Fox's Megyn Kelly Outsources Facts On Gun Laws To NRA Spokeswoman
Megyn Kelly responded to President Obama's call for news organizations to present facts about the effectiveness of gun laws by relying completely on NRA ...
Here are some fact's: Google "World Data Bank" and "Nations Master
Statistics" Both show numbers of murder's per 100,000 citizen's.of "Gun
Free" Countries.
Germany- 2.48 per 100K
France- 8.09 per 100k
Belgium- 17.93 per 100k
Ireland- 5.79 per 100K
Now lets look at the United States
5.02 per 100K
Now that has changed recently for France, The recent shootings of 135 dead
and 300 wounded is the largest mass killing in 20 years, the last was in
the Ukraine.
So you are more likely to be murdered in a "Gun Free" country than the U.S.
( except for Germany" ) you are more likely to be murdered in these
Countries because you are not allowed to own a firearm for defense.
Last but not least, look at Mexico which has had a total gun ban since
1970, 37.91 murders per 100k. 33.46 per 100K murdered with means other than
gun's.
+BigChiefNoWashieTribe Jimmy Carter was no where NEAR the "worst president". Personally, I think FDR was still worse than even Obama. However Obama is running a really tight race for first place. If Obama does manage to nullify the 2nd Amendment, then Obama will get first place. But then... that would actually be the end of the USA as we know it too. Either there would be a full scale civil war, or the USA will shrink into the woodwork as the last part of the NWO takes over the planet.
+BigChiefNoWashieTribe The number for Germany is changing rapidly as well. Despite PM Merkle's concept that mass immigration is "good" for the country, the truth in the math says the opposite.
How irresponsible is Fox to have these lIARS for experts on their program?
Beheadings in the UK? There were only two such cases in the UK one, a
so-called wannabe jihadist who decapitated a soldier, the other was an old
lady decapitated by a mentally unstable man. The recent case this lying
woman referred to was not linked in any way from her with a crime the
victim was a depressed medical worker who went missing for over 8 months
before his body was found in the sea, and no such link to a beheading was
mentioned by the police. The fisherman who found the body said it was in a
very badly decomposed state and hardly recognisable, which could be the
reason for the missing head as being in water that long could weaken the
neck from the weight of the head and caused it to snap off in the sea. It
is rather ironic that they said Obama spoke without facts and they
themselves are calling a body without a head a beheading and linking it to
a crime which it wasn't or not proven- SHAMEFUL! I am glad this Megyn Kelly
no longer practice law she is certainly a charlatan to have discreditable
guests like this and agreeing with them!
On the other point about Austrailia doesn't she know the infamous family
that owns Fox are of Australian origin, how could they allow such a blatant
fabrication of facts to be left unchecked, and so defame a whole country in
their attempt to vilify Obama? This is a classic case of 30 pieces of
silver. There are no such mass killings in Australia and the forced gun
confiscation as she puts it is a total twisting of the facts Australia had
a forced gun buyback scheme way back in 2003 and a gun amnesty 2013 and it
was a very successful one at that- Another total lie on Fox! Note how she
went way back to 2003 but did not mention 2013.
I noticed how she slipped in the South American countries while avoiding
New Zealand ( also mentioned by the president ) to divert from her brazen
lies!
As a Brit, I am ashamed of my fellow Brits who no doubt listen to and watch
Fox and hear these blatant fabrications against the country and would not
muster a rebuttal here or anywhere else!
Shame, Shame, Shame, on Megyn Kelly and Fox!
+Army Vet 4444 Ha ha ha ha! Lol, this is the best tonic to go into the New Year... read your bile again moron and see why you re prime Trump material. How could you deduced that I yell by writing? "Liberal" is that a new insult now? Go look up the word moron, we are all liberals by the very nature of the word, for indeed moron you are exercising just that, by taking a word and attributing a political twist to its meaning does not take away from the true meaning- everything you just post, you did so by expressing your liberty!Read again your rant and see how incomprehensible it is ( trying to sound intelligent ) it is littered with grammatical errors- re you a Trump speech writer? As you just admitted that you are a racist bigot it would explain you rank and utter stupidity, so as you said, it is of no value debating with an Orangutan, racists regardless of colour or creed share one thing in common and that is a disposition to hated and derided by all, you are a disgrace and I am ashamed to have debated you- now go slither back under the rock whence you came you crusty amoeba!
+Earl RichardsonWhile I would love to rebut all the trash you just dished, it's obvious you do not hold the intellect to comprehend it, so it would be a waste of my time. You are a "typical" Liberal. The ONLY thing you said that was correct, is that I AM racist, and a bigot. I have no problem with that. Obviously you don't consider yourself to be one, which means you are even more susceptible to being controlled than most.You have decided you are right, even though you are not, and so to prove your point, you yell a lot. That's what liberal do. They can't back their beliefs with facts, so they just yell to cover up their lack of ability. You taught me to be a "moron" many a time, as though that were truth. Again, another liberal idiot ploy. Repeat a lie over and over, so that others will take it as truth. Fortunately for me, I have truth on my side, and your slander is no affect. It's like they always say, "Liberals, it's not a way of life, it's a disease like cancer, to be abjectly destroyed."
+Army Vet 4444 You are a total moron- what slang? what 'big bad boy"? You have just quantified my point about the bigotry and racism among your ilk, your tone has to place here as you again assuming my ethnicity- not that I am denying or admitting one way or the other but is is relevant and consistent with the bigoted racist ignorami- who come to the conclusion that in order to support Obama you are somehow of a certain demographics and so the perpetual racist connotations are in abundance. Army vet? I just hope you did not have black comrades because they would not have been safe around you.... P.S.. moron I do not comment for public approval I merely commented on a video as I see it, from experience here on these threads the propaganda that somehow Obama is such an incompetent and weak anti-American leader propagated by the cretinous Fox, has well and truly corrupted the sheep, hence the overwhelming support for a buffoon like Trump! The facts remain that since coming into office a lot have improved compared to the Bush years but if you tell a lie long enough it becomes the truth- from day 1 the destructive seeds about Obama were planted and it still continues to be planted today.....Oh and by the way moron, sometimes when there are no ticks for your comment it could mean that there are no real answer to debunk the statement so I take it no one other than you found fault with it? You imbecilic moron you are total lightweight and have no place debating me- now clear off and find a fellow redneck to argue with- may i suggest your uncledaddy, or your brotherson?
+Earl RichardsonROFLOL and you have the audacity to critique MY writing skills? Your point is lost in your slander. You are so busy trying to prove what a "big bad boy" you are, you forget to separate your slang from your ideology. Have a good day.Oh... I also see you don't have much in the way of public support either. (No up ticks). Those are the true tell as to who writes to the public, and has something to say they appreciate.
+Army Vet 4444 Poor lad you most probably got shot in the head and so is not able to speak or write properly- but if you haven't then you are a disgrace to the English language! I do not believe any "Brit" ( note the correct spelling) would encourage any frivolous ownership of guns, its just not in our veins, after all we are the example of a civilised society, we champion the pen over the sword, we gave the world Shakespeare and Wilde and Nelson and Churchill, while all you could muster is Britney spears Kim Wilde and the Sugar Hill gang? ( a bit of British humour ) By the way fish don't run up a stream, they swim, and who are you to say against the norm? How do you know, are you a fish? Salmons do it all the time so other fish most probably swim down the river against the norm?I am not against gun ownership I commented on a story with people who are obviously on a propaganda exercise and called it for what t is, and if that does not suit your narrative then fine but don't try to insult someone who is OBVIOUSLY more sophisticated in thinking than you! I am sure you would be very vexed and angry and would be willing to resort to violence towards me, so if you do read the sentence before this again!
+Earl Richardson MOST of your fellow "Britt" companions are constantly yelling at the USA telling us "Don't let them take your guns, no matter WHAT you have to do, do NOT let them take your guns." So I will listen to your diatribe as a fish running up stream against the norm.
Arguing with an NRA gun nut with facts about Gun control
The title is misleading, where's the facts about gun control? She did
nothing but spit out garbage. Our guns don't flow over to Mexico...Eric
Holder sells them their guns. The violence and drug running in Mexico is a
joint effort by the Obama administration and the government of Mexico. The
war on drugs is about as real as Osama bin Laden's funeral. Newsflash...our
government is behind the drug trafficking. Wake the flock up.
There is a gentleman who is giving 25 thousand dollars for anyone who can
prove Sandy Hook actually happened. Nobody has collected and they won't.
All these so called incidents are false flags, meant to create the
perception of people out of control.
Addressing anti-depressants would save more lives in one week then
enforcing gun control. If gun controlled work, Chicago would be one of the
safest cities to live.
Every country that took guns away has led to genocide or a dictatorship.
Gun control is about saving lives of the criminal sociopaths who have
abused, their position...have been bought off, blackmailed into submission
and fear the retribution of the people for their treasonous behavior. Who
made this crap video, Eric Holder?
The Evolution of the NRA's Top Gun | FRONTLINE | Gunned Down
Subscribe on YouTube: //bit.ly/1BycsJW NRA Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre wasn't always a gun enthusiast. In fact, when LaPierre first joined ...
When are the sheeple going to stop listening to factless emotional based BS
like this Frontline episode that gave very little of the gun rights point
of view and overwhelming emotional based view. When is America going to
listen to reality that comes from the science of the subject? Yes published
peer reviewed journals of CRIMINOLOGISTS. It does not matter what side they
start their research from they ALL come to the conclusion that gun control
has no significant effect on crime. The studies not funded by gun control
argue it has a negitive effect on our rights and victems of violence. Many
say violent crime rises when strict gun control is implemented.
How can we as Americans condone the trampeling of our rights. Setting a
example for the free world. When genocide still happens and the UN small
arms treaty Obummer and Hillarious sighned would take them from us. The
same UN that promised protection in Rawanda for disarming civilians that
split at the first gunshots and left them all to be killed by machette to
save ammo. Infants raped while mothers watched. Gun control has failed
world wide to the tune of 260 million + people this century and climbing.
People killed after gun control by their own government immidiatly or years
later. The American value I know does not agree with doing biz with China
due to their labor practice. Suicide nets suround the workplace is no
consolation.
When people around the world fighting bad goverment are asked, " What are
you fighting for, what do you want to achive?" They say "WE WANT WHAT
AMERICA HAS FREEDOM" The right to bear arms protects that freedom. You can
wonder how can armed citizens stand up to a powerfull tyranical government
like the USA? The US military swears an oath to protect our Constitution
from enemies foreign and domestic. It takes a lot of men and women to keep
a jet in the air or a tank rolling. The talaban is also an armed citizen
based group that still exists. They did not give up Bin Ladin without
evidence and now US says it was Khalid Shaikh Mohammed (google it) The fact
is self defence with a modern tool in common use is a natural human right
and there is a campaign to villianize it law abiding gun owners and the NRA
for protecting it.
The 'crime' issue is a red herring. Even if 'gun control' could be proven to lower crime it would still be evil. All 'gun control' is propaganda designed to condition the sheeple to more 'control' until full civilian disarmament is achieved. Thus all gun control is an act of war. All who forward it should be arrested, tried for treason against Human Liberty and executed. When guns are outlawed "Liberal"(commie) trash season begins. The Newswhores die first.//www.freekentucky.com/what-will-be-required/
Thank the anti-federalists who insisted on a Bill of Rights. But you'd better be ready to do what will be required because our Liberty requires enforcement by 'We the real American people' against our blood domestic enemies://www.freekentucky.com/what-will-be-required/
+David P Actually, the bible (before translation) said, "thou shalt not murder" and Jesus told a follow that "if he cannot afford a sword, to sell his coat and buy one."Killing a person in self defense or the defense of others is constantly supported in the bible and is not considered "murder."If everyone followed your belief system, evil men would have overrun the earth thousands of years ago.
+Matt Alexander The problem is we have federal background checks in every pawn shop gun show and gun shop. Many states like mine require every sale or transfer go through an ffl dealer including background check and waiting period. States make gun laws. The 2a is about tyranny in a big part not duck hunting. The NRA pushed year after year and still people that the court certifies crazy are not even in the database for denial. Felons try and buy guns and fail the background check are a non issue and not sought by police. Talk to your state about it if they allow private sales to other state residents. Criminals but off the street and we have tried to make drugs hard to get too. Gun control groups and the UN wish to take them all away. Guns that shoot farther than a football field. The real nutcases will always find a way. Why don't we listen to criminologists? Why cant we
+Matt Alexander Damn some of you anti gunners are violent hating psychopaths that need to seek help. I hate the corps raping us too. I dont think we should ever have started biz with China. We used to refuse do to labor practice. I think that money in politics has ruined the anerican dream mostly. BUT I am no evil freak like you that wants to leave good people helpless at the mercy of rapist and murderersI side with Jesus Ghandi and the Dali Lama.
+Matt Alexander Gun rights should be universal dumbass its constitutional rights. If you dont believe in it beat it because your not changing it and it is the fabric of our nation.
Hi Clay, I'm always curious about the ''God-given'' right part. I do know about ''thou shalt not kill'' in the Bible, but have yet to find (or hear about) any reference to gun-rights in the Bible? And no, I'm not against your 2nd Amendment right; I've got friends/family with guns, but they think the NRA has lost it's true purpose and thus they've withdrawn their membership.
In my opinion the NRA went downhill when Charlton Heston got a hold of that
organization. Now that LaPierre is the face of the NRA it's even worse. The
NRA seems to only cater to right-wing extremists.
+Greg BlackburnNow as far as the gun show owners along the Mexican boarder goes: "The U.S. agency that monitors gun sales wants American weapons dealers located near the Mexican border to start reporting multiple sales of high-powered rifles, according to a notice published in the Federal Register." (Because of suspected Cartel activity sending in gun running mules) "The emergency request, published Friday in the Federal Register, is likely to face stiff opposition from gun rights advocates, including the National Rifle Association." The NRA DID help to oppose and block it. The NRA said that they don't want criminals to have guns but measures getting guns out of criminals hands violate the 2nd amendment. So again, I'm telling the truth and not making things up.Why do you right-winger have a hard time accepting actual FACTS???
See folks, “Liberal”(commie) trash will never change. We will have to eradicate them to fix this mess if it can be fixed. They killed 170 million in the 20th century, they’ll have no problem killing again for their communism. It’s time to prepare for what will be required.Liberty or death didn’t mean the Founders were going to blow their brains out if the British didn’t grant them Liberty. It meant they were going to blow British brains out.Don’t understand? Start here: //www.willowtown.com/promo/quotes.htm
+PhillipHunsberger Good! One of the requirements for gun confiscation is for a government to have all guns registered. The less registration, the better. Name me one country that outlawed guns without first forcing universal registration. Just one man, that's all I ask.
+PhillipHunsberger"All the NRA's doing." Your blind hatred for the NRA allows you to excuse murder and put the blame on a group, not the murderer. It should take more than a restraining order to cause one to lose their rights, especially since it's pretty easy to get a restraining order against someone. I know, because I have gotten one before against someone who threatened to harm me. Once a person has paid their debt to society, why shouldn't they get their rights back? If they commit another crime, that is their sin, no one else's (other than the judge's light sentence perhaps).From what I have read (and police officers I have spoken with), most criminals are repeat offenders. If the law didn't stop them before, then how is a new law going to stop them now? Drugs are illegal, how is that ban working out?
+Greg BlackburnBut then again you right-wingers literally argue against what most peer reviewed scientists say about things like climate science. Right-wing Republicans call them liars and say that none of what scientists say is true.
+Greg BlackburnOn gun show loopholes "The “Gun Show Loophole” is a gap in federal law that allows private citizens, who are not licensed firearms dealers, to sell guns without conducting background checks or keeping records. These “private sellers” often sell guns at the thousands of gun shows that take place every weekend across the country. But, private sales of guns also take place daily between individuals as people sell guns to family members, friends and strangers without any requirement that the purchaser undergo a background check."
+Greg BlackburnNow as far as criminals go... "Prohibited under federal law from buying guns because of dangerous behavior? No problem, the NRA believes in second chances. In 1986, the NRA-drafted Firearm Owners Protection Act significantly altered federal law by allowing states to restore gun purchasing/ownership rights to convicted felons. Since that time, the NRA has lobbied aggressively in the states to establish such restoration programs." "For example, in 2001, three police officers in Minneapolis were shot and wounded by a convicted murderer whose gun rights had been restored automatically in 1987." All the NRA's doing."Protecting Arsenals of Domestic Abusers. The NRA also makes it difficult to remove firearms from violent individuals under active restraining orders for domestic abuse. In 1994, Congress passed the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act, which forbid most domestic abusers subject to full restraining orders from purchasing or possessing firearms. However, lobbying pressure from the NRA caused lawmakers to exclude individuals facing temporary orders of protection." "In July 2010, Oklahoma resident Barbara Dye received an emergency order of protection against her husband, who she was in the process of divorcing. Two weeks later, her husband shot and killed her in a parking lot with a revolver." ALL the NRA's doing."The National Rifle Association (NRA) claims that it supports vigorous enforcement of our nation's gun laws and efforts to keep guns out of the hands of criminals. Yet the NRA has actually worked to put guns back into criminals' hands. Following is the saga of the federal "relief from disability" program. The NRA has worked to expand and protect this guns-for-felons program that has rearmed thousands of convicted—and often violent—felons."
+PhillipHunsberger Who are you citing?Joe Manchin himself admitted his bill would not have prevented the Newtown murders, so what's the point? //www.breitbart.com/big-government/2013/04/14/sen-manchin-our-background-check-compromise-wouldn-t-have-stopped-newtown/And explain this to me. If a person has been released (therefore found to no longer be mentally ill) why would you still want to deny their rights?
+Greg BlackburnHere's the points on the mentally Ill I was talking about... Yes, the NRA does say that the mentally Ill should not have guns BUT AT THE SAME TIME (Now Get This).... "It's not merely that a bill the NRA helped kill in April would have closed loopholes through which criminals and mentally ill people can currently buy guns without a background check. It's also that the NRA-backed substitute legislation, which also failed in the Senate, would have made it easier for people with a history of severe mental illness to buy firearms." ALSO..... "Specifically, the NRA supported a bill offered by Sens. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) and Ted Cruz (R-TX) that would have let people who have been involuntarily committed to psychiatric hospitals buy guns immediately after their commitment order expired." LOOK IT UP. So YES what I'm saying is true.
+PhillipHunsberger It takes a scientist to disprove the position of the NRA? Nice work assuming I'm GOP. Please find me an NRA document that explains how we "support felons and the mentally ill" having guns. That's your homework tonight. Anything less is simply BS.
+PhillipHunsberger None of the things you say are true. NRA does not want the mentally ill to have guns nor do we support felons having guns.Because of the work of the NRA, people are now much safer, and this is proved by murder and violent crime rates being way down, although the numbers of people carrying legal weapons are way up. If you do not think you need or wish you had the right to bear arms, that's fine, but don't make the rest of us willing victims.
+Greg BlackburnYou mean the gun rights that exist and will always exist even if the NRA didn't exist? It's one thing to debate if a certain specific gun should be banned or not, or how many bullets should be allowed in certain clips. But the NRA became obstructionists against common sense. The NRA fights for the rights for mentally ill people to carry guns. They fight for the right of convicted felons who used guns in their crimes to get back the right to use guns again. They block measures that would allow gun stores along the Mexican border to report suspected drug cartel activity sending mules and gun runners to buy guns in bulk and smuggle them back to those cartels in Mexico. The fight against gun show loop holes that end up allowing felons to purchase guns without a background check, and leave the gun show the same day with the gun. That's the very tip of the iceberg on the outrageous thinking of the modern NRA.