Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease symptoms mayo clinic . , . . . . Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease usually causes no signs and symptoms. With your doctor if you ...
A Martial Life - Episode #20 - Liver Transplant
In this episode Don visits his friend who he hasn't seen in 20 years. Mitch Giampaoli is a Deputy Sheriff in San Mateo County and is in need of a liver transplant.
BioLayne Video Log 4 - Myths About Protein
In the 4th Video Log, Layne lays out some common protein misconceptions and does his best to break down the actual science. *disclaimer* This video is not ...
Man this is brilliant!
One thing though, what did you say for "we are meant to eat meat?" "K19?"
(@ 11.43) I am trying to google it to know more but can't find anything,
did I get it wrong?
So you talked about 30-40g being the "max" sensible protein intake per
sitting and this to be no more frequent than 3-5 hours. Assuming an average
day (of 16 hours), the "max protein intake" caps out at 200g?
You have also talked about the metabolism "slowing" down to accommodate for
elevated protein intake. To what degree? I'm assuming having an intake of
200g of protein once a day WILL make a difference? And on the other side of
the spectrum: Assuming I only have three sittings per day: What would be
the max protein being actually used anabolically?
Oh, and I'd also like you hear your thoughts on sleep. It seems
counter-intuitive, that one would NOT eat most of ones protein in the
evening, right before anabolic processes are most active. (I could be wrong
about the latter.)
+HomunculusProject +biolayne Me too. I'm doing Intermittent Fasting, and I only eat about 3 meals a day within a ~6 hour timeframe - the first of those 3 meals being very high in protein (~100g) usually.I'm wondering if this makes any significant difference in terms of total muscle protein synthesis per day, and thus building muscle.There are studies suggesting that eating 5-6 meals spread out over the course of the day is (slightly) superior to eating 2-3 meals within a short timeframe when it comes to building muscle.Then there are other studies showing it does not make a difference at all - it's only the total amount of protein being consumed that has an effect on MPS and so on.Research seems to still be quite inconclusive when it comes to that topic.
+Muhmet Saad As an MD myself, I'm disappointed how you can be so disrespectful towards a fellow scientist. I've learnt most of my knowledge regarding nutrition and exercise from people like Dr Norton rather than from medical school and my postgraduate studies. When my patients ask me about weight loss etc, I can actually give them some real advice backed by science now. Your attitude really does a disservice to the medical profession, who already have a bad reputation from giving poor nutritional advice for decades. I would highly recommend listening to what Dr Norton and other experts are saying with an open mind. Thanks.
i was referring to myself (my shock as an MD and researcher in biochemistry ) . and i didn't criticized you as a person nor your scientific degree .. i was just disappointing that the information on this video was superficial and didn't come from deep understanding and integration to many fundamental concepts . im sorry if i offended you as person i totally respect you and your degree, yet i don't respect nor value the information presented on this video .
+Muhmet Saad I'm a PhD not an MD. I'm disappointed you don't know the difference. That means I actually did RESEARCH in a lab, formed hypothesis and tested them. Where did you do your research on protein metabolism? Thanks