How to be bill gates Videos

Because in poor countries they don't have any form of security for when you need to stop working due to poor health or old age. If for any reason you can no longer keep working, you need to rely on your family (often your children) to support you, in those countries, your children are your life support. The more children, the better your chance at a good life when you are old.

You have a problem. That's how it is

+Owen M why is it always Africa?? did the white man make you feel that way?, India has more poor people than the entire sub saharan Africa but I hardly hear indians when talking about poverty.

+chicagoelectricbicyc Nobody is dying from starvation in the US.100% of the poverty in the USA is due to drug addiction, crime, and corruption in the federal and state governments. Nobody on Earth, not even Bill Gates, has any solution for the idiotic things going on this formerly great country.

The people in Africa are in serious risk of death as a result of their poverty. They cannot afford even basic necessities such as food, clean water, and healthcare. The people in the United States are simply below the poverty line, which although is bad for the people, they are not really in much danger.

+Anita Vejar u?

+Guided Hand I like the process, not the result. The problem with some countries making babies is that they tend to dump the little critters in other countries

+yiwei wu making babies is fun no matter what country you're from. And if you're afraid of other countries making more babies I'd suggest you might be doing something wrong.

+Guided Hand Yes, everyone in China and India make more babies, come on everyone, let's flood every country with immigrants and take over the world. Wait a min, that's not a bad idea. Yes! Make more babies!

Nah. I'll do whatever the fuck I want.

+Antonio Dunlap lol

+GamingCentralTV1 Lol screw u hot wing eating ass

+Antonio Dunlap THIS IS NOT A FUCKING JOKE NIGGA

+GamingCentralTV1 ik man im just joking

He owns wingstop franchises. He wants more of his franchises at every corner so people will buy and he can build his wealth

+Markellis Steele hell no

Damn it'll be funny if ross live longer than u. Sometimes what u wish on others happen to you.

true dat

made niggaz

Why so negative.. you can just build your life, like they did.

+vishal singh lol more like 1/100...

+Rohan M Warren has given lot of for melinda gates foundation..n lot of for charity work. Bill also done that. Both are great one.

+Rohan M bill gates

+Jonas Sahlin He has earned an estimate of $47.56 from this video. Get real brah.

+Tony Harrisson Grab the whiskey bottle and take some pills bruh

Pretty sure he's trolling

+sansoit Yeah, I'm sure Bill is sitting around just frothing at the fart in the wind that is the money that comes from YouTube. Good lord. YouTube could not even pay him and I'd doubt it'd be strategical for him to even a lift a finger to change it. What an absolute moron you are, Jonas

Hahaha you made.me laugh bro, you have a nice week man

+commandolam welll still their time is so expensive :P

+Maria del mar it is possible.

Because, as he CLEARLY stated, his foundation is aimed at removing the BIGGEST inequalities in the world. Since advanced nations (mostly white) already possess most of the world's wealth and have the highest levels of development, it makes absolute sense to help the least developed nations (LDN). Nearly every LCN is in the African region, where quality of life and economic prosperity is among the lowest in the world.

+John Jake well we are the hobos.

Yea only if u give change its not going make a fucking difference. Even if a million dollars is not a lot of money to bill gates it is to other people and it'll actually make a difference.... Btw it was billions not millions

+Basil Gentleman - yeah and we dont mean alex jones

i am interested. could you give me links to articles or something I can read or look at?

+Sinus Plexus mabye you'll die befor him .... what makes you so certain he'll go first?

+Nahim Kamali No, he might be the answer to humanity, kindness and sanity. And for that I am very grateful.

Yeah, he might be the answer to poverty.

+Nick Stegmeier Do you mean that as a disqualification? Shaky, if so.

I can't take your comment serious because you're a moron.

Yes, I am.

+Eternus Via I take it you are an atheist?

I take it you are religious?

+Eternus Via Because he's just too much a face of militant atheism rather than anything else he has done. I read his book, 'God Delusion', and I thought it was a joke, but he is serious about it, so I can't take him seriously.

+Karp Calmari Why?

+I Scream You Scream What if the NSA plants some disgusting porn on your computer and has you arrested, bringing shame and humiliation to your family? Have you thought of that?Bill Gates had the choice - money or honour. I think you know what he chose.And it might be a good idea to be a bit sceptical about his work with vaccines - https://archive.org/details/WipeOutHumans-BillGates-VaccinesArebestWayToDepopulatePlanet

+Galahad Threepwood And that's bill's fault? What if Microsoft has to give up the info or face consequences from the government, ever thought of that?

+I Scream You Scream Yeah - and thanks +thegatesnotes  for handing all our information to the NSA with those back doors into the MS operating systems. We know whose side you're on.

+Sander Pedersen You have shown a bit better disposition so I will answer you. You did 'attack' me of course and you thought that was justified. And I point out your errors in judgment because I deem it pertinent. Ad hom is not inherently a fallacy. That's a common fallacy because it assumes both parties are reasonable and that only the subject matter needs to be clear. And that's of course spectacularly wrong. In all cases of heated discourse at least one of the people is the problem, not the wording. In this case, you are the problem. Because not only am I right and the phenomenon is real and not fictitious but my arguments are sound and adequate that a rational mind would heed them.You claim criteria to protect your mental failings. When I offer you a senior employee at the FAA, you don't just get to say that testimony is worthless. That's a common stupidity among lesser minds. But you can choose to do better. You can listen to him talk here on youtube. John Callahan. Look him in the eyes. Listen to his speech and emotion and make an assessment if he is of sound mind and telling the truth. Does his behavior fit the truth.You see, a rational approach is like a police investigator. You look at the person and the testimony. You assess him and you check if his story check outs. You deduce, you hypothesize. Sherlock Holmes, if you will.You can't just categorically dismiss facts at hand because your sloppiness and laziness wants it not to be true. You can't be that immature child that doesn't want to be lifted and whines and moans.You have to deal with the motherfucking truth.If you want to dismiss people, you need a hypothesis that fits the facts. For a person that would be either psychosis or entertaining delusions for own selfworth. Those exist unfortunately in the UFO scene. Typically aging women with slight mental problems so they entertain plausible fiction as the truth to feel important. They have all the answers but it doesn't hold up to scrutiny. There are no verifiable specifics and they can't account for how they supposedly know all these things. It can be spotted. John Callahan is not such an individual. He had a significant verifiable job and he has data and the japanese pilot to corroborate it.Particularly in cases where multiple disconnected people verify the same story, you really don't get to claim that testimony is worthless.Now I have spent a lot of time on you and I'm a genius. Be worthy of my time. Start thinking.If you have serious mature questions, I can help. I know a lot. More than you think is possible to know about an extraordinary situation.To handle this you have to handle that our world has been a lie for over 70 years and our own people have committed that treason. And that is indeed the case.If you actually look into the matter you will find enough to be certain many times over. I can name a few key cases that are individually solid enough to be certain.Kecksburg 1965, Ruwa Zimbabwe 1994, Roswell 1947, Rendlesham forest 1980, JAL Alaska 1986, St. Louis 2000, Phoenix chevron 1997, Travis Walton 1975.Don't believe the first low quality account you may come across. TV documentaries are often good for such cases (search for them here on youtube). And some people lie about these cases to dismiss them. If you are looking for an easy way out, there will be scumbag shithead liars to tell you what you want to hear.Do better.US astronauts Gordon Cooper and Edgar Mitchell are quite noteworthy as well.This truth wont be easy or comfortable. Even I struggled with it.And I have only told you the most superficial. If I told you the full truth your eyes would glaze over like a cow in the field.

+Dan Frederiksen I would appreciate it if you could take the time to respond to this.What do you mean by better mindset? The only thing that could be considered ad hominem in my last comment was "It makes you look simple". Honestly, I was just trying to help with that and I'm sorry if you perceived it as an attack on you. I definitely could have worded it better. The fact remains that it does make you, or anyone else for that matter, look simple. Besides I would hardly say it is ad hominem as I was not actually trying to undermind your argument. It was more of an observation of the bits before your argument.You claim to be pointing out my mental failing, but in reality my mentality is perfectly fine. It is just different from your mentality. Saying that my standards are self serving would simply be wrong as I apply my skeptic mentality to everything. The whole UFO thing just happens to not meet my standards. I would not say my standards are unreasonable either because you must take into consideration how extraordinary these claims are. Remember "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence".What do you mean by me blaming you? Don't think I have blamed you for anything. I could be wrong though.I have been looking on the internet for a while now and I have not been able to find any evidence like the evidence you claim exists. Could you please give me a link to the article or website you are referring to? 

+Sander Pedersen you ask me to stop ad hom while ad homming. I point out your mental failing when it is pertinent. You are constantly failing and hiding behind self serving unreasonable standards while blaming me. I wont answer you again unless you choose a better mindset.

+Dan Frederiksen I've already said that eyewitness testimonies are not worth much. It doesn't actually matter how reputable the eye witness is. As for the "oceans of solid evidence" you claim exist, why didn't you just link me to some of this instead of useless eyewitness testimonies?Can you stop with the ad hominen? It makes you look simple as it is most commonly used by immature and or unintelligent people. Not really helping your cause to be honest.

+Sander Pedersen in the world of stupidity, you dismiss testimony no matter how reputable and numerous because it's not what your intellectual laziness and cowardice wants to hear.FAA division chief John Callahan has come forward about a japan airlines 747 40 minute encounter with 3 huge spherical ET ships that he investigated and that people from the FBI, CIA and whitehouse told him 'never happened' after they reviewed the evidence. He has radar recordings from the plane and ground stations. There is audio tape of the ATC communication and the japanese pilot has also come forward.There are oceans of solid evidence. Enough to be certain many times over.

Interesting. I did see one good point in the comment section as well; however in the world of critical and evidence based thinking, word of mouth is the least reliable source of information. I am a skeptic and if I were to believe something like this, I would require proof. "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence". Word of mouth is not extraordinary evidence.Despite the fact that I won't be convinced, I'll do some more googling. As you said "Google is your friend".

+Sander Pedersen if you could think that would be wonderfulwatch?v=wsEd_b1C8DYgoogle is your friend. use it

+Dan Frederiksen Why are you so obnoxious? My brain requires evidence. I won't just believe something for no reason. If you could supply me with some links, please? That would be wonderful. 

+Sander Pedersen you can google if the airforce actually did put out a press release. but that's not how your brain works.you can also listen to us astronaut Gordon Cooper tell you about his multiple encounters with ET ships. But that's not how your brain works.

+Dan Frederiksen I can't handle you

+Dan Frederiksen Do you believe everything you read? I've read your wall of text, but I could not find the evidence for your claims so naturally I will not believe it. It's not that I do not want to believe, but I simply can't. It is the way my brain works.

+누파박 well I am smart but it's not for my vanity. If people actually listened to me, if a person like Bill Gates actually woke up and listened, we would have star trek here on earth in 10 years. Without exaggeration.You see, we are actually on a planet in space and space is big and old and we were never alone. Physics is apparently almost suspiciously sportsmanlike and allows easy (practical) field propulsion travel as well as faster than light travel. And quite surprisingly the physics is invoked by dialing in quite conventional electromagnetic stimulation. That's why flying saucers have the characteristic shapes they do. Much like a magnetic coil, they are dictated somewhat by the field physics they need.And interestingly the delicate resonant fields can be disrupted by strong radar which is how the famous Roswell incident happened. A very surprising vulnerability but most interestingly makes sense once you know. You see Roswell was home to the only nuclear weapons base in the world so it was no coincidence. They had 3 megawatt radars guarding the airspace. And the Roswell craft was apparently an ultralight version that may have been running at lower power thus more susceptible to interference. And we know a vehicle crashed because the airforce actually put out a press release saying so in 1947. You are just too weakminded to appreciate consequential facts. A handful of base personnel has since given deathbed confessions that it was indeed an ET craft and beings were inside. It was taken to Wright Patterson.Reverse engineering was successful. Several other craft have been downed since. At least 6 that I know of. I'd estimate a total of around 2 but it could be much higher. There are many species btw. It's not just one visiting us. And some of them are human...oh and they are telepathic and the spiritual is real.Can you handle any of that? no.

+Dan Frederiksen "look at me I'm so smart"

+Dan Frederiksen All you've done here is throw ad hominim attacks at me and then stratigically not answer my question. I am ready to understand, but you won't explain anything. The thing you called "blind faith" is based on the scientific method which does mean you are calling the scientific method "blind faith", but I highly doubt you will admit this.You are saying I am not willing to understand, yet you never explain anything. Let me give you an example: You said "that's just your lazy mind goto" to me correctly stating what your argument was. Yet you neglected to explain what you actually meant. You said my version was wrong, but you did not offer an alternative. (textbook fartbagism by the way)You are a textbook hypocrite and if you do not respond to this, that doesn't win you the argument... It just makes you a child

+Sander Pedersen I said they had blind faith in something being the case while labeling it the scientific method.And no your interpretation that I claim God because of an unknown is entirely wrong as well. That's just your lazy mindless goto. I understand that it can't be done in the physical. I'm not saying I don't know how to do it therefore it is impossible. I understand that it is impossible. That you don't want that to be true doens't change that it is true.If you actually tried to understand you could. But you don't even try.I wont answer you again.

+Dan Frederiksen You did say that Hackis bell explaining our understanding of pain that has been acquired by means of the scientific method was "Blind faith" so either you didn't explain yourself very well or you said that the scientific method is "blind faith" (there is no such thing as blind faith as faith by definition is blind)Your argument does seem to be that qualia is not understood therefore God did it. Qualia is not proof of God nor is it evidence of God. I don't know why you seem to think it is evidence for God. could you explain?

+Sander Pedersen I said nothing about the scientific method requiring faith. That's your massive mistake. Nor did I say that qualia proves God. Qualia does however prove our spiritual nature aka supernatural aka extramechanistic. Because it can't be done in the physical.And that's one hell of a step towards God. Certainly puts evolution at quite a disadvantage. And by that I mean it's killed dead with no chance of recovery. A spiritual variant might be real however. But that's a far cry from the theory of evolution which is entirely mechanistic

+Dan Frederiksen The fact that you think the scientific method requires faith makes it hard to believe the "I'm a genius" tangent, not to mention the fact that being a genius does not include "very competent communication".Now, with my tangent out of the way... Just because we do not fully understand how the brain works that does not mean God is real. That is all I'm saying.

+Dan Frederiksen Philistine? Oh get the fuck out.

+Sander Pedersen no I'm a genius which includes very competent communication. You merely failed to appreciate the significance of what I said because it didn't conform to your thoughtless belief system. Pain is not understood in the slightest and what's even worse, it's not understood that it isn't understood.If it was understood it could be implemented in a machine. Yet nothing about it is understood. I'm a genius AI scientist and I can make machines intelligent but I couldn't even begin to touch qualia.

+Dan Frederiksen So your argument is because humans cannot create life, therefore God must have created life? If this is the case you are completely forgetting the fact that the existence of God has not been proven. We have a perfectly good understanding of what pain is. We gained this understanding through the scientific method, which is self correcting. I feel like you are being very philosophical, but you lack the rhetoric skills to properly communicate it (I'm not trying to offend you).

+Hackis Bell try less blind faith and more thinking.I know for certain that it can't be done. Ever. Because I actually understand the situation. That it's a surprising fact to you, doesn't mean that your unfounded belief is valid.

+Dan Frederiksen Pain happens in our bodies! We have nerves in our bodies that are responsible for pain. There are places on our body where there are no nerves so we don't feel pain in those places (hair, brain) and places where we have small amount of nerves so we feel less pain (head, face) and where are lots of nerves so we feel huge pain (sexual organs). And pain is nothing else than brain's way of saying to us "Come on, go do something about that thing right now or you're going to die or risk dying!". And I am sure we will be able to make machines feel pain, but first we have to create machines that actually "live" and then we can make them feel pain. But the question is why would we do it anyway, since machine's parts are replacable, so pain is not needed.

I think think you should check your math, a stack of 4,500 hundred dollar bills would be 450,000, not 45,000

+MrColate8 Probably drug money, so no.

+James not only that, he also invests billions into renewable energy, and getting clean drinking water and sanitation to underdeveloped countries. bill gates decided to use his wealth to make a life-changing impact on tens- if not hundreds of millions of the less fortunate around the world, as well as the future generations, by supporting renewable energy.he has also donated millions to inventors who want to make a change, but don't have the funds for it. all the super wealthy should learn from him, they have far too much money to spend on themselves.

+Pranx Finally, after years of searching, I finally found it -- the funniest comment on YouTube. Alas, now I can rest.

+Desmond Bear It doesn't matter. It's still your bloodline, Your kids' kids and so on. 

+James but again, he'd never live to meet those family members, so it's not surprising to me he'd choose to donate. But still, it's definitely a great thing to do. I'm glad that he did it and have a whole lot of respect for the man.

+Desmond Bear It's still his legacy. He earned it all in his lifetime. So it still must be difficult to know your children might not make it that long. He could set his family up for thousands of years with that money and instead he's choosing to donate it to charity.

well to be honest, 70 billion is more money than should ever be given as inheritance. half that, 35 billion, is still more than anyone could ever even use.

In a couple weeks, I can see you giving handjobs to strange men in an unoccupied meat processing plant in exchange for alcohol, you contemptible douche.

+Pranx You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. Just a jealous cunt trying to find reasons to hate on people infinitely more successful than you. 

+James He's a terrible man. 'Charity' is not all equal. His money will go to eradicating diseases which up until now have been the only forms of population control operating in the third world. This means his efforts will result in an even bigger exponential growth curve in those places, which means BILLIONS of more suffering poor humans.

I hate Microsoft but I still have loads of respect for this man

+William Bush lol show Donald Trump what real money looks like

+Critter Donald Trump is leading so yeah. xD

+Critter for all our sake I hope you're right, but on a more serious note, at the end of the day all politicians are the same anyway....I believe the puppets are not the one to blame....

+manamiemyr yeah but no one is gonna vote for him

+William Bush Donald Trump can

+William Bush he should

+Perfect Failure WHO TOLD Y.. uh I mean, no.   No, it isn't me.  I mean, him.

+Jago Sevetar Bill, is that you? ;-)

+Shashvat Aditya I meant, doing nothing to help poor people.  He was doing a lot to monopolise the PC software market.  At one stage Bill Gates was getting fined by the US courts for $1 Million PER DAY for forcing PC users to use Microsoft products.  But anyways, that's ancient history.

+Toby Brack Typical self-centred conservative response.  I wasn't jealous, or pissed off because I didn't have $40 billion.  I was pissed off because he could have saved millions of lives with a signature on a cheque, and he chose not to.But now he is doing a lot.  The UN has estimated the Bill and Mel Gates foundation has saved over 200,000 people.  200,000!  And he's still rich as hell.  I have a world of respect for Bill Gates, now. Back in the 90's though, Bill Gates was seen as the devil incarnate, particularly by IT types of people.

+Jago Sevetar doing nothing?

+ItsOneInAMillion Well that's not really true, the vaccien they used to eradicate polio is known to cause another disease with similar symptoms, that's why it's illegal in ALL modern countries and have been for a long time.

+ItsOneInAMillion maybe you should look up the origins of eugenics. Planned parenthood and Margaret Singer. Eradicating disease... Ha!

+Anthony Houghton Mass vaccination programs are eradicating diseases. Infectious diseases don't exist in developing nations anymore. And you claim that somehow saving millions of potential lives is supposed to be a population control? You're not making any sense.

+ItsOneInAMillion is that what u think is going on genius? U obviously are still asleep. Go back to bed with that bs! Goodnight

+Anthony Houghton Yes, because eradicating diseases is a great way of going about a eugenics program. Don't be stupid.

+Anthony Houghton yes. questions would have been initially screened by the producer. questions like eugenics that would vilify him directly wouldn't see the light of day