Marriage records etowah county alabama Videos

Yo sexy ass.

Actually the captain made an ass out of himself. It says canon but maybe it really is a canon!! Lol

+MrUnapologetic - My first job at a law firm was in '76, and not even the post 9/11 exceptions allow the actions taken in this video.   Brown v Texas has not been set aside, and Hiibel made it clear that illegal activity must be evident prior to a demand for ID.  In this case there were no "specific, objective facts establishing reasonable suspicion that the subject was involved in criminal activity."  What other people who have taken photographs have done in the past is moot.  Brown also struck down all requirements that someone provide ID just because an officer wants it.  So maybe you aren't a very good lawyer, if you actually ever were.  

+agb1953 - Resulting to ad hominem, shame on you! I haven't lost a case yet (Real case not TV case) and would gladly retake the bar, New York State. Get your facts straight, or at least your argument. Smith V. City of Cumming only asserts that they have First Amendment rights to gather information about what public officials do on public property (not that doing so was free from suspicion). A point I never called into question. Possibly a fallacious attempt the degrees from the matter at hand? However, it doesn't detract from my prior point of affirming one's eligibility to the rights of which they claim sanctioned by. Given the Post 9/11 law changes signed by President George W. Bush the officer(s) would have been completely warranted for the request of identification. Current laws trump decisions made "long ago".Since I can't bill you for my time I'll let you continue to babble incoherently to whomever may have found the thread interesting, Unapologeticly

+MrUnapologetic Nope. What can constitute reasonable suspicion is not arbitrary. The Supreme Court long ago declared that someone freely exercising a civil right (such as using a camera in a public area) CANNOT be deemed suspicious. And a public area or public space is any place you can enter without invitation or fee, and actual ownership is moot. The citizen in this video did not try to hide when the police arrived, did not try to hide the camera when police arrived, and did NOTHING but continue to engage in a legal activity. Go learn actual law, not TV law. Someone has to be in a place, at a time, and doing something an ordinary person would not do before they can be considered suspicious. Nobody, cops included, could reasonably believe a person on a public sidewalk in broad daylight using a camera to record what they can witness from a public space has, is, or is about to commit a crime. That's the totality of the circumstance. Look up Smith v Cumming from the 11th Circuit, which this particular county happens to be in and which is exactly on point, cops interfering with someone's right to film in public. You are just wrong.

+agb1953 - Reasonable suspicion is a legal standard of proof in United States... #FACTReasonable suspicion is evaluated using the "reasonable person" or "reasonable officer" standard, in which said person in the same circumstances could reasonably suspect a person has been, is, or is about to be engaged in criminal activity. Taking the "totality" of the situation it is reasonable to request his identification to validate citizenship and thereby his freedom. Such measures protect US citizens, not sorry.

+MrUnapologetic - News flash, in the US the cops can't just walk up to you and say "Show me your papers." An officer has to have direct evidence that would lead a reasonable person to believe you had, were, or were about to commit a crime before they can demand anything from you. It's called freedom.

+Adam Reed None at all, you should ask your mother.

+lostchild2003 Does shit smell different between butt holes?I don't brown nose, but I'm curious to know what experiences you've had doing it.

+Shake_N_Bake Explain if you can what in your opinion what constitutes a "wild" statement.

+lostchild2003You said "What we see are assholes with a camera...doing whatever it takes to "create" content that panders to the bottom feeders of society." Yet you watch the very same videos. I am quoting what some police officers say when a "Youtuber" decides to film the police.

+Shake_N_Bake Wild statements? Such as? Explain if you can what in your opinion constitutes a "wild" statement.

+lostchild2003 Are you ok sir? do you need medical attention? You are making wild statements that make us think you are mentally unstable.

You seem to enjoy talking about other men's genitalia don't you Mike?. Are you a closet queer Mike? Is that what you think about all day Mike? Are you fantasizing about sucking my cock as well queer? You know Mike, there are forums other than YouTube where you can live out your desires.

+lostchild2003 I'm not the one licking cop balls. I recognize when someone else is though.

+Mikevdog Is that what you are into, watching men lick each others balls? What sort of freak are you?

+lostchild2003 your tongue  missed a spot on the bald cops' nut sacks.

+magazin9000 I did specify. see, it did go over your head son.

Nah I get what you think. Your opinion just doesn't carry any weight when you don't specify why people are "assholes" for standing up for their rights. I thought you might wanna elaborate on that

+magazin9000 If my post went over your head, I can't do anything about that. 

+lostchild2003 Are you gonna come up with a real argument for your opinion also?

+LMSTactical It's amazing how many of you retired asshole cops aka "Old Bacon" there are out there.  I fully believe a couple of your other comments on other posts that back in your day you would beat the shit out of people, etc.  Guess what?  There are these things called cameras now that every cop you come across hates.  So I think your days of being violent legalized thugs are quickly coming to a close.  Now we the people throw assholes like you in Jail  :-)  :-)  :-).  Wonder how long your friend in South Carolina is going to get for shooting that guy in the back?  I'll bet my 401K that if it weren't caught on camera he would never see the inside of a jail.  Might even still be on the force.  I'll bet you hate cameras as well.  Too fucking bad!!! 

+Ben Dover Im sure she would not even notice your two inch baby dick. Your inflatable doll even laughs at your pathetic ass.

+gat0rbball She works for the Sheriff that is corrupt. He's not harassing them, they are harassing him. This lady deputy was completely unprofessional.

+gat0rbball  In all fairness though your asking him to investigate a "corrupt" sheriff when we just watched a video of a slime ball cop being corrupt and breaking the laws she was sworn to uphold. Your comment is very confusing. I have never heard him be an ass and if he has its been after 20 minutes of lies and vile from dirty cops.

Why Thank you !!!!!

'Asswhole'?  Really?  Not once, but twice??? That's a 'whole' lot of assholes, you idiot.

She gave the Sheriff head.

In support of.

Doug, Did you post statute in support of Jeff, as general information or trying to use it as justification for the police and department of corretions actions.  My reading of it shows Jeff did not violate any of the items stated in 33-602-231 as he was not a visitor nor was he on state property.

Unconstitutional!  I haven't seen the video, but I would assume as always that Jeffery Marcus Grey from St Augustine County Whoop Whoop!  was on public property.  The warden can't trump the constitution by issuing a policy. 

lol but I cant wait

Let her wait on the rest of the video.  How many times do you think she has checked to see if it's been uploaded.  The Gadsden County Sheriffs' Facebook page has been shut down, her phone goes directly to voicemail.   Jeff is probably receiving offers to not release the rest of the video by both the department and Tiffany herself. I don't know what's in the video, but I would imagine that before she pleads the 5th she becomes aware that she was being filmed.  Can't wait to see it wither, but let her squirm a little longer.  She's pathetic!