Great video! I'd love to chat with you about your setup. Please check out
https://fpvracing.tv. The site is currently focused on quadcopter racing
but we'll be adding cars very shortly. So much fun! :-)
Salut,Antenne de base vendu avec l'émetteur et les lunettes Fatshark model de base aussi.
RC car FPV multifonction 6x6
First Person View Radio Control Truck 6x6 multifonction. -Snow plow -Snow blower -Lawn mower -Towing truck -Crane truck -Off road truck So many things to ...
C'est vraiment un bel engin. Je préfère personnellement les plateformes
volantes. Mais ce que tu fais de tes jouets sur roues me donne vraiment le
goût.
FPV RC Car chases real car! (HPI eSavage, RCSchim)
More Info / deutsch: //RCSchim.blogspot.com This time I wanted to show my car based FPV fun. It came from the idea, that this way I would be able to test the ...
@420choky forget the small round (earlike) antennas (also called vitennas
with gooseneck). I'll send them back - they haven't compareable reception
to my older 8dbi circular polarized patch (which is square and around 15cm
each side, with 60degree horiz and vert). Now I use the old patch in
combination with 3dbi omni. So I have good reception behind and directional
range as before.
@420choky I have no idea about how a grid antenna would have changed
reception. I just use a 8dbi circpol path and an 3dbi omni on a diversity
rx. Right now I'm at a new location where I reactivated the tricopter after
some rest. It's been a blast flying here at the lake. Stay tuned - gotta
use the editing software again ;-)
@YTschim so far for me my grid antenna helped me fly 5 miles away .. worked
better farther away .. but now im seeing theese little antennas that look
like martian heads hahaha ,.,. circular polarity or what ever they call it
.. havent tested one .. tricopter seems awesome i bet you have alot of fun
@paintball9621 my savage is a few years old now - so it's only nimh
batteries here and two brushed motors. The topspeed on good ground and with
fully charged good batteries was around 40km/h. For this test the speed was
sufficient...
Coolio. It's interesting to see the goggles view as you see it. Nice effect
to bring the screen up & down to show the quality on the ground at distance.
For FPV's sake, why with the damn wifi. Phones aren't capable of smoothness
in FPV video, the lag would be unbearable to me. Funfact, most of the times
I say I can't make it for the money it costs- however in this case...
Using a touchscreen removes all the feeling you can get out of the sticks.
Nothing more than an expensive gadget.
+Mark van Werven Just had to add this- the fact they didn't even demo fly it, probably does say a lot. Most of these planes just have proportional thrust, both full power means going up, while yaw is possible by speeding up 1 motor.As Tested has been interviewing some FPV enthousiasts, I'd think they had a little bit more interest in non-gadgety rc stuff. Pretty ironic by the way, could have better called your channel "Talked" for this one, not much of a test going on...
+Batu Gunduz Yeah, im sure it has a lot of limitations. But how else to accomplish control on a paper airplane? Adding control surfaces to that thin frame would be hard and just add more mass, price and plane would have more things that can break as these will crash a lot.
A lot of people commenting about the price. The one thing that draws me in
is that you can design your own, paper, plane and attach this to it...Over
and over.
Too bad there wasn't a demo, but not really feasible inside a crowded tent.
+Jarrod Abel the thing is that you cant change the position/number of the engines (so you cant change the weight) nor can you give good control to it so you cant change center of gravity whitch means you are stuck with the same design. And because of the limited control, it will loose control and crash and 200 dolars would go the bin.