Ancient DNA from Siberian boy links Europe and America
The oldest known genome of a modern human solves long-standing puzzles about the New World's genetic heritage. The 24000-year-old remains of a young ...
I knew this but the Siberian population aren't Europeans. The ancient
ancestors of Native Americans are from Siberia, from a proto-mongoloid
people. Siberians aren't like East Asians(Chinese, Japanese) to begin with.
+Nicole N European peoples lived in Asia long time ago. Just look up mummy reconstructions found in China. They've also found 20 thousand years old French stone tools on the East Coast of the USA.
+Nicole N I AGREE IM ALSO INDIGENOUS MEXICAN PUREPECHA
Jews from Spain 1
Dr. Dell Sanchez talks about Israelis in Sefarad, Spain from the time of King David and King Solomon. Jews from Spain wind up in the Americas brought by ...
I really feel I should do a genetic test of my DNA. That is the only way I
would know if I have Jewish blood. Even though my Grandmother says we do,
but we never had proof.
YES do it with familytreeDNA dot com - FamilyFinder (FF) and mtDNA (maternal) test make you happy!
Afro-Brazilians search DNA for pre-slavery origins
Keep up-to-date with the latest news, subscribe here: //bit.ly/AFP-subscribe A documentary series is reconnecting Brazil's Afro-descendants with their African ...
Zeze Motta is still more than welcomed to the Ivory Coast
Ancestry.com Dna Sample
This is my first video on DNA & I just sent my sample & I'll make a video on what percentage I'll get & on my results see you.
Archives, DNA and Oral Histories prove Jewish Ancestry among Latinos.
New Mexicans finding an inner passion for Israel and for connecting with their Jewish roots. Large land grants were given to Sephardic Jews in Texas, New ...
I remember my grandmother would say that the Abrego last name meant Jewish
people from the South in Catalan which is one of Spain's native language.
It's strange because I have this fascination with Israel, and I don't know
why.
+Ivonne Martinez Hi Ivonne, Arek Sanchez here. I am curious. Did you ever do a DNA test? I personally am Spanish and Mexican and born here in America. We discovered our Jewish ancestry from both sides. Israel is a very beautiful country and you must visit soon. We were organizing study conference tour groups to Israel. Soon by The Lords Grace we will host and organize another trip. Maybe you can join us.
Sinclair DNA Chequy Pattern
On February 14th, 2015, I was a guest writer on Scott Wolter's blog, discussing my work on a SuperFamily that includes the Saint-Clair family. Blog at this link ...
Warrenne, Warrens, etc variants, are all part of the greater Norman
royal-noble dynasty of that time period, and trace right back into the main
branch of the royal Norman (ie bastard Duke William cum King William I
Conquerer). I have some of these lines.
And most especially, I have all of the Magna Carta Barons (on both sides!)
and (hmmm!) even of King John, so these lineages I am learned about.
You need to rephrase please that these are super families (which they are
...), but that they are a special family, and faith. These are those
branches of the greater Templar families, and that they were NOT !!!!!!!
(ad nauseum) catholic. They were celtic church, and they were Yehidah (not
the current word definition of jewish-christians or christian jews, ... to
be accurate bible-thumpers would be more accurate). Yehidah (Yehoidah, of
which Judaic, royal Judah dynastic bloodline, and the patriarch Judah) are
"spiritual worshippers." This does not, and has no connection with the
word Jew, Jewish, or Judaism, as modernly word defined.
Jewish, and Jew are Yeh-U-dah. The ancient Kingdom of Israel, with the
last King Yehu. The Yehu-di are Israelites. The Yeh-I-dah are the royal
Judaics, and the lineage of the Master Jesus, ... and his children. And WE
KNOW THAT!
The Templars (and all those Gothic cathedrals) were all celtic church,
before being confiscated by the catholics as their own ex-propriated
properties, from the times that the celitcs were in the crusades, and out
of the country, and after the templar inquisitions of 1307 onwards, into
the Wars of Religion in the Reformation and Renaissance times of the
1500s-1600s, ... and the Counter reformations of the cahtholics.
It was the same for the English Wars of the Roses, that historians and
theologians won't tell the truth. The real reasons, even back to the times
of Magna Carta, was the introduction of catholicism into England. Call it
Episcopal, Anglican catholics ... King John was Anglican. Many of the
Barons were (still!) celtic church. Forget all the rest that mainstream
documents tell you. It was religous. The Yorkists were the Anglicans.
The Lancasters (my FitzAlan side of the religious wars) were the celtics.
Actually, some of the same events were part of the American Civil War. The
southerners were Anglicans, and the sons of the Dutch and German nobility
and professionals that came to the States, becoming the corporates and
slave holders. The northerners (Pilgrims - mine lines, and the Puritans
American catholics - some of mine) were the remnant celtic church and bible
thumpers. Here again, the celtics (this time!) thumped the catholics. Now
all is changed with the South having all the bible thumpers and baptists,
while the north has been all overturned with the high church, irish
catholics, secularists, socialists, progressives, ....
These ancestral lineages, many of which died out in the female descendants
of Burkes Peerage and Banks Peerage et al, were all the celtic church, and
these super family branches of those who were Norman (Scandinavian Danish,
Norse, and Swedish) and Norman-French (also Italian Norse, and the ancient
royal Judaic bloodline dynasty found in Provence, etc.
I had a South Dakota Greek orthodox priest (former Russian orthodox until
he accidentally burned down an Alaskan heritage church !!!) curse me and
all "franj!" french catholics and protestants ... for stopping King Harald
at Hastings, when he would have changed the state religion to (orthodoxy).
It was Duke William of the celtic church who came and fought against these
orthodox and anglicans restoring the celtic church.
And in Norse sagas, King Harald did live after the battle, and changed his
name to Christian, and his sons and daughters (losing the Danish throne to
his brothers and cousins) went back to Denmark, and within 3-4 generations
as the House of Oldenburg regained the throne, of which the Christian
namesake descends down to the Danish and Danish-Greek royal houses to this
day, i.e. Prince Phillip of Greece, husband to Queen Elizabeth II of the
UK. I have these lineages as well.
There is so much more to detail about these truly hidden templar and Rex
Deus than you can imagine.
My DNA and valid genealogies will prove most interesting to you, as it is
the main branch of all these other family branches. My record, validated
by many researches and researchers goes back to 0 CE and back, and many of
the female lineages are also traced out on my blueprint sized anafatel
charts.
And I have many Clare et al lineages, and these other names you continue to
mention.
Hi +John Lord, Thanks very much for your lengthy comment. I haven't looked into the religious affiliation of the various members of the "super family" I'm researching, apart from their affinity to others in medieval records, mostly benefaction to particular abbeys and priories. These varied even from the same individual. For instance, the de Redvers family gave land to houses of Cluny and the Cistercians. I think you might like the work of Beryl Platts. She spent years studying the Flemish in Scotland, an overlooked area of research until she came along. She is certain that the Warennes, and many other of these families close to the Conqueror, were descendants of Charlemagne.
Steve,
Video 1:57 and 2:00.
You didnt say ... so I dont know if you "saw" or just didnt mention the
cheque pattern below the window, and then the second sighting of another
cheque pattern mentioned above.
The cheque while it can be applied to a tiled pattern (ie masonic flooring)
is just a geometric pattern. But, to have a cheque pattern on a coat of
arms, the heralds would have used the pattern as an ancestral symbol (ie
your mention of the engrailed cross), or that this person was the Exchequer
(Secretary of the Treasury) for the king at that time. And, of course,
this is the start of the checker pattern for the checker board game.
So, to me, this person was the Exchequer, and that this could have been a
lifetime, or a serial Exchequer position with the King (and his dynasty)
for some time. Just like the Mayors of the Palace, etc.
Hope this helps in this portion of the greater adventure.
Just as much as (ahem) modern historians, armorialists, and theologians stipulate, ... armorials were NOT until the 1300s etc.Bunk, like the vast majority of all current academics. Such armorials trace all the way back even to the exiting Israelis from Egypt, with their tribal ensigns mentioned in the Old Testament, ... and can be seen in the many bas reliefs of Egypt, Assyria, Babylonia.I was the first to find the ancient Israelite ensignn (ie Star of David) on the bas relief of the Assyrian conquest of King Yehu (the Yeh-u-dis, these are the "jews") and above both people are their national ensigns. Then you have the star of David in the Capernaum synagogue. All 100 CE or earlier.The original ensign was the Star of David and Seal of Solomon. It went with the northern rebelling tribes, and the royal House of Judah (our lineage) took on the lily (french fleur de lis), the honey bee, and the rose of sharon. It is my armorials of the FitzAlans that have the 3 fleur de lis as part of their Norman heritage of Gaul-France. It is also your heritage.Irrespective of the official offices of the King, or them being given official ensigns, ie Exchequer chequey pattern, they were still doing the job all the way back to the Yehidah (just say templars, Scott and I share this more ancient information) crusader empire of the Mideast 125-600s CE. This was the first crusader empire, and King Arthur of Britian was at Petra/Pendragon, at Eilat (Israel).Aqaba (Jordan), ... Camelot. Our ancestors were there with him in those centuries, ... until a vast planetary global warming, such as we are barely experiencing now. All plaentary (not man made) events.There was still the Solomonic Fleet (say later Templar fleet) that was still sailing from headquarters Maya land transoceanic Atlantic to Europe/Mideast/Africa etc, ... and transoceanic Pacific, Indian Ocean, Arabian sea, Persian Gulf, Red Sea, etc. These all were operating in the days of Solomon to the east with India and to Maya land and the gold mines of Ophir (Peru). These sailing fleets could surely substantiate your chess migration to the Mideast, and these crusaders.So by a "modest" statement, the Exchequer or chess pattern, or that of the castle chequey gate pattern, can come from these times of the 600s CE. Since wood was more scarce in the Mideast, they would have used metallic bars for the gate. At Petra in these Roman and Greek times, only Petra ! across the vast majority of the Mideast had copper mines (still there). Lead and tin came from Britain, other copper deposits came from elsewhere, and Scott's Great Lakes copper mines. In Britain and Europe with greater wood, they would have used their pine, fir, hemlock, yew, oaks, maples, for their wooden gates and drawbridges.So again, we have a further "logical" conjecture that the chequey pattern is not of the "medieval crusader" period of 1089, ie Ace, but that of earlier crusader and fortress construction defense techniques.And it is the catholic organization that hates and refuses to acknowledge anything Arthurian. Why?! Because the truth, when known, that there were celtic christians of the celtic Yehidah faith in the Mideast, ... those fleeing Christians out of Jerusalem, with the attack of Vespasian and TItus 69 CE, that this was the split between the Pharisee jewry and the celtic christians. We stayed in those Jordanian lands, and this became, with further christian pilgrimages of the European royalty and nobility, just like the 500 years later period of medieval crusades, we were in the Mideast 125-600s CE.And we did have armorials in those days as well.Here is a historical tickler for you. I have found Robin Hood. Actually, it is most obvious. The English royal family, King Richard, John, and Princess Beatrice. Beatrice goes to Italy and marries King Robert (Norse) of Italy, and has son Italian name, but Robert Jr, ie Prince Robin. With the death of King Robert, brother usurps throne, and ousts Beatrice and Robin from Italy. This is the same time period Richard is moving from England, via Malta, and picks them up. They accompany him to the Mideast, and Robin joins the crusaders. Richard conquests Acre (as you mention above), and then goes for further expansion and conquests. It is not mentioned in history, but he gives (has to give Acre to someone to govern the castle), and this goes to Beatrice and Robin (actually Robin and Beatrice). And here is the real name, bastardized down through history as Robin of Loxeley (not a British town !!!!), but Robin al Acre (arabic version).King John (anglican) and King John, Beatrice, and Robin (celtic church) cause all the British Magna Carta baron demonstration. Robin comes back from crusades, before RIchard and his German imprisonment and ransom, and wants back his hereditary princess mother's lands. John refuses and puts Robin into outlaw status. Robin then has his own folowers, and such other compliant barons, and they wage war against this catholic (!) king. This is where they earn their noted green knights uniform, and the hood title, Robin Hood. Thereafter, his progeny, who appear multiple generations later, and still in lawful or outlaw status appear as other namesaked Robin Hoods. Here is the real truth of the blood and genealogy of Robin Hood.The green knight uniforms also go back to the green man of the forest (ie Merlin ... and the Arthurian Green Knight legends) connection, all happening in the earlier Mideast celtic Yehidah crusader empire 125-600s CE.And such are the 100 (?) green men sculpted into Rosslyn chapel of your ancestors (... and possibly some of my female lineage as well. I have the Black Douglas (Scottish outlaw and exile from King Jaimie), who married my ancestor's noble son, ... Mary Douglas, and we inherit the namesake Robert into our 'ENGLISH!" clan. And if I go back on these Douglas bloodlines of royal Stewart, I am sure that there are Sinclair lines.Also when my 3 FitzAlan brothers move from Shropshire (1450s) to Hertfordshire, we all gain armorial coats, and set up all kinds of industrial businesses (Datchworth, thatch, Shephall, sheep ... famous FitzAlan biggest sheer herders of England, Kempton town changed from Norman Chemington name, Hitchin, etc. And at that time, we were very well placed, and it is the rise of the Clares, as Earls of Hertford, and the Governors of Guenersey and Jersey, that I am having blood pains in connecting them with other 1450s-1643 anafetal lines of mine.It is my Sir Robert Kympton, 1575, knighted by Queen Liz, that namesaked Scottish (-Frnehc) Robert name, Lodon lawyer, landlord of Gray's Inn, who is in that period of lineage, and marrying into these Clares.So I do have multiple Clares, and Scottish Sinclairs in the bloodlines, for you to study.YOu should know ... that all these super family and branches were celtic church, and that these (said) donations to such priories, abbeys, churches, ... were all donations to these (then) celtic Yehidah faith churches. Just the same as the massive Templar (Yehidah) church organization that grew out of the medieval and crusader operations, and all the Yehidah were giving money and lands into this organization versus the anglican church (and King John's financial distress). The catholic church and John were suffering from the Yehidah, not putting "John Tetzel" coins into their bags, and putting them into the treasuries of the Childen of God, these Rex Deus organizations, the Children of Jesus.You are of that bloodline, descended from the Master and Mary Magdalene, on my bloodline from Joseph, son of Jesus, the European branch of the family. All royal dynasties of Europe descend from this, ... my ... bloodline. This is what the catholic church hates the truth, and their theological heresies.So if (and when) you see such donations, and they are not to the anglican church, strongly suspect that these are celtic Yehidah church. And these are Yehidah people. So ... if as you say ... you are tracing out such donations to churches (et al), then I wonder (hmmm ?!) if you are trying to find all these Yehidah churches across Europe, and that these provide the financial network for the Templar financial banking system, ... and for what might be the footprint for the removal of the templar funds (treasure) out of the hands of the catholics and their inquisitions May 13, Friday, 1307 onwards. ?!The entire northern and western lands of Europe were celtic Yehidah, not catholic, much in the same lands, that we saw the Wars of Religion in the 1500s. These faith-wars were fought at the faith-borders of their own faith-nations. So, any templar funds in the catholic south and central regions would have been sequestered out and into these lands away from confiscation, ... and into the Mideast sections of remnant templar families remaining after the crusades.So much to dialogue here ... this is exciting.
Hi +John Lord, I've never heard of the origins of the chequy pattern being the Exchequer. From a quick glance in my sources, the role of Exchequer in England and Wales started (or at least was first documented) in the 12th century. The Dialogus de Scaccario (Dialogue concerning the Exchequer), written by Richard FitzNeal, was from the late 12th Century. Another interesting book, the Tractatus of Glanville was written before 1190, probably by Ranulf de Glanvill. (That surname is incredibly interesting in my research). Glanvill wrote it for King Henry II, and it was the earliest such document on English law, defining the roles and common laws of England. Both these books were too late for the building of Castle Acre, which was founded in 1089 and built for several years after that. I think your chess board is a good bet, as chess started in 6th century India and by the time those first crusaders were coming back, 1099, chess had made it's way well into Europe.I'm glad you're in touch John. Your notes certainly help on the historical adventure we're all on.
I didn't know it had Masonic significance. After posting that video, Scott confirmed what Anthony had said, it's of importance to the Masons. It's likely somewhat common as an artistic motif. But on an armorial bearing, one cannot say it's common. If you haven't seen this page on my website, check it out - //www.stclairresearch.com/content/Sinclair-Templar-Proof.htmlSome of the families using it were related. These others are all interesting if you're a student of medieval English history - Warenne, Vaux, Dreux, Vermandois, Mulan, Clifford.Thanks for your comments.
Hi NibiruLives, the coat of arms in Portugal is not mine. I forget the name of the family. It was one I've never seen in my research. The Phoenix? I don't think so.