+Don Macski Haha... I hear you bud. We'll know more about it in 61 years when they de-classify those missing pages of the 9/11 Commission report. But by then no one will care, and it'll be just the same as right now if one were to say 'look at all this shit they were doing in past decades'.. no one cares, sadly. And that's exactly why they classify all this shit for 75 years. They all gotta go, along with the mindset that they or the system they force on everyone is needed in the first place. Apologies for going off topic!
You want to get technical? Was the building a moving object? My point of course is that many more relevant descriptions of that event could have been used which would more accurately account for what happened that day. The language we use carries a complex array of subtle suggestions. Describing the events in NYC on 9-11-01 as a collision suggests it was some how random, accidental or normal. It was an attack. You could describe the shooting of that news reporter and her camera man the other day as a collision. I submit it would be a more accurate use of the term by the definition you use. But it was many more things than a collision. It was a murder. You could describe the Fort Hood shooting as 'Workplace Violence' or you could describe soft tyranny as a man with a pen and a phone, it does not make those descriptions accurate. There is some distance between the Clintonian truth and the WHOLE truth. Of course that might depend on what your definition of "is" is...
+Doctor Brohoof It is actually believed that a set of bombs were armed at the low floors of the twin towers, so after the planes crashed into them the terrorists activated the bombs to make the buildings collapse.
other than the 9/11 hoax being on this list is not bad.. however in place
of the hoax I would have had the armed bank robbery in LA by the two
heavily armed and armored men. That was live and was a huge awakening to
why Americans should never be disarmed. If criminals can get that amount of
fire power the civilians would never stand a chance.
I can always rely on at least one tinfoil hat wearing conspiracy theorist relating his mind blowing intelligence upon the rest of us. My father was an engineer, as are many in my family. So if you think you can set up this, without the extreme heat from jet fuel, then try to use the mind over the BS you are fed. Dipshits believe anything if fed enough shit.
Coverage of the Earthquake and Tsunami in Japan from Nine News Melbourne. Also includes story on Carbon Tax protests, I've included these in this video and ...
It was 31 degrees day in Melbourne on 12 March 2011 and Jo Hall still
wearing a long blazer. She was look so presentable to me, even Jennifer
Keyte (Seven Melbourne weekend newsreader)
Interesting... its now been 5 years and there is a huge influx of refugees
from the Syrian crisis and NZ has signed the TPP without proper public
consultations and even though people undertook massive protests....
+Vincent Eastwood there is footage of the speech and i have seen it ... its about somewhere ... also recent news about russian leak saying they have such capabilities
+Tim Williams Sigh... all this God stuff is too complicated, divisive and confusing... I do however see a war between good and evil and I side with good... unconditionally. For I am the Angelica... messenger... the essence of angels and always will be, no matter what happens. :o)
+Angelica Perduta That's cos I was given an audio recording of John in a public meeting saying it and I had footage from a different public meeting so you wouldn't be looking at a black screen.
+Paul Wilson oh... well John Key (NZ Prime Minister) can be heard saying the Christchurch Earth Quakes were a man made disaster and immediately correcting himself to say it was natural. There are conspiracy theoiries it was related to oil exploration or even weapon tests... but the words we hear do not match the PM lip movements shown.