Home » Video » ...

Is the lemonade diet fda approved Videos

LEMONADE MASTER CLEANSE DIET DAY 5

User Comments

Andriy Poltava commented on 24 Jun 2013

Hey! I'm David.I did -35 lbs last two months.Go to aidadiet.com

iamcamicoco commented on 30 Jul 2011

Great Job!!!! My day 5 is tomorrow....Lets get it!!!!

pedicures commented on 16 Mar 2013

ur feet r sooooooo sexxxi !!!! mmmm mmmm mmmm

D Borah commented on 30 Jul 2011

Thanks Chica lol. Good Luck @iamcamicoco

The master cleanse 2015| Intro day

Hie guys, my name is clara, I am on a mean weightloss journey and id love to share my journey. At the moment i have stated the master cleanse to give me a ...

The Master Cleanse

Cleaning the internal system, natural home remedy lemonade diet, master cleanse, Maple syrup diet, day one of the Master Cleanse.

What We Saw at the Lemonade & Raw Milk Freedom Day

As government crackdowns on raw milk-selling co-ops and children's lemonade stands keep making headlines, political and health food activists are raising ...

User Comments

Doron B commented on 30 Aug 2012

yes its a low number of deaths, and if you are a healthy person the chance of serious harm is very low, but that number is over only 1% of the milk consumption. also is chance for death the only criteria you take into consideration? what about the chance to get sick? and infecting others? those illnesses are extremely unpleasant. i will say this again, i don't challenge your or anybody's liberty, i just want people to know the risks and also that natural\raw things aren't necessarily healthier.

Siegetower commented on 21 Aug 2012

Making cows produce more milk has nothing to do with pasteurisation or homogenisation of milk. Flouride is a natural element, deficient in our diet. How many studies say its not poisonous. Many water catchments in England only received flouride in recent decades, not 100 years ago like in America/Australia and our teeth are fine, and UK kids are fine. Vaccinations are not preservatives they are a weak strain of virus aimed at generating an immune response. Bacteria also create deadly infections

TigerghostPictures commented on 20 Aug 2012

If the government did not subsidize certain industries, such as oil or the farm industry, then the market would destabilize and we could even see another crash looming. Say the government halted every bit of money that it gives to the oil industry [which is something that I support by the way], then the price of gas would literally shoot up to near $10/gallon. Many people would not support such a drastic measure, but at least it would get people interested in alternatives. $8.35/gal in Germany.

Siegetower commented on 20 Aug 2012

Because I know I'm getting a consistent product in terms of nutrition. I'm not justgetting white water full of permate (not that Im arguing this raw milk is like that). I'm getting genuine milk with a known quantity of cream. Think of how random in quality your food would be if eg bread makers didn't effectively homogenise their recipes. One batch, full of fibre, the next, next to none. I know but supermarkets take that to the extreme, but like everything, there needs to be common sense limits.

Paul commented on 25 Jul 2013

I just don't see the logic in NOT pasteurizing milk. First of all pasteurization is not some kind of wacky chemical laden process it's just a process that quickly heats the milk in order to destroy any harmful bacteria. You lose a minute amounts of nutrients. While of course drinking raw milk is not going to cause you harm every time it's an increased, unnecessary risk that I see as foolish. I would not say that "Bacteria is the devil" but it's foolish to think that bacteria can not cause harm.

Siegetower commented on 25 Aug 2012

1. Define industrialisation. Do you mean the Industrial Revolution of the 18th/19th Centuries? There ARE demonstrated flouride deficiencies if you care to go look them up. Post-trial fluoridation began in 1934 didn't it? At the time UK and US aircraft were made with timber and canvas. Aluminium took off in WW2 yes, many years after fluoridation began. Your timing on this is way out. 2. Well done for introducing chemistry but fluorine is an anion, not a cation. 3. It exists naturally. Pollution?

Siegetower commented on 21 Aug 2012

And furthermore with bacteria, you're aware they are EVERYWHERE on Earth, you're breathing in millions of bacteria from the air as you read this. Many are harmless, many are beneficial (yes, including the bacteria in our gut), and some are malicious. Are you aware that before penicillin it was common for small cuts to peoples' skin to generate bacterial infections that killed. People died from shaving cuts, paper cuts. Along wth other processes, killing bacteria is a necessary human process.

Siegetower commented on 23 Aug 2012

So just one study forms the basis of your firm determination that this natural mineral is a cancer producing, IQ dropping poison? Did you read the report and understand its' conclusions in their entirety or did you just google 'flouride' and find this study, as that's what I just did. Furthermore if you can find a natural watercourse that does not have a trace level of flouride, worldwide, please, point it out. It's already everywhere just not in amounts that are the most beneficial to us.

yakyakyak69 commented on 20 Aug 2012

Want freedom? Progressivism (freedom-fearing "Liberalism") is defined as "change via gov't action". Authoritarianism via "central planning" backed by armed military & police. FACT: Politicians are just cronies to their largest corporate & "special interest" campaign backers. Yes, "progressives" (Democrat & NeoCon) get what they sow... Tyranny, monopoly, & corrupt cronyism! "Liberal Progressives" are truly STUPID serfs of the political class & their "special interest" campaign backers who t

Siegetower commented on 21 Aug 2012

You'll have to explain how hormones are at any stage a part of the process of pastaurisation. Making additives is not pasteurisation. We've used pasteurised milk for a relatively short time that includes life expectancy averaging above 68 years old. Unpasteurised milk has been here for millenia, most of which the life expectancy was averaged under 38 years old. Please refer to my original comment that started this conversation about the processes that have increased our standard of living.

Siegetower commented on 22 Aug 2012

HA. Isn't ReasonTV a channel of libertarians? Free choice, free decisions, free thinking. But I have a point of view contrary to yours and you want me to go away? Right. As I've said, flouride is a totally natural element humans need in certain amounts. (like we do with many minerals). It just happens that most of the flouride on Earth is locked up as the mineral flouride in rocks. When industry found a way to liberate the flouride we need that is otherwise deficient, Great! I'll take it!

jowb63 commented on 20 Aug 2012

Do people have the right to sell each other poison knowing they intend to consume it. Yes. You own your own body, you have the right to your own life and your own body and you have the right to buy the poison (think drugs and Cigars). The one possible exception to this may be if the seller is lying to buyer and saying its actually not poison or doesn't have any harmful effects when he known that the product is harmful. I would rather not get government involved in this but fraud is fraud.

Siegetower commented on 21 Aug 2012

I have taken the time to watch this video, I disagree and initially just said: "Respectfully I'll still be drinking homogenised and pasteurised milk". Of course I am aware that the process is not perfect, but it is preferable to me to remove/nullify the bacteria that may enter the milk from cow faeces, to name one source of bacteria. Im not from a purely urban family, family farmers adequately showed me where food comes from and how it is obtained. You're not saying anything I don't know.

TigerghostPictures commented on 20 Aug 2012

So you admit that it is capitalism that is to blame. Entrepreneurs may have a very new and great concept, and then a large corporation buys the patent from the inventor and locks it away due to fear of competition. You know, there have even been instances when corporations have hired assassins to kill whistle-blowers, union leaders, and competitors. Corporate warfare does exist and it is more dangerous than anyone knows. It's funny that cartels are shooting us with our own guns isn't it?

snappa52 commented on 21 Aug 2012

Hormones are part of the process of production which makes cows produce more milk. Harvard came out with a study that found fluoride was poisonous. No offense, if fluoride was a benefit the English would have better oral hygeine. Vaccinations are fine as long as you don't have to suffer the side effects of the preservatives and other additives. Life expectancy has many, many more variables than the type of milk one drinks. Bacteria is part of the immune system of the gut and of the skin

wjestick commented on 24 Aug 2012

1. There was never a fluoride deficiency before industrialisation. TheWar created a massive surplus due to Aluminium production for war planes and the the Use or Fluorine in enriching Uranium to make bombs. 2. Fluorine is the most reactive cation known. It even attacks glass! In the body it disrupts enzymes. Since the our whole biochemistry depends on enzymes, the potential detrimental effects are unlimited. 3. 99% of fluoride in water is not consumed, it just pollutes the environment

mixmastermeeks commented on 20 Aug 2012

Again...your point is incoherent. Please explain why if the patents they are buying could be so lucrative they could threaten the corporations existence that a corporation would lock such a lucrative item up and not market it themselves. Or why if the patent had the potential of being that lucrative why the inventor sold it to begin with. And certainly I am not moved by vague accusations of corporate assassins. And it isn't funny because our gov, not corporations, gave them the guns.

wjestick commented on 25 Aug 2012

Anything can be a pollutant if it is introduced into the environment in high enough concentration. Carbon Monoxide, Nitrogen Dioxide, Sodium Choride, the list goes on. Fluoridation is forced medication that has no benefit for most people who consume it. Only claimed benefit are Children 5-12 years. 1. No dose control 2. No medical supervision 3. No long term controlled safety studies 4. No allowance for other environmental sources 5. 99% never consumed just pollutes the environment

Jordan Holmes commented on 21 Aug 2012

Someones on the defensive...so let me help you. If I could go back in time I would stop slavery, end feudalism and the reign of kings, stop the invention of the atom bomb, and prevent the creation of GMOs. what your trying to say is that I am against innovation. everything you mention has an invention, an updated system or increase in knowledge that has replaced it. but when it comes to NATURE and natural things, It was right the first time. You rarely out do nature. Germaphobe.

wjestick commented on 25 Aug 2012

1. Where did you get 1934 from. The first controlled trial on a large population was in Grand Rapids Michigan in 1945. Fluoridation became US policy in 1951. Wikepedia give a basic time line, use it! 2. Fluorine is still highly reactive, attacks glass, disrupts enzymes, and disrupts body chemistry detrimentally and unpredictably. 3. Natural Fluoride form is Calcium Fluoride, not sodium Fluoride. Natural levels are up to 0.3ppm in fresh water not 1-2ppm in tap water. (continued)

mixmastermeeks commented on 20 Aug 2012

The truth is that oil companies love this green energy joke. Oil companies probably make as much money on ridiculous gov green energy subsidies as they do on oil. Which is why they buy up ridiculous green patents. They get subsidies to research them. So the gov spends money paying people to research projects that will never go anywhere and no company has an incentive to only pursue those that will work. So again the supporting the gov goes against what you say you want.

Siegetower commented on 22 Aug 2012

I don't listen to those girly yoghurt commercials telling me this is so. I know they replenish themselves just fine after any antibiotics treatment. If you truly believe a given source of food has active antibacterial agents in it that will have an antibiotic effect in you, the consumer, then choose a different supplier, brand or product. Or you can research whether the product is the way it is through selective breeding and high protein diet, rather than antibiotics.

snappa52 commented on 22 Aug 2012

But you listen to people when they tell you to eat the industrial waste labeled as fluoride? It's been proven that probiotics help people with horrible acid reflux caused by antibiotics killing off the bacteria in the gut. They don't replenish just fine for everyone. Why are you commenting on this page? If you want to subscribe to group think do so, you're not adding anything to this subject by condescending the choices these people make with half cocked information

DemiseFromTheSkies commented on 20 Aug 2012

Part 1 "I wouldn't drink raw milk either because it has BACTERIA." Well how interesting it is that we have "liberty lovers" and "freedom advocates" standing up for the right to consume raw milk while IGNORANTLY SPEWING BULLSHIT FEARS. Really, you're so concerned about bacteria in the milk? Why don't you do some reading and realize they are BENEFICIAL bacteria. Pasteurizing KILLS THE BENEFITS. Fucking idiots. You think we don't have the tech to produce safe raw milk?

Link for boards:

Link for your site:

Current link: