Chicago jewish university Videos

We got at least 25, good job everybody! We almost had a civil comments section on a video about Jews and economics, almost!

+El Zrinja That would probably heavily depend on the state of the country in 1963, but I'd venture to guess he probably didn't since it wasn't too terribly controlling or anti-palestinian at that time.

+rod garrett what country are you from?

+Jay Me if you really wanted to convince me you would provide a respectable secondary source or an accurate primary source. You haven't and your logic is really messy. So you simply have no case

+Jay Me i don't have to name any sources i didn't make any claims. You don't understand how logic works. Its clear you think your version of reality is the standardized version. You have to back up your claims, i just have to point out logical fallacies or a lack of evidence. I already did that and then rejected your claim based on lack of cogent logic and evidence

+TheeCM5See that's the difference between you and me.  I'm not expecting anything.  And the trouble with individuals like you, once you start naming sources.. which you have not provided either.. you go off attacking sources as having their own agenda or as being antisemitic.   Believe what you want.  Unfortunately, you expect everyone to believe what you believe.

+Jay Me there are reasons for why the Rothschilds got wealthy. The Baron von Hesse-Kassele was one of, if not the richest man in the world and he also happened to be the chief client of the Rothschilds during their rise. Basic stuff like that and the friendship between Mayer and the Oppenheimer patriarch go a long way to explaining things of this nature.

+Jay Me she's provided 0 evidence for this and ignores or denounces all attempts to demonstrate to her that this is an inaccurate figure and that there are reasons women make slightly less than men.

+Jay Me lmao you haven't provided any sources at all. None, your claims are outrageous, you don't provide a clear line of logic and when asked for clarification you back down. I am not trying to be anything, i'm telling you you're either lying or misinformed. the latter seems more likely as i don't think you are a stormfag. What your saying sounds like either a Fascist or a paranoid Libertarian conspiracy theory with no basis to back it up. No one is denying that the Rothschilds influenced British, German and French politics. They did to a large degree up until the First World War. But you're not making coherent claims that can be falsified or even challenged. You back away from each point when its analyzed without either proving me wrong with evidence or logic. You just expect me to believe you about something at face value. Which is a lot like what Commies, Religious people and Feminists expect me to believe. My SJW soc teacher expects me to believe women get paid 66 cents on the $

+TheeCM5Don't try to be an intellect.. you're embarrassing yourself.   Wow... a 2 minute search on the internet.  Excellent.

+TheeCM5 just so you know i found one single instance of morgan and rothschild cooperation and it was selling $2.5 million in Gold to the US treasury under Prez Cleveland to save the US from the Great Panic. Apparently it pissed of the Agrarian Sector and affected the following election cycle. Other than that i don't see anything about Morgan being supported or financed by them, including that incident where they were going in as partners on the deal with the Treasury.

+Jay Me right, well my search came up empty and since you are reluctant to provide one reliable secondary source, much less a primary source i have to apply Occam's razor and reject your claim completely.

+TheeCM5Well since you call yourself 'TheeCM5'.. fuck.. you must be right.  But I'll think I'll trust my sources.. and you can google it yourself.

+Jay Me the Johnson family owns huge stakes in Fidelity investments funds, which are worth trillions. They're another candidate, i would definitely say that certain leaders like Berlusconi are hidden billionaires and its very likely that members of the Qatari royal family and top America financial magnates are hiding billions. But really the problem here is statism and corporatism which allow individuals to hide their wealth very easily as well as to eliminate competition and distance themselves from systematic violence. something Icahn and Perelman did very well with their scummy takeover bids.

+Jay Me again no they are not, as a whole their wealth is spread across 2000 descendants and is probably if we include literally all of their properties, assets and hidden wealth is ball park $75-200 billion. But this is spread across 2000 people, is tied up in huge amounts of real estate, investments and assets and obviously would depreciate immensly in value if it was all turned into cash at once. We know that $20 trillion is being hidden in offshore accounts by the uber rich, we know that people like Icahn and maybe even Ortega and Slim are hiding tens of billions. So its not inconcievable that there are trillions (albiet hidden ones). But if there are trillionaires its going to be people like the Li family, the Mars family, the Russian Oligarchs, Putin (estimated true worth upwards of $100 billion), The Koch's, the Quandts, the Albrechts, possibly someone like Ellison, Gates and definitely the house of Saud. But the rest of them would have to be drug lords, arms dealers

+TheeCM5Rothschilds, collectively are worth trillions. But I guess you know better because you 're their personal accountant.  When you talk to Evelyn again, tell him I said hi.

+Jay Me what the hell are you talking about? Do you have a source for that, like a Morgan biographer or a primary source from a newspaper? Because that claim, i've never found a shred of evidence suggesting that JP Morgan was owned by any of the Rothschild bankers, at all. I've debunked this theory 3 or 4 times now. No primary source or respectable secondary source evidence has ever been provided for literally any of the claims. The Rothchilds lost there power as the industrial revolution peaked and by World War 2 fell as a dynasty just like the Vanderbilts fell. Its normal for uber wealthy families to decline badly after about a century or so. There's nothing remarkable about them now other than their philanthropy and ownership of fine arts and creepy castles.

+Jay Me eclipsed the rothchilds and today there are jewish financial magnates like Carl Icahn and George Soros who are worth a lot more than any one Rothschild is (Nat, Jacob, Evelyn are worth about $11 billion combined, lets say $20 to be safe). But the top defense companies, pharma companies and oil companies (the most powerful industries outside of finance and banking) are literally all owned and run by White Northwestern Euros, Asians and Hispanics. Most of the world's richest bankers are Russian, Hispanic, Jewish, Asian or Anglo-Saxon. The world's rich list is noticably dominated by Whites, Hispanics and Jews. Most top diplomats are white, most board members and controlling share holders in the Major Commercial banks are white. Its absolutely absurd to think that Jews own the world. I'm using moderate language so you reply coherently, i actually find the idea repugnant and idiotic beyond redemption.

+TheeCM5Who do you think owned Morgan smart ass.  When J P Morgan died, they realized most of the 'his' wealth was actually Rothschilds.You debunked shit.  Get over yourself.. And for someone with such a skewed perception of history and reality.. I have nothing to prove to you.You're full of shit.

+Jay Me first of all the Rothschilds are europeans so unless you have some primary source or accredited secondary source info to back up your claim that they had anything to do with the first two central banks, you're full of it. Next if they did you would have to prove that they were the leading party and benificiary. Third of all which banks do they own shares in that have stakes in one of the 12 banks? Which ones? I actually have a list of all the banks that own shares in the Fed right now and its mostly medium sized and small regional banks with a few big ones like Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan. But which banks and how many shares do they own in those banks? Which Rothschild? How long have they been invested? Who else owns shares in those banks? Do the rothschild's have a controlling interest? Lmao i've debunked this bullshit 3 or 4 times now. The richest people are on earth are of multiple ethnicities, there is no Jewish conspiracy. By the early 20th century white anglosaxon bankers

+TheeCM5The Fed is NOT to mediate the job market.  The Rothschilds own shares in banks which own the Fed and others around the world.  Rothschilds had very much to do with its 2 predecessors.While Friedman opposed the Fed, it wasn't 'cause they were meddling bureaucrats, it was because it gave too much power to too few men.And in school I was taught there were 3 races, white/Caucasian, Mongoloid/Asian, Negroid/Black.  But I guess Jews are a race now.So I guess everything you said was supposed to be funny.  Your sense of humor sucks just like your intellect.

+Jay Me no he actually did, the Fed has nothing to do with the Rothschilds and neither does a lot of things you mentioned. All the Fed does is manage the reserves for the member banks, manage interest rates and tries to mediate the job market. Its a vehicle for destruction for sure, like during the Great Depression and the recent recession. Which is why Milton Friedman opposed the existence of central banks, who he viewed as meddling bureaucrats.

+Juskevicius1985 the Jews did all the bad things and the poor weak white people just stood back in horror as uber..er i mean untermenschen stomped all over the proud aryan noble white race. Ohhh it was terrible, whites were forced to share power instead of having all the power, the Poor White Man. How oppressed and put upon he has been, his eternal enemy the Jew man is too powerful.

+Jay Me Stop playing games you odious vermin. You didn't criticize Jews--you lied about them with the sick expectation that your specious and noxious claims would be integrated into chat as fact. Your claims are hateful lies and you know it. You lied about the entire religion (by the way, ass-wad, Judaism is a religion, not a race). Thus, you respond with a hackneyed rhetorical device. Give it up you SS Murderer Wannabe. It is easy to write heinous lies on these pathetic sites and to invite other hateful uncouth Nazi Youth Brigade wannabes to your twisted mindset. Keep it up flyspeck. And one day, you will cross someone who is unamused by your dark imagination and decides to kick the shit out of you or just buggers you until you vomit out your intestines.

+Sapere AudeWhen I hear complaints about whites, I don't immediately jump to take offense, nor feel the whole race is being sited.. maybe you should try that when you read criticism of Jews.. I won't ask you to lay off the antisemitism word.You haven't said anything worthwhile.. You've only shot your mouth off like a 12 year old. Good bye

+Sapere AudeOh I guess you gave up on your Fed shit... If I remove all the juvenile name-calling.. you again.. said nothing...

+Jay Me Couldn't agree more--a Chaucerian fraud like you should come out of the muck and prepare to take a lickin;, whether he is wearing a Timex or not.Let;s address the rest of your bullshit--you say "Jews created Communism and murdered 10s [sic] of millions/ Prove that absurd charge you churl!You say Jews don't benefit from free market capitalism, only from monopolies, oligarchies, revolutions, bribery, theft, murder and intrigue--that is quite a list, bitch. Now, prove that to Mark Zuckerberg, Sergei Brin, Larry Ellison, Larry Page, David Karp, Steven Spielberg, Michael Bay, Woody Allen....Oh My!! Monopolists all!! Murderers and bribery artists. Tell that to Michael Bloomberg, Milton Friedman, Paul Krugman, and Cheryl Sandberg you two-bit, anti-Semitic thug!You pathetic peckerwood----I effuse vomitosis all over your fat little Nazi face. You humiliated, impoverished, nothing.....I urge you to kill yourself.

+Sapere AudeInstead of talking like a 12 year old, why don't you enlighten us on Rothschilds' "sole" hononary trustee role (I guess you mean Walter Rothschild), what that meant and that Rothschilds's had no influence on the Fed in the past century (ignoring the 1800s influence on central banking in USA) which you seem to imply...

+Sapere AudeWhat's a squirt-a-hole?... your imagination ain't too good.. even your platitudes about the Rothschilds..honorary trustee.. . I was ready a while ago to tone down my comment.. but after receiving just juvenile attacks from the likes of you.. I thought why bother...

+Jay Me I know the subject you squirt a-hole. The Rothschilds have no ownership. Years ago, one of the family was an honorary trustee. That is not ownership you anti-Semitic pile of anti-intellectual horseshit.Go peddle your conspiracy manure to your pedophile boyfriend. while he "jays" you.

+Sapere AudeThere's a lot out there on the Fed, central banking and the Rothschilds.  Look it up when you have time between accusing others of anti-semitism and other bullshit. 

+Sapere AudeSo your condemnation is suppose to make me feel what???  Get over yourself.  You haven't said a damn thing..   You don't make any sense...

+Jay Me You had better read up on the Fed formation...The Rothschilds are uninvolved with FED history and Fed behaviors. Your blanket comment about how Jews have benefited is outright anti-Semitism (and stupidity), You had better be prepared to condemn all banking communities with their multi-ethnicities and nationalities. Your understanding of banking history is impoverished...and your understanding of Jewish history is enriched by your envy, humiliation, and dim-wittedness.

Jewish Goldman Sachs

Exactly ... Asshole!

+ClassicPerformances2From your comment... why would I bother?  As far as your opinion. I couldn't give a shit.

Name some others besides the Tothchilds, envious antisemitie you are. The dichotomy of capitalism exploitation and socialistic and communistic leanings are valid as brought out by Friedman .... Everything else you've uttered reconciles your inept and simplistic mind as pertains to history... In other words, s typical unrighteous goy!

The way you feel that you just described is also known as schizophrenia. Good luck with it ;)

+Jay Me: Of course you're right. It just sucks being right when everybody else is stupid, naive and deluded.

+Jay Me Well, I guess it is not easy to put so many antisemitic cliches in a few sentences, but you managed.

+DANIEL K Cunningham Partly true but Jews do control media, press, a thousand subversive groups, the FED. CFR et so if you even want a career in higher power you must kiss ass or you wont even get thru the door. SAD, VERY SAD.

+luke dawson go eat shit and die you brain-washed pig.

+Alfred S I guess some people are not aware yet about the truth on germany and Nationalist socialism ! The lies of the fake jewish holocaust is coming out slowy but surely !

+DANIEL K Cunningham so if there are very few jews then it should be easier to name them, who are they ? can you give names and show that they are indeed to blame for anything ?not to mention the fact that if they are american citisens they have a right by law to try and influence their government.btw i read on wikipedia on this scheuer guy and he says saudi arabian influence is greater than israel's and more insidious and for some reason ... i'm pretty sure, you have no claim against saudis. you won't even think of blaming them for the wars in iraq .you are therefor an anti semite. 

+DANIEL K Cunningham ooooh an antisemitic opinion, i have NEVER seen this before ... just for the sake of argument, can you tell me who are those jews who make "anti goy plans" ? and who are they paying ? if this michael shaeuer is saying these things you're saying than he is antisemitic. the only ones i know who are actually doing the things you say are arabs who are buying out whole faculties to poison the minds of students around the world against israel, and it's working for them.so tell me, who are those jews behind the "anti goy plan" and what is that plan to begin with ?

+soulfull M. You are right. The cia agent Michael Sheuer points out there are very few Jews and it is the hosts of non Jews who take graft and pay off money to carry out the Jewish anti goy plans who are the real problem. Sheuer wrote: though they will always be disloyal, they would be absolutely impotent — and, indeed, comical — if their campaign contributions, media power, and threats of political retribution, did not have a seemingly unending supply of prominent and avaricious U.S. citizens who will take their money and do their bidding. And the graft takers, as far as I can tell, are overwhelmingly non-Jewish.

+MEDIACOP YES ! IN THE WHITE HOUSE ,TOO MANY CONTROLLING MY LIFE ! GOD DAMN YOU LIER !

+turtlelovingzombie Is that why of 30 or so ongoing conflicts around the world there are no Jews, just Muslims? What Jew has harmed you? Do you know any Jews? Which Jew controls your life?

+robert franklin that is one zionazis ppl.

OH YEAH!!