Flying car disadvantages Videos

Cool. Thanks. Have fun!

I did notice when I crash sometimes that happens and I just have to turn it off. Don't think it can do that on it own when it's off though. Was yours off?

+Dustin Dunnill Unfortunately I'm waiting for some parts before I get back in the air. My power module died after too much time powered up on the bench. The replacement is coming from China, so the wait is on. I've got a Xiaomi Yi and a 3-axis gimbal coming as well, so I'm looking forward to seeing how those perform. The quality of the Xiaomi Yi has come a long way over the past couple months and it's already eclipsed the Mobius in terms of overall quality and capabilities.

Thanks. Off topic but...Hope your quest for aerial photography is going well. My Cheerson cx20 is serving me well. Next I need to look into a higher resolution video camera.

+The RCAddict I got mine for $16.20 USD on Amazon What a rip.

+TheCubingGamer I agree. Great design and quality. Cheerson really hit a homerun with this nano quad.

Sure thing Roger :)

I believe it can, I saw the other day, some Eachine nano quad just got FPV on it.

+Glitchz FPV yah if it's reeaaal mini.

+twrecks116 Alright thanks!

+Dustin Dunnill Yes, re-watched and saw around the 9:00 mark, it just flipped.

Thanks. Maybe I'll do a night flight video. I tried funnels in the vid @ park in rate 3 and it crashes...but maybe if you ease up a little yaw it would work.

Thanks

Thanks Bill

+W Zííkalokko Também acho que pessoalmente o aprendizado é bem melhor, você pode procurar o clube CCA em Itú, ou o pessoal da Go Fly no Aerobello em São Roque, eu também vôo em São Roque sempre que dá. Abraço

rsss não ele é bonzinho :)

+Tio DVD Hobbies que honra em kkk

+luiz miguel pereira Respondido pela hobbywow :)

+ luiz miguel pereira it's 45.39USD with free shipping. //www.hobbywow.com/en-x25-6-axis-gyro-speed-switch-rc-quadcopter-flying-car-with-2-0mp-camera-rtf-2-4ghz-p239716.htm

+TheGusK I was flying it on the lowest setting and just putting around. It is VERY responsive and quick. It all comes down to what you are comparing it to though....

+Rh Last Nae I agree, it looks kind of like a bird of prey flying around :)

+Darren Bunch You are welcome! :)

+Darren Bunch I wouldn't recommend either for a beginner. Go with a Cheerson CX-10 and practice with that indoors. Those are under $20 and not nearly as dynamic as this one is. It is a handful for a noob.

+AnkushVlogs I am sorry but like I said before, if you don't know those basic things then this is NOT one you should be flying. Use Google and read the manual.

+Ben Pyka Yep! lol

+GBLynden Lol grounded as in can't fly Lol !!

+Ben Pyka Oh man. I am sorry to hear that you are grounded Ben!

Thanks Bill! This thing is actually comparable in size laterally to your QX 350. It has a much shorter profile though and it tough!

+Practical Islamic Finance no.It means: It was off the discussion NOT to go.

Virgin Galactic is a space tourism company, not a launch services company like SpaceX.

+Ryo's Dojo That's almost the exact same thing. NASA was purchasing the ability to use a capability (Falcon 9 LV) rather than purchasing a capability (flights on a Falcon 9). NASA doesn't benefit at all directly from SpaceX completing a preliminary project management review of SpaceX, and yet they were paid $23 million to do it. That's not contracting, that's development funding.Not that that's a problem. The government could get something by having Falcon 9 and SpaceX could get something by having the government as a customer, so it was an ideal relationship.

+Ambient Morality All spacecraft development (F9, Dragon, etc) was paid for already by SpaceX. They didn't receive a single cent in funding to create its systems. Under COTS NASA would only provide what was essentially reward money to space companies AFTER they had achieved key objectives. COTS was also a part of NASA's Commercial Crew and Cargo Program (C3PO) where funding was as part of launch contracts. Which confirms what I said, that SpaceX only received money for work it actually completed.

+Ryo's Dojo Wrong. Falcon 9 was paid for under COTS which contracted development of a launch vehicle if applicable and a spacecraft. SpaceX used COTS money for Falcon 9 development and Dragon development.

+erbgeg egerger Actually, CRS is based on contract value. That means contractors ask for however much money they want to offer for however many missions they can offer, and NASA makes a selection based on the best proposals financially, risk-wise, and other factors. So NASA selected SpaceX and Orbital because they were the best deals of the bunch - and SpaceX obviously overcharged because they're so much cheaper than their competitors, then used that money to fund development.

+Sebastien Fauste 1.) like you said, NASA did not just buy ISS resupply flights, they subsidesed SpaceXs R&D by massive amounts monetary AND intellectually, you cannot not mention that. 2.) When did I say SpX is in competition with NASA? 3.) First you claimed "most of their revenue" now you claim "much of their revenue", quit sugarcopating it, SpX is taking a shitload (and majority!) of it's money from NASA. Just because others take money too doesn't make it invalid to point out SpX does (too). Summary, NASA played a big monetary and sharing knowledge part in getting SpX to where they are now. SPACEX WOULDN'T EXIST TODAY IF IT WEREN'T FOR NASA. If you don't belief me read Elons biography //www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-SpaceX-Fantastic-Future/dp/0062301233

+erbgeg egerger 1.) you're just plainly wrong and don't know what you're talking about, the "500 million" dollars of seed and development money was in contracts for missions that were cheaper then other competitors.2.) Spacex is not in competition with NASA they are in competition with other government subsidized space corporations that are NOT privately owned and funnel off government money like no tomorrow.3.) Spacex derives much of it's profit from other satellite companies and governments and would continue even without NASA contracts, they wouldn't be as far, but they would go on.  The point why Bill Nye is full of shit is because he somehow credits the government with the achievements of a private company that was created because the government couldn't achieve what Musk thought should be possible, I repeat: The great amount of cost reduction and advancements in rocket technology has come specifically from the government sponsored corporations sucking so much that a 13 year startup is easily beating them.

+Sebastien Fauste Are you purposefully deceptive or just a ill informed fanboi? Your level of ignorance really pisses me off! Falcon 9 has by a large percentage been subsidies by NASA, NASA got NOTHING in return, they just pay them so that they can play around and experiment. Without NASAs free money SpaceX wouldn't be anywhere near where it is today. Also NASA didn't just by Dragons to resupply the ISS, they gave SpaceX money to build Dragon only to then buy Dragon flights. BUT even if you dont count that money, SpaceX would STILL not "get most of their money from private companies". Your ignorance pisses me of!

+Zamolxes77 At this point you should just let evolution take place and let them slowly go extinct

+airgjoijsfdhads Then a scientist wouldn't help, most effective would be my little friend, 9mm

+Zamolxes77 No, nothing will change their views even if they saw evidence face to face

+airgjoijsfdhads Do you really need a scientist to shut down flat-Earth idiots? It's easy, just climb a hill by the sea ...

+airgjoijsfdhads Must be a centuries old joke to say you believe in a flat earth. All you have to do is go up a tall hill and look at the ocean and you can see the curvature of the earth.

Like that would help. These fucktards don't understand facts and evidence, much like their ideological cousins the moon landing denialists.

watch his episode of the science guy called "pseudo science" then (but they'll say it's all a fraud made by NASA and satan)

+Raychristofer don't feel bad man, I'm a hypocrite to judge lol, I've been struggling with time management and consistency for a while. Keep going man, your video production and audio quality continues to improve with each new video I watch.

+PocketableTech Franco I feel so bad youre right, I have two folders of vids filmed and need to narrate them and edit. I need to stop trying to be such a perfectionist like in this case and just trust. I promise Ill do better.

I love short light mood vids.. it's a nice break from the norm sometimes. I think it showed more of your personality in it and it was fun to watch. 

+Practechal Reviews Thanks PT, I was sure the first comment would be "that's stuupid lol. was in the mood to do a hustle edit today.