NSA Shri Ajit Doval Shocking revelation on why British left India -Every Indian must watch
Shri Ajit Kumar Doval Sir, our National Security Advisor reveals truth about why British left India. Its one of the most secrets hidden till date by Nehru & co but ...
+Akhtar Mahmood u guys are fit only to clean toilets and latrines ...abey bhosdike kab tak hamare desh mey bheekh maangte rahoge .. u guys just beg for eveything u pigs and jihadis .. islam ki gaand mey suvvar ka lund ... bloody half penis race ...
+Akhtar Mahmood This retard is ur real father .. teri ammi ko poore bharat ne chod diya aur tujhe pata nahi laga , mulle ki aulad .. teri maa ku fuddi mey suvvar la lund
The only thing that Gandhiji did was that he turned the Indian freedom
struggle into a non-voilent struggle so that the british could hold india
for a little longer.
Subhash Chandra Bose and Hitler freed us..........
+Aniruddha Rairikar Here is also an interesting article about Gandhi (British stooge) and his treacherous actions - //www.henrymakow.com/ghandis_role_in_the_illuminati.htmlYou all should check out the documentary "Adolf Hitler: the greatest story never told" which shows the truth about World War 2 hidden by Britain and France.
Traitors were involved to try killing of Nethaji. Still no clue what
happened to Nethaji. Waiting to know whether the traitors succeeded in
killing of Nethaji or he ascaped from the ambush.
Baluchistan is yes and Khalistan no and Kashmir will is part of India and take over POK as India become stronger economy and militarily, Baluchistan never been part of Pakistan.
Indian history has been rewritten by Khangress to bluff Indian citizens and
dethrone the nationalist and remain in power forever.
And not so surprisingly, we as a nation still bow down our heads in the
memory of Nehru and Gandhi, while we criticise Godase, Bhagat Singh,
Chandrashekhar and Rajguru, veer Savarkar, tana ji Malsure, Tatya Tope and
many more like him.
Major Gen Baxi,
I was absolutely delighted to hear your comment on Netaji. Our earlier
history has been warped by the likes of Romila Thapar. Who are these people
who have taken great trouble to distort history of the contribution of Azad
Hind Fauj and Netaji Bose?
Another reason behind the British leaving India, was also the American
pressure on the British after the second world war. The Americans joined
the British in the 2nd world war to prevent the defeat of the British and
preserve their independence. They could not allow the British occupation of
India to continue.
No my frnd it was russian pressure. Russia was very near India. English saw the danger of a military uprising and russia exporting its arms into India for a Red uprising. So they fled India. Had they not India would have completely gone out of their hands. This situation was created by Netaji and Ina's struggle.
I dont blame the British people, I blame Queen Victoria She was one hell of
ratchet woman. I honestly like most English people I meet. Its not fair to
blame the common folks. The eites are messing up this world, and us foolish
commoners are hating on our neighbours.
British people are equally responsible as British people never strongly protest of illegal invasion of their rulers in many country.British loot many countries. the crown of queen victoria was the property of mughal ruler humaiyan. British Robbed that crown from mughal palace!!!!!
+JoStylin The "British" Monarchy which is actually German has had their fingers in almost every English pot and plot. Even today they are behind the scenes using their stooges to carry out their dirty work. They have shielded criminal pedophiles, made countless illegal banking transactions , murdered Princess Diana and robbed numerous countries of their gold and assets. The Boer war was all about their greed for South Africa's gold and diamonds. The list can go on and on.
+wolverineeagle You are half right. And half deeply, deeply wrong. Yes, all cultures and peoples have committed crimes. We all have both rape victims and rapists in our ancestry, guaranteed. Your understanding of British history isn't as strong, however.You state that because Britain was a constitutional monarchy during that time that all British people are equally responsible."The common folk are every bit, if not more, to blame for the problems because they often support the decisions of the elite."Are you mad? You understand that the current constitutional monarchy in the UK and the one during that time are actually radically different, right? The people who voted for the cabinet and ministers who made the decisions during that time were a tiny minority of the population, mostly upper class and upper-middle class property owners. The government was an elitist club which very few people had a say in.Also damning the whole population because they 'often' supported the decisions is absurd. Often isn't always. And how much is 'often'? It seems pretty vague to me. What proof do you have of whatever woolly amount you've dreamed up? I'm quietly confident they didn't take opinion polls back then.Saying that all British people are responsible for the crimes of that select few isn't just ignorant, its deeply offensive. You are blaming not only the people responsible but their victims. You are saying that my ancestors, whom lived in a landlocked county and largely spent their whole lives working in mines and factories for pennies, are somehow responsible for things that happened on the other side of the world. The closest my family got to the glorious empire was to be conscripted as cannon fodder.Stop grabbing random dates from wikipedia and read a book.
+JoStylin You clearly have no idea how the British Monarchy works.Queen Victoria was, like the current Queen, a constitutional monarch. She possessed no real authority. She was a figurehead. The last British monarch to wield any real power was Charles II. But after his death and the succession of his son James II, there was an event called the “Glorious Revolution”. (So-called because of the relative bloodlessness of the event)This revolution lead to the removal of the Catholic James II(England was violently anti-Catholic) and replaced him with William of Orange(a distant Dutch cousin) and Mary(the US university is named after them). The resulting revolution would lead to the circumscription of the Monarchy and it’s current state as the symbolic head of the government.Every since that time England’s domestic and foreign policies have been conceived and enacted by ministers appointed by parliament.(The first prime minister did not come about until 1721 during the reign of George I) However, suffrage to the common-born males did not come until the 19th century.(Chartist movement) and women fully until 1928. Democracy did not come with the absolution of a monarch fully invested with the powers of state.The common folk are every bit, if not more, to blame for the problems because they often support the decisions of the elite. They are the ones filled the army, government bureaucracy, and electing the people making policy. The common folk are an essential component to the plans of the powerful. Without them the elite possess no power.Furthermore, the Populists trope of “the People are victims” ignores that it is the People who rape, murder, steal, and otherwise mistreat their fellow citizens. This has been going on since we emerge from the mists of time.Lastly, what happened to India, Africa, and the Americans has happened all over the world since we first formed into civilization. Invasion, conquest, enslavement, and ethnic cleansing/genocide are ages-old habits of human beings regardless of culture.
+Booby Hill Spoken like a person who has never been hungry or poor in their entire life. I think you missed the bit early in the documentary about the general strike.Ironic that you would tell other people to do some research when you haven't even watched the documentary you're commenting on...
The English people traded their humanity for jobs from elites who stole resources from poor people yet you somehow don't think everything is related, do some research please.
+JoStylin YES RIGHT ON GURL!!!!! 200 internetz for you.
After Colonialism Tharoor Leaves Unexplained Why India’s Slide Continued After The British Left
Subscribe to Times Of India's Youtube channel here: //goo.gl/WgIatu ongress parliamentarian Shashi Tharoor recently spoke at Oxford criticising British ...
South Asia - Bangladesh, China, India, Pakistan - 20110111 - After the British empire.
The British has left a geographical mess behind after ending their empire in South Asia. China is still taking advantage of this mess after it seized the east side of ...
Ur wrong about nationality's on the basis of the religion & language,on the
basis of religion in your country have Hindus & other religions, so as
India, so as Pakistan,the partition happened because of politicians & then
people want to live together so moved from different of British ruled India
now the central India,that's why they kill each other & massacre happened
during the partitions,so understand & for ur kind information most of the
Muslims r living in Central India & whole overIndia
The first British troops leave India and were bid farewell at Bombay by the new Governor General, Lord Mountbatten. You can license this story through AP ...
British Indian Railway - On Tracks of Empire - Unite and Divide Part 3
British India from the view point of John Sergeant (BBC). A must watch documentary for all Indians John Sergeant embarks on a unique 3000 mile journey ...
British railway engineer richard boyle was one of the pioneers of Indian
railways!? WHAT RUBBISH? U British dont even study beyond school level...u
r useless and work in shops like tesco..sainsburys,,asda and what not? Take
a look at Indians..every single person..b it poor or rich is highly
educated and in a decent office work..& not causal labours like u
Brits..look at Indians and learn some values and morals..stop BRAGGING what
u guys did in the name of RULING INDIA...u exploited us Indians..
I should have been clearer on this. When I say 'Young Indian Nationalists'
I was referring to those who appear on Youtube - and for some reason they
do seem to be younger than average. It's the same everywhere. There's a
load of dickhead PIRA supporters (The Youtube IRA, as we sometimes
affectionately refer to them) out there who are Irish-American, rather than
bona-fide Irish. Seems that sometimes the less of a connection you have to
something, the more you want to attack it just for fun.
Hello Mr John Sergeant....No one gave support to British to RULE INDIA>>.u
fucking bastard cant say anything and everything just because its BBC....U
Bloody ppl ruled and LOOTED INDIA...India was once a RICH Country. India
was famous for spices esp Turmeric and other scientifically proven
ingredients which are used in medicine. British simply looted it...what
about the Diamonds and Jewels? U have robbed India an kept it with you
disguising it as a gift given to your stupid queen..
See still Britishers were looting Iron...sulphur and other raw materials
from India to British...to enrich Britishers fucking economy...thats why WE
INDIANS fought against it...''''Aaahh...the way u say REALLY..at 7.14 shows
that u act as if u dont know that Britishers were looting Indians in the
name of railway'' So john boyle did not come to India to make his name in
civil engineering but to LOOT INDIA through the railway network.
Why does it bother you now when you're no longer in India? If it's any
comfort, Indians aren't really Anglophobic, least of all the young. In fact
we don't think of Britain much. You may come across some odd comment on the
internet but, by and large, Indians don't hold on to any animosity towards
the Brits. Young Indians are surprisingly unconcerned and indifferent
towards Brits, less so for the older ones.
fucking bastard? ''What not ur man''? ''richard boyle''...and Kunval Singh
got commemorated'' and u john sergeant feel so dissappointed? As I said
earlier...fuck off from INDIA...someone should have shot u point blank when
u did this documentary...who on earth gave u rights to shoot all this?
where is ur permit? U brits still exploit poor immigrants in the name of
VISA...
Well, it clearly shows you were never educated either, otherwise you
wouldn't be stupid enough to pull some random made-up statistic out of a
hat and think even for A SECOND it wouldn't have people facepalming. Young
Indian nationalists and their Anglophobic horseshit do make me want to
vomit.
which part of FAKING an accent dont you understand??...watch the video
again and tell me he has a proper british accent or a fake one considering
that it's a Bihari student from Ara we are talking about!!!
Very Good from 8.30 onwards..thank you fellow Indians...Jai Hind...Mera
Bharat Mahan...India is great...good from 9.30 onwards...everyone must
watch see the face of john...ur face crippled like a mouse...
British Indian Railway - On Tracks of Empire - Unite and Divide Part 6
British India from the view point of John Sergeant (BBC). A must watch documentary for all Indians John Sergeant embarks on a unique 3000 mile journey ...
In the end MG might have used the railways knowingly r unknowingly..so just
stop bragging and falsifying why they were made in the first place. Brits
never did, will do good for India. Thus there was no good deed intended for
Indians other than to loot India through the railways..railways were purely
laid to exploit India from west 2 east fast & efficiently..thats why Gandhi
was afraid that we will loose all our wealth & treasure and he rightly
overlooked that Brits will use the railways for it.
Oooo reporter..john..the feelings...vividness is alive in each person even
till today...this is because of BRITISH...if u BRits did not rule us..we
Pakistan and Indians would all be ONE..this relation was spoiled only
because you ruthless brits ruled us Indians and Pakistan. This pain will
not leave Britian alone...the sadness...pain and grief will be experienced
by Britain ONE day..the day is not far...BEWARE Brits...
MG did not do anything at the cost of India...One has to remember he was
one of the pioneers who fought for India...even today he exists in every
heart and soul. Gandhi was against railways because he knew u Brits will
loot us Indians of our riches...so thats why he was strongly against
modernising India..
SOCIALISM,NATIONALISM,ALL KIND OF ISM..THE TRUTH IS SOME INDIANS ARE JUST
CLOSET GAY AND THEY LIKE TO GET SCREW BY WHITE SKIN THAT IS ALL SO FUCK
WESTMINSTER,BRITMISER, AND THOSE INDIANS WHO LIKES THEM..