Point break rzym Videos

i miss you

You need to have a computer who can handle it bro otherwise it won't work...

It seems that YouTube disabled 4K, strange. Almost all of Devins videos have 4K, I've watched them before...

Да,Благодаря интернета е слаб и батерията ми пада надолу !

Полина надявам се по късно да можете да го видите на PC си или може би не го отваря защото  мобилния ви интернет е слаб! Хубав и :) ден!

Съжелявам,че не мога да го отворя тук на смартфона ми erny 1957 !

He's using a Glidecam HD 4000 for stabilize his camera. You can follow this in the info box under the video

glidecam hd 4000

What I was thinking buddy!

concordo pienamente

ahhahahahaahahah

+Saint Vicious Sh.+GhillyComics <3

I understood every bit of that without translation.

+xikarra Also Juan Martin Del Potro

+Game Ovais Oh yeah, roddick, who won most of his matches against djokovic

Only idiots bring up the era argument. But most of the former greats of the game have said this is the greatest era ever, with Nadal and Djokovic slugging it out and Federer still chipping in here and there. But that's up for debate. Djokovic has had to beat Murray, Nadal and Federer for him slams. Federer had to be Roddick, Nalbandian and Hewitt for his slams lol. I think only hardcore Federer fans and idiots would argue about it being a weak era. Even if it is a weak era, who's fault is that? It's not Djokovic's fault is it?

+Game Ovais Federer was in decline since late 2007. Point remains, djokovic is one player. Does one player equate to a better ERA? I say no

Haha, you need to get your facts sorted out. 19 of their 39 matches were before 2011. It was about 2011 Fed's decline began. Or do you think 29/30 yr old Fed was not prime? Djokovic started to beat Federer as a 20 yr old when Fed was at his absolutely pomp. Don't worry butterfly you idiot, the H2H you're grasping on to, it's not long till it probably goes as well.

+Game Ovais Its pathetic that Djokovic ISN'T leading the H2H already. They hardly played any of their matches while fed was in his good years.

Butterfly you really do know how to chat out of your arse. You're hanging on to this H2H record Federer has against Djokovic, but soon that's probably going to be gone as well. Djokovic is only 1 behind now. I don't think Federer fans can use H2H much lol, given how badly he's been hammered by Nadal.

+XxMaplerzxX Because of djokovic and nadal. Nadal has always been the exception so the only difference in quality of this era is Djokovic. That's one player! A player who doesn't even lead the head to head with Fed even though he's played him mostly in his prime and long since Fed's prime. And why did Djokovic lose to Robredo not long ago as well? 

+butterflycaught900 if he had "pretty much no trouble" then why has he only won 2 Slams of the last 20? Why does he lose to guys like Robredo, Monfils, Seppi, Kyrgios, etc...

+Game Ovais You talk about Federer's "weak era" even though he has pretty much no trouble handling the field today!

+Game Ovais hey hey hey... Don't put all of us in a single basket... read my very first comment:''As a Federer fan i agree with you, but it's not just that... Nole is also playing really really well.. he really is in his prime. But you're right about fed, nadal and murray... i just wish Roger had Nadal's age (29) or Nole/Andy (28)... the outcome would be wayyyyyyyyyyyyy different''I don't take shit away from Novak!! He's truly a great champion! and if you read my second comment, I'm just defending the fact that even when both Federer and Nole/Rafa/Andy belongs to different generations (Roger is at least 5 years older than the older player amongst the 3 of them) there was no such thing as a weak era, just pure domination of all players not named Rafael Nadal in GS while Roger was at his peak... His time has passed and Nadal's peak faded rather fast (2007-2012) and now Nole is dominating everybody on tour and only an old guy like Roger is the one trying to fight against him!So please, even when i understand that they are many Federer fans that comes here with some biased and stupid analogies, there are also Nole fans that does the same, as well as Rafa fans.. so it's part of our everyday as well.

That's the kind of rubbish that Federer fans love spewing out. Murray and especially Djokovic were winning tournament when Fed was at his peak. Djokovic won his first slam in 2008 when Fed was at his peak. To say Djokovic is taking advantage of a weak era is fabricated lies to try and make Fed seem even greater. Whilst Federer was beating Nalbandian, Hewitt and Safin for slams. Djokovic and Nadal were having to beat each other and Fed to win slams. I think I know who had the toughest opponents.Fed fans are so blind and so biased it's beyond a joke. No one is disputing his status as the GOAT, not sure where all these insecurities are coming from.

+XxMaplerzxX i call that pure bullshit, plain and simple... Nadal was already dominating in 2009 (Came from conquering 3 GS in 2008). Djokovic won the AO the year before and Murray was being Murray in 2008 (winning Masters but chocking at Grand Slams and last time i checked, that hasn't changed). Then came 2009.. Federer got Finals on AO, Won the FO, won Wimbledon and got to the finals of the USO... the 2 Slams he lost that year were 5 setters in which HE CHOCKED!!! yes, he should had won the Australian Open against Rafa (Rafa wasn't even playing great until the 5th set) and lost the finals of the USO against Del Potro (another match which he chocked out in the 4th set). Rogers prime was from 2003 to 2009 and even then he got: Australian Open title in 2010, FO finals in 2010, Wimbly lost against Berdych in semis i believe and then chocked out in the USO against Nole... come 2011, AO semis, FO finals (stopping the unstoppable Nole in his prime year, streak ended at 41), Wimbly quarters and USO semis. In 2012 won Wimbledon taking out Nole in semis and Murray in the finals... 2013 was a year in which he played with a sore back most of the year and still got to Semis in the AO.. 2014 he got to Semis in AO, Finals in Wimbly and Semis in the USO.. all that wayyyyyyyyyyy past his prime...So a guy that dominated the so called weak era got constantly to the semis and finals of every GS after his prime.. Could we say the same about Rafa who peaked at 2007 and only had 2 successful years after that? could we say the same about Nole who peaked in 2011 and that was his only 3 slams year? do you think winning 1 slam a year makes him comparable with Roger?OH AND ANOTHER THING... Roger was playing against younger players and SLOWER COURTS (who of course damaged his chances).. he had 2 factors against him and still was competitive while the boys you're mentioning were peakingNo bro, the guy didn't dominate a ''weak era'', he dominated every single person not named Rafael Nadal in his era, and while being 5 years older than the current top dogs (Nole, Murray and Nadal) he's still the ONLY player capable of beating Nole any given day (yeah, the gandpa who played on a weak era).. Stop with the BS and talk with facts...and the fact is one (as of today)... Roger Federer is the Greatest Tennis (and all court) Player of all Times... will he still be that person in 10 years? that's up to Djokovic.. And btw... why did Nole and Andy started winning big tournaments when Roger got older? ;) I know the answer, you know it and the rest of the world knows it... Just deal with it

+ChannelLtoN Federer's era wasn't weak because he kept winning, it was weak because his competitors were weak. Hewitt, Safin, Nalbandian, Coria, Roddick, etc, simply weren't that great, esp when you compare that to Nadal, Djokovic and even Murray. As soon as Djokovic and Nadal started to peak, Federer fell away (and he wasn't even that old at the time).

+Game Ovais Maybe, just maybe the reason why I wrote an "essay" on Youtube is because people like you who would read it and respond to it? Idk, you be the judge. :) The Big 4 were constantly beating each other during the last decade or so, but Federer was the one winning the most GS and staying at world #1 ranking the longest during that stretch. I have repeatedly agreed with you that the argument goes both ways, not sure what was not clear in my previous response. Federer is the GOAT, I don't think it's up for debate at this point due to his countless accomplishments in tennis. Djokovic has a good chance to surpass him just as Nadal had when he was healthy. Whether or not either of those 2 can surpass Federer, only time will tell.

No idea why you wrote an essay on youtube, there are plenty of forums for that. But that said, Djokovic hasn't just started beating Federer, he was beating him as early as 2007 when Fed was in his mid 20s. So argument works both ways really, old Fed beating prime Djokovic is not much different to baby Djokovic beating prime Fed.

+Ameya Deshpande +Game Ovais You know what's funny tho? It's usually not the Federer fans who started this "weak era" theory. People would blindly ignore that Djokovic, Nadal and Murray were ALL ALONG while Federer was dominating (well not so much against Nadal, but Federers records speak for itself). Federer was setting the bar and everybody caught up eventually as he ages. I am just pulling the trick Federer bashers used against him all these years and test it on the Djokovic fans. Looks like the reaction is exactly what I expected. I couldn't agree with you more and I have nothing but respect for Djokovic as he earned his #1 ranking. Federer is the GOAT because of his indisputable consistency and his overall accomplishments (17 Grand slams, most weeks of world number 1, master titles, etc) over his career as he continues to stay competitive against these much younger fellows. Indeed, it goes both ways. Please don't use the exact reasoning that you are going against and use it on Federer when it comes to arguing his place in the tennis history.

+Game Ovais I couldn't have put it better myself! :)

+Ameya Deshpande I'm not disputing his statues as GOAT, I'm disputing this era bullshit Fed fans more than anyone else like to brag about. Djokovic is beating whats in front of him. Weak or strong Djokovic is the best right now.  

+Game Ovais You speak the way you do only because Fed was able to wipe out the competition and produce 92-5 win-loss in 2006. Had Fed lost more than he did in 06, you would probably argue he doesn't deserve to be GOAT as he wasn't able to beat likes of Nalbandian, Hewitt... It goes both ways homie...Think before you write

+ChannelLtoN Yep. Fed fans talking about lack of competition. What competition was there in 2006? Nalbandian and Hewitt? The competition for Fed then was worse than what it is now and it's pretty bad now. Novak was beating Fed in slams as early as 2008. Fed was 26 then, so please don't try and make out like Fed is invincible. At least have some respect for what Djokovic is doing right now, taking the field apart one by one.

Federer isn't GOAT.

+ChannelLtoN Yeah, he is truly enjoying it, just as Federer did in his time x)

+ChannelLtoN as a Federer fan i agree with you, but it's not just that... Nole is also playing really really well.. he really is in his prime. But you're right about fed, nadal and murray... i just wish Roger had Nadal's age (29) or Nole/Andy (28)... the outcome would be wayyyyyyyyyyyyy different

zapowiada sie dobrze.. pewnie sie wybiore ; ).. Na pierwszej części tez byłam ; )

I Tak Według Mnie George Sampson Jest Najlepszym Tancerzem Na Swiecie (Eddie)

ja tam wole Street 1, lepsza ekipa byla... A teraz ich nie ma ;(;/

Ten film jest..cudny...ale nie mogę znaleźć piosenek z niej :(

mam nadzieję, że lepsze od 1 bo jedynka to sam syf :(

Bylem Na Tym Dzis I Mowie Ze Film Jest Genialny

Oglądałam zajebisty film!;D Polecaaaaaaam;*

Nawet torrenty nie mają tego do zassania :(

Super :D Nie mogę się doczekać ;)

Supcio byłem natym 2razy :D

co to za piosenka w 0:35 ?

Łoo nawet Lilou jest :D

Co to za piosenka, ktora leci na poczatku?;)

Lilou zniszczy. Znów Sampson...

polecam film ;D swietny jest ;d

prosze o tytuł pisenki od 0:16

Sunday Girl - high & low

sunday - high & low

super świetne ;D

Herve - Together

REWELACJA !!!