Campbell university jfk Videos

+Zoological Militia What did you KNOW about MARS?

You haven't established rule #1. You present zero evidence that would stand up in an investigation let alone a court of law.

+freddyT1994 Rule #1 If there is clear evidence of a conspriracy, it's a conspiracy. #2 if the evidence shows more than one shooter, it's a conspiracy. Rule #3 See rule number 1.

+Nate725 Your mom's cunt. 

+superchitownhustler Lol..  Wait!  What are you laughing about!?

+sonoran rain lol

Absolutely; just another piece of the puzzle(cause) that led to his assassination; Also Kennedy's executive order to withdraw all troops from Vietnam  (which LBJ reversed on Monday November 25th(only 4 days after the assassination) which along with the "Gulf of Tonkin" incident gave LBJ a blank check to escalate the war to over 1/2 million troops within 2 years; the oil depletion allowance Kennedy advocated which would have put a HUGE dent in the Texas Oil tycoon's profits and a myriad of other reasons gave motive and opportunity to many who wanted him killed. America became a "banana republic" on 11/22/63 and has never recovered the trust its citizenry once gave it.

+sonoran rain what about the whole aspect of getting away from the federal reserve, which was dismantled once LBJ took over?

lol seriously???

+sonoran rain  The special needs class got out early today! See Below.... LOL..LOL..LOL...LOL..LOL...LOL..

+sonoran rain lol...dweeb.

+Jimmy Allen lol....dweeb.

+Jimmy Allen Agree completely; hence I am not responding to the toad. And I'll take that last phrase as an indirect compliment and you seem to be as well :-). We and millions of other people thankfully represent individuals that review the assassination evidence empirically instead of from a myopic perspective that the idiot box feeds them. And yes you are right, you can't expect rational discourse from deluded people. I truly pity them as they are typical of the mindless trolls that offer no cogent thought to defend the sum total of the evidence. All they can do is resort to coarse invective; hence we can only trust that many of them are hopefully in custodial care.

+Jimmy AllenWhen debating conspiracy theorists, the debate always ends when you get accused of being apart of the "sheeple". But, I'll destroy you anyway.Lee Harvey Oswald did it.Why? It was due to a lack of bowling alleys and nightclubs in the Soviet Union. More immediately, he hung out with Castro sympathizers in Mexico City during his unsuccessful attempt to get a Cuban visa, some of whom voiced the opinion that Kennedy should be killed in retaliation for his attempts to have Castro assassinatedAs for your "magic bullet" that so often pops up among the conspiracy theories is also based off the seating of the people in the car, Kennedy included.Again, if you look at the seating arrangements in the car, then the theory, and any that expand on the idea, are destroyed instantly.Your theories claim that Governor Connally was sitting in front of Kennedy, and that this proves that Kennedy couldn't have been shot by Oswald.In reality, Kennedy was behind him sitting elevated position, and Connally front of him on the right-hand side on a less elevated plane, and in the path of Oswald's shot. Indeed, the entire thing can be disproved by the way everyone was sitting when Kennedy was shot.And that's the truth. I'm sorry. No conspiracy. I know it's boring, but it's true.

+sonoran rain You can't teach the non thinking......they wouldn't know evidence or be able to process it. The Warren Report was made for sheep like them. They attempt to "argue" thru insults. I don't waste my valuable time conversing with low intelligence beings. You may have a higher constitution.....

+sonoran rain STFU you ignorant idiot. You are the sheeple. 

+Roguemember So Peter Jennings and that ABC special closed the case for you to disprove any conspiracy? Ruth Paine and the Russians not liking Oswald seals the deal for you? Wish you had gone to the Warren Commission back in 64 and closed the case more quickly for them. Anyone that believes that there was no conspiracy has NOT looked at the plethora of evidence from that day in Dealey Plaza as well as all the people that had motives to take Kennedy out. Sounds like you're the one with the tin foil hat as you refuse to believe the empirical evidence (read: ALL) the evidence that does not support what that special presented, but is satisfies the myopic sheeple like you that like being spoon fed what the networks are still pushing from 50 years ago. Relying on one source or opinion is where the misinformation campaign began and it will continue to propagate as long as there are bozos like you that believe a single special on ABC that still pushes the lone assassin theory.

+sonoran rainWhere's your evidence? I need real evidence, and not your tin foil hat.

+Jimmy Allen Absolutely! Jennings had a visible amount of remorse when doing that "special documentary" Lots of misinformation that was once again spoon fed to the American Public. It should be clear that although Oswald had complicity in the assassination, he was duped/betrayed by all of the other conspirators. He believed he was going to be whisked off to a safe house as were the true assassins and then flown out of Dallas. Instead, many powers controlling the strings decided that Oswald would have to fall on the sword and his killing by Ruby would be the only way to keep the conspiracy from being exposed. Marrs does go down some rabbit holes that I question, but I do believe as do many researchers now that the cover up can be traced to Hoover and Johnson; Confiscation of film,destroying the crime scene, murders of  innocent people,  and a  huge rush by Johnson to get the Warren report to cherry pick the evidence and get this behind the American public (which has the memory of a fruit fly) as quickly as possible. Had their been an alternative media and better forensics in 1963, the perpetrators of this coup would have been exposed within hours

+Jimmy AllenEvery real conspiracy, such as the Iran Contra Scandal, has had a whistleblower.This one hasn't. Neither has 9/11 (although there is legitimate concern as to whether or not we may have let it happen rather than an 'inside job that was planned'). Withholding of information doesn't equate "cover up". There's evidence that isn't publicly available in the Columbine Shootings or Sandy Hook.So what?

+Jimmy Allen LOL...Gotcha you full of shit poseur. 

+superchitownhustler .......AND it would be "gold" to a one dimensional "thinking" Warren Fairytale Groupie

+Jimmy Allen I guess it would to a full of shit CTer' 

+Roguemember That ABC special with Peter Jennings that "totally disproves a conspiracy",,,,,,,,,,,was more like an enema.

+Roguemember Yep.  You are 100% correct.  Jim Marrs is a provocateur who will never give up his meal ticket.  He is a disgrace to "journalism".  Fucking piece of shit.

Incredible!