Low GMAT? - how you can still get into the top MBA programs
Aringo.com helps MBA candidates with GMAT scores below 720 get into the top programs. What can you do to strengthen your candidacy if your GMAT score is ...
How about candidates with low GPA and strong a GMAT score ?
Low GMAT? Part I - how you can still get into the top MBA programs
Aringo.com helps MBA candidates with GMAT scores below 720 get into the top programs. What you can do to strengthen your candidacy if your GMAT score is ...
GMAT Counselling Services Offered by MBA Dream Consultants in Delhi
MBA admissions Consultants and GMAT Counselling Services Blogs from MBA Dream are a good way to get school-specific admissions advice and keep up ...
#GMAT #Counselling Services Offered by MBA Dream Consultants in Delhi
For More Detail Visit www.mbadream.in OR //blog.mbadream.in/
Follow us on #Pinterest : //www.pinterest.com/mbadream01/
This video was somewhat helpful in providing information about the value of
different rankings. However there were a few things I disagree with: 1.)
You say the Financial Times and Economist give too many points to European
programs. But US News does not look at European schools at all. And
BusinessWeek ranks Non-US schools seperately. So, I would argue that US
News and Businessweek give *too little* weight to Non-US programs. At least
FT and Economist attempt to compare all MBA programs.
3) Last point... Your final comment was about how GMAT scores correlate
with starting salaries. That's true when you look at averages. But to say
that a person will get get $3000 more in starting salary for every 10
points higher he scores on his GMAT is absurd. If you get into Wharton with
a 600 GMAT, are you saying the person should retake the test to get a
higher GMAT and therefore a higher salary?
2. In the same way you say FT and Economist are biased toward European
programs, you are very clearly biased toward American programs. You say
building a network in the US is more valuable. But, if you're aim is to
work in Europe or Asia, obviously building a network in those networks
would be more valuable to you.
The GMAT score being predictive of the starting salary after graduation is
NOT an indication that getting a higher GMAT score will get you a better
salary. The implicit assumption that correlation = causation (both with
GMAT ∝ salary and with school ∝ salary) is blatantly false.
Did you graph this using individual GMAT scores and salaries upon
graduation or, rather, a school's average GMAT score and average salary
upon graduation? If it's the latter (and I have a feeling it is) then this
is a poorly-reasoned conclusion.