Home » Video » ...

Flying car specs Videos

Jouney Home Part 1 - Before the Flight, Car services, luggage weight

Flight to HK from Newark, NJ, then shuttle back to ShenZhen China thru ShenZhen Bay.

User Comments

wompwomp8032 commented on 06 Dec 2013

thank you for documenting your travel. I am taking my first trip to Hong Kong in just 5 weeks. I am really excited. I went to Taipei two years ago and I fell in love with Asia and can't get back soon enough.

Neil R commented on 31 Mar 2013

as long as you consume it on the plane and don't take it to your arrival country

vanessatalkstips commented on 08 Feb 2013

hey i go to newark every time i go to dominican republic thats so cool

The 2016 New Bentley Flying Spur Luxury ~ Overviews, Pricing, Specs, and Redesign

The 2016 New Bentley Flying Spur Luxury ~ Overviews, Pricing, Specs, and Redesign : GET OUR TOP STORIES AND MORE We deliver to your inbox for free!

Witness a flying car

2017 Bentley Flying Spur Redesign,Price and Specs

2017 Bentley Flying Spur Price Pricing for the new 2017 Bentley Flying Spur has been set at $46120 – $56670 based on current exchange rates. If there are ...

Crazy Flying Weight-Lifting

Watch Previous Vid: https://youtu.be/nZ0ibZ7VKUQ ----- My links!!! YouTube: //www.Youtube.com/JRMun0z Twitter: //twitter.com/JRMun0z FaceBook: ...

User Comments

Edwin Mondragon commented on 14 May 2015

TELL HIM TO BRING $TEPHON BACK !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

kim Rose commented on 14 May 2015

What about your girlfriend?????????????????????????

elias winters commented on 14 May 2015

dude u need a wind breaker on that cam

*Possum_Pony * commented on 14 May 2015

4.49 ..... hahahahahhahahahaha :')

ayellessnuffelhoek commented on 14 May 2015

You got that spraytan...

Eduardo Castellon commented on 14 May 2015

Where in Coachella? ..

Isitwrongtobestrong1 commented on 14 May 2015

poop

GTA 4 iCEnhancer 2.1 (Amazing Flying Car) GTX 770 4GB

RC quadcopter flying inside sealed box reduces weight - common sense really

This was a silly argument at work, its obvious to me that if you weigh a box with a quadcopter flying in, your just weighing the box itseld as the quadcopter isn't ...

User Comments

Tore Lund commented on 03 Sep 2015

I don't know why you a getting a mass reduction for the complete closed system; box+air+quadcopter, it shouldn't be possible? Maybe you have an EMI problem with your scale? Try suspending the box on blocks a few millimeters above the scale and then redo the experiment. I suspect that the motors or your transmitter is interfering with your reading and you can reproduce your result without the box touching the scale. You could also redo the experiment on a mechanical scale, it wouldn't be susceptible to EMI.

Tore Lund commented on 14 Sep 2015

So this was a spoof! You sounded really convincing, are you a real estate broker in real life?

jamesb72 commented on 14 Sep 2015

+Tore Lund You should watch this video with explanation ;) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UcYMyZIHzrU

Dave Pitt (XXPITT) commented on 19 Oct 2014

mark and neil are idiots!

jamesb72 commented on 19 Oct 2014

no arguments here ;)

→ to the knee commented on 11 Oct 2014

I think you are interpreting the results of this experiment wrong. The weight goes down because the force of air is pressing down on the right side of the box causing an imbalance of force across the box and thus the scale reading is wrong. I just performed the same experiment and made sure to tie down my helicopter to keep it from moving around and the weight does *not* change inside a sealed box. If you don't believe me, then take your interpretation to its logical conclusion: the helicopter can fly to the top of the box, and if powerful enough, the upward force on the top of the sealed box can lift the box off the scale and the whole box can fly around like a magical UFO. Clearly, this doesn't happen. Explanation: the air molecules hit the bottom of the box and exactly cancel out the upward force, thus the scale won't change if everything is kept lined up over the scale.

jamesb72 commented on 13 Oct 2014

You may be right ;) Quadcopter in a box REVEAL - SECRETS OUT

→ to the knee commented on 11 Oct 2014

That said, I'm now going to run some more experiments to make sure I'm not making stuff up... Thanks for posting your video as it is making me rethink my process...

robertsulley commented on 02 Aug 2014

I'm confused, one of Newton's laws states that the quad must be exerting a downward force equal to it's weight in order to hover right. So regardless of whether it is hovering or landed the weight should remain the same no?

MrAaronvee commented on 13 Sep 2015

+M3ta7h3ad Exactly. WTF is wrong with these people?! Vibration can also make a simple balance 'weigh light'. There is a name for the sort of person who hopes to get an accurate weight for a moving object: that name is 'idiot'.

M3ta7h3ad commented on 28 Sep 2014

You're right. We are being crushed.The jumbo jet's displacement is spread out over a great area. To put things into perspective, we're currently being crushed by a giant column of air above us, yep even the gases that make up our atmosphere have a weight.The box went light due to the balance of the box changing, just as my weight changes if I was to stand on one leg or hold my arms out wide on my bathroom scales.Can't even believe this is even being debated tbh by folk who use the principles of lift and therefore physics in order to enjoy their hobby. :/

iforce2d commented on 10 Aug 2014

I really hope not, otherwise every time a jumbo jet passed overhead we would be crushed by 300 tons of downward force.

eroticmasterbaker commented on 02 Aug 2014

If you fly a qaudcopter inside a moving automobile do you have to give it forward thrust or will it automatically move with the car?

jamesb72 commented on 19 Oct 2014

+Dave Pitt Great question, I am guessing the innitial jolt maybe, but if the elevator was really smooth accelerating then no throttle reduction would be necessary, as the air in the elevator is all moving down with you and the quadcopter. Would be a good video though if someone has an elevator ;)

Dave Pitt (XXPITT) commented on 19 Oct 2014

if i quad is in an elevator do you need to lower throttle to get it to maintain same height when elevator is descending?

iforce2d commented on 10 Aug 2014

+Wolfeyes Sunny No, that would be like geostationary orbit.

Wolfeyes Sunny commented on 02 Aug 2014

+Aditya Gupta This might sound silly but if a quadcopter could stay in the air for say like 12 hours in one spot with no other forces acting on it like wind, it would end up on the other side of the planet?

jamesb72 commented on 02 Aug 2014

+eroticmasterbaker surely if the car windows are closed there is no wind in the car, so if car is travelling 20kmph before take off quad will just hover level and stay in position (as no wind pushing it backwards), whereas if the car accelerated or braked it would then need forward/back stick to hold position inside the car. Maybe we need to try this next !!

eroticmasterbaker commented on 02 Aug 2014

Thanks, this is still boggling my mind, seeing as how their is no wind resistence affecting the quad. If I fly my quad level in wind it will drift with the wind.

Aditya Gupta commented on 02 Aug 2014

imagine the car traveling at 20kmph with the quad sitting in the car. now the velocity of the quad is also 20kmph because it is attached to the car. butas soon as the quad lifts in the air and loses contact with the car, it will lose its velocity will drift back and the car will move forward. so yes you have to give forward stick to the quad.

Link for boards:

Link for your site:

Current link: