How to become eu national Videos

videos en español YA!!!!

Only stupid people.

+52percent Being bored of a problem doesn't make it go away.Wait, this is Canada. Never mind.

+52percent May I suggest Fox News?

The scientific community agrees on a crucial fact: we must leave most remaining fossil fuels in the ground, or our children and future generations are screwed.

+brazilianniceguy Deep Cycle Batteries could solve the lack of energy at nights. About the required energy to activate a solar cell, there is radiaton data and models that allow us to calculate how much energy we would be able to produce basing on the weather of the geographical location and the type of cell, so the ammount of energy it's a known fact when it comes to installing solar panels.- (I don't speak english very well but it's understable)

lol

+Tyler Peterson XD ... i wish i could tell you more , ok ill try a little... even humanity leaves earth most of the 7 billion on the planet will stay with earth ... so the people who stay will try to make it survivable for as long as possible  .... you may think its impossible to outlast the ever growing sun , but we are working on ways to do this ... besides that humans over time do have an effect ...  but everything is perfect  the way it is ...   but we cant mess up ... its complicated 

+J-N-H-M I don't think you realize just how little heat we extract from the earth compared to how much there is. Also, why do the future generations need protection from the sun. In the future, when the sun is expanding and earth is in its path, we need to flee the planet. Having a warm core will not help our planet.

+Joshua Le Marchant "science"

+Zsolt Khalil dude chill....its a goddam science video

+Guymick Cormic Hemp as a source of energy like all bio-fuels are far from clean. As for it been used for bio-fuel there are plenty of plants better suited like sugarcane. As a material it should be considered as it can be grown plentiful in a short length of time. As for a clean energy source It's all about Thorium fission reactors ;).

The tuff they put back in the crops is digestate, which is an organic liquid compost. Biomass for biogas should exclude food crops and should be from waste sources only, like yard waste and food waste and waste water treatment plants. They completely forget about waste water treatment plants and the biogas they produce. I say biomass from waste sources only or none at all.

+AngelLestat2 it is not about stopping CO2 emission but slowing and stalling them. also the biomass is used to "store" the energy is only going to be used until battery tech becomes better then it is.

+Johnny Athanasiadis magnetite induced dynamos

+Val Boyanov Nope, the worlds oil reserves are not limitless, eventually we have to find alternatives, and that is what especially the Nordic countries are doing, and have done for years.

+Peter Knagge of course I do not expect you change your understanding, but at least you know already that there are other solutions

+Val Boyanov You're not listening, you're too late!

+Peter Knagge One entity is much easier to protect from terrorist, than multiple targets (distributed energy), because a high level technology can be applied. For small target high level protection is not possible, because it will cost a lot. It is called " economies of scale". On top of that, any new comer hacker can get entrance examination to the gangsters, putting any small entity on black-out. On water desalination, yes it is expensive, but in all Middle East they do and it works. It doesn't cost one millionth even of the promotional campaign of renewables, including conferences and flight tickets.

+Val Boyanov are we watching the same video? alsoAgain we have a water, nuclear and fossil fuel crisis, your plan is financially and environmentally unsustainable. The desalination plant in Sydney Australia costs $500,000 a day to run and it's only in standby mode. UN and industry reports show that we will run out of water, oil, and nuclear resources by 2050. How are we to transport nuclear energy? Where how much will it cost and where will we store nuclear waste for maybe over a million years? As for terrorists, statistically I'd much prefer many targets then just one easy target controlling all power that's also a nuclear plant to boot. Are you saying you support Iran's and North Korea's nuclear power program?plus “98% Of Electricity Can Be Generated By Solar Panels At Alabama Steel Plant”//solarlove.org/98-electricity-can-generated-solar-panels-alabama-steel-plant/“Wind turbines providing power to the BMW Leipzig Plant”https://www.bmwcca.org/sites/default/files/content/media/image/i8-Production-6.jpgMany countries have over 30% or more renewable energy like Germany for one example, unfortunately a few countries will never catch up and will be left behind https://yearbook.enerdata.net/renewable-in-electricity-production-share-by-region.htmlThe aesthetic argument against renewable energy is spurious at best, the sight and noise environment impact of renewable energy is minimal and is incredibly land space efficient, and opposed to what? I suppose you are all racing to have a coal or nuclear power plant in your backyard?

+Peter Knagge Air pollution is mostly driven by the cars. Of course thermal power takes also a big portion. Filter is the solution - passive, chemical, electrical, etc. But the "renewable revolution" does not support this investments. <span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";color:black">The United States has three main sources of electricity according to the Energy Information Administration: Coal at 39%, Natural Gas at 27%, and Nuclear Power at 19%.<span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";color:black">Even with this step of development renewable can not replace the existing power generation. In the same time - no investments. No logic.

+luminouslights I like the feeling on the top of wind tower, I like also the humming of the propeller. But:- it is against the law of the market, to subsidies one technology, on the expense of another- it is against the common logic, that any European country is subsidizing a producer from China, India or other outside Europe. Same for US. Subsidies must go to the producers of the same country or group of countries.- it is landscape polluting, both solar and wind. All becomes ugly. The small water power kills the fish in the rivers.- it is expensive, because:= subsidies= it needs a lot of distributed energy measures= it is vulnerable this distributed energy. We hear these days about hacker attacks against high level authorities in US. With distributed energy vulnerability goes to very high level. It cost money. It is much cheaper to protect one big nuclear power station, than thousand of wind stations. = the vulnerability of the system also shows that renewable can not go more than 15-20% of the total energy mix. Nowadays everybody talks about renewable, pushing subsidies. What about the rest of 80% ? No subsidies, no investments, time is coming we pay great price for that.= talking about talking, who can estimate the cost of this "renewable campaign" all over the world - yotta bites of information produced, trillion of paper wasted, conferences, congresses, flights, hotels, etc. - may be already more than billion USD ?Coal is a very unclean and very non-renewable energy source. However, it does have a redeeming quality: it is comprised of many other minerals and metals that make up the leftover remains when coal is used. One of those metals: lithium. Lithium is the most important element of the distributed energy, because distributed energy needs batteries.

Even with subsidies renewable energy is cheaper, easier and less stress than subsidised fossil fuels. (//www.iena.org/News/Description.aspx%3FNType%3DA%26mnu%3Dcat%26PriMenuID%3D16%26CatID%3D84%26News_ID%3D386&ved=0CCkQFjAE&usg=AFQjCNETVEzrXgxJO_N-NRvof9-bX77ydg&sig2=DeaLmXNCpvUmebUwFGl3VQ) There is now no excuse not to update to clean renewable energy.

Desalination plants are expensive to operate.Plus pollution from fossil fuels causes millions of deaths every year due to disease (//www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs313/en/).

water problem can be solved with desalination. energy problem can be solved with deep processing of oil and coal and very strong energysaving program.

+Val Boyanov because we have a water and peak energy resources global major crisis

+Mohammed Haithamoh, you're right about vatican, but how haven't you heard about other countries i mentioned xD. Where are you from?

+angrysyndicate​ vatican wasnt independent it was conquered by itally and wasnt given independence untill mosiliny and i never heard of the other countries you mentioned

+Mohammed Haitham Portugal, Spain, Andorra, France, Monaco, the UK, Denmark, the Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg, Germany, Switzerland, Lichtenstein, San Marino, Vatican, Austria-Hungary, Sweden-Norway, Russia, Greece, Italy and the Ottomans. That's 21 :P

+angrysyndicate​​ only ottoman empire greece russia itally austria russa germany denmark sweden france uk spain and portugal netherlands belgium luxembourg and swetzerland-17 countries/empires

+Mohammed Haitham actually, 21

+Camilo Herrera G. (EA) That was not a very nice thing to say.

+GeimsForLaif OMG u r so fony!!!1!!!Kill yourself.

Ur mom

Circassia

Its not the Ottoman empire but I had the name and I forgot so I need to find it out

Ottomans old flag I think

+TheOttomanEmpireWillRiseAgainMwhahahahahahahaha thanks

+pengu No Problem ;P

+GeimsForLaif Aah, thanks! :)

1815-1846

It's the free city of Krakow i think.

+Ashmansworth Anyone who has an understanding of sustainable fiscal policy is a Tory in their eyes.

+puzox to me there is only tories and labour to hate. So I'm not sure what red tories are

+Ashmansworth yeah, we hate the red & blue tories all the same

+Chris Dorman I would hardly call 15% sticking 2 fingers up to a party. Labour only got about 22%

Going by the last election, they stuck two fingers up at both labour and tories. And voted in a the nationalist party.

+EndivioRoquefort I'm not so sure. I think people like him precisely because he doesn't pretend to be anything other than what he is.

True and the French are with them all the way. 

+kevin walters Greece is the perfect example, given more money than they could ever repay deliberately now forever up shit creek, Germany laughing all the way to the 4th Reich !

+SALZOPYRIN And of people. Look at Greece.

+Jak Kuhl Among my greatest fears as an American is that Europe will again come under the grips of charismatic madmenLike Donald Trump or Sarah Palin? That age has gone in Northern Europe at least, but is alive and well in Russia, with Czar Vladimir. In fact real power in the West lies with the billionaire corporate oligarchs, who have their power base in the US, and who control American politics especially and international trade and finance. Money is the real power, not demagogues.

Rees-Mogg is an entirely different league, although Hunt does have a toff streak I'll give you that

+Francesco Scala Tristam Hunt?

+Ted StrikerFirst of all, I live in a country that is very similar to Switzerland (Belgium is also a 10M inhabitants multilinguistic neutral country), but my country isn't a great, and I believe it's 95% due to politics. The key element of Switzerland is it's direct democracy features, especially when it comes to law making. When a law is introduced by the government in Switzerland, everyone knows it trought a weekly paper "la revue fédérale". If 50k people disagree with the law, they can fill a paper and send it to their local government agency.  At this point, a referendum is made, and if a majority of voters doesn't vote in favor of the law, it goes straight to the thrash.  Not voting counts as a "no". For instance, if a law is proposed in order to ban pistols, most pistol owners will fill the paper to challenge it, and the law is dead unless 50% of the voting populations intervenes to save it.  Because it's nearly impossible to get an absolute majority on an issue, most abusive laws that are endemic to Europe never get to Switzerland. 

+iotaje1Yes, we could. But I know little about Switzerland. Maybe it's the small size that matters. I have always been skeptical about democracy in giant states. But it seems painfully obvious that politicians who are elected to rule for four years at a time, don't really have long term interests in mind, not to mention they often make arguments that are easy to understand by the masses, but do not necessarily hold water. Many European countries are outright suicidal, with political elites that do not serve the interests of their people.

+Ted StrikerNo, but we can take a look at what makes democracy work so well for them, and introduce it to countries that need it. 

+iotaje1Well, we can't all live in Switzerland.

+Ted StrikerThat's a demonstration that a representative democracy with an incredibly concentrated political power generates corruption.  On the other hand, there are a few examples of democracies working very well, Switzerland comes to mind. 

+iotaje1I believe democracy is a system that we should not embrace. I do not advocate fascism. But if you look at democracies like the USA, it is sickening to what degree they are corrupt. In reality you have a small ruling elite: bankers, corporations, and a narrow circle of politicians. Bush #1, then Bush #2, Clinton#1, now perhaps Clinton #2... The media are largely owned by a Jewish elite that promotes its own interests. The kind of choices people can make are virtually meaningless, not to mention the bulk of the people literally have no ability to judge what the consequences of their votes would be. You might as well let a flock of sheep vote.

+Ted Striker Ho, it's that neonazi again. Do you believe fascist systems are better alternatives?

+Jak Kuhl You mean where we have a constitution that can be altered at will by the majority?

+Ted Striker Effective alternative: Republic.