Enter your query, example: how not cry when slicing onion or how to enter an Free Italian Sex Webcams?
Home » Video » ...

Audi nhtsa Videos

2013 Audi A4 / S4 | Frontal Crash Test by NHTSA | CrashNet1

Crash test dummies representing an average-sized adult male and a small-sized adult female are placed in the driver and front passenger seats, respectively, ...

User Comments

https://gp6.googleusercontent.com/-IZO7C-EFYH8/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/iUNqaz-TgzI/s48-c-k-no/photo.jpg?sz=64
piero914 commented on 08 Nov 2012
Ouch...painful to watch .... I hope that guys OK.
https://gp4.googleusercontent.com/-5P1arFIj8Hw/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/gW8-_YQ8PmI/s48-c-k-no/photo.jpg?sz=64
CNHabs commented on 18 Jul 2013
There was no one inside...
https://gp3.googleusercontent.com/-q0NRDR1SnTc/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/XbPIWlYGEUQ/s48-c-k-no/photo.jpg?sz=64
burak han semerci commented on 30 Aug 2013
56 h km :S
https://gp3.googleusercontent.com/-UZ33x8J-vBY/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/Ya3k-5njm1c/s48-c-k-no/photo.jpg?sz=64
ThatGuyWhoMakesVideos commented on 08 Aug 2013
wow

Audi 5000 / 100 / 200 | 1985 | Frontal Crash Test by NHTSA | CrashNet1

C3 Audi 5000 S / 100 / 200 Impact speed for the vehicle was 32mph(56.33kph). The vehicle tested is complied with: -FMVSS 212: Windshield Retention -FMVSS ...

User Comments

https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-4E9om5CVZOw/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAk/-xN2padxTlg/photo.jpg?sz=64
whattheheck1000 commented on 30 Mar 2015
The 1989 Audi 100 model had a driver HIC of 185 and passenger HIC of 710. The 1989 tested did have an airbag though. The 1986-1991 Audi 80, the smaller line, had a driver HIC of 600 and passenger HIC of 535 when it was tested for the 1989 model year as well. So the '89 Audis were quite a bit safer than the '85s, it looks like. March 29, 2015 11:39 pm
https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-4E9om5CVZOw/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAk/-xN2padxTlg/photo.jpg?sz=64
whattheheck1000 commented on 13 Dec 2015
This is one of those cars where it did very poorly (for the driver) but the structure was sound. A lot of times, a 2,000+ HIC means structural failure; this was just a problem of the seat belt and steering column. Adding a driver airbag would have made that 2,105 HIC go way down, maybe even below 500. December 13, 2015 12:30 am
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-r_d4NK3UlWc/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAVQ/EKT7Zf7g--8/photo.jpg?sz=64
Антон Горбачёв commented on 06 Mar 2015
Сердце кровью обливается, когда видишь, как бьют такие ретро-машины :( Хотя понятно, что тогда они были совсем свежак :)
https://gp5.googleusercontent.com/-VlFK3IkSzDc/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/kQ_DCSc8kYI/s48-c-k-no/photo.jpg?sz=64
bradhunt120 commented on 21 Jun 2013
i got rear ended by one of these and my 97 camaro was 100 precent fine but the 5000 was done fore impact was around 15 kph
https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-fUbzmHDCsic/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAA8/YxSOKUS9ANU/photo.jpg?sz=64
László Tóth commented on 08 Nov 2014
hát itt még nem volt procoten,de igy is elég jól bírta!
https://gp4.googleusercontent.com/-wWXfK11tIxU/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/XJzdOdJm4gA/s48-c-k-no/photo.jpg?sz=64
compu85 commented on 15 Oct 2013
I wonder how much better the 1988+ cars with ProConTen did?
https://gp6.googleusercontent.com/-RqDOPQHX6t4/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/PY5lBTdWNjI/s48-c-k-no/photo.jpg?sz=64
logovo2012 commented on 30 Jun 2013
такой бампер разъ#####ли!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
https://gp4.googleusercontent.com/-4AnmlDlu5iI/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/7RXeccYjpeg/s48-c-k-no/photo.jpg?sz=64
Audi Quattro commented on 14 Aug 2013
Дааа днем с огнем не найдеш!!!
https://gp6.googleusercontent.com/-bjkbjt_wk94/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/W1VaX4A919E/s48-c-k-no/photo.jpg?sz=64
AcuraCSXTypeSK20 commented on 08 Jul 2013
Wow, for 32mph full frontal, that was awful
https://gp6.googleusercontent.com/--FngVTvMk2c/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/XXzmVT-qZEE/s48-c-k-no/photo.jpg?sz=64
GSi16vrs commented on 27 Sep 2013
This is before 88b, no proconten
https://gp3.googleusercontent.com/-bXeVY0lGZfM/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/LiyC1JsMXhQ/s48-c-k-no/photo.jpg?sz=64
Audiman0aha commented on 11 Aug 2013
Damn i own one of this :/
https://gp5.googleusercontent.com/-HzNWtDUZdZk/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/sFn1ehKOzf0/s48-c-k-no/photo.jpg?sz=64
Auto Acc Rotterdam commented on 03 Oct 2013
NCAP ratings -5 stars
https://gp3.googleusercontent.com/-Xr8l2oyYJVc/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/6R_sl26Wg48/s48-c-k-no/photo.jpg?sz=64
Aaron P commented on 20 Mar 2013
ouch

2009 Audi A4 (B8) NHTSA Frontal Impact

Driver-Passenger Head Injury Criterion 338-436 Chest deceleration (g's) 39-38 Femur load l/r1 (lb) 186 / 101-133 / 102 *****-***** (Go Audi!)

User Comments

https://gp6.googleusercontent.com/-Au-sqWkWkdY/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/j8KL-p9CGfs/s48-c-k-no/photo.jpg?sz=64
TheCarArchives commented on 06 Mar 2012
the engine on the 2009-present Audi A4 Engine petrol engines: 1.8L TFSI I4 2.0L TFSI I4 3.2L V6 FSI diesel engines: 2.0L TDI I4 2.7L V6 TDI 3.0L V6 TDI
https://gp6.googleusercontent.com/-4E9om5CVZOw/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/q9VoN33KrKo/s48-c-k-no/photo.jpg?sz=64
whattheheck1000 commented on 15 Apr 2010
those femur loads are excellent. this is a 35 mph car crash and i weigh more than every one of those load measurements. (Not combined, of course)
https://gp6.googleusercontent.com/-Au-sqWkWkdY/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/j8KL-p9CGfs/s48-c-k-no/photo.jpg?sz=64
TheCarArchives commented on 06 Mar 2012
the 2009-present Audi A4 is assembled in Ingolstadt, Germany Aurangabad, India Jakarta, Indonesia
https://gp5.googleusercontent.com/-gHIWQtFnmr4/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/MIfyYGQMIQs/s48-c-k-no/photo.jpg?sz=64
georg holz commented on 13 Nov 2010
is that a good result?? i hope so XD
https://i1.ytimg.com/i/WEvUYXDwBMlJ9wKiQgZPgg/1.jpg?sz=64
MRJ1994 commented on 15 May 2011
@xzaxx its says 35 mph on the car
https://gp3.googleusercontent.com/-CdgYM8wO-Zw/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/igA93Img1pE/s48-c-k-no/photo.jpg?sz=64
03RaP23rPatryq commented on 13 Jul 2012
bardzo bezpieczny samochód
https://gp4.googleusercontent.com/-F94-nggYom4/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/bNZZxthhh2g/s48-c-k-no/photo.jpg?sz=64
xzaxx commented on 24 Apr 2011
at what speed?
https://gp4.googleusercontent.com/-rV1yHS0rpmU/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/-FntcgF1sCs/s48-c-k-no/photo.jpg?sz=64
TheSpeedula commented on 30 Jul 2011
@georg214 yes

2013 Audi A4/S4 (B8) NHTSA Frontal Impact (NHTSA Five Star Car)

Driver-***** Passenger-***** Earned ***** Overall (NHTSA Five Star Car)

User Comments

https://gp5.googleusercontent.com/-Y-BRoQ67G3E/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/lBJ81Oleyu0/s48-c-k-no/photo.jpg?sz=64
Mikey Agnew commented on 12 Nov 2012
See? A manufacturer that actually knows how to make a car. No need for side curtain deployment during a frontal impact. I hate it when I see that, what if you spun into the road way and were t-boned after your initial accident. Wouldn't those side air bags be important? Now, hit a wall going 50 MPH, it might help to have a bouncy castle inflate around you.
https://gp5.googleusercontent.com/-CpcMdcYtA1c/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/ymNB04jlatU/s48-c-k-no/photo.jpg?sz=64
amokachi31 commented on 08 Nov 2012
thx for the explanation. I just missed the topic and assumed that the test was done by euroncap (again forgetting that the euroncap always uses offset tests) :)
https://gp5.googleusercontent.com/-CpcMdcYtA1c/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/ymNB04jlatU/s48-c-k-no/photo.jpg?sz=64
amokachi31 commented on 07 Nov 2012
something's wrong with the info I guess. as far as I know 5th star is due to pedestrian safety. s4 may be a 5 star safe car. but not bcs of this crash test
https://gp6.googleusercontent.com/-FCqf3Ekq1KA/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/kXk3fi4AgU8/s48-c-k-no/photo.jpg?sz=64
CarPro1993 commented on 08 Nov 2012
NHTSA uses star ratings differently compared to EuroNCAP. There is no pedestrian rating for North American vehicles.

Audi A4 / S4 | 2011 | Side Crash Test | NHTSA High Speed Camera | CrashNet1

Crash test dummies representing an average-sized adult male and a small-sized adult female are placed in the driver and rear passenger seats (driver's side), ...

Audi 80 / 4000 | 1980 | Frontal Crash Test | NHTSA | CrashNet1

1980-1987 B2 Audi 4000 / 80 Impact speed 35mph. The vehicle tested is complied with: -FMVSS 212: Windshield Retention -FMVSS 219: Windshield Intrusion ...

User Comments

https://gp4.googleusercontent.com/-jkQtkyP3nZA/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/3ohObRVDnB0/s48-c-k-no/photo.jpg?sz=64
TheGuyFromUme commented on 29 Oct 2013
Not really, the lack of airbags would probably still turn the occupants into meat stew. But yeah, probably safer than most cars of the time.
https://gp4.googleusercontent.com/-oOHVsdsLndU/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/m9PyW0ktxx4/s48-c-k-no/photo.jpg?sz=64
Shady Ard commented on 23 Jun 2013
waw it's so strong !!! so saafe
Sign up for free to join this conversation on fsaved.com.
Already have an account? Sign in to comment