Singularity university board Videos

Would have been great to see what they have on screen.

+MirceaKitsune This is where you are wrong, consider this;//motherboard.vice.com/read/this-poker-playing-supercomputer-is-getting-crushed-by-humansAI is one thing, self motivated, self aware is something else. - //www.wired.com/2015/01/ai-arrived-really-worries-worlds-brightest-minds/The builder of the system is not beat by the system he built, keep that in mind. You can never out-design the designer."The claim that research in AI will inevitably result in consciousness has absolutely no scientific justification. At best,it's speculative science-fiction. At worst, it's pure ignorance. Putting a timeframe on the claim is self borderline psychotic." -- //www.wired.com/2015/01/ai-arrived-really-worries-worlds-brightest-minds/People should try investigating and paying more attention to people much more knowledgeable on such matters who do not sensationalize it and talk TRUTH about it, here's another prime example of how many news organizations don't give real computer science but tabloid science passing off speculation science as 'IT'S NOW A FACT!"The furthest we have gotten to AI has not really changed since computers first came about. The only difference today is bandwidth. Machines still follow a given set of instructions, as they have always only been capable of doing. They are still just calculators. Even Watson or Asimo, or the Google Brain are just responding to inputs and outputting the programmed responses. Siri appears more AI-like than a casio calculator, but underneath they use the exact same computational principles. Siri has no better rationale, so-to-speak, she just has an expanded information pool from which to draw inputs and calculations, and a higher number-crunching bandwidth. We are not even close to cognizance, because it takes an entirely different kind of computing. We will not have real AI until we figure out how we have attained our own cognizance and are able to instill that factor into a machine. That all being said, nefarious or unintended outputs from unconscious algorithms are just as much of a concern as more and more things become connected. - //www.wired.com/2015/01/ai-arrived-really-worries-worlds-brightest-minds/"AI Has Arrived". Really? Let me know when an AI can make a half stab at the Turing test. Pretending to be foreign or ignorant for some reason is not allowed. The problems that are being discussed are important, but are not going to materialise any time soon. They require an AI to have a profound understanding of itself and human beings. //www.wired.com/2015/01/ai-arrived-really-worries-worlds-brightest-minds/Once again, such organizations are over sensationalizing this and not making clear that AI will NEVER be "CONSCIOUS" since this is HOLLYWOOD and not reality.(of course this is an evolutionary point of view) We don't define consciousness as a neural network. We assume that consciousness is what's HAPPENING in a neural network of sufficient complexity. There's a huuuuge difference between those two concepts. Also, we've pretty much always tried to describe the human brain as an analogy to whatever the most sophisticated technology of the day is. Before neural networks, the brain was described as a bunch of wires and vacuum tubes...before that as a steam engine and even before that, as a clockwork. That tradition goes all the way back to the ancient greeks and as such really doesn't reflect any qualitative progress in our ability to define or identify consciousness. Not trying to be a downer here. Just stating the simple fact that scientifically speaking there's absolutely NOTHING to justify the assumption that we will inevitably create a self-aware AI. There's no theoretical or empirical evidence, not even on the smallest scale, to support your assumption. //www.wired.com/2015/01/ai-arrived-really-worries-worlds-brightest-minds/"A computer is a glorified abacus. Please keep that in mind. It's a machine. We can make machines to kill people or save them, but each and every one of them depends on us and our ability to choose. They're levers. That's all." //www.wired.com/2015/01/ai-arrived-really-worries-worlds-brightest-minds/"Yes, but consciousness is not a prerequisite for destruction. Albeit simple, look at any kind of malware. Simple code that can spread like wildfire with one objective in mind -- taking over other software. A truly conscientious AI mind would be the exact same risk as any person would be against another-- some good, some bad. All depending on a plethora of factors. Even still, an algorithm hardly has to be "smart" to cause destruction." //www.wired.com/2015/01/ai-arrived-really-worries-worlds-brightest-minds/"It is not true that AI has arrived. Image and speech recognition algorithms are not even close to matching the capabilities of the human cortex. For example, a deep neural net that has been trained to recognize chairs really has no idea what a chair is. It cannot tell you that a chair is for sitting, or that it will fall over if pushed, or that it can be made of any number of materials, or which part of the chair is closer to the camera, to the left or to the right. If you give it a video clip of a chair being moved, it has no idea that each frame of the video represents the same chair. Recognition is really a very small part of what the cortex does." //www.wired.com/2015/01/ai-arrived-really-worries-worlds-brightest-minds/So just some things to consider.

+Awakened2Truth - Disciple of Jesus the Christ One correction: I think that an AI capable of human level intelligence might exist, perhaps even in a decade. Likely not for conventional computers that operate in binary, but once researchers figure out how to engineer an electronic device that works like the human brain. This is however more into the distant future... researchers are on the way but not there yet (last I heard at least).

+MirceaKitsune but they are already doing it in CA. Google cars drive in real time.

+MirceaKitsune "engines will never replace horses, horses are faster and you dont need to twist something in the front to start a horse. I will never buy a engine car because I'm no used to horses." Your kind has been around before and it will exist in the future. These people are called "wrong"

+Ryomaru Yes... I did make a mistake stating that only a 2D image from a camera is used. There are also cameras that can sense depth, radars, etc. Certainly these can be used here as well.However, I do not rationally see a way in which any scanner can detect where an intersection is, how a road curves, understand the painted lanes, and especially perceive then rationalize road signs and traffic lights. How does it detect the edge of a road for instance, so the car doesn't disregard a turn and jump into a lake... especially if for some reason the ground happens to have the same color as the pavement (eg: gray clay)? It's no Dunning-Kreuger, I am simply asking what sort of alien technology they're going to use to process data which to my knowledge needs a human brain to translate.Like I stated, this is possible if every intersection has a location sensitive sensor which explains the state of the traffic lights, at which position offset to steer and for how long, etc. Or maybe using satellite data, and pre-writing the "rules" of each road and the exact movements the car must take along the way... although that would require a GPS that's sensitive to the centimeter. There might be even better ways I didn't think of... but I believe that in general it needs special sensors in roads, I don't see how else.

+MirceaKitsune A classic example of the Dunning-Kreuger effect in action. My favorite part was where you compare a set of LIDAR, RADAR, laser rangefinders, and a database containing a million man-hours of test driving data to 'a 2D image'.

@MrNaryal A bit of research would give you more detail. CISSP is a Certified Information Systems Security Professional Network Security is the security infrastructure of a network In the case of a CISSP, Information system security is what the engineer does in a nutshell, although it'd be better to do some research to find out what this entails, as it will differ slightly between companies that may seem similar at face value.

I disagree re his assertion that product liability will not help. He claims it will overwhelm insurers. I doubt it, not now that insurance is more widespread. Yes, that will make more business for me, but really, that's not why I favor legal action. I just believe that cos should be responsible for their negligence.

I am very happy to see the vidoe from you, hopefully the others also are happy for You describes the future of online security, privacy and society. This lecture is from Singularity University's Graduate Summer Program

Your Video Is Very Useful Sharing Brad Templeton, chairman of the board of the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), describes the future of online security, privacy and society

There is a new product to Protect Children on the Internet. (SnipeSlider) This is amassing! -Take a look : youtube.com/watch?v=48saXiJE9Mg

Waste of time. Skip to 48:55 to hear him actually talk about future of computer security, kind of.

I just finished this video... And its educating. :) Thanks.

Chilling and insightful look at the future of freedom.

Very good and informative thank you for upoloading this

Thanks for the continual upload of fantastic lectures.

I do think he should have dried his hands beforehand.

Mrs. Leakey reminds me of Jamie Lannister just too much :)

Great Interview, Love it.

GMO is unstable and controllable , it is a money machine it has nothing to do with saving the people or the planet, it is not the future and it will not be , the hole idea is insane , why would you not go after natural selection but rather spend millions and make a plant that would take such a chemical abuse and will not let you keep seeds for next year because they will not grow , unless it is money and control you are after

@bighands69 And what happens when these corporations are all corrupt and start making terminator seeds? What happens when you can't keep your own seeds for next year? What will feed people in the 3rd world is innovation ,less corruption and exploitation, peace for a change, and when the 1st world stops raping Africa and the rest for resources watch?v=VV16qVoZ5SA - US trashes $ 1 Bln worth of food

@koneye 2/2 Real innovation is the driving factor behind GMO advances. There is more independent scientists doing research into biotechnology and its applications. Open source biotechnology has been in full swing for many years and has millions of researchers. Stopping GMO's would suit large corporations more than it would suit the people of the third world.

@koneye GMO's are offering a means to feed people in the third world who at present do not have the land or means to grow food. Yes GMO's will be abused by certain corporations but that is not a reason to no do research or bring these products to the market.

This talk was more jam-packed with insights and on a wide range of topics than perhaps any I've seen. And I watch hours of talks almost every day. That kind of awesomeness is intimidating.

No doubt one of the Best and smartest man I have ever heard speak! Would luv to talk to him in person or on the phone or even? Thank you JB6

This guy's so damn captivating. Good voice. Good tempo. Intersting information. Love it! :3

Holy crap! This guy is an Estonian? I'm from Estonia and I've never heard of this guy!

@bighands69 Not sure you got your facts str8 watch?v=eilDbdLAyFs

O SHIT THANK YOU THIS IS AWESOME !!!

Blame the media in your country :>