Home » Video » ...

Federalist party pdf Videos

BookTV: "The Tea Party: Three Principles"-- Elizabeth Price Foley

Constitutional law professor Elizabeth Price Foley joins Book TV at the Los Angeles Times Book Festival to discuss her new book, "The Tea Party: Three ...

European External Action Service an unnecessary burden on taxpayer - James Carver MEP

//www.ukipmeps.org | //www.ukip.org • European Parliament, Brussels, 23 September 2014 • James Carver MEP (West Midlands), UK Independence ...

User Comments

guydecervens commented on 25 Sep 2014

You could carve quite a bit of excess bureaucratic fat from this bureaucratic monster. But I'm sure the people who are enjoying the five star service on Fiji would be a little disappointed

Would West Mids Combined Authority be a help to EU Territorial Governance? - Bill Etheridge MEP

//www.ukipmeps.org | //www.ukip.org • European Parliament, Brussels, 13 July 2015 • Bill Etheridge MEP, UK Independence Party (West Midlands), ...

User Comments

SuperLuckyLad commented on 15 Jul 2015

What the hell is a "Director of Spatial Foresight"?

teepriest commented on 15 Jul 2015

+SuperLuckyLad It's a gravytrain appointment, get paid, don't do anything adventurous, and the man who makes sure your paycheck arrives? support and obey him in all he asks of you, otherwise we'll replace you.

kmg501 commented on 14 Jul 2015

The more I watch how these short videos play out, the more convinced I become that UKIP is either co-opted or a fraud.

Stu Lee commented on 15 Jul 2015

+kmg501 a) if that's what you think, you've not watched and/or understood how the EU worksb) then what the hell are you watching for anyway? bog off back to your LibLabCon EU love in circlejerk channel

Is Democracy Overrated? Q&A with Columnist David Harsanyi

"I think the Founders weren't wary enough of democracy," says David Harsanyi, senior editor at The Federalist and a nationally syndicated columnist. "I think ...

User Comments

Bezlichnyy commented on 23 Apr 2014

Correction, the U.S has a Republican Government. This type of government permits citizens to vote through a representative. See the U.S. Constitution for details.

Bezlichnyy commented on 24 Apr 2014

+Kizone KaprowLol I find your sense of humor refreshing. Thanks for commenting.

Kizone Kaprow commented on 24 Apr 2014

You might assume that libertarians would know the difference between unlimited democracy and a representational republic. You would be wrong. This is YouTube. The puppets believe everything they are told.

Nate Saint Ours commented on 23 Apr 2014

Its sad that young people feel forced to be liberal/socialist because they never heard good arguments for conservative ideals. Mainly because modern conservatives are not conservative when it comes to businesses. I don't understand how you can want to take power away from big government and not want to take power away from big corporations. Power is power.

Brucie Bee commented on 23 Apr 2014

Yes, I agree that's why I'm a Libertarian for reduced gov't obstruction & fair open markets. Oligarchy and big gov't creates excessive cronyism which left unchecked weakens democracy & leads to a chaotic lifestyle & civil strife. Absolute power corrupts absolutely- Acton 1874

Felicia Cravens commented on 23 Apr 2014

"I think people feel libertarian about the world, but they don't vote libertarian that often..." THAT.

Jorg Ancrath commented on 27 Apr 2014

Governments have done a good job of keeping people afraid of each other and dependent.

Brucie Bee commented on 23 Apr 2014

Totally disagree w/ this but this is the crazy anarcho-side of Libertarianism that is so off putting & why it will never muster enough votes to ever participate in governance. Last time I checked the United States is a bicameral Constitutional Republic federalism w/ States rights, for your FYI 49 states have plebiscite. Voters decide on issues that don't infringe on the US constitution & this only very rarely on amendments (obviously US Constution is sacred). Actually the 2party system is reducing direct representation in popular vote as more States want the 'popular vote metric' in Electoral College. There should be better ratio-to-rep meaning more congress members and they should be elected in multi-member districts under the proportional vote. In fact most democracies in the world use proportioned vote as did the US in some cities and states till 1940's. //www.nationalpopularvote.com/map.php Real Libertarians are more democratic not less!

Brucie Bee commented on 25 Apr 2014

+Tom Hines The Rights of the individual already enshrined in Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution. No VOTE would or could trump these two laws.[We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.]

Brucie Bee commented on 23 Apr 2014

+surrealnumber Yea, this is an ideologue Reason Mag Rag vid clip.Figured it would be populated w/ silly commentary.

surrealnumber commented on 23 Apr 2014

+Brucie Bee grouping individualists? is that like generalizing specifics? 3.4+3.5= something more than 1?i talk about legal systems and call out you bullshit claim about how great and libertarian it is when governments make people suffer for their own glut.i am calling out your bullshit, i do not care about your general theory of libertarianism. you can have whatever opinion you want, but when you use falsehoods to back it, be prepared to have people call you out on it.

Brucie Bee commented on 23 Apr 2014

+Bleakfacts Reality is there was LITTLE gov't because human beings were use to living independently and worked to make the stuff like food they grew and lived off of. But we live in the MODERN ERA where there is economic inter-dependence and specialization. Libertarian values are still in play but not the romantic notion you suggest.

Brucie Bee commented on 23 Apr 2014

+surrealnumber Anarcho-Cap libertarians do not figure in votes received. Maybe in % possible w/ proportional voting.Only 7-8 libertarian (history) candidates at any level of gov't running under the banner LIBERTARIAN PARTY ever got elected - this is too low.Just sayin' if U don't insure participation in gov't or don't vote you have zero stake in governance - don't participate.The only people in the modern political era who have made a difference are Dr. Ron Paul & Mr.Garry Johnson but they ran under the 2party banner.The respect Libertarian gained in gov't was achieved by them & the only way to get Libertarian ideas across to the public is to win elections in fairPROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION ELECTIONS where you stand a better chance of getting elected as a LIBERTARIAN.

Bleakfacts commented on 23 Apr 2014

+Brucie Bee No the US government has a history of abusing individuals right where ever it can, but a most of the US started with little or no government, so that economic growth, for the most part, outpaced the burdensome growth of government and it's inherit corruption.

Tom Hines commented on 23 Apr 2014

+Brucie Bee and it is being undermined by democracy. The people have decided they like the bill of rights except when they don't like it. We can make excuses for them by criticizing the two party system but no one is enforcing this system by gunpoint.

Brucie Bee commented on 23 Apr 2014

+Tom Hines OK ... weak governance leads to violence and a failed state. But as a minarchist small gov't effective rule of law maintain a healthy state. The US has tradition of individual rights but this is being undermined as we speak.

surrealnumber commented on 23 Apr 2014

picking failed states and implying that they are libertarian in anyway shape or form is pure bullshit.Syria and Somalia are not libertarian states, hell they even have civil law legal systems therefore the government has the authority to do anything at any point.if your laws are not common in nature you are a slave to your government.

Brucie Bee commented on 23 Apr 2014

+surrealnumber For your FYI most nations who subscribe to the electoral process //www.idea.int/esd/world.cfm choose proportional voting. Discussing distasteful weak democracy systems like: Canada-France-US-UK or odious failed states is not my fav discussion.

Tom Hines commented on 23 Apr 2014

Yeah we know how the federal government was supposed to work. What we are saying is the majority has no right to trample on individual rights. Just because a certain point of view is popular does not mean it is right and it certainly doesn't mean it can be forced upon an individual.

surrealnumber commented on 23 Apr 2014

+Brucie Beesomalia still has a large tax and regulatory structure, it is a failed state, not a libertarian one. syria had its government overthrown by the "good democracies" in the US and europe. also not libertarian.

Brucie Bee commented on 23 Apr 2014

+Ian Sean Montgomery Again... bicameral Constitutional REPUBLIC.Look up meaning of 'republic' as opposed to monarchy or totalitarian systems or anarchy (weak governance). Syria, Somalia are examples.The US Constitution is a check on rampant majoritarian actions so is the balance of power (div of gov't). But increased 2 party voting system duopoly gives rise to oligarchical power in the US. This needs to be put in check by minoritarian congress that reflects votes actually obtained by its members.

Ian Sean Montgomery commented on 23 Apr 2014

I guess it depends on your reference point. More democratic than the current status quo? Yes. Democratic as a matter of principle? Of course not. Then we'd be "Majoritarians".

Link for boards:

Link for your site:

Current link: