Pars cars lhd Videos

Японцы их уничтожают по закону, по ригисту не положено использовать авто более 8 лет, по этому его утилизируют, весь мир задается тем же странным вопросом ПОЧЕМУ

Cette chanson...cette vidéo...tout est magnifique ! =D Cette traduction aussi, en plus j'aime beaucoup la police que tu as choisie pour les passages manuscrits ! ;D ♥ J'aime beaucoup la voix de Tone Rion, comme souvent avec le groupe des VIPPERLOID leur voix fait très travaillée à mon sens, ce qui fait qu'elle se marrie très bien avec celle des Vocaloid. ^^

Oui je l'ai adorée dès la première écoute, c'est pour ça que je me suis jetée dessus quand elle a été traduite en anglais. XD Oui on entend plus la voix de Tone Rion dans cette chanson, c'est vrai.^^ Mais cela m'a fait rire de traduire encore une chanson où Miku chante dedans (j'ai l'impression de traduire beaucoup de Miku), c'est pour ça. ;)

Rapide ! Merci beaucoup pour la traduction ! Cette chanson est vraiment vraiment magnifique ! C'est tellement triste.... encore merci ! J'adore les refrains, ils sont magique... Sinon c'est plus Tone Rion avec Miku que Miku avec Tone Rion.

Hahaha! XD Je me disais aussi!^.^ Oui je sais c'est abusé mais cette chanson est trop belle! X3 Et puis le contexte est différent non? =p Wouahou, des messages pour moi dans Tokyo? Trop bien! X3 Merci en tout cas! ♥♥♥

Après avoir (enfin) écouté toutes les chansons et lu toutes les traductions de TampopoXTampoco et réécouté et relu les tiennes, je crois que ma préférée reste celle-ci, elle est vraiment trop bien !

Mais quelle cruche j'ai lu Sukone Tei et Hatsune Miku ! XD J'avais pas vu Tone Rion ! XD Haha ! Rien à voir avec les VIPPERLOID ! XD

It is actually a Bremach T-Rex, so i don't see any news... Looks like a licensed production... :-I

+Benjamin Huynh hey he people are stupid on youtube .The M2A3 has the most sophisticated FCS in the World, with hunter-killer mode, auto tracking capabilities advanced thermal cameras ect. What of the above the M113 MRV has?Let's move to the weapons now. The M242 is one of the most successful IFV weapons ever fielded. It is capable to destroy tanks from the sides. Against personnel the weapon offers more ready to use ammo than any other modern IFV with bigger caliber. Size matters but quantity of ready to use ammo matters more. This gives Bradley the advantage of more engagements with the enemy. The weapons of Bradley do not end with M242. It is equipped with a double TOW launcher. I don't have to tell you more I suppose.

+Ombre CZ Listen, as a combat vehicle the BMP is alright BUT as an APC which was its purpose it was terrible. BMPs in wars in places like the middle east would be wiped out in nearly a minute. You look at the entrance for the BMP and you say "Wow its so thick is that to protect the troops" Then the operator says nope! Its a fuel tank! Which is stupid because if you shoot an RPG at it the fuel catches on fire! and everyone inside dies! Isn't that wonderful?

+Ombre CZ BMP 3 is pure crap

+Ombre CZ The Bradly has much better weapons, much better APC overall

bmp 3 has got better weapons , it is faster and it can swim.. bradley can not.. yes bradley cost more and have got modern technology inside.. but BMP3 is DEVIL

+Ombre CZ Nahm The BMP-3 is good, but the Bradly is much better especially in sensors, weapons are about even with the Bradly in the topNow the LAV-25 is something to compare as it is amphibious but the Bradly is much better then the BMP-3 

BMP 3 is better .. meaby the best 

Waf? Its italian iveco, no bae and locked martin

+aavmarine1833 I guess you are still living in a cave ... listen the world has moved on fellah ... Lol.

+Molo19 Havok Pulled from competition.

+brunoraoni As someone who went to war maintaining and arming Harriers (amongst other duties) can I just say you have just listed more lies and bullshit about that aircraft than I have ever seen before. Even on YouTube! * The Harrier and SHAR could take off in weather that closed down CATOBAR carriers. We did the Falklands War in the South Atlantic in Winter. * It didn't need exceptional pilots. It needed exceptional training. And why the RAF / FAA had very few losses due to pilot error. * The Harrier gave over 90% availibility and the maintenance was far less than a Buccaneer or Typhoon or, I would suggest, an F18 or F15. It was basically a very simple aircraft doing a complex function. Can't beat bycicle chains to swivel nozzles! * Harriers and SHARs carried wing tanks when required... * The Harrier's range again was never an issue as it could be positioned closer to the battle lines than other aircraft. Its why we designed it that way to operate out of car parks with a fuel tanker and little else. *Given we shot down 20 Aircraft in the Falklands for zero losses I guess that makes your comment about dogfighting stupid. * To compare a Harrier or a SHAR with an F14 really shows you haven't a bloody clue what you are talking about. Different aircraft, different roles, different capabilities. I never saw an F14 land without Traps or take off from a car park. I saw plenty of Harriers and SHARS do just that. And speed doesn't win dogfighting. It just gets you there faster.So basically stop making half wit comments about an aircraft that you clearly know nothing about, is totally unique in aviation history and one that the USMC, Spain, Italy and India still use very effectively 50 years after it first flew...

+Jman21UK The Navy basicly used the VTOL only on Helicopters Carriers, where the Harrier was the only plane that could serve. The other ones who served on a proper aircraft carrier still uses the catapult to take off. And like a said, it was needed a verry good pilot to fly properly a Harrier, and it was still a nightmare for anyone if the carrier was found out in rought sea's. Not to mention how much money was needed to maitain the Harrier, it uses too much fuel and it fuel tanks were small, making his range too small to be effective, it was also too slow and was bad at Dog Fighting. For example the F-14, The F-18, Saab Gripen, Rafale, SU-33 were much better for intercepting both air and ground targets, got way better range and are much faster too.

+brunoraoni the harrier still had a good few years left in it and its still the only plane that doesn't require a runway to land and take off, if its full of flaws why did the USA create a whole load of them? The only thing the government did wrong was sell it no matter who to.

+Jman21UK The Harrier was far away from being the most capable warplane. In fact, it was full of flaws. The Harrier needed a verry good pilot to fly, it was unstable and had a verry poor range. Forcing the Aircraft Carrier to get closer to the Enemy, in any case the Harrier is already obsolete in the Battlefield that is not even worthy mention it. and why call the british goverment stupid for ''giving'' that plane? USA and UK had being Allies for many years, trading technology since WWII.

+njdevil281 actually the USA buys UK made equipment they even patented there own version of the harrier after our stupid government basically gave them the best and most capable warplane ever made what a stupid idea that was!

+njdevil281BAE Systems was formed on 30 November 1999 by the £7.7 billion merger of British Aerospace (BAe) and Marconi Electronic Systems.  It was NEVER American, BAE (British) & Marconi Electronic Systems (British), merged company was renamed to BAE System.  Get your facts right!

Except that BAE Systems inc is actually American and owned by BAE which is British. A crap ton of the technology with a BAE logo on it is actually made in the US. 

how did you get that speed? mine is 90 hp and only reaches 176 km per hour?