Police dispatcher Videos

Can tell this vid was made quite some time ago, Saw Windows XP on one of her screens...LOL

There's usually most of the female dispatchers.

@bradfirec71 The other sentence sounded like something yodas retarded brother would say. You want to refute my point by solidifying it once more in the last few sentences of your post. Brilliant!!!!! It seems im the idiot here. BTW i didnt start the name calling here. You called me stupid. You decided to act childish by attempting to insult me and now you claim that somehow i am the one that needs to mind his words? Fuck off once again dude.

@PCGAMEfreak no the lesson here is this idiot woman called 911 to complain about a 12 year old girl taking up the dispachters time that could have been used to actually attend to emergencies. If anything this woman should be tossed in jail.

Mike, you are a BOSS, i would double your pay if I was your boss just because that was the most hilarious call I have ever heard, thats right, police really can't do much if you can't control your child in your own household

@FarukH91 what kind of shit parent or irresponsible adult do you have to be to not be able to keep a 12 year old in line? This gen is raised by pussies i swear. The police have better things to do than subdue your own child.

That's not a emergency! Bust your kids butt, thats what's wrong with kids now of days no punishment or discipline! Dispatcher got sick of the bullcrap. That's a false emergency call in my area, arrest her

@bradfirec71 LAWL! your post is epic irony. You cant even form a coherent sentence yet you want to talk down to me like im the idiot here............seriously dude fuck off already.

No matter how stupid that call from that woman was, and yes it really was, you must maintain professionalism at all times!!

@mucura1 the girl gone wild, woman can't stop her because girl is stronger then her. That's why she called the police. :D

@mucura1 how about no jailtime, just a stop being so fucking stupid lecture.maybe a side of education thrown in.

This is one of those calls that should have perhaps taken place on the police non-emergency line.

Tundo is a fucking dumb fatass nigger with spic blood flowing through his kike veins

Maybe, lady, you should stop feeding your 12 year old all those fries and pizzas :P

LMAO....hahaha if you can't control you child, that's a parenting FAIL

Kids, what is the lesson learn here? DON'T BE A DUMBASS 911 OPERATOR~~

@PCGAMEfreak if anything, the woman who is calling is a dumbass

@mucura1 moron, did you actually listen to what she was saying?

I think it's obvious Mike isn't a 911 dispatcher anymore

That lady needs to calm down. I thought it was hilarious

lmfao if i were his boss. i'd give him a promotion :D

lmfao. probably wont put this job on his resume.

Wow that teacher is dumb but it was hecka funny

One Correction in my post ^ . "PERSONS" should be INDIVIDUALS , I don't believe these individuals showed ID obligating them to privileges given to PERSONS .

     i know for a fact they all hate to be lied to. one of their stock lines goes " don't lie to me and i'll help you all i can" But most of them are hypocrites because they'll lie like a very cheap suit without blinking an eye.                  Darryle W.//  11 01 2015//  NOON15

+Darryle Waggoner Lie to a cop and see what happens. They lie, and nothing happens to them.

+Joseph Belfi An investigative detention based on reasonable suspicion is legal. Walking in an area where one has the right to be and engaging in lawful activities isn't grounds for reasonable suspicion, which is a term of art meaning articulable facts which would lead a reasonable observer to conclude they are seeing a crime happening or about to happen (Terry v. Ohio). By the officer's own words nothing he heard amounted to reasonable suspicion. Being concerned or suspicious isn't sufficient to produce reasonable suspicion.The bulk of the fault here does lie on the dispatcher, but even with his lies nothing he told them amounted to a description of (possible) criminal activity.

+Thy Horror It's not that I "don't want to know." It's that I know your pseudo-legal gibberish is meaningless. "That Human Being is property as a Citizen and works for that very same PERSONS . Learn what i just said so you'll be on your way to understanding it."That's complete nonsense. Being a citizen doesn't make a person property of the government. This is a Republic: the people are sovereign. Being a citizen in the United States means one is part of the ruling body of the nation. Emptily declaring yourself not a citizen but a "Human Being" doesn't alter in any respect the degree to which you are subject to the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction therein. Then Demand fundamental justice be provided with Jury of piers AFTER you provide a certified record of birth (not birth certificate) . LEARN baby , , ,leeaarrnnMore pseudo-legal nonsense. You don't have to provide a "certified record of birth," and there's no legal difference in proving who you are between a "birth certificate" or a "certified record of birth." It's a jury of peers, not "piers" unless you think they're going to drag a couple of wharfs in to sit on the jury. I suspect you won't get a verdict. Provided you're charged with a criminal defense you can demand a jury trial regardless of whether or not you are citizen. You can demand one whether or not you provide a "certified record of birth" or any other document.

+Thy HorrorWhat does one do withwhat?

+bacchys you sound like you don't want to know . OR do know . So . . . . . enlighten us all with your genius . because you think that because you don't understand , that it's "nonsense . I see you as a slave but i doubt you'd do anything but deny it . So speak oh wise one and answer the question "What does one do?"

+Michigan Mister He might have a history of saying it, but it's complete nonsense.

quick interjection, Thy Horror has a sound history of knowing what the hell he speaks, might want to take a re-look....I have no dog in this discussion, but I'm right here with what I said. Merry Christmas.

+Thy HorrorSeparatist movements?  The human being is property as a citizen and works for the very same persons?  Demand fundamental justice be provided by jury of piers? Dude, you sound like you're trying to use legal terms when you don't actually know the proper legal terms. First off, I am not part, nor have I even heard of, a separatist movement in the United States of America.  Secondly, I don't know how you consider a human being a citizen working for the same persons.  I have no idea what that means but I'm pretty sure you are trying to use the sovereign citizen argument that a person is not the living human being.  In other words, you are not responsible for your actions, only your "person" is.  That is just absurd bullshit that hasn't worked for anyone.  Besides, all one has to do to negate that bullshit is prove jurisdiction. As for demanding "fundamental justice provided by a jury of piers", I'm assuming you mean demanding a jury trial.  Which completely ignores your sovereign citizen argument entirely.  The whole point of the sovereign citizen movement is getting your charges dismissed by claiming you are not the "person".  In other words, the government only has jurisdiction over the person and not the actual living being.  So you can't demand a jury trial because you are not part of the court system because they don't have jurisdiction over you.  Remember?Also, do you know the definition of fundamental?  The entire criminal court system is fundamental.  You don't need to demand it.  It's guaranteed.  Even if you claim the stupid straw man argument. 

+Thy Horror You're spouting nonsense with no basis in history, fact, or law.

+ElGatoLoco698you just and others just got associated to terrorists by bacchys. your human rights and Citizen duties have nothing at all to do with separatist movements .

+bacchysIndeed. The whole sovereign citizen thing has done nothing for anyone except cause problems.  I'm very familiar with the whole "straw man" argument and it does nothing but piss of judges and cops. 

I don't think sovereign citizen nonsense is going to help him.

+ElGatoLoco698 I don't know where you live but listen anyways . That Human Being is property as a Citizen and works for that very same PERSONS . Learn what i just said so you'll be on your way to understanding it . Then Demand fundamental justice be provided with Jury of piers AFTER you provide a certified record of birth (not birth certificate) . LEARN baby , , ,leeaarrnn

+bacchys most jurisdictions actually do require their officers to have a surety bond. While its not a legal requirement as a base for employment as a peace officer, many cities and states do require it. Peace Officer's Surety Bonds are a very real way of seeking remedy for violations of rights.The catch is, its technically not LEGAL (or in this case criminal) remedy, only a matter of contract law, much in the same way that if i cause an accident, the other injured party can make claims against my insurance company far more easily than trying to press for charges against me or filing suit in civil court.

+bacchysI remember reading an article about that.  Many people have recommended that cops be insured and any claims against that cop could force an insurer not to insure that cop.  That would get many bad cops off the street.  Interesting idea.

+Trenton Stone You should read up on qualified immunity and the difficulty in overcoming that in holding a police officer personally liable for his actions. Your "bond number" claim is useless. Most cops aren't individually insured and they don't have bond numbers, whatever that is supposed to be. //law.freeadvice.com/government_law/civil_rights_law_ada/sue-the-police.htm

+bacchys title 42 USC 1983deprivation of civil rights under color of law.they can also be held personally liable for their actions, but if all else fails, get their bond number and make a claim against the bond, no bond, no badge.

+ElGatoLoco698 You can sue in Federal court for a violation of your Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable search and seizure. If the dispatcher isn't a law enforcement official, he may not have qualified immunity, which means you can sue him directly. Win or lose, in that case, it will cost him money. That might deter future dispatchers from embellishing.Sadly, there's really nothing you can do to stop the cops from unlawfully detaining people in the future. They are protected by qualified immunity and the courts have said they can be mistaken on the law and the facts and they're still protected. Only if you can prove they intentionally violated your rights and were motivated by personal malice could you sue them directly. At best, you have a civil suit against the department, and that's not going to deter any individual officers from unlawful acts.

+ElGatoLoco698 I wish I could give you 100 thumbs up.