscribes any return, statement, or other document, which contains or is verified by a written declaration that it is made under the penalties of perjury, and which he does not believe to be true and correct as to every material matter...shall be guilty of a felony and, upon conviction thereof, shall be fined not more than $100,000 ($500,000 in the case of a corporation), or imprisoned not more than 3 years, or both, together with the costs of prosecution.When it comes to the annual Form 1040 filings of CtC Warriors, Neither of the above has happened.There have been many tens of thousands of CtC Warrior victories, some of which are reported to the //losthorizons.com website, but it seems that you seek to emphasize the 24 or so instances wherein CtC Warriors were compelled to go to court and sue in attempts to recover their property.Here are links to CtC Warrior victories, including refunds and IRS Closing Notices, as reported to the //losthorizons.com website://www.losthorizons.com/EWWBL.htm//www.losthorizons.com/BulletinBoard.htm//www.losthorizons.com/tax/Highlights.htm//www.losthorizons.com/EveryWhichWayButLoose.htm//losthorizons.com/EveryWhichWayButLooseII.htm//www.losthorizons.com/EveryWhichWayButLooseIII.htm//www.losthorizons.com/EveryWhichWayButLooseIV.htm

+Ken Seabury So you know EISNER yet you don't know that your 'private party payment"s are defined as income under that ruling and that Congress', and the law's, current indention is NOT the one you are using.  The money in question in Eisner was a stock dividend, but the stockholder had never gained possession of the money, therefore it was not 'income'.This case also negates your claims that only federally-related incomes are taxable, The incoem in question had no relationship to the Federal government in any way.  "Congress was at liberty under the amendment to tax as income, without apportionment, everything that became income, in the ordinary sense of the word,""The IRS is not even aware that we earned money,"Yes, we already know that is your justification for lying on your returns and claiming your employer does not know how much he paid you.  It has a 100% loss rate in court.

+areanna beyer For those of us in the private sector, tax liability is premised on an erroneous information return (Form W-2, 1099). The IRS is not even aware that we earned money, other than what was reported to them on an erroneous information return, which does not constitute conclusive evidence of the receipt of taxable income. Such information returns are lawfully correctable in the form and manner as prescribed by the Secretary://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f4852.pdf//www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f1099msc.pdfWhen these instruments are properly completed, signed, executed and included in lieu of erroneous information returns in our annual Form 1040 filings, this constitutes a lawful claim for refund of withheld property, including FIT, Social Security and Medicare contributions. In the case of erroneous Forms 1099, such lawful filings generate IRS Closing Notices. Here's a link to an example of a Form 1040 filer who used one of those lawful instruments I linked to://www.losthorizons.com/tax/taximages/KBThompsonDocs.pdfFollow this link and scroll down the page to see the U.S. Treasury check issued to her://www.losthorizons.com/tax/MoreVictories9.htmAdditionally, you may wish to consider visiting the //losthorizons.com website and see for yourself the many, many others who have also used these lawful instruments://www.losthorizons.com/EWWBL.htm//www.losthorizons.com/BulletinBoard.htm//www.losthorizons.com/tax/Highlights.htm//www.losthorizons.com/EveryWhichWayButLoose.htm//losthorizons.com/EveryWhichWayButLooseII.htm//www.losthorizons.com/EveryWhichWayButLooseIII.htm//www.losthorizons.com/EveryWhichWayButLooseIV.htm

+Curtis Doleshek They ended up taking his house and selling it in auction.

Oops.

+marie smith I think your CAPS LOCK button is stuck

Exactly! Just when he is about to say something of importance he's cut off for Adam praising him. Let the man finish what he saying. Extremely frustrating Adam.

+WDEMMEL That's nice. Now pay your taxes....pay your taxes, or go to jail.

+zaxx19 This video is about property rights. Him not having a SSN and not participating in the system means he lives by common law, not contract law, giving him legal standing you and most other don't have. He is legally closer to a King, than most people in the country.Before there was a SSN, there was no Property Tax, nobody to ask if you can use a car, and nobody could be taxed for the privilege of using their house or car.The loss of property rights is the by far most impacting damage ever done to the prosperity of the people.An average American pays in his life time in today's dollars $180,800 income tax for war,$120,000 in Property tax$15,000 in license fees for his carAdd interest on that and inflation, and you'll know why not every American is a millionaire, what he should be.

+Craziejane73 The IRS and the Federal tax laws it enforces are Constitutional, particularly when the authority of the Internal Revenue Code is limited to their proper subjects. The IRS wouldn't even know we exist if our private-sector workplaces and other payers weren't sending information returns (e.g., Forms W-2, 1099) to it.

+dagothex Mr. Schiff did not properly correct any erroneous information returns (e.g., Forms W-2, 1099) when he filed his annual Forms 1040. There were also instances where he didn't file any Form 1040 for several years. Filing a Form 1040 means entering your sworn testimony in a legal proceeding. When a private-sector workplace or other payer sends erroneous information returns to the IRS, that person is constructively obliged to file a return.

+AirborneErnesto The Federal income tax is lawful, and it is Constitutional when limited to its proper subjects. What happens in many cases is that our private-sector workplaces and other payers often send erroneous information returns to the IRS, otherwise it wouldn't even know we exist. There is a lawful way of correcting erroneous information returns already sent to the IRS, and the IRS has the forms for this specific purpose. Such forms can be downloaded from the IRS website.Form 4852 is used to correct erroneous Forms W-2, and Form 1099MISC is used for correcting erroneous Forms 1099. When these forms are properly completed, signed and included with our annual Forms 1040 instead of any erroneous information return already sent to the IRS, these constitute lawful filings. Form 1040 filings that correct erroneous Forms W-2 are lawful claims for refund of all withheld amounts, including FIT, Social Security and Medicare contributions. Form 1040 filings that correct erroneous Forms 1099 generate IRS Closing Notices.Follow these links to see about 1,200 examples of private-sector Americans who have employed this lawful filing practice://www.losthorizons.com/EWWBL.htm//www.losthorizons.com/BulletinBoard.htm//www.losthorizons.com/tax/Highlights.htm

+james mase What happens is that your private-sector workplace and/or other payer(s) send erroneous information returns (e.g., Forms W-2, 1099) to the IRS, which tells our Federal government that it was a party to the economic transaction. Filing an annual Form 1040 along with lawful correcting forms as supplied by the IRS, instead of any erroneous information returns already sent to it, would solve this problem. If it weren't for our private-sector workplaces and other payers sending erroneous information returns to the IRS, it wouldn't even know we exist. Form 4852 is used to correct erroneous Forms W-2, and Form 1099MISC corrects erroneous Forms 1099. Form 1040 filings that correct erroneous Forms W-2 are lawful claims for refund of all withheld amounts, including FIT, Social Security and Medicare contributions. Form 1040 filings that correct erroneous Forms 1099 generate IRS Closing Notices.Follow the links below to see about 1,200 examples of private-sector Americans who have employed this lawful filing practice://www.losthorizons.com/EWWBL.htm//www.losthorizons.com/BulletinBoard.htm//www.losthorizons.com/tax/Highlights.htm

+james mase I would refer to the famous Forest Gump "Stupid is as stupid does" or as Reid code words are "I hope you stupid taxpayers will buy my BS".  Fact is that most of Reids and Democrat voters don't pay income taxes. They are the 52% demanding that other 48% share their hard earn money.

+VibratoryExistence Harry has learned well from his bagel munching masters who hold the puppet strings.

+Robert Wensley For those of us in the private sector, the IRS doesn't even know we exist, other than when our workplaces send in erroneous information returns (e.g., Forms W-2, 1099). Both Congress and the Secretary are well aware of the fact that erroneous information returns are all-too-often created, so the Secretary has provided us with the forms and instruments for the specific purpose of correcting them://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f4852.pdf//www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f1099msc.pdfWhen these lawful correcting documents are properly completed, signed and included with our annual Forms 1040 in lieu of any erroneous information return, such filings are in full compliance with our Federal tax laws.Here are links to some examples of filings of some private-sector individuals who have followed this lawful filing method for 12 years and counting, and the results of such filings://www.losthorizons.com/EWWBL.htm//www.losthorizons.com/BulletinBoard.htm//www.losthorizons.com/tax/Highlights.htmOther than those engaged in economic activities subject to the special filing and tax requirements which fall under the authority of our Federal tax laws currently codified at 26 U.S.C. § 6151(a), there must be an assessment in strict accordance with the rules and procedures as prescribed by the Secretary."For the condition precedent of liability to be met, there must be a lawful assessment, either a voluntary one by the taxpayer or one procedurally proper by the IRS. Because this country's income tax system is based on voluntary self-assessment, rather than distraint, Flora v. United States, 362 U.S. 145, 176, 80 S.Ct. 630, 646-47, 4 L.Ed.2d 623 (1960), the Service may assess the tax only in certain circumstances and in conformity with proper procedures."Bothke v. Terry, 713 F. 2d 1405, at 1414 (1983).https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=7528748945831120959&q=bothke+v.+terry&hl=en&as_sdt=80000006The Secretary tells us in the Treasury Regulations:26 C.F.R. § 301.6203-1The district director and the director of the regional service center shall appoint one or more assessment officers. The district director shall also appoint assessment officers in a Service Center servicing his district. The assessment shall be made by an assessment officer signing the summary record of assessment. The summary record, through supporting records, shall provide identification of the taxpayer, the character of the liability assessed, the taxable period, if applicable, and the amount of the assessment. The amount of the assessment shall, in the case of tax shown on a return by the taxpayer, be the amount so shown, and in all other cases the amount of the assessment shall be the amount shown on the supporting list or record. The date of the assessment is the date the summary record is signed by an assessment officer. If the taxpayer requests a copy of the record of assessment, he shall be furnished a copy of the pertinent parts of the assessment which set forth the name of the taxpayer, the date of assessment, the character of the liability assessed, the taxable period, if applicable, and the amounts assessed.//www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/26/301.6203-1The "supporting list or record," mentioned in the Treasury Regulation above, is from the Federal government's own records, which could include evidence of payments from Federal payrolls, pensions, military pay, Federal licenses, etc. This list is by no means exhaustive.

Just cause you call it voluntary, doesn't mean it is

Robert!! Be real with yourself and the people on this planet! The entire "Capitalist" exchange/property-based monetary-market system is a complete failure, completely corrupt and on it's way out. Our world is increasingly imbalanced and dysfunctional on all levels. Don't allow yourself to be just another pawn/tool; regurgitating this overly-intellectualized economic garbage and perpetuating ignorant obedience. Instead, use your life for something great; something benficial for the future of our species; such as, pursuing studies in nueroscience, sociology, psychology, kinesiology, engineering, molecular biology, alternative energies and technologies, etc. If you are honest with yourself, there's no denying the trends of our global socioeconomic system... and, my friend, you are in a dying field that is a part of a disease that has been hindering our world for thousands of years now - money & competition.Not my intention to demean you in any way, Robert; I'm just writing with the hopes that my message may make you really critique your thoughts, words and actions. Ask yourself - Who are you? Why are you? What do you stand for and how will you be remembered?

+Michael NitschIt is the law because Public Law 83-591, 68A Stat. 3 and Public Law 99-514, 100 Stat. 2085 (10/22/1986) say it is law.By law you are subject to the taxes in title 26, so you are a 'Taxpayer'.  Where you 'domicile' makes no difference, you are in one of the fifty States.

+RetSquid where did you get the idea kid that it is law. one day you may have to prove it in a court of record.i have already told you kid but you were not paying attention.for your information i am domiciled in the state i am in. not state of and i am not in washintond.c. or any of its federal enclaves. which means by law i am not a tax payer. the burden of proof is on you kid. and what the hell makes you a expert on taxes? who the hell are you !!!!???? show your face as i have and stop hiding behind the mask, be a man and not a coward. you are no expert just a kiddie coo who has a little college in him!

I would consult with a tax attorney to ascertain what you can do about the IRS taking your money. The Federal Reserve bank is scamming the American people and they designed it this way to purposely have everyone bankrupt while they,the wealthy elite get even richer and richer but yet the ones who don't file an income scam return get hounded by the IRS even though they have zero justifiable cause to do so.

Thank you so much jesse! Love your pic.

+Ken Seabury How can you claim that the W-2s are incorrect?  Did you work for free as you seem to claim here?  Or do you just lie about your income as you have confessed before?

+prof5string I agree completely, there is a law, just as you mentioned. But first, the assessment."For the condition precedent of liability to be met, there must be a lawful assessment, either a voluntary one by the taxpayer or one procedurally proper by the IRS. Because this country's income tax system is based on voluntary self-assessment, rather than distraint, Flora v. United States, 362 U.S. 145, 176, 80 S.Ct. 630, 646-47, 4 L.Ed.2d 623 (1960), the Service may assess the tax only in certain circumstances and in conformity with proper procedures."Bothke v. Terry, 713 F. 2d 1405, at 1414 (1983).For those of us in the private sector, the IRS is unaware of our economic transactions with our workplaces, other than what was reported to the IRS on erroneous information returns (e.g., Forms W-2, 1099). Such erroneous information returns are correctable in the form and manner as prescribed by the Secretary, who has provided us forms and instruments for this specific purpose:This is the Form used in correcting an erroneous Form W-2://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f4852.pdfThis is used to correct an erroneous Form 1099://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f1099msc.pdfWhen properly completed, signed, executed and included with our annual Form 1040 filings in lieu of any erroneous Form W-2, this constitutes a lawful claim for refund. In filings where erroneous Forms 1099 are corrected, such filings generate IRS Closing Notices.Remember what the Secretary tells us:26 C.F.R. § 301.6203-1The district director and the director of the regional service center shall appoint one or more assessment officers. The district director shall also appoint assessment officers in a Service Center servicing his district. The assessment shall be made by an assessment officer signing the summary record of assessment. The summary record, through supporting records, shall provide identification of the taxpayer, the character of the liability assessed, the taxable period, if applicable, and the amount of the assessment. The amount of the assessment shall, in the case of tax shown on a return by the taxpayer, be the amount so shown, and in all other cases the amount of the assessment shall be the amount shown on the supporting list or record. The date of the assessment is the date the summary record is signed by an assessment officer. If the taxpayer requests a copy of the record of assessment, he shall be furnished a copy of the pertinent parts of the assessment which set forth the name of the taxpayer, the date of assessment, the character of the liability assessed, the taxable period, if applicable, and the amounts assessed.//www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/26/301.6203-1Assessment Officers at the U.S. Treasury are charged with completing and signing 26 U.S.C. § 6203 Certificates of Assessment. Assessment Officers must take financial responsibility in a personal capacity for the creation of any enforceable debt, are not aware of, and do not have access to records of, any transfer of private-sector funds/assets. Conclusive evidence of a tax liability can only exist when a balance of greater than zero (0) shows up on a Certificate of Assessment.When zero (0) and negative balances show up on Certificates of Assessment and IRS Account Transcripts for a given tax year, these are the results://losthorizons.com/PostCertsOfAssess.pdf//www.losthorizons.com/EWWBL.htm//www.losthorizons.com/BulletinBoard.htm//www.losthorizons.com/tax/Highlights.htm//www.losthorizons.com/EveryWhichWayButLoose.htm//losthorizons.com/EveryWhichWayButLooseII.htm//www.losthorizons.com/EveryWhichWayButLooseIII.htm//www.losthorizons.com/EveryWhichWayButLooseIV.htm

+RetSquid For those of us in the private sector, the only evidence of the transfer of funds/assets is in the form of an information return (Forms W-2, 1099). Information returns are correctable in the form and manner as prescribed by the Secretary, who provides us the forms and instruments specifically for this purpose.//www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f4852.pdf//www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f1099msc.pdf When properly completed, signed, executed and included with our Forms 1040 in lieu of any erroneous information return(s), such lawful filings constitute a lawful claim for refund. In the case of erroneous Forms 1099, such testimony generates IRS IRS Closing Notices.Here's a link to one example in which a filer used these lawful instruments to reclaim her property://www.losthorizons.com/tax/taximages/KBThompsonDocs.pdfFollow this link, scroll down the page and see the check issued her from the U.S. Treasury://www.losthorizons.com/tax/MoreVictories9.htmIn fact, there are many, many more examples of the results of such lawful filings reported to the //losthorizons.com website://www.losthorizons.com/EWWBL.htm//www.losthorizons.com/BulletinBoard.htm//www.losthorizons.com/tax/Highlights.htmConclusive evidence of the receipt of taxable income is in the form of a balance of greater than zero (0) on a 26 U.S.C. § 6203 Certificate of Assessment. Certificates of Assessment are completed and signed by Assessment Officers at the U.S. Treasury who are financially responsible for the creation of any enforceable debt and do not have access to records of transfer of private-sector funds/assets.Follow this link and notice zero (0) balances of the 26 U.S.C. § 6203 Certificates of Assessment and IRS Account Transcripts of a filer who used the lawful correcting instruments in his filings://losthorizons.com/PostCertsOfAssess.pdfRemember what the Secretary tells us in the Treasury Regulations:26 C.F.R. § 301.6203-1The district director and the director of the regional service center shall appoint one or more assessment officers. The district director shall also appoint assessment officers in a Service Center servicing his district. The assessment shall be made by an assessment officer signing the summary record of assessment. The summary record, through supporting records, shall provide identification of the taxpayer, the character of the liability assessed, the taxable period, if applicable, and the amount of the assessment. The amount of the assessment shall, in the case of tax shown on a return by the taxpayer, be the amount so shown, and in all other cases the amount of the assessment shall be the amount shown on the supporting list or record. The date of the assessment is the date the summary record is signed by an assessment officer. If the taxpayer requests a copy of the record of assessment, he shall be furnished a copy of the pertinent parts of the assessment which set forth the name of the taxpayer, the date of assessment, the character of the liability assessed, the taxable period, if applicable, and the amounts assessed.//www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/26/301.6203-1"For the condition precedent of liability to be met, there must be a lawful assessment, either a voluntary one by the taxpayer or one procedurally proper by the IRS. Because this country's income tax system is based on voluntary self-assessment, rather than distraint, Flora v. United States, 362 U.S. 145, 176, 80 S.Ct. 630, 646-47, 4 L.Ed.2d 623 (1960), the Service may assess the tax only in certain circumstances and in conformity with proper procedures."Bothke v. Terry, 713 F. 2d 1405, at 1414 (1983).

+Ken Seabury100% failure rate, you lie on your returns

+RetSquid CtC Warriors make truthful declarations of income and accurate self-assessments over our signatures on our annual Forms 1040. Our filed Forms 1040 are in full compliance with our Federal tax laws.For those of us in the private sector, the only evidence in the record is/are erroneous information return(s), which are correctable in the form and manner as prescribed by the Secretary. Here are the lawful instruments used specifically for this purpose://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f4852.pdf//www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f1099msc.pdfHere's an example of a filed Form 1040 by a CtC Warrior, using those lawful correcting instruments://www.losthorizons.com/tax/taximages/KBThompsonDocs.pdfFollow this link and scroll down to see her victory, in the form of a refund check://www.losthorizons.com/tax/MoreVictories9.htm

+Ken Seabury You have confessed that you lie on your income tax returns, by not reporting ALL your income.

+RetSquid What crimes have I committed? All I've done is exercise my First Amendment rights.CtC Warriors make truthful declarations of income and accurate self-assessments as the result of those declarations over our signatures on our annual filed Forms 1040. My actions, as well as the actions of many other tens of thousands of CtC Warriors, are in full compliance with our Federal tax laws, as such pertains to our filed Forms 1040 (lawful claims for refund) and the included information-return rebuttal instruments as prescribed by the Secretary.//www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f4852.pdf//www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f1099msc.pdfThis is why we haven't been prosecuted by the thousands. Of course, should such a thing happen, it would be quite a media event, and the IRS wouldn't like that kind of publicity, as IRS/DOJ attorneys would likely be thrown out of court on their ears.Instead, there are only 25 or so CtC Warriors who have been compelled to go to court to recover their property, as you have obsessed over. Here's a link to one of many examples of CtC Warrior filings, which are in full compliance with our Federal tax laws://www.losthorizons.com/tax/taximages/KBThompsonDocs.pdfOur IRS Account Transcripts, 26 U.S.C. § 6203 Certificates of Assessment tell us unequivocally that there is no evidence of an income tax liability. Note all those zeroes (0), especially under the "balance" heading, next to the signature of the Assessment Officer.//losthorizons.com/PostCertsOfAssess.pdfNo balance of greater than zero (0) means no conclusive proof of tax liability, resulting in refunds of FIT, Social Security and Medicare contributions. Here are just a relative few victories reported to the losthorizons(dot)com website://www.losthorizons.com/EWWBL.htm//www.losthorizons.com/BulletinBoard.htm//www.losthorizons.com/tax/Highlights.htm

+Ken Seabury I only need to quote your 100% failure and your confessions of your crimes.

+RetSquid It seems to me that you're no longer quoting Code and/or case-law. Perhaps this is because you're unable to prevail in this debate. I've also noticed that you and Cliff Yablonksi have been going off on a tangent lately.CtC Warriors are truthful in our declarations of income and make accurate self-assessment as the result of our declarations over our signatures on our annual Forms 1040. If this was not true, our IRS Account Transcripts and 26 U.S.C. § 6203 Certificates of Assessment wouldn't look like this://losthorizons.com/PostCertsOfAssess.pdfYou always mention the 24 or so CtC Warriors who have been compelled to go to court to recover their property, but never the many tens of thousands of CtC Warrior victories over a 12-year period of time, and counting.Here are some links to a few examples://www.losthorizons.com/EWWBL.htm//www.losthorizons.com/BulletinBoard.htm//www.losthorizons.com/tax/Highlights.htmRemember, 26 C.F.R. § 301.6203-1The district director and the director of the regional service center shall appoint one or more assessment officers. The district director shall also appoint assessment officers in a Service Center servicing his district. The assessment shall be made by an assessment officer signing the summary record of assessment. The summary record, through supporting records, shall provide identification of the taxpayer, the character of the liability assessed, the taxable period, if applicable, and the amount of the assessment. The amount of the assessment shall, in the case of tax shown on a return by the taxpayer, be the amount so shown, and in all other cases the amount of the assessment shall be the amount shown on the supporting list or record. The date of the assessment is the date the summary record is signed by an assessment officer. If the taxpayer requests a copy of the record of assessment, he shall be furnished a copy of the pertinent parts of the assessment which set forth the name of the taxpayer, the date of assessment, the character of the liability assessed, the taxable period, if applicable, and the amounts assessed."For the condition precedent of liability to be met, there must be a lawful assessment, either a voluntary one by the taxpayer or one procedurally proper by the IRS. Because this country's income tax system is based on voluntary self-assessment, rather than distraint, Flora v. United States, 362 U.S. 145, 176, 80 S.Ct. 630, 646-47, 4 L.Ed.2d 623 (1960), the Service may assess the tax only in certain circumstances and in conformity with proper procedures."Bothke v. Terry, 713 F. 2d 1405, at 1414 (1983).

+Ken Seabury You lie on your 1040s, your do not report your actual income, you lose every single time you try these lies in court.

+RetSquid Our IRS Account Transcripts and 26 U.S.C. 6203 Certificates of Assessment indicate otherwise://losthorizons.com/PostCertsOfAssess.pdfThere have been 24 or so CtC Warriors who have been compelled to go to court to recover their property; this is what you seem to repeatedly emphasize in your posts. But you don't seem to mention, over a period of 12 years, the many tens of thousands of CtC Warriors who have prevailed, some of whom have posted our victories on the losthorizons(dot)com website://www.losthorizons.com/EWWBL.htm//www.losthorizons.com/BulletinBoard.htm//www.losthorizons.com/tax/Highlights.htm//www.losthorizons.com/EveryWhichWayButLoose.htm//losthorizons.com/EveryWhichWayButLooseII.htm//www.losthorizons.com/EveryWhichWayButLooseIII.htm//www.losthorizons.com/EveryWhichWayButLooseIV.htm//losthorizons.com/Documents/TensOfThousandsOfVictories.pdf

+Ken Seabury 100% failure rate, every single time you guys go to court after the IRS finds out you are lying...you lose...your arguments have no basis in law. 

+RetSquid The numbers that appear on our 26 U.S.C. § 6203 Certificates of Assessment and IRS Account transcripts beg to differ with you://losthorizons.com/PostCertsOfAssess.pdfCtC Warriors make truthful declarations of income and accurate self-assessments over our signatures on our annual Forms 1040.Here's a link to a filed return that is in full compliance with our Federal tax laws://www.losthorizons.com/tax/taximages/KBThompsonDocs.pdf//www.losthorizons.com/tax/MoreVictories9.htm

+Ken Seabury100% failure rate in court, you lie about your income on your returns, you keep posting proof of lies and fraud. You do not use the same definition of incoem as the IRS, the courts, and the law.

+Libertytree Tv To determine whether an individual is liable for the tax, such a tax liability would appear on a 26 U.S.C. § 6203 Certificate of Assessment or an IRS Account Transcript. Follow the link below and see what they look like://losthorizons.com/PostCertsOfAssess.pdfTo obtain an IRS Account Transcript for a given tax year, complete this form, mail or fax it in to the correct IRS campus://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f4506t.pdf26 U.S.C §  6203 Certificates of Assessment provide conclusive evidence of a tax liability, as they are completed by Assessment Officers at the U.S. Treasury. Assessment Officers must take financial responsibility for the creation of any enforceable debt and do not have access to the records of transfer of non-Federally-connected, private-sector funds/assets.Conversely, information returns (W-2, 1099) do not constitute conclusive evidence of the receipt of taxable income or a tax liability, are merely the testimony of the payer, and are correctable in the form and manner as provided by the Secretary://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f4852.pdf//www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f1099msc.pdfHere's a link to an example of a CtC Warrior's filing of her Form 1040, properly completed, signed, executed and incorporated with her filing://www.losthorizons.com/tax/taximages/KBThompsonDocs.pdfScroll down this page to see her victory://www.losthorizons.com/tax/MoreVictories9.htmSuch a filing, as shown above, constitutes a lawful claim for refund.

Actually Income Tax laws in America have been passed and repealed for the past 200 years. The latest in 1913.

+IRS Internet Defense Force troll

+RetSquid Thank you. for your comment @RetSquid Please define the word "income" per the constitution.

Thank you. for your comment @RetSquid Please define the word "income" per the constitution.

+Jessica Miller Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 says Congress can impose taxes, the IRC is them imposing the income tax.

+prof5string you said "Section 1 of the Internal Revenue Code imposes a tax on the taxable income of individuals" ....... It says "Section 1 of THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE" not section 1 of the Constitution.

+Rod Knocker has a 100% failure rate in court....

+Libertytree TvGreetings Libertytree Tv. Ignore the child that protests much, RetSquid. It most likely profits from taxation so it wants to keep the lies going.

+Libertytree Tv“The Sixteenth Amendment declares that Congress shall have power to levy and collect taxes on income, ‘from whatever source derived’ without apportionment among the several states, and without regard to any census or enumeration. It was not the purpose or the effect of that amendment to bring any new subject within the taxing power. Congress already had the power to tax all incomes. But taxes on incomes from some sources had been held to be ‘direct taxes’ within the meaning of the constitutional requirement as to apportionment. [cites omitted] The Amendment relieved from that requirement and obliterated the distinction in that respect between taxes on income that are direct taxes and those that are not, and so put on the same basis all incomes ‘from whatever source derived.’”Bowers, Collector v. Kerbaugh-Empire Co., 271 U.S. 170, 173-174 (1926).

....Nine Out Of Ten Lawyers Agree......THE SUPREME COURT IS EFFECTIVELY "INFALLIBLE" in its legal opinions. So, when that court says:"[B]y [capitations and other] direct taxes in the constitution, those are meant which are raised on the capital or revenue of the people; ... paid directly from, and falling immediately on, the revenue;..." "[Capitations are taxes in which people are rated] according to what is supposed to be their fortune, by an assessment which varies from year to year;""[T]he Sixteenth Amendment did not authorize any new type of tax, nor did it repeal or revoke the tax clauses of Article I of the Constitution, quoted above.  [Capitations and other direct] taxes were, notwithstanding the advent of the Sixteenth Amendment, still subject to the rule of apportionment…;""If [a] tax is a direct one, it shall be apportioned according to the census or enumeration. If it is a duty, impost, or excise, it shall be uniform throughout the United States. Together, these classes include every form of tax appropriate to sovereignty. Whether the [income] tax is to be classified as an "excise" is in truth not of critical importance [for this analysis]. If not that, it is an "impost", or a "duty". A capitation or other "direct" tax it certainly is not;""…taxation on income [is] in its nature an excise...;" and"...the requirement to pay [excise] taxes involves the exercise of privilege,"

+prof5string Did you not notice t]his name? He is 100% clearly a comedy/troll account...

+Libertytree TvWhy do you post such outright lies? The 16th clearly removes any income from the direct category and makes it an excise tax.The Constitution means what it says, not what you twisted it into saying.AS the cases prove, you have no backing for your claim the individuals can't be taxed without apportionment...which is not a way to tax individuals, it's a demand for States to raise money in proportion to their population.

HA o jesus now you claim the constitution doesnt mean what it says ?    citing irrelevant cases do not change the constitutionsorry troll buy your a shitty debater you went from trying to claim the16th changed article 1 and now that you know EVERYONE KNOWS THATS NOT SO your only pathetic answer is the constitution doesnt mean what it says ? you need to be reported i think you have medication you should be taking

+Libertytree TvYou keep saying that like it has been true, but it has never been the truth.“In the end, the [Constitutional] Convention opted for a Constitution in which Congress would exercise its legislative authority directly over individuals, rather than over States.... The Framers explicitly chose a Constitution that confers upon Congress the power to regulate individuals, not States.”New York v. United States, 505 U. S. 144, 165-166 (1992).“[T]he Framers rejected the concept of a central government that would act upon and through the States, and instead designed a system in which the state and federal governments would exercise concurrent authority over the people--who were, in Hamilton’ words, ‘the only proper objects of government.’”Printz v. United States, 521 U.S. 898 (1997).

+RetSquidArticle 1 Section 9 Cluase 4     NO CAPITATION OR OTHER DIRECT TAX SHALL BE LAID WITHOUT APPORTIONMENT     the fed cannot tax a citizen directly  only th estate by apportionment .

+Libertytree TvYou can keep repeating that, it has no application to income taxes.

+RetSquid  ARTICLE 1 SECTION 9 CLAUSE 4 

+Libertytree Tv Show me where in the law it limits "income" to federal privileges.

+Libertytree Tv You cite an irrelevant section that was superseded by the 16th amendment and you call him an "ignorant fool." You're pathetic. Learn how to do real research instead of just being a gullible idiot and believing everything you see on youtube.

+Libertytree Tv The Supreme Court and lower courts have in numerous cases agreed that income from labor can be taxed. 

+Libertytree Tv The 16th amendment changed it so that it does not have to be apportioned. 

+Libertytree Tv An income tax doesn't have to be apportioned, dumbass.  Read the 16th Amendment. Moreover, a tax on pay-for-work isn't a direct tax; it's an excise. Income isn't limited to that derived from privileged activity, moron.  The Supreme Court has held that income from illegal activities such as embezzlement and extortion is taxable, but you're so pathetically stupid that you probably think those activities are "privileged".

+IRS Internet Defense Forcearticle 1 section 9 clause 4  read it and shut  up

+IRS Internet Defense Force i dont pay "FEDERAL  "income "  tax and im not liable to  because i dont have gains from a federal privilege   booya . you talk shit when its you who is the ignorant fool .   Article 1 sec 9 clause 4     read it fuck tard

+prof5string"anyone required"  oooopps  that means NOT EVERYONE IS REQUIRED  durrr  

+prof5stringthats not a law   , the supreme law is the constitution and it says no capitation or other direct tax shal be laid without aportionment    end of story    "TAXABLE INCOME"  guess what  ? that tells you not all income is taxable AND income is privileged gain  NOT PAY FOR  LABOR  

+Jameel Collinshey im going to do a series on this   get a book called super-scam.com   and in the meantime  google  " losthorizons 16th amendment    "    the trick is "income" means privileged gains  , not pay for labor  .     https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SOPz7hXPgy8

+prof5stringif your going to be calling people dumb ass then show me where it says IM LIABLE FOR  A DIRECT TAX WITHOUT APPORTIONMENT   then sit back and prepare to be educated DUMB ASS

Watch the video you retard, and stop talkin to me, I know the truth!!!!

+IRS Internet Defense Force Read the Constitution sometime, you dumb POS.  You'll find it explicitly authorizes an income tax. 

Please kill yourself uploader they have authority under the swastika. It is illegal to talk about Obama or the great IRS unless it is in their favor. You are a traitor to the constitution and the constitution states that you must kill yourself upon talking bad about your government.

+prof5string Watch the video and see for yourself you cant have a slave mentality forever, some people just need to think outside the box. The man is asking questions and the other man really dont wanna answers them. So my question is to you, how much do you trust your government?!?!?

Of course there's a law.  Section 1 of the Internal Revenue Code imposes a tax on the taxable income of individuals, married couples, heads of household, trusts, and estates. Section 63 defines taxable income.  Section 6012 says that anyone with gross income (defined in Section 61) over a certain amount nust fie a return, and Section 6151 says that anyone required to file a return must pay the tax.Don't buy in to the crap peddled in Russo's film.  Many of the so-called "experts" he features in the film are convicted tax swindlers.

Yea but there is more and Im going to find out, when I do Im going to expose these devils!!!!

Thank you for sharing this information....definitely an eye opener!

+aeromedical67 NOFUCKIINGFOOLING. YOU NEVER WORK A HARD DAY IN YOUR LIFE. AND YOU HAVE ALL MY MONEY. go fuck yuor self, and farm your own god dam food.wetired of working for YOU. AND RETARD. IF YOU SIGN CONTRACTS AND AGREE TO PAY. YES YOU CAN BE PROCECTUED. IF YOU DONT OWN A BUSINESS, BY LAW, YOU DONT HAVE TO FILE TAXES..... I KNOW THE LAW, YOU DONT. please help start a comunity garden, with the money you have stollenfrom working people. and housing for homeless. they worked all there lives too have nothing. you have there money. they would have been able to bulid there own house in that time, but the illegal monetary system, and creating money loaned at interest, followed by inflation and illegal taxes, is why we are all poor. again. WE ARE TIRED OF FARMING YOUR DAM FOOD. goto work, and stop eaching of the working people. I dont care how much papers with ink you have.gotten away with. AND IF YOU ARE SAVING FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES, LIKE IN THE BANK, YOU ARE CAUSING INFLATION, AND THOSE NOTES ARE TO BE PAID BACK TO THE BANK ON WItch it was created.. so, you do owe money.like the rest if us. unless you own gold or any other commodity.

+aeromedical67 +aeromedical67 you really are a stupid retarded moron... I hope you stay poor for ever.... BTW i am advising people on how not be taken advantage off by criminals in the fed gov. I am advising people how too not follow rules that violate the us constitution, and take advantage of credit, becuase its not actually money, and not illegal not to pay a bill. FYI, i have been working as a painter since i am 13. and joined the painters union at 19. working ever since... AGAIN, please get informed or get taken advabtage off, and stay poor for ever,, peace..

+aluckyshot I'm with you brother.

+Violetta Polska I agree

if every one would be doing this*

+ding aling We pitch in for roads when we buy gasoline, as the taxes on gasoline (50% + tax) is supposed to go toward roads, highways, bridges and tunnels. Royalties and excise taxes charged to multi & transnational corporations that take our natural resources are to pay 100% of our health care systems, but they corrupted our governments into waiving one or both (royalties & excise taxes) so that burden has been (illegally) transferred onto us tax payers. Lately, education is paid through fools buying lottery tickets, and wasting their hard earned money at casino's. So, what's really left? what are our taxes really going toward? & I mean legally, not as a result of corrupt officials reallocating our revenues to cover costs the corporations have weaseled out of. even our national debt is a farce. Trudeau gave up control of our monetary system, where we could print our own currency for free, he gave it to foreign private bankers, whom have enslaved us with debt at compounding interest.We also need to completely sever ties with "Her Majesty" immediately. so really, what is left that we should even have to pay one red cent of taxes for? fuck all!

+Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart Fuck the state.

+LightUpon Light In Finland--as it should be everywhere--you have to pay a percentage of your wages for many violations.(//www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2015/03/finland-home-of-the-103000-speeding-ticket/387484/)Right on! This is the ONLY FAIR system as the punishment is EQUAL in effect to ALL violators, regardless of financial or social status. Here in Canada, the wealthy can break the law as far as their wallet or influence will allow~! Why do the people who need it least get the most free stuff in this world (e.g. $168,000+ Oscars 'gift-bag' for celebrity attendees--or 6 YEAR AVERAGE WAGES BEFORE TAXES) while the needy and starving law-abiding tax-paying citizens get NOTHING for free and even have to pay for vital necessities for life like WATER which makes up more than 75% of the Earth's surface!?!U.S.A. was created from a letter to their government stating they do no longer recognize their authority; this is all it takes to disassociate yourself from your government ('masters') and free yourself from their unfair taxation practices. The freemen must have realized this and use it as did the government. 'What's good for the goose...' and all that.It is common belief that taxes were created to fund wars (and thus the willful execution of fellow humans); unfortunately, the majority of taxes collected today are still used in this sinister fashion. How many civilians (children, men, children, women and children) were slaughtered/burned alive in Nagasaki and Hiroshima as a direct result of funds which were collected from American taxpayers who were not aware that they were funding mass-slaughter of civilian children, men, children, women and children? Japan attacked a military installation; they did not attack New York! Soldiers know the risks involved when they sign on. Civilians should not have to experience this sort of trauma; ESPECIALLY unarmed ones!!! Only cowards use guns; weak girly-men. Taxpayers fund wars and subsequent government violations of basic human rights (such as the raping of 10-year old Muslim girls by US soldiers //worldobserveronline.com/2013/06/13/rape-iraqi-women-us-forces-weapon-war-photos-data-emerge/) ; the very rights which they profess to protect. Governments have no accountability since they can mold and modify laws to suit their desired actions. It is this 'if it is illegal, make it legal' tactic Bush used when he took almost all freedoms away from the American public from under their noses. They cling to their "carry arms" clause, but the only ones they have to fear is themselves. Americans kill more Americans than all other nationalities combined!Anyway, enough with this rant. I'm on lunch and must eat (if I can afford it...)