Dr oz dieting lies Videos

I've been taking Green Coffee Bean extract for about 5 months now. I've lost 50 lbs combined with mildly sticking to the Paleo Diet. I do not exercise. I can't say it was the pills that helped me lose so much weight; but I definitely know that just eating spinach salads every morning didn't do it either. I was 220lbs. Now i'm a little under 170lbs. No exercise, just increased vegetable, fruit, water, meat, and nuts intake. Close to no dairy, carb intake.

Well done! I had such high hopes. I mean, after all, it was on Dr. Oz! But after 1 month of using this product by the book and actually gaining a quarter pound I realized that I needed to do some more research. That's when I found out that the only accredited test that we're done on this product by actual doctors showed that the placebo group lost more weight than the people actually taking this product! :-( I don't trust Dr. Oz anymore... 

He was payed by a company to advertise it. Ratings and money went up. I agree there lies. Me Oz works for Oprah. Didn't work for my after 4 weeks. I'm still the same. I purchased from costco and returned the empty bottle and lied and said it was empty so costco gave me back my money. It stated money back garenteed. I need to see if it would work. And it does not work. I wonder if oz could be sued 

Well, thank you, you are the first video that I saw that talked realistically and from the heart. Most of the other videos did it like they were doing advertising. But I guess regardless of how rich a person is (DR. OZ), that person would still want to make more, even if it meant selling his soul. He lost his morals and never stopped and thought what it could do to people's health. 

u need p90x

I agree

+Tatiana Michailova I forgot to add, I do have great respect for dr. OZ. and enjoyed watching the show about Magnetic therapy especially, its widely used in my culture and RUssian olympic champions use those as well as hyperbaric chamber.

why wont the doctors use their own drugs, or the FDA use their own drugs, to prove they are safe, or do what they are made to do?did you hear of the French that conducted  a drug study, and one patient became brain dead, and others started having nervous disorders?why all of the drug lawsuits on tv?

+Sooner Science Nerd Oz and the people selling the quack 'miracle' products that he shills out just love the suckers.

why is it that the AMA is trying to silence dr. oz because of his help to others? sounds like they want to keep better health ideas, procedures, from helping people, and make people use their drugs.

+Sooner Science Nerd The FDA-approved drugs are not what Dr. Oz peddles. He wasn't shilling for quack home remedies and snake oil before he became a doctor. His sleaze started later.

+Ron Dobrosielski niely said!

Thanks for the advice.

+Ron Dobrosielski Strive to become less gullible.

+Alexander Russo People who say there is no benefit of vitamins might as well say that fruits and vegetables are poison. They are full of vitamins and minerals.

+Mark Èdgette please reference a source of you're going to throw out an outrageous stat like that. Western medicine does a lot for people - perhaps you've just had a bad experience. Doctors dismiss him as a quack because he does not practice evidence-based medicine. If you're going to claim that something is very effective as a weight loss supplement, then it better be. Now Dr Oz has also claimed that his show is not a medical show. So why have Dr in the name???

But statistics show that 80% percent of doctors in America are corrupt I just don't see any sense in western medicine I was nearly murdered by this quackery and refuse to this day and I'm healthier than ever whatever western medicine says go opposite you will be glad you did.

Shut up dunce

shut up stupid!

shut the fuck up, you phoney tough guy.

+PetrisFitness Dr. Oz is the still better to listen than those quacks from 'the doctors'

+drpiddleton dude u or any pathetic scumbucket u know like yourself couldnt shine my shoes you fucking waste of sperm!!!

+Tom JonesPeople also have a responsibility to not knowingly and endanger their children and those around them; this is why we have laws against drinking and driving because sometimes your actions endanger the lives and well-being of others.  Also, you seem to think that you have more rights than you believe.  I don't recall food or vaccination being mentioned in the Bill of Rights.  You know what you don't have, the right to play with other people's lives.  You also do not have the right to even have a centrally located store where you can go and purchase food as if it magically appeared there without a single thought about how someone did all the back breaking labor to grow that food for you while you sat on your fat lazy ass.  There are cities and entire counties that don't have any supermarkets so there is no law that mandates that someone has to supply you with food at all.  There is no law that requires anyone to do your work for you so you can live by providing you with food and then only to hear you arrogantly bitch about the food they provided you with.  Also, there is literally nothing different about the food, so what are they labeling?  The method used for growing food is not a mandatory label.  Should they label how much the crops were watered?  How about the time of day when they were harvested?  What about the farmers first name and the shirt he wore when harvesting?  All those have as much relevancy as the label you want as they all have to do with how the food was grown and have absolutely zero to do with the nutritional value or safety in any way of the food.  Besides, there's already a label, "USDA organic".  The fact that you want 2 labels is not only confusing but just shows that this argument has nothing to do with you just wanting information about the food because you already have a label that gives you the information you want; just assume anything without organic on it is GMO, there problem solved.  But you're not happy with that; you're taking the playbook that every anti-GMO and anti-science group and moron has put in writing and it's blatantly obvious.  You are incapable of being honest about it too.  You want them banned and you incorrectly believe that labeling is the first step.  GMO will never be banned, ever.  3 billion people would die within a year if we scrapped GMOs.  Most of the people in poor and developing countries would die, all diabetic type I would die, everyone that gets cancer will die, no medications of any kind will be able to be made, the world economy will crash.  No politician is dumb enough to even consider it.  The next step you've been instructed to take after the label is to go around telling everyone "see, I told you they're dangerous.  If they weren't dangerous, then why are they forced to label them?" even though you would know god damn well that the label would be there only to make morons like you happy.  The fact that you won't even be honest about that makes me lose complete respect for you and you literally have lost whatever tiny bit of credibility you might have had a chance of getting.  If you are so into finding out how your food was grown, then get off your fat lazy ass and grow your own damn food because that's literally the only way anyone can ever get as much information that you want about the food.Lets take your "I just want labels for information" argument and turn it flat on your face.  If your unvaccinated child is so safe, why won't you label him/her?  I just want information so I know to avoid him/her like the plague... like he/she literally might have the plague.  I have the right to know these things for my safety and the safety of my family.  My rights to not be endangered by you and your families reckless behavior and complete disregard for the health, safety, and well-being of everyone around you supersedes your general and vague yet unsubstantiated and baseless delusional belief system for which you cannot provide a single shred of evidence that even suggests that there is even the smallest chance that you could possibly be right.  Here's a novel idea, prove your case using evidence instead of just calling people shills and talking about imaginary rights that you don't even have.  You can't though because there are no legitimate and reputable sources on the planet that support you.

Blah, blah, blah. tell it walking.  people have a right to know what they are eating, and the right to refuse to be vaccinated.  Your "science"' doesn't supersede rights.

+Tom JonesIt is not at all common knowledge that Monsanto and pharmaceutical companies hire people, that's just insane conspiracy theories and only a complete moron would believe such nonsense... The kind of moron that would believe that the Dr. Oz show gives legitimate information.  I mean Dr. Oz has actually himself admitted that the show is bullshit both in video interviews and in front of congress and you still defend him; how dumb do you have to be to defend him when he isn't even defending himself?There's no worry about losing market share and it'll take a lot more than you to hurt their sales.  It's pretty arrogant of you to believe that you are such a threat to these companies that they would feel the urge to hire someone to stop you; you simply aren't that important and you certainly have to power or influence over the market.Liberal arts and english people are not the right choice to try and convince people about science.  If they were going to hire someone to do that, you would by necessity have to hire people that actually have strong science backgrounds unlike yourself so that they can make logical scientific arguments instead of spouting a bunch of bullshit like you and Oz do.  Those people cost lots of money, have higher integrity than you can imagine, and take pride in their careers so they wouldn't waste their life doing something they view as pointless; they want to make a mark in this life not argue with a bunch of you moronic anti-science conspiracy theorists.  The fact that you believe that someone with a liberal arts or english background would have any clue what they're talking about with this subject shows your complete lack of knowledge about the subject.I love how you just keep avoiding the fact that he admitted his show is bullshit and just change the subject to suit your needs.  All this plus the shill argument which is the argument that only someone who has no legitimate argument, proof, evidence, data, source, or research to support any of their claims so they try to divert attention away from the argument at hand and make a baseless and unsubstantiated claim that cannot be unproven.  I could just as easily claim that you're a shill for the organic corporate giant but I'm not a moron.  And the organic corporations are all individually at least as large as Monsanto.That's funny that you think this is a debate.  I'm not debating you, I'm correcting and debunking you so that others can have accurate information and see that I say things that make logical sense whereas you just go around accusing anyone that disagrees with your delusional baseless conspiracy theory belief system because of course anyone who disagrees with you must be paid to do so because you are infallible and have never been wrong about anything, right?  You're all knowing, right?

 Please, we're adults here.  It is common knowledge that Monsanto and big pharma hire shills when they're fearful of losing market share .  With so many college grads with English and Liberal arts degrees out of work, this is a match made in heaven.    You can pick them out by the polyphonic word usage and assuming people's "intellect" is inferior to their own.  I'm not wasting my time debating with you.

+Tom JonesHe literally has since come out and say that his show is not meant to be a medical show or give medical advice.  He said, quite idiotically, that this is the reason that they put "dr" on the logo tiny and in the corner (which is a terrible argument but it's what he said).By the way, you're doing the exact same thing he did which I wrote about above.  Instead of giving a valid argument to prove me wrong or sources that prove me wrong, you immediately just go to an ad hominem attack about someone you literally know nothing about.  Here look, I can do what you do too.  ERERERRRR, you're a shill for Dr. Oz.  See, it's easy.  The only reason that someone immediately out of the gate goes to an ad hominem attack first is because they know that it's true and there literally is no other possible argument to make.  In other words, you making an ad hominem attack tells me that you are very aware and know for a fact that he is a quack but choose to be in denial about it.  If you thought any other way, you would have tried to make an actual argument but instead, the shill argument which is a blatant indication that you have no legitimate argument and can literally find no other way to argue your point... or you have the intellect of a 6 year old.

+Doc Mike Go crawl back under your rock, shill