Thanks to our friends at Gene Butman Ford in Ypsilanti for letting us film this car. You can visit them at https://www.facebook.com/genebutmanford/ and ...
When auto production started up after the cessation of World War II hostilities, major manufacturers simply picked up where they left off after Pearl Harbor ...
That's what my research turned up. Please share and enlighten.
2015 Ford Mustang GT Premium - WR TV POV Test Drive
Read our thoughts on the 2015 Ford Mustang GT here: //www.windingroad.com/articles/reviews/driven-2015-ford-mustang-gt/ Thanks to our friends at Gene ...
please correct me if i'm wrong here, but as the gas station, did I see you
put diesel into the car, only saying because I saw you use the nozzle with
the green handle on it........
+Stephen Anderson Thank you so very much for responding, the only reason that I was asking was because wherever you filled up the car, the color of the nozzles from what you were telling me were in complete reverse from where I normally get my fuel...LOL meaning at my stations, all the regular fuels, unleaded, super unleaded, etc, normally have the black handles, and for the diesel, that always mark that one with a green handle, but you may be right though, it probably varies a lot from station to station......Thanks again.......
I know its been 2 weeks but green is normal gas and black is diesel. The only vehicles ford makes that ate diesel are F-250s F-350s and most utility vehicles... Most take gas...
I know that everyone loves manual mustangs, but I was really interested in
how the automatic transmission sounds shifting on its own, hence my
disappointment. You drive the entire drive in manual mode, so I still don't
know how the automatic drives on its on. Maybe in the future you could give
equal representation? Thanks for listening!
I'm looking at a car like this, and it's an automatic. It's a better deal than most of the manuals I see, and I'd probably use the paddle shifters most often.
I was about to buy a stick shift but was unsure because I've never driven stick before. Everyone told me to go with the automatic cause of the constant heavy traffic in the area that I live in.
+Scott Stillman mmm... no... I still cant get it... if the traffic is such a problem then the parking is also an issue so this is not the best car for this aria... if you have to sneak in the traffic then you will have an issue with the visibility as well. I used to live in a big city with awful traffic but the manual was never an issue for me...
I can, because I live in an area where a manual is a giant pain in the ass. If you live in a sparsely populated suburb or a small city, a manual is fine. If you live in a city where traffic is an issue, a manual transmission becomes a chore. The auto gives you paddle-shifting so you can at least use that once in a while. Also, despite the increased power, the 2015 Mustang was geared more toward grand touring instead of just a drag racer, which adds to its international appeal. Unless you're a frequent visitor to a race track, getting an auto actually makes a lot of sense. Think of it as greatly discounted Aston Martin.
2015 Ford Mustang GT Premium - WR TV Walkaround
Read our thoughts on the 2015 Ford Mustang GT here: //www.windingroad.com/articles/reviews/driven-2015-ford-mustang-gt/ Thanks to our friends at Gene ...
+Nicklaus Shoaf And no I dont have to be right. I understand that it is muscle and yes it most certainly is, but its also a sports car which ford states...
Classic Volvo police patrol car at clumber park 999 day 30/8/15 (via YouTube Capture.)
2016 Ford Focus SE (5MT) - WR TV POV Test Drive
Thanks to our friends at Gene Butman Ford in Ypsilanti for letting us film this car. You can visit them at https://www.facebook.com/genebutmanford/ and ...
I own the 2012 Hatch with the 5 speed manual. It's by far my favorite car.
It's smooth and has plenty of passing power. Surprisingly quick for it's
class. Also, it's very comfortable. Taken it on a 1600 mile drive. Went
great
hahahaha... the designers of these cars...
Not sure if intentional or not, but this is quite cool.
Imagine the 2 tachometers are eyes, the steering wheel with the logo is the
nose (the horn part) and the small hand rest hole at the bottom of the
steering wheel is the mouth... ghostface anyone? :D (with mustache if you
consider the side button clusters on the steering wheel). Can't take my
eyes away from it lol!
And while you drive the mouth goes slightly left... slightly right... the
car is staring back at me and its amazed ROFL.
+wonderwall135 true, but with BMW and Mercedes only the low end models have the flimsy screen not built in. With BMW it's the 3 series and the 5, 6, and 7 series are all in dash systems. Likewise with Mercedes. The Mazda 3 is a great car, but uses more plastics then the Focus Titanium. The Mazda and the Focus are the best compacts I've ever driven. I would buy a Mazda, but for me the Focus felt right at home. Plus, once my car is paid off I could trade in for a Mazda and try owning one myself.
Well then we disagree. I feel the Mazda has way better quality and much nicer handling. I don't mind the on top infotainment. BMW and Mercedes have that too so hey it's not in bad company.
+wonderwall135 I liked the Mazda 3 but the navigation system isn't fully built in, it looks like Mazda just slapped it in there. But the engine is really peppy just a like the focus. I test drove every compact and mid size sedan on the market, and the focus was the best compact from driving experience and quality.
I wonder if manual transmissions get more popular in the United States, or
if it can vary from State to State? By the way I am European and I prefer
automatics :-). One comment on the shifting, though. The way you shift in
this vid will certainly shorten the life of the synchromeshes in the
gearbox. Don't abuse the gearbox, you will regret it.
Winding Road Magazine
What was the cars mpg?
Contrary to a lot of American fools who told me take Corolla,Civic,Sentra,
I drove a Ford Focus 2014 5 speed manual and my verdict is, not just good,
its brilliant, unbelievably good, I bet as good as new Mazda 3,
I got an average of 34 mpg combined and on highway cruise at 55-60 mph I
got like 42-44 mpgs at times,
Also the car rides handles light years better than shitty
Toyotas,Hondas,Nissans and seemed the quietest of the lot in terms of
wind,road,tire noise insulation as well
It had awesome sounding music system, best AC,pin sharp handling as well
I found just 1 con to the Focus, thats back seat legroom is too low , even
still its got enough to pack 4 of 5.5-5.6 feet tall people,
I dont understand why a lot of people detest Focus, sure the DCT had some
issues but even still the car is a gem, pity on Americans detesting such
awesome domestics,
+Ponygt 662 I like it in every way, except, I occasionally do want to drive with adults in the back seat. Don't need an intermediate or full-sizer, but I do want a back seat that won't give its occupants cramps.
+sic22l No way, The Powershift tech had 2 unites the wet clutch unit and dry clutch unit, the wet clutch unites are designed and tested in Europe, all dry clutch units are done by Getrag USA, Getrag is a big company, true its stationed at Europe but its US division is responsible for the DCT on Focus of USAThe DCT on TDCi are wet clutch units they were R&D and tuned in EuropeAbout Duratec, the long gone series of Mazda L series engines, how pathetic man, Mazdas old block was adopted by Ford, but the new TiVCT Duratec for Focus is developed by Ford, USA, dont think Americans are dump like they used to be, they are sleeping giants, poke them they bite hardThe 2.0 Duratec is also used in Ginetta cars, but thats in the 200 HP tune, thats completely developed by Ford Europe-Ginetta partnership, the 160/170 HP Focus tune is an American made tune
+Ponygt 662 Powershift dual cltch gearbox was designed in Europe, in a joint-venture with Getrag in order to compete with VW's DSG. The engine was designed by Mazda. Current focus is domestic because it's assembled in the US. It's as american as VW Passat.
+sic22l Whatever its made in USA as of now, also the 2.0 Duratec with Powershift AT was mated and designed in US, so is the MyFord Touch, so is the Mk3 Focuses BLIS etc
+Ponygt 662 It's not exactly domestic... Current Focus was designed in Europe, by Europeans and for Europeans. Ford did some adjustments o fit more tastes around the world so it's not as good as the Mk2 EU Focus but it's still nice.
Tucker - Great Cars
From the PBS series Great Cars. Just after World War II, Preston Tucker wanted to be the first automaker to introduce an entirely new car, not just a touched up ...
@DanFrederiksen The drag coefficient is what it is, regardless of
size--it's not the be all and end all of how aerodynamic a car is overall,
of course--designers sometimes increase it to counteract lift. Looks can be
deceiving when it comes to aero efficiency. Take the Lambo Countach: it
looks streamlined, but is surprisingly unaerodynamic. Not sure if wind
tunnel tests were ever conducted on the Tucker; designer Alex Tremulis may
have done WT testing on models.
@devilred1971 thanks for commenting. Ford did avoid taking a direct cash
handout but benefited greatly from the bailout because without it, Ford's,
and every other car makers' supply network would have collapsed and so
would the banking system that propped them all up. They also were given
cash infusions for various R&D efforts and were the biggest winners in the
so-called "Cash for clunkers" program. Ford execs are the first to admit
that it saved them all.
@galoon And Alex Tremulis, who designed the Tucker, is one of the most
respected US auto designers. By the time he came to Tucker, he had
extensive design experience with Auburn/Cord/Duesenberg, plus solid
knowledge of aircraft design/aerodynamics, which he studied during WWII. He
went to Ford after Tucker folded, and frequently published articles for
Road & Track after retiring. He knew what he was doing when it came to
aerodynamics, that's for sure!
@neatoauctions: builders were more concerned by costs-revenues ratio,
marketing & sales.Safety,fuel consumption & environment and aerodynamics
concepts on bodyworks were introduced (namely in USA) following state
decrees & rules. Without Ralph Nader actions maybe car builders never
reproject safe models,without the "moose hazard" complaint made by two
Swedish journalists, Mercedes never fit EBD system on his class A models.
@DanFrederiksen The Porsche figures sound about right; drag is greater with
a spoiler because it's there to reduce lift (and thus keep that speed
machine on the ground LOL!) Low drag is one of the reasons why the Tucker's
modified helicopter engine could get 20mpg at 50mph, which was pretty good
for that time--all US cars were big; that's what most of the public wanted.
It took the Oil Crisis to change their minds!
@galoon porsche drag coefficient is typically around 0.28 without spoiler
and 0.31 with spoiler. they claimed it was mathematically calculated. which
seems unlikely at the time : ) probably more like pulled out of their ass :
) and yes aerodynamics is an absolutely critical parameter of a car when it
comes to fuel efficiency and that all cars were that stupid large at the
time is little excuse.
@DanFrederiksen The 0.27 C/d figure for the Tucker is based on Alex
Tremulis's coast tests that he conducted on the car--he was somewhat
skeptical of the results too, so he rounded it up to 0.3 as a figure to
give the public. Today's passenger cars are between 0.3 and about 0.5, so
this is a pretty darn good C/d. Most US manufacturers in the '40s ignored
anything related to aerodynamics!
@DanFrederiksen It's actually very aerodynamic--it has a drag coefficient
of only 0.27, which is the same as the 2009 Honda Civic Hybrid and Lexus
sedan. It had an aluminum rear-mounted engine and four-wheel independent
suspension at a time when no other US cars did. If Tucker had more time to
work it out, it would have had fuel injection and disc brakes, too.
@DanFrederiksen Not aerodynamic compared to a Porsche of course (it wasn't
designed as a sports car) but considerably more so than its rival sedans.
Look at the car's body and profile compared to, say, a 1948 Ford or
Chevrolet; you'll see how much lower and sleeker it is. It's big because
it's a late 1940's family sedan; those were all big.
I can empathize with a company being muscled out by larger established car
makers but what's really great about this car? it's ugly overweight
irrational non aerodynamic like many other US car models at the time and
since. sure credit is due for seatbelts but still. it's not like it was a
fiber glass composite series hybrid electric car
@galoon 0.27 isn't particularly aerodynamic though, nor does it account for
the massive size of the tucker nor is a claimed value of 0.3 the same as
actual performance. I'd like to see good simulation or windtunnel data to
believe that design has as good coefficient as a porsche
I allways compare the tucker to the very elgant Czech Tatra streamline rear
engined V8 cars of the same era for comparing please go to the video Tatra
603 Motorsound here on youtube.
A car way ahead of it's time in safety and innovation. The first production
car with disc brakes, seat (safety) belts, safety glass and a helicopter
engine. And the BIG 3 hated it.
Classic Restos: Petersen Automotive & Ypsilanti Museum Series 20
Classic Restos returns to the USA, featuring The Petersen Automotive Museum in Los Angeles and the Ypsilanti Automotive Heritage Building, showcasing the ...
2014 Ford Mustang V6 (Manual) - WR TV POV Test Drive
With the recent release of the new 2015 Mustang, we thought one last look at the current generation was in order. Thanks to Winding Road friend Tom Hudler at ...
I have this exact mustang by just adding a Magnaflow exaust and any Cold
Air Intake the car sounds mean, I get asked all the time if its a GT even
though its not.
+DubLifeOfficial How does it handle? Im more of a handling guy than a power guy and I've heard cause the rear is only semi independent it can get a little trouble some on bumpy roads
+Coupydog well decided not to buy a new car. The answer is simply because used cars have loads of problems. At one point it was scary because my car wouldn't start on the day of an exam.It came down to I would rather have to worry about a 250 dollar payment than if my car would start that day or not.Ultimately decided not to, still deal with small problems here and there change of clutch and flywheel change a compressor and most recently my car is misfiring.If I made more money no doubt I'd choose a car payment over car problems any day. I'm literally studying all the time so I don't really have time to set to repair my car.
Manual is always 100% better in many ways and circumstances, the only "but"
I can give to manual is a pain driving it in heavy traffic, but even then I
will choose manual over automatic. Automatic is just way too boring.
My mate has a 2014 Mustang V6 automatic and, one day we took it for a drive and skidded around corners and did donuts. It actually had great handling for an automatic
buying a V6 is actually a really smart choice you can have a great Mustang with descent fuel economy plus you can add a lot to a V6 and improve its performance