How to become ethical Videos

The Panel is quite strong. Please publicise your debates. the content is great. Kya sarkari channel hone ke karan, laziness ke shikaar to nahi aap ?

@marusiraz .. "so in the ethical hacking u knooww their is a category called white hacker and a black hacker"... is TRUE! He clearly states at the end of it that "white hacker are the ethical hackers and black hat hackers are the hackers that do the hacking for the harming purpose"! I know that the text books mention them to be black hats and white hats... but come on man.. just learn what you can learn from this and shut up.. he knows what he is talking about..

Creating a secular ethics is an extremely laudable goal. I fear however it fails if it requires, as was stipulated repeatedly here, that one accept the immortality of the self. Not having such a faith does not equate to nihilism. I have to wonder if this is not an attachment in Buddhism? I may not exist at a given point in time, but the universe does exist in all points of time. The fact that I have suffered in this universe need not dissuade me from loving it for the happiness and beauty it also contains and has gifted me with. I act to create a better world not for reasons of enlightened 'immortal' self interest but simply because I have sufficient love for the universe and that which exists within it. It is the immortality of the universe that I love, that is my motive, not the faith in my own. I am personally enriched now, in this life, by virtue of this love at the same time as I am able to enrich that which I love. Whether I am enlightened or attain enlightenment is relevant only as a guidepost, we need not be attached to enlightenment either. The assertion here that science cannot prove that nothingness exists, and that that 'proves' that nothingness does 'not' exist, is fallacious. That said, I am not convinced that one need have a 'faith' in one's personal immortality in order to 'be enlightened', one need not be so attached to one's self. Indeed, realizing that one may in fact have only one life is if anything to me, more impetus to get it right, right now. There may well not be time later.

I have a theory that there is a secret society of scientists and engineers that is dedicated to making sure countless technologies and weapons as bad or worse than the atomic bomb be prevented from ever being released upon the world. The one time they failed was WWII.

As in many issues, there isn't just one side to the future of robots taking over all sorts of industries. As to speak for negatives, first comes mass unemployment. People with nothing to do and no means to support themselves and their families are likely to... You know... Get freaking angry! I doubt that multibillionares will run around sharing their profits with anybody, so we will either have to engage in wars or just kill off much of Earths' population through some other means. Second, imagine the amount of power, required fow all those robots to operate. Now imagine the ecological and economical impact of producing that much electricity. Feel sick yet? Well, I'm not done, because then comes the scariest thing of all. Robots have no feelings. Captain Obvious has nothing to do with this one - we really don't appreciate and value the influence of emotions and feelings on our history, intellect and daily lives. Think about it. Just think. As to positives... Precise surgery, piloting, driving, assembling stuff, productivity up and labor costs down. Clean streets, homes, robits doing your dishes and laundry... If you can afford any of that WITHOUT A JOB. Yeah, good luck. I hope, I won't see that mess in my lifetime. There's no ethics to it. Robots are awesome, useful and the shit, but what value will humans hold without having anything to do at all? As for progress... Come on, we obsess over iphones, instead of conquering space. We aren't progressing, we're getting dimmer by the day. 

U only speak of improvement, however fail to adress the short and medium term social degredation with unknown long term degredation. this is on the bais that a) never before in history has all forms of profestional employment never happed b4, hence the vast amount of unemployment created means that the vast amount of idividuals will lose there incomes (and sice ocupational mobility of labour is non existant as all profesions will be taked by AI there will be no alternatives emloyment avalable) hence wont be able to enjoy whtever beter services offered by AI. Further the only benifical party would be the large corparations making this AI however without a market they to will fail, moreover if managment of resources (i.e. the post of CEO type jobs) are also replaced by AI then there would be no gain there to humainty aswell. In addition wht this would mean is that the only feilds left for humanity would be feilds such as politics and philosophy which too would be obsolete as logic based AI would be more suited for politics than the more swayable human and then if all walks of soceity arent human wht is the point of human phillosophy (its like asking a dogs perspective on human soceity). Lastly wht this incures is that AI is the largest threat to human civilisation in todays context, it is of an imperative to improve tech to improve human soceity hover it is obsolete to create AI capable of replacing the economic and political capablities of humans as then there will not be a human society . ;'(

I think it's a bad idea because, it's bad enough that people these days do nothing but text even if they're right next to each other, just imagine.... We'll all be fat, lazy, and doing nothing but breathe, making it a waste of what we can do if we don't get AI!

Is anyone able to tell me the name (if any) which this music is known by? If so, I would be grateful.

Ethical Leadership means a variety of things, rather than one set definition. It means to be accountable for your actions in all aspects: in terms of profits, in terms of the quality of goods, in terms of employee conditions, and in terms of morality, which can also be broken down into world, community, etc. An ethical leader is never fully satisfied with a current situation--he/she is always looking for ways to improve some aspect--but at NO cost to others, for example, to create a better product but cause worse conditions for employees would NOT be ethical. An ethical leader uses the mission and vision of the corporation to set and accomplish goals while keeping everyone even remotely involved on the same page in terms of goals and how to accomplish them. An ethical leader is ready to make changes, he/she is always evolving as is the world and the marketplace.