Austin white cigarette bin Videos

Solitary Man - so pleasant, NOW WAY THE PUNX COULD EMBRACE IT. Good song tho - at 8:00 - it could just loop forever. Well done.

Compelling melody, vocals, guitar solo, and beat. Well done! Happy New Year!

Austin Petersen is correct and pretty much all liberals are Nazis, if you don't agree with them they throw you to the wolves.

You know what a national socialist is in Germany? Anyone that's part of the German Social Democratic Party!! Y'know, the same fucking party that Adolf Hitler, the leader of Nazis who you label anyone that can analytically call out your bullshit himself, prohibited in 1933. I mean, the audacity of these people to infer Sanders, Hartmann, anyone from the left, a Nazi. When Nazis, disabled the party of the ideologies held by these guys through the Enabling Act. Even went as far as to kill government officials or send them to exile. This fucking idiot knows jackshit about Nazi Germany. Yet, quick to call anything that doesn't fit into his political view Nazism. Peterson's a corporate whore! Hartmann should've asked how much David Koch paid him to suck his dick!

+Travis Harrell Typical fascist disabling replies to his comments. "Socialism is a system of governance where the state owns the means of production." WRONG. Socialism is a system where the people own the means of production communally. Socialism was achieved without a state in Barcelona before the Spanish Civil War. "Free" market fascism has never existed without the state. "Fascism is a system of governance where the state controls the means of production." WRONG. Fascism is a system where private corporations own the means of production. Fascism is also called "corporatism" for this very reason. Your historical revisionism is astounding.

As Just another example of Travis Harrell's lies he purports that Krugman called for a bubble. But that is just another poor libertarian lie, like the rest of their 'history'. *"When Someone Says Paul Krugman Called for Greenspan to Create a Housing Bubble Back in 2002, They are Trying to Say That They are Either a Fool or a Liar"* Wednesday, 22 January 2014 13:25 Paul Krugman is a very smart person who does a fine job of defending himself. But he has enough detractors who repeat the same nonsense enough times that some reasonable people may actually be deceived. For this reason, I will briefly intervene to point out that the people claiming Krugman called on Greenspan to create a housing bubble in 2002, like Bret Stephens in the Wall Street Journal today, are just making stuff up. The basis for this absurd claim was a 2002 column on the weak recovery following the 2001 recession. The column notes the weakness of the economy at the time (we were still losing jobs 8 months after the official end of the recession) and attributes it to the fact that the 2001 recession was not a standard post-war recession. It was brought about by the collapse of the stock bubble. Krugman then wrote: "To fight this recession the Fed needs more than a snapback; it needs soaring household spending to offset moribund business investment. And to do that, as Paul McCulley of Pimco put it, Alan Greenspan needs to create a housing bubble to replace the Nasdaq bubble." It should have been pretty evident that this was sarcastic. Later in the piece, Krugman derides Greenspan for failing to have taken steps to head off the stock bubble, explaining that Greenspan badly needed a recovery: "to avoid awkward questions about his own role in creating the stock market bubble." The last paragraph expresses Krugman's pessimism about the recovery's prospects: "But wishful thinking aside, I just don't understand the grounds for optimism. Who, exactly, is about to start spending a lot more? At this point it's a lot easier to tell a story about how the recovery will stall than about how it will speed up. And while I like movies with happy endings as much as the next guy, a movie isn't realistic unless the story line makes sense." Note, there is no moaning about how difficult it is to get a housing bubble going. The point was that we needed some additional source of demand and Krugman did not see where it would come from. In this respect, it is worth noting that two weeks later, partly at my prodding, Krugman wrote a column explicitly warning about the dangers of a housing bubble. So let's cut the crap. There are plenty of places that right-wingers should be able to take issue with what Krugman says, but the story about him urging Greenspan to create a housing bubble in 2002 is complete nonsense. The people who repeat this line are either dishonest or too clueless to take seriously. From the "Center on Economic and Policy Research" And Krugman himself said: "One of the funny aspects of being a somewhat, um, forceful writer is that I’m regularly accused of all sorts of villainy. I was personally responsible for the demise of Enron; my nonexistent son worked for Hillary; etc.. The latest seems to be that I called for the creation of a housing bubble — in fact, the bubble is my fault! The claim seems to be based on this piece. Guys, read it again. It wasn’t a piece of policy advocacy, it was just economic analysis. What I said was that the only way the Fed could get traction would be if it could inflate a housing bubble. And that’s just what happened." Travis is *both* a fool *and* a liar! ..

Austin, let's put 5,000 on the table and make a bet: I bet you that EVERY SINGLE NAZI is right-wing. We'll go out and find them and do a poll. Ya, it's an ideology that appeals to the RIGHT-WING because it's RIGHT-WING. Dumbass.

Alright, before i go anymore into 20 seconds in, I have to say the guests, from left to right, look like a goatee-less Tony Stark, Crazy Steve from Drake and Josh and stylish Seth MacFarlane.

These are one of my least favourite cigarettes (or the worse if you prefer). I had trouble finishing a pack. There's something wrong for me with JPS cigarettes. I don't like the black either. For the same price, I go with Winston, 10-fold better. Even Austin are better than JPS to me.

Shit the kids leg! And what the hell was the last pic? it looked like a half of a head...