This video goes over the "Basic" hoof mapping protocol used by the E.L.P.O. for evaluating hoof distortions, hoof ratios and foot balance. This process can be ...
You've drawn in what you say is the rim of the crater, but I think the
crater is wider than you've drawn it. I think this is because the photo
you've used (9487) is a low resolution version, and also out of focus. On a
high resolution version it's possible to see that the right hand side of
the crater goes much further, to just left of the reticule to the right of
the LM. Try another one, for instance AS14-68-9425.
I found out a HI-resolution photo of FRA-MAURO's by the lunar orbiter for
your advice. Thank you. However,if the large crater assumed 'OLD-NAMELSS'
then the view-angle was over 15 degrees.... therefore, my claim in this
movie never resolve yet. HI-resolution photo's URL. (remove the spaces) 3w
. lpi . usra . edu / resources / lunarorbiter / images / preview / 3133_med
. jpg
"I think this is because the photo you've used (9487) is a low resolution
version" NO, I used AS14-68-9487HR. Please read carefully in "À propos de
cette vidéo ". I enumerated what referred some sources on it. Have you made
a movie? Try it for your learning. It seem a very clear movie just after
making. However it to be very poor after upload to YT.
Good research, tkrWkLNsQk. Keep up the good work. Don't pay any attention
to apollotls. You'll find lots of time-wasting pro-Apollo pimps on the Web.
They have no interest in proper investigation of the Apollo fraud. A fraud
that was DESIGNED to fool billions of people and swindle the World.
lol it makes me laugh,of course they went there,do you think that cone
crater was a filmset? your attempt at these feeble calculations bear no
fruit,as its well known distance is hard to judge on the moon as there is
nothing to gauge distance apart from rocks and craters and mountains
Of course I'm being honest. Go to the Apollo Lunar surface journal and look
up the description - not of photo 9487, but rather 9486. "Al is to the left
of the spacecraft with his back to us looking in the general direction of
the LM and, beyond it, Old Nameless. "
i thought "believe" is unsuitable. this argument is not argument that
"believe" or "not believe". i only found a scientific proof of some photos
is faked and show it on YT. therefore,my proof is right if you are not able
to find that my proof is wrong.
apollotls,i have a few questions about OLD NAMELESS crater. 1)which part of
it did be measured? the center,the rim,or the others? 2)how much was the
diameter of it? 3)where did you measure the distance? 4)when did you
measure the distance?
"So change the video, and we'll continue the discussion." I added a new
video, watch?v=pSJGHasbo5g. The video connot post comments, please comments
post to this video. the video as an appendix.
En plus, you think my comment about the laser measurement system was
serious. Try this link ... remove the spaces 3w. hq. nasa. gov / office /
pao / History / alsj / a14 / a14pp-011-020. pdf
Well at the very least, your "proof" in your video is wrong, because the
crater you say is South Triplet is actually Old Nameless. So change the
video, and we'll continue the discussion.
Artex Transfer-Kit for Ceramill Map300 ITALIANO
Wells Field Trail, White Clay Creek State Park -- June 10, 2010
Part 4/5 - VCU Occupy Wall Street Solidarity Rally - Oct. 7, 2011 - Richmond, Virginia
Dark Heresy Session Three: Overview/GM Interview - Vidcast
Session length ? I know(now)many people limit the time to around 4 hours or
so. I always prefer about 8 hours. I really enjoy that length. My usual
rule is not shorter than 6 hours. I not-so-famously did the post on running
a 90 minutes session. Just too rushed, as I find 4 hours to be as well. For
the amount of RP we do, 4 hours is too short. For us. I've also done 12
hours often-few times over 24 hours. I find with published adventures, I've
had to add so much to fill in the holes. Why bother?
My group plays Sundays 3pm till 11 or midnight so I ub=nderstand the fun of
long games. Sounds like you guys have a good group that has a lot of fun
together. That is th emost important rule I think. Does full auto have a
chance of hitting everything in the area. Say within 1 meter. Makes using
Auto fire when PCs are near will dangerous or good for mowing down groups
which makes sense. Just my 2 coppers.( disclaimer I know nothing of this
game, just what you and Lorry have said).
When GMing Call of cthulhu I often put small things in the story which
don't make sense, then AFTER the case if all my PCs aren’t dead I can bring
them back to the location and have them discover a much deeper plot. This
can be done in the next session or 10 sessions later. Generally it goes
down quite well but requires some forethought. It also means my players
don't go questioning me so much when I mess up and do something that
doesn’t make much sense :)
@masterofflowers The auto fire doesn't seem to be able to spew out into
groups of enemies, that I have seen at least. We've not had anything like
that. What is there in shooting though is trying to fire into a combat
where friends are engaged in melee with the target creates a minus to hit.
Thanks for your words of encouragement for the series. Great to have you on
board. Glad you're enjoying seeing how the other half life, so to speak.
@masterofflowers I think that as far as th eweapon goes it is assumed its a
strong hit and not any hit( just guessing since I know nothing about the
weapon) otherwise it would go off if someone acidently bumped it or fell on
it... Now if he said I want to attack the floor to set off the blast(
because that would be easier to hit) I might allow that. Just another of my
2 coppers. =-) Keep up the videos my friends I enjoy them immensely.
@RobertJFreemantle Yes it would be a task uploading a 7 hour session! Maybe
just a session segment then. Player permission has been a pain in my butt.
However the shy players agreed I could recorded sessions showing mini's
only. Which would be fine but the only camera I have is on my laptop and so
is the current adventure. Anyways I always enjoy listening to you and your
mate racapping your sessions. kudos
@blackbarnz heh heh. Well, recording a session means some heavy duty
uploading going on, with session length being what it can be. Perhaps when
we're up to full run speed with our sessions with more confidence going on
and permission from the players.
@WinstonBiggleswade That's a nice idea. It sounds like it would work
especially well with CoC indeed too. That's the danger I guess with
"investigative games" such as these two, but yes a great idea to use. Our
GM will read this...
Glad to see your still enjoying the game and have settled the auto fire
issues you were having. I might try that simple change you mentioned, it's
does make a bit of sense.