I did something like this when I was in highschool to figure out how many
atoms were in the universe. I started with a quarter... decided that there
was probably somewhere between a trillion and a quadrillion atoms in it
(10^15). That's way too little in actuality but I didn't know that at the
time. Then I tried to figure out how many quarters would fit in my state.
How many of my states would fit in the earth. How many earths in the sun.
How many suns in the galaxy. How many galaxies in the universe. Every guess
was completely wrong and based on no information or research. I ended up
with something like 10^68. The actual number (best scientific guess)
according to google is 10^80. Which is pretty close for having done no
research I think.
By your description "pretty close" would have to be within like %50 of the true number to seem reasonable, and that defeats the whole purpose of using exponents for estimation. Even using your population example... say you had no idea what the true number was, or how many people countries had. 4 people in your house. Probably like... 50,000 houses in your city? Less? Maybe like, 1000 cities in the USA. And what, 200 countries? Ish? Rapid estimation. That method gives us... 40 billion. Which is according to google is only a little more than one power of ten away from the real number (7 billion). We could say 1/10 is relatively insignificant... but that would be silly since we're just trying to estimate a practical high or low limit. Ya know?
+kevin smith Pretty close? Your maths is way off. the difference between 10^80 and 10^68 is 10^12.10^12 = 1,000,000,000,000 = 1 trillionThat means, for every atom you counted there are 1 trillion more. Or the universe has a trillion times more atoms than your estimate. Or your number a trillion times lower than the actual number. 10^68 is only a trillionth significant for 10^80. If 10^68 atoms were taken out of this universe, we will hardly notice anything different. That's how 10^68 is insignificant for 10^80.It's okay as you did it in high school. I counted my country's population the same way when I was in the high school. I came to a number which was also highly insignificant in front of the actual number. As it turned out people had time for lot of quickies. :D
because we don't know exactly how many but it's a big city, so it's a couple millions. and that corresponds to 10^6. We don't care about wether it's 1million, 2millions or 9 millions. We know it's millions so that's enough. Here you go, 10 at the power of 6
This is the most CONFUSING thing I have ever seen. Why is this so
complicated?? 3 goes into 13.. 4 times... then 3 goes into 18 ..6 times.
The answer is 46. There is a whole lot of extra wasted time to get to the
correct answer. I bet the moron who came up with this ridiculous method
never thought about the PARENTS that don't know anything about this having
to help their children understand it and help with homework. Its like me
trying to teach someone Chinese. I don't know that language but I'm going
to try to teach you how to speak it.
+Debbie Lemon I'm sorry you're having difficulty with this lesson. The publisher (publishers) of this textbook are trying to show several methods to estimate division. This is just one way. Their hope, and mine, is that after seeing many approaches, you will be able to tackle problems by having the choice to pick your method. Again, I am sorry. Take care. :(
+The_Playstation_Bro Great question! Yes, you are right, 12 is closer to 13 than15. But we’re using 138 (13 tens and 8 ones), 150 – 138 = 12. But 138 – 120 =18. So, 138 is closer to 150 (only 12 away) than it is to 120 (18 away). I hopethat helps. :)
Estimating Sums and Differences - MathHelp.com - Math Help
For a complete lesson on estimating sums and differences, go to //www.MathHelp.com - 1000+ online math lessons featuring a personal math teacher inside ...