Meredith college student id Videos

+Aweta Noah Haha,good one! (I almost thought you were serious....)

+dkmeller1 Wow! You're proof that women do need feminism. You're masculinism sucks, and is destroying the planet.

One word...."Palimony"!

+SPOOKYLORD2001 XX "Painfully"? For whom?

+ranged12345 I'll try my best. I just don't have much time, but I'll try to make a pragmatic decision. Life feels really ambiguous right now, and very lonely; but I don't have a problem with that. I would rather spend a majority of my time in solitude, than spend a majority of my time around inept, conformist, and illogical human beings; and I mean that in most humbling way possible. I probably sound rather condescending.

+The Observer Many thinkers have made their name in fields they weren't formally educated in.. Its a hard decision, but I recommend thinking about it very pragmatically -- I know loads of people with great intellectual ambitions, useless degrees and unreasonable debt.

+ranged12345 I've considered venturing into more lucrative career paths, but I'm not sure if I will be enthusiastic during the education and after the education. I have a insatiable thirst for knowledge, but I've never been able to pin point a degree in relation to said thirst. Anything having to do with nature, anatomy, psychology, philosophy, epistemology, etc. I feel like I'd be wasting what little time I have on earth, if I end up just getting a practical career. But if I end up doing something too ambitious, I will probably hurt myself financially in the long run. I'm just really perplexed right now.

+The Observer Read/think/write philosophy in your spare time. I got accepted to a top uni to study philosophy half a decade ago, yet changed my mind last minute and went into computer science. So now I am in the situation where --if I wanted to --- I could do ten hours of programming work a week, live frugally, and spend the remaining time reading about some mindfuck epistemological conundrums until my brain melts. I recommend you pursue some form of degree or training that gives good future returns compared to its price in terms of time and debt. E.g. welding/computer science/accounting &c. Plenty of sysadmins/programmers/designers don't have undergrad degrees and are well paid. And if you are feeling despondent, you should prioritize changing your brain chemistry to increase dopamine levels, and decrease chronic cortisol sensitization and inflammation. Get restful sleep/accrue positive social interactions/meditate/eat well/exercise at least twice a week. There's no point in for example doing a degree if you feel lethargic and demotivated and can't put 100% of yourself into it.

+Zagg777 lol I like that. So true.

+Zagg777 Yup. You are paying for her to leave!

+cookie man You're trying to hard. Why do you care if certain men bow out of the game? Why does it bother you? Everything is shit and you know it.

+cookie manInstead, I am going to spare myself the wasted time trying to teach you the logical value of generalizations.

+ExBruinsFan "Because I prefer to reason things out. Not guess at them"But you are guessing at them. We are not like a rat or a bird, we are beyond blindly following instincts. There is no way to find the intentions of a person unless you specificly investigate that person. You have to assume when you talk about random encounters, and the only reasonable assumption is that without evidence to the countrary, people want what they say they want."It is not 100%. So don't say that that was claimed, just to make it easy to disprove."That was what was said, indirectly. Like I said, if it's not 100% or at least close, then it's worthless because you are still stumbling in the dark when making decisions. Either it's just worthless rambling, or it has a use in making decisions about things and predicitions about future interactions. Since it seemed to me, and be free to correct me if I'm wrong, that the video suggests I should act in a certain way based on this information, then it should be 100% or close to 100% true.Again, who are you to say when women only want sex? Go back to my example. Lots of time I don't want desserts, but sometimes I do, and because of that any decision that is based on whether or not I will have a dessert is based on nothing but the assumption that I will, or won't have one. The same way, lots of women cheat on their rich husbands, but some don't. Some do this, some do that, people do all sorts of things and what I'm getting here is that you are essentially thinking "My rule should be followed consistantly even though it is not consistant."If a certain woman is known to follow said rule, people won't be idiots. What I'm talking about is a random woman that you know nothing about. You have no justification to go and tell a person "I know what you want and that's what you want no matter what you say or think that you want."This is a lose-lose situation for women. No matter what they want, what they say they want, what they think they want, MGTOW people already know what they want and they are sure to tell them, and women are either lying when they say it's not true or they are unaware of that great inescapable biological direcive.Now, before you reply, ask yourself - Is what you say reasonable to be applied 100% of the time to 100% of the women before you even met them, or it's inconsistant enough to allow for individuals to make their own decisions? If it's the latter, then don't bother replying, I'll just give you the the win right here and now because even if you'll end up correct it'll be worthless information.

+cookie manDid you WATCH the video?"And here's the problem. Why do you assume the sex providers want money?(Well, assuming normal people, not prostitutes or sugar stuff)"Women are (by nature) prostitutes. It IS normal behaviour."Why can't you assume that hetrosexual couples trade sex-for-sex too,"Because I prefer to reason things out. Not guess at them."and the money is just a side benefit because let's be honest, everyone would like for someone else to pay for all their things, male or female.I am getting the vibe that MGTOW believe that women are barely interested in sex for it's own sake if at all, and it's 100% only to get things out of men."It is not 100%. So don't say that that was claimed, just to make it easy to disprove."That if a woman says "I just want sex" then she must be lying and you need to start searching for the true reason."Women only "just want sex" when they have the money and status already taken care of. Lots of women cheat on their rich husbands.

+ExBruinsFan And here's the problem. Why do you assume the sex providers want money?(Well, assuming normal people, not prostitutes or sugar stuff) Why can't you assume that hetrosexual couples trade sex-for-sex too, and the money is just a side benefit because let's be honest, everyone would like for someone else to pay for all their things, male or female.I am getting the vibe that MGTOW believe that women are barely interested in sex for it's own sake if at all, and it's 100% only to get things out of men. That if a woman says "I just want sex" then she must be lying and you need to start searching for the true reason.About the women are less eager to have sex, well, I am less eager to eat sweet stuff but I sometimes buy desserts because I feel at that time to eat something sweet for the sake of eating something sweet. You can't make predictions if your model can sometimes stop working out of the blue. Either women don't want sex for it's own sake consistently enough for you to be able to assume any random woman you meet follows the rule, or the rule is unreliable enough that you may as well ignore it because it's useless beyond talking about it.

+cookie man The male/female dynamic is designed for heterosexuals - since nature only cares about reproduction. Men trade money for sex, because money is what the sex providers want.Gay men want sex. There are gay prostitutes, so some of the dynamic applies, but mostly, it is sex for sex. This is theory, of course. Feel free to correct me.Lesbians? Who the fuck knows? I have heard that lesbian relationships have the least amount of sex. This makes sense to me, since women are less eager to have sex.

Just throwing a slightly more difficult case for you. It's easy to say all men want X and all women want Y and that's why they do things, harder when you can't point and blame.Seriously, is it a requirement for being a MGTOW that you believe in biological determinism? Because I am yet to find a single one that says "I believe we(women too, in case you wonder) are at least 90% in control of our lives and decisions"

+cookie man What about them?