Enter your query, example: how not cry when slicing onion or how to enter an Free Italian Sex Webcams?
Observing the universe using visible light Videos
- 1. Solving Cosmic Cold Cases
- 2. Seeing the First Light
- 3. Observing The Universe From The Bottom Of The Planet: Matt Dobbs at TEDxYouth@Montreal
- 4. Hubble Space Telescope - Better Than Ever!
- 5. New Look at the Infant Universe
- 6. AIRGLOW at ORM (La Palma)
- 7. Spitzer
- 8. NRAO | The Very Large Array Observes Hercules A
Solving Cosmic Cold Cases
From ESO, spectacular star-filled nights frame the telescope array of the new ALMA project, where scientists are taking on the mysteries of the cold hidden ...
User Comments
gmodpenguin24
commented
on 19 Apr 2013
You have a serious case of stupidity, that person who looked through his
telescope knows more then you will ever know in your entire stupid fucking
life, unless you disprove what I know and what millions of scientist know
you can suck my fucking dick you stupid son of a bitch. I can't believe how
fucking stupid and ignorant you are my head is going explode from how
fucking stupid you are! HOW THE FUCK CAN YOU BE SO STUPID!?!?!?! WHAT IS
WRONG WITH YOU!??!?! Now read my next reply am out of chara
BoRiCuAnPR
commented
on 09 May 2013
oohh look we've got another star wars bullshit believer I choose not to
accept the idiotic assumptions of astronomers who don't know shit about the
universe and make stories for dumb asses like you to feel more inteligent
or much better to come up with stupid stories like the big bang LOL the big
bang and feed it to people of your kind and justify the waste of money that
could be used to feed others in need humans haven't been able to send mens
to mars and yet they think they know it all LOL
ForeverFlame88
commented
on 03 May 2013
Macroevolutionism: a big Lie. Share2care! :) Subscribe! UTube: "CSE-01 Age
of the Earth (FULL) Kent Hovind." Google: "SCIENCE VS EVOLUTION." If I get
buried on top of a Dragon, doesn't prove I evolved from the Dragon.
Homologous structures prove a Common Designer who designed similarly
because He knew similar functions would require similar parts! Tautology:
Who survives? The fittest. Who's the fittest? Those who survive! Richest,
luckiest, funniest, quickest, strongest, etc.
ForeverFlame88
commented
on 03 May 2013
Theoretically, it takes 20 stars to EXPLODE SIMULTANEOUSLY NEAR EACH OTHER
to produce enough pressure 2 form a brand new star. That has never been
observed. A more logical explanation is that stars were CREATED in
equilibrium since it is impossible for a gas cloud to condense, by gravity,
into a star, regardless of how massive the cloud is since the more gas u
have, the more the heated gas wants to EXPAND, PREVENTING formation of a
star by purely naturalistic means.
gmodpenguin24
commented
on 20 Apr 2013
That first comment you made and deleted was fucking retarded, fix your
retarded comment. If you don't wanna be a "know it all" then you are far
past the definition of retarded you are what I call a creationist tard. I
wanna know everything, I wanna learn all I can and understand why things
happen, you comment didn't make me feel bad but made me want to learn more
thing so next time I know a bit more and add more to the argument. So fuck
you.
BoRiCuAnPR
commented
on 23 May 2013
oh Im sorry where are my manners, I wasn't talking for you in fact I don't
even know who you are, I was talking for me and for those who think like
me, so don't think for a second that I was talking for you, and yeah you're
another of those who think that astronomers know it all LOL tell me did the
earth and moon where created by inteligent rocks colliding with each others
and then putting all living species in earth? LOL
MachinesProductions
commented
on 24 Apr 2013
Not at all. In fact, I was waiting for someone to bring this up. The
Catholic Church wanted to kill him because he had 'eccentric' ideas
compared to the teachings of the church. However, these teachings (or
doctrines) were somewhat corrupt, and did not actually express the true
teachings that the Bible was putting forth, therefore giving the church a
false base that Galileo was killed upon.
psycotria
commented
on 08 May 2013
Great vid! Excellent value on money & time spent. I choose to ACCEPT the
findings of the intellectual giants we call SCIENTISTS, while morons such
as @BoRiCuAnPR offer pathetic Appeals to Incredulity & Ignorance in feeble
attempts to rationalize the irrational; their sad need to call belief
knowledge and cling to the wishful-thinking of ignorant savages from the
edges of History.
MachinesProductions
commented
on 24 Apr 2013
I was making a general statement, but from my own perspective, I take the
Christian stance. Let me give you an example. Galileo. He was a Christian.
And yet also a scientist. We have accepted and enhanced so many of his
theories into our lives. How can a generalisation that religion is
'anti-science' when you see some of the greatest minds being religious
people themselves?
gmodpenguin24
commented
on 18 Apr 2013
Okay I have to make sure, is every one here brain dead, mental, or
religious? Cause this stupidity is off the charts. Cosmic microwave
background radiation is real I didn't hear it from some dude I heard it
from many scientists and I studied it in my science course, so for you to
say its fake shows how much of a fucking retarded moronic piece of flying
shit you are.
BoRiCuAnPR
commented
on 24 Jun 2013
Ohhh is that so? then what is the title of this vid? or what about the
millions and billions of year they say the universe is? or the big bang?
LOL the big bang or how the earth was created by colliding rocks? LOL
colliding inteligent rocks? I can keep going and never end this stupid list
of bullshit astronomers likes to tell!
HiggsBoson®
commented
on 20 May 2013
Our lives? To my understanding, astronomy is the study of celestial objects
not our lives. Please don't confuse astronomy with astrology. You obviously
do not understand physics, if you would, you would know the reason why
looking further is looking back in time. It's a shame to have you as a
member of homo sapiens.
gmodpenguin24
commented
on 20 Apr 2013
Are you serious? You made me look like an idiot after you said the
scientist that look through telescopes with "fancy colors" are full of
crap? Scientist that have telescopes hundreds of kilometers in the air,
that landed rovers on mars and landed men on the moon. Yea keep telling
yourself that you moronic fuck.
BoRiCuAnPR
commented
on 19 Apr 2013
uuhh so it isn't the same thing? studying the same thing as the dude who
looked at space with a telescope told his bullshit to another one and that
other one told you his crap about wanna be know it all? yeah keep trying
tell me more about what you know with those fancy science names to make
them sound "smart".
mrmeatymeatball
commented
on 07 May 2013
20 stars? Hmmm that's impressive too bad you're forgetting gravity's
effects when you're dealing with the truly astronomical volumes of gas
we're talking about. Of course you'd have accept Einstein's theory of
relativity which of course you don't because Master Don't-drop-the-soap
Hovind told you it was evil.
BoRiCuAnPR
commented
on 17 Apr 2013
we CAN'T tell how old is the universe because time laws only apply here on
earth there is no day and night in the universe there is no weeks months
and much less years! and yeah it might be pathetic to you but it isn't for
me!! what really is pathetic is you with your stupid assumptions!!
Alfonso Ramirez
commented
on 19 May 2013
Great, no doubt. I think that a field with temperature over 0 K could be
considered a very heat place by a particle at 0 K. ( A singularity, perhaps
). I am as an amateur no professional working the idea of volume generated
by heat and cold. Thanks a lot for you targeting my interest.
Skyler Myers
commented
on 17 Apr 2013
Not quite. We know how old the Universe is due to calculations of the
redshift of distant galaxies using Hubble's constant, among other methods.
So you know how old the Universe is better than modern science because it
says so in a book of ancient myths written by primitive men?
UnknownXV
commented
on 17 Apr 2013
We invest hundreds if not thousands of times more money in the effort of
killing ourselves than we do exploring that final frontier of space. That..
is depressing. If we cannot get above our petty differences, perhaps as a
species we aren't as deserving as we thought we were.
BoRiCuAnPR
commented
on 17 Apr 2013
WE KNOW????? humans don't KNOW anything about the universe what you know
now is theories out of the ass of astronomers high on bullshit!! and light
shifting is not accurate to measure age on anything it really annoys me
people like degrading others for there beliefs!!
BoRiCuAnPR
commented
on 20 May 2013
did you really read what I wrote or did you rush your self to reply that
stupid answer of knowing what astronomers do? please don't confuse my
answer and stop trying to act like a know it all because I know what is
astronomy and astrology is... sheesh
BoRiCuAnPR
commented
on 20 May 2013
please do your self a favor and shut your computer off so you can stop
learning idiotic stuff astronomers tell everyday of our lives like the big
bullshit bang or the other one that says if they look deeper in space
they're going back in time LOOL
BoRiCuAnPR
commented
on 19 Apr 2013
yeah you can't answer shit that's why you're insulting and of course that
person who looks in a telescope to outer space will know more than me
because you believe the bullshit he says like the one you just told me the
big bang LOL
onyx1186
commented
on 14 Apr 2013
glad to have helped sorry i must have read what you posted wrong but others
can read my previous comment and maybe learn how to also :) yeah i was
blown away also did a lot more research on it to understand it better.
Seeing the First Light
//www.facebook.com/ScienceReason ... The Hidden Universe of the Spitzer Space Telescope (Episode 5): Seeing the first light from the first objects in the ...
User Comments
TheTelevisionPirate
commented
on 22 Feb 2010
I mean that last comment with all the love, and sincerity in the world!!
But it's true in the most general sense possible! Because apparently what,
still 80 percent of people apparently feel obligated to some god in the
sky!?? What a joke! I bet you could easily shed another 10 or so percent of
that because I know many people are worried about becoming outcasts in
their friends, and family! Thats how religious people roll, if you don't
think like me your burning in hell, and I have no time 4 u
TheTelevisionPirate
commented
on 22 Feb 2010
I thought to myself, because she's a really nice lady... Yeah, you better
add that piece of information... Because we are not bound by god's clock,
or watchful eye! Your nuts if you really think god knows everything your
doing... come on! You made him human! HUMANS MAKE MISTAKES.. That's another
reason I think making god out to be this perfect person/think/godlike
whatever... Is a joke! Surely god made some mistakes! I'll give you one
right now! That he made a bunch of retards like US!! HAHA!
Tapecutter59
commented
on 02 Mar 2010
It acts a bit like an explosion but what is expanding is space itself.
Nobody has a clue what is causing space to expand. The "smoking gun" of the
BB theory is the predction of the CMBR and it's subsequent observation at
exactly the wavelength the theory predicted. It would seem to me that
humans have just as much trouble imagining infinity as they do imagining
nothingness. Personally I like the idea that we are inside a giant black
hole but there are some technical problems with that idea.
TheTelevisionPirate
commented
on 22 Feb 2010
A bunch of selfish righteous morons! They think we're above all other
species! WE ARE NOT! Religion is dangerous in so many ways, and if the
world ended as we knew it because of our mistakes they would say it's all
part of "god's plan!" Wha... wha... what?!?! Okay, retards think what you
want. But if you ask me that's exactly why America is in the shape it is
in! I had my neighbor tell me she doesn't care what happens.. It's all part
of god's plan, and she real quickly said.. "my opinion."
DistinctiveBlend
commented
on 23 Feb 2010
It hardly stops at "a profound sense of awe" many a 'spiritualist' would be
outraged at such a limited definition. I don't use it that way and I view
it as a weasel word sucking the grandeur out of the universe as revealed by
naturalism and replacing it with some vague sense of mysticism. While
turning my own words upon me is humorous you missed the point. The popular
usage may very well defy etymology but it can't escape it; therefore
spirituality will always keep its roots in mysticism.
TheTelevisionPirate
commented
on 22 Feb 2010
If we were still tied down to religious zealots strings, we'd still be
saying the Earth is the center of the Universe, and that stars are lights
that god gave us so we can find out way around easier at night! That sounds
so stupid, and now religious morons are saying there is absolutely no way
there is other life out there... Well, y not? If god made the Universe from
what your saying, why wouldn't he spread life around the universe? Bcuz
it's about ME ME ME! That's all they think about!
Tapecutter59
commented
on 01 Mar 2010
@STROTCH According to modern physics there is no such thing as nothing.
Note that the guy in the vid said "almost nothing", cosmologists do not
claim the universe came from nothing they claim it came from a primodial
particle. Religious people who don't like the idea are the ones who claim
science says it comes from nothing. Science says we are stuck inside the
expanding primordial particle along with spacetime and can't see out. Ie:
it doesn't claim to know where the particle came from.
LordSlag
commented
on 23 Feb 2010
No, all light travels at the same velocity. Science must study this era of
the universe in infrared because as light travels vast distances over long
periods of time, the expansion of space increases it's wavelength. The
visible light emitted by the first stars has been traveling for so long in
the expanding space of our universe that it has been stretched into the
infrared portion of the spectrum. There are also other ways in which light
can be red shifted, such as a receding source.
IconOfSin88
commented
on 22 Feb 2010
Creationists, for an example, use the term "explosion" to ridicule the big
bang theory. I'd rather have accurate information given out instead of
overly simplified information, which might cause misnomers. We were told in
school that the big bang wasn't an explosion in the way we know it, but
rather an expansion of time-space. The people in my class didn't seem to
have trouble accepting this when it was explained. I don't think we should
underestimate student's learning capabilities.
Tapecutter59
commented
on 01 Mar 2010
The term "big bang" comes from an astronomer who was trying to discredit
the theory (Fred Hoyle). Supporters of the theory didn't like the name and
pointed out an explosion is expanding matter not expanding spacetime.
Nowadays the argument has largely been forgotten, cosmologists all refer to
it as the big bang theory and many use "explode" and "expand"
interchangeably. Of course I could be talking out of my arse but that's how
I recall it.
LordSlag
commented
on 23 Feb 2010
Light slows down when traveling through any medium that isn't a hard
vacuum. Further, my answer to bangnl94 has nothing to do with the speed of
light through any material medium. Instead, it dealt with why the light
from the first stars in the universe must be studied in the infrared
wavelength. Please do not confuse him, or the issue, by pointing out things
that do not apply merely to try and give the appearance of intelligence.
IanBillings00
commented
on 25 Feb 2010
@ShadowofProclimaton This guy has a PhD in astrophysics... You would think
he might know about this. Actually, I am sure he does, but he seems to be
trying to keep things at the level of the layman. An awful policy if you
ask me, others need to bring themselves up to speed on their own times. I
wish these people wouldn't lower the bar just to get attention from people
who don't care enough to try to understand.
Craigipedia
commented
on 22 Feb 2010
STOP CALLING THE BIG BANG AN EXPLOSION IT WAS NOT AN EXPLOSION... YOU ARE
FUCKING SCIENTISTS GET YOUR HEAD OUT OF YOUR ASS. Us calling it an
"explosion" to help out the laypeople is what Sean Hannity and other
fucking tools use to make scientific people look retarded and hypocritical.
Use proper terminology and fuck everyone who doesn't understand, you can't
dumb yourself down.
hutchings000
commented
on 23 Feb 2010
@Gesmehod We still have to build the massive telescope arrays orbiting our
sun, that will be able to see the surface of distant planets ;) Not to
mention see the little roadways and buildings of ancient alien
civilizations. xD I'm thinking that if we discover alien life, it will be
with a telescope, long before we get the chance to use a microscope ;) So
excitingly Cool! :D
Tapecutter59
commented
on 02 Mar 2010
Yes, our ability to see patterns in random noise basically explains all
superstistious behaviour. There were some ingenious experiments in the 50's
showing that pigeons do the same thing. Being aware of that cognative trap
helps avoid it but none of us are completely immune to it. But what use is
a brain if it's not used to chew on mysteries. ;)
Roy G Biv
commented
on 26 Feb 2010
Correct me if im wrong but when educated people say "everything in our
universe burst into being in a tremendous explosion" Isnt stating that it
is an explosion incorrect? I understand they try to water it down for the
layman but isnt it better to use correct terminology. Can someone confirm
this for me?
gl2findme
commented
on 22 Feb 2010
I don't see how that is a problem. If they are interested, then they will
find out quickly that it wasn't an explosion. I believe schools teach it to
be an explosion, to make it simpler to understand. Bending space-time is
perhaps not as easy to get a grasp on as we might think.
shadowmax889
commented
on 06 Feb 2011
@STROTCH i think you are underating yourself. Humans do not only imitate
they improve some nature desings and twist them and also create new things
that nature doesn't have. I don't think humanity is missusing our
habilities (may be some specimens are but not all ok us)
Mattinmotion
commented
on 22 Feb 2010
Lamer? I thought the information was conveyed rather well, which is all I
care about. I didn't find anything out of place with his voice .Considering
that the target audience seems to be very wide, probably from small kids
and upwards, it seems entirely appropriate.
TheRationalizer
commented
on 22 Feb 2010
"Something from ALMOST nothing" - they really should NOT have said that,
because many people won't hear the "almost". Besides, it's very unlikely
there was "almost nothing", to satisfy the conservation of energy there
must have been a hell of a lot of something.
Tapecutter59
commented
on 02 Mar 2010
I wish you luck I chewed on similar questions for a few decades before
becoming somewhat content with the "I don't know" answer. I'm not religious
at all, I agree with the observation that life is the process by which the
universe achives self awareness.
turkeyburgers
commented
on 25 Feb 2010
This is also because the Sci-Fi channel which airs the new doctor who is
trying to attract more female viewers. 50% of their demographic are NOT
neck beard chip crumb spewers. It is also the reason that they changed
their name and the font they used.
crowscrowcrow
commented
on 22 Feb 2010
on one hand, id agree that the term is misleading for a layman. on the
other hand, you kinda have to spice it up to make a layman interested. its
just to bad some people like to take that and pervert it to mean something
else.
gre107
commented
on 24 Feb 2010
@Grillzor It seems that you do not understand the theory... Everything came
from nothing? The "particles" as you call it were already there and always
have been. "Everything from nothing" where does that come from?
Observing The Universe From The Bottom Of The Planet: Matt Dobbs at TEDxYouth@Montreal
Mankind has been looking up at the cosmos throughout history, asking big questions such as, "what is our place in the universe, ... how did it begin?" Today ...
User Comments
Matthew Dobbs
commented
on 02 Jun 2014
Hey my name is Matt Dobbs too and I wanna know if this guy is related to
me.
Hubble Space Telescope - Better Than Ever!
//facebook.com/ScienceReason ... The Hubble Space Telescope Is Back - Better Than Ever! Final Servicing Mission. --- Please SUBSCRIBE to Science ...
User Comments
Mafiaaffe
commented
on 15 Sep 2009
Thats why you belive in magic rather then in evidence right? You can not
even define evolution but you say you know anything about biology or
genetics? Thats ridiculous. As a secular humanist i dont have to respect
arrogant, anti-scientific and most of all ridiculous statements by people
who never read a single textbook in their life. In fact I see it as my duty
to expose them. You claim to know the history of the telescope but you want
to change the name into something completely meaningless?
Ed Prato
commented
on 15 Sep 2009
eydos: My guess is that the sky is so vast that Hubble can only examine an
tiny fraction of the cosmos throughout it's entire lifetime. This means
that every sector of the cosmos that Hubble focuses on is given much
thought. Thus, when Hubble is directed at objects thousands of lightyears
away, it actually collects more data as it captures a greater swath of the
universe. But I agree with you, it would be nice to see near objects in
great detail. The question is, how much will we learn?
Tiago Villas-Bôas
commented
on 15 Sep 2009
I can assure you I'm far more well educated in biology, genetics and
astronomy than you. And just because of that I am able to make a statement
like that. The dumbass here is you... calling ur self a "secular humanist"
with no respect what so ever to other person's thoughts. I'm pretty aware
of the telescope name's history, thank you. I as I see what you don't (yet)
see, I would rather call it Humbble, and I believe hubble would love that
too. ;-) Peace Out man... take it easy...
buchananstreet
commented
on 05 Apr 2010
the fact that there is tons an tons of great space music out there, which
has been created in the last decades YET NEVER IS USED ON THIS TYPE OF
VIDEO, shows that man is by far not mature yet for space life : instead,
they always use bombastic, pompous, tasteless, megalomaniac choirs from
hell, with giga brutal bass drums and all that. most men are really idiots,
tolstoi was perfectly right. a bunch of idiots. too noisy.
Mafiaaffe
commented
on 14 Sep 2009
The telescope is named after astronomer Edwin Hubble, who discoverd through
redshift that the velocity at which various galaxies are receding from the
Earth is proportional to their distance from us. This has become known as
Hubble´s law and it proves that the universe is expanding. It´s not just
some name they made up. You are an uneducated conspiracy theoriest with a
astronomy and biology education of a 4th grader.
Baldurpet
commented
on 14 Sep 2009
It is possible to download videos from YouTube, but that was not what I
meant- I must've been a bit ambiguous. What I wanted to say was that I had
checked the Hubble images before and downloaded them- before I saw this
video. I don't understand what you mean by scrolling down to the bottom of
the page? If you want to find the pictures you go to Google and paste
"Images from Refurbished Hubble" into the search bar.
TheLunarmonkey
commented
on 14 Sep 2009
oh right so we cant down load directly from you tube, just iv watched
videos where the user asks for us to down load and to post the video on our
channels im supposed to skroll down to the bottom of the page and type the
title into google chrome and find it that way...yea? can you tell im not
very well educated in using computers.lol
wolf wing
commented
on 14 Sep 2009
Well I'm not sure if it's seen actual planets, not sure it's strong enough
to yet, but it's definetly seen evidence, and in a few cases where planets
are *like early solar systems forming with rings where planets are going
through* but has there been a actual image? Heh of course they are going to
be blurry even if we do find one.
GR3c0rds
commented
on 14 Sep 2009
You could also invest that money into direct research. In that case you
wouldn't have water purifiers as a "by product" of space research. And that
way you can get even more people a job, for you don't have to spend so much
om (already research-wise established) space shuttles with their enormous
costs.
gxrcix525
commented
on 19 Jul 2011
I dont see how people can believe a "god" created all this or that "the big
bang" really happened we can't be right no one here on earth really knows
there theories people get so butthurt only the smartest civilizations who
have been in the universe for millions of years might know were just too
dumb
NoAntecessor
commented
on 17 Sep 2009
The shoemaker-levy impact left a larger scar which eventually faded. The
question is what process continues the great red spot. If you're interested
in wierd gas giant phenomena, check out the south pole on Saturn. It's got
a hexagonal shaped storm on it, weird stuff.
DOUBLECHEESEBARGER
commented
on 20 Jan 2011
@luker4459, just...i just wanna say are you like...planning to live a
thousand years? let's focus on your twenty years you have left. Find Allah
that wrote the book for us and talked bout these amazing eye melting
phenomenas.
bad4ever2001
commented
on 14 Sep 2009
Aye. Although I wished I was able to see Mars, the storms of Jupiter and
the rings of Saturn with my own eyes from orbit...I reckon my descendants
will have to do this for me. Heres to the species buddy, heres to SCIENCE!!
:D
vgg767
commented
on 23 May 2011
if hubble telescope has that powerful capability, I think we can look at
the moon and other planets under a microscope. Imagine that. How come we
don't have HD pictures of the lunar surface? Are they hiding something. WTF!
Daniel Wright
commented
on 17 Dec 2011
@vgg767 its not about the power of the telescope its about the size of the
mirror , hubble is to small to see the moons surface up close let alown
other planets in are universe hd lunar surfce pic and vid links below
Rockster969
commented
on 20 Sep 2009
Yeah man,gives me goose bumps! And yes,I always go a little dewy eyed in
awe and wondrance seeing those rockets building up that thrust before
finally almost groaning off the launch pad then onwards to throttle up!
cadentavaricegrtrj
commented
on 14 Oct 2010
Unlimited energy sources are out there!But Millions are spend in supressing
that information,Get a motor that works with the power of magnets only at
LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,take part in the revolution!
DJKP (Kev P)
commented
on 03 Oct 2009
i think the guy doing the audio must have been a million lightyears away.
very cool video. i love the butterfly nebula. its a thing of beauty.
untouched by the wicked hand of man. amazing.
Baldurpet
commented
on 14 Sep 2009
3:33 I checked out the new Hubble images, and the first thing I did after
seeing this one was downloading it and using it as a wallpaper. Linux has
never looked sweeter!
comicreaper
commented
on 05 Mar 2010
can you imagine what we would see if we had a Hubble orbiting another body
in our solar system. also what every happened to voyager have we stopped
receiving info yet?
jhmoonman
commented
on 23 Aug 2010
I love this video! I think, I'm there,in space,even though I'm not spaced
out!!!can I have the Hubble,hst, after 2014? Please,please,please !!!!
mikialjan
commented
on 30 Apr 2010
@Reguba24 No she didn't. I had to quadruple check and reconfirm. She said
"visiteded". No big deal, not the end of the world, but very funny indeed.
Nor Carr
commented
on 13 Sep 2009
When I first saw all this in the news they showed a new galaxy that clearly
shows a bright white center, but I didn't see that one in this video.
Nor Carr
commented
on 14 Sep 2009
Yes then that sounds like the same galaxy. It would be sunshiny all the
time there I guess. lol Paulusma is dutch and my hubbies father is Dutch.
New Look at the Infant Universe
From ESA's HubbleCast. In early 2009, a team of astronauts visited Hubble to repair the wear and tear of twenty years of operating in a hostile environment ...
User Comments
kpn5000
commented
on 12 Dec 2015
What a crock of propaganda from NASA, et al. Deciphered video: "Please keep
funding us, we're doing really cool sciencey things!" Phooey, the Earth is
flat.
Lorie Marinas
commented
on 05 Mar 2016
+kpn5000 No; the Earth is star-shaped.
AIRGLOW at ORM (La Palma)
At 2400 meters, high above the sea of clouds, in the most vertical island in the world (La Palma, Canary Islands), in the Atlantic Ocean, we find the Roque de Los ...
Spitzer
On 25 August 2003, the Spitzer Space Telescope was launched into space by a Delta rocket from Cape Canaveral, Florida. She was the fourth and final mission ...
User Comments
TrickShot1100
commented
on 19 Sep 2011
It's real nice seeing this on a 40 inch monitor.
NRAO | The Very Large Array Observes Hercules A
National Radio Astronomy Observatory (NRAO) astronomer Jim Condon describes the newly renovated National Science Foundation's Karl G. Jansky Very ...
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on fsaved.com.
Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Already have an account? Sign in to comment