What's Next for the Chinese Regime After Libyan Sanctions?
For more news visit ☛ //english.ntdtv.com or Follow us on Twitter ☛ //twitter.com/NTDTelevision The Chinese regime on Saturday voted with the United ...
@segregator236 Urs is a common case of nationalism catalyzed by a
quarantined information flow and strict censorship of all negative data. I
understand nationalism ...but u are one of the above 30% that have had it
good .. If democracy was so good no one wold come to the street would they?
Im amazed at the audacity at which the Govt controls the Chinese like u are
nothing. And quit justifying ur Regime...have u herd of the Stockholm
syndrome? Chk it out Chinese kinda have it in some cases.
Hold up?! China is criticizing another country for harassing protesters?
this a joke? Why is a "communists" country apart of the UN anyway let alone
leading it? Wait, weren't they doing business with this man? I can't wait
to see who they prop up next in that country.
Thousands of People Petition to Cancel Family Planning Fine
Ukraine Clashes Fueled By U.S. Meddling as Manifest Destiny's Child Strikes Again
The violent clashes unfolding in Kiev are directly linked to policy decisions and money flow from Washington DC. Just as the genocide of Native Americans to ...
LOVE your channel! BUT, you are dead wrong on this. Please provide
evidence and within context. The US response has been tepid. The protests
have been from a wide scope of Ukrainian society. This is not an outside
meddling but a grassroots hate for a government that has turned into a
dictatorship. I am not saying that bigger geopolitical players aren't
supportive but they have been less than effective in this revolution.
if US and EU wanted they could have threatened the assets of government officials. they didn't. That threat could have ended this as most of those corrupt leaders are scared as hell to lose all the billions they extracted from Ukraine.
The recording of the Victoria Newland on the phone literally saying "we'll fuck the EU on this" (yes, she said Ei-Yu), and explaining exactly how, isn't proof enough?
I have always sympathized with Dennis Trainor's peace loving and criticism
of the status quo and of the powerful, but this really just sounds like
Putin propaganda. Seriously, even if the CIA is meddling and trying to
influence the Ukraine, that doesn't change that there is a government
backed and influenced by Putin killing its own people and that the whole
thing started with Russian meddling.
Dennis Trainor is making the same mistake so many left leaning people made
100 years ago when their justified gripes with western capitalism and
colonialism and imperialism drove them into cheering for even worse
monsters like Stalin.
+valhala56Russia is not doing better than the EU. They hardly have a economy at all. All they have is oil and gas and other shit they dig out of the ground and sell to people who have the industry to turn that stuff into something useful.Now the oil price is high and the Russians are getting arrogant and start of dreaming of an Empire again, but it is still the EU, America, China and Japan who buy the stuff the Russians have to sell and China itself only has money for doing so because Americans, Europeans and the Japanese are buying the stuff the Chinese produce.If the oil price should ever go down again or the rusty old technology the Russians still use because they never invested in something new is not able to produce as much oil anymore, Russia will be in deep shit again in no time.Russia has money now but they are doing nothing to built themselves a future without oil. They are not investing in building up industry of any kind and they are not investing in infrastructure or the education of their youth. Corrupt politicians and oligarchs run away with Russia's temporary wealth and hoard it in secret offshore accounts or buy British soccer teams and giant yachts and what little is left for actually running the country is spent for weapons. Once electric cars and renewable energy sources really take off worldwide, the oil boom is over and Russia will have nothing left.Are Putin's corrupt gang and all the rich Russians who bleed their country dry CIA agents too?But nooo, the EU is off much worse, right?Bullshit.Germany's economy is still going strong and in places like Ireland it is slowly looking a bit better too.I agree that the banks need to be regulated and need to pay their fair share when it comes to damage control, but if the crisis has shown anything, than that countries who make their money with know how, with producing stuff and with a well educated workforce will always be better at dealing with something like the 2008 crisis than countries that think they don't need industry and try to get rich off of juggling money around or by other easy ways, like by selling stuff you find in the ground.
+TrangleC I guess you missed the riots and protests in greece the last couple of years. Most of the EU is on the verge of economic collapse, Unemployment for youth is over 50% in most of the EU, The banksters are ripping off all the people of the EU. So how is being in the EU better then being allied with Russia which is doing much better then the EU?
+James GeddesLast time I checked the Ukrainians were on the track to join the EU till Putin got Janukovic (or whatever his name is) to take Russian money and change the course of the country back into becoming a Russian satellite state and that is what the people protesting have a problem with. What does the US empire have to do with any of that?Trainor is peddling the official propaganda line of a regime that imprisons journalists and dissidents and sends out goons to beat up and torture people who disagree with them and I'm "a shill" for being disgusted by that?You're a shill or an idiot who is blinded by his hate of "the west" to the point at which he rather cheers for primitive, stalinistic dictatorship.I'm as anti American empire as it gets and always have been and until now I was subscribed to this channel because I sympathized with Trainor's criticism of that, but this blatant regurgitating of propaganda is highly disappointing and if this has become a channel for retarded Putin fans like you, I'm out of here.
You need to read Paul Craig Roberts article. US is pushing the world into war-a big war and you fail to see that.
Are There Rare Cases When an Abortion Is Justified? / Pro-Life Anti-Abortion Video
Are There Rare Cases When an Abortion Is Justified? What if someone brought up these arguments to justify the killing of an infant: "The baby was conceived ...
I don't have a problem with people living their own lifestyles. I only have
a problem with it being legal to murder innocent unborn babies. Unless you
meant when I typed somewhere that when people know they don't want a baby
before having sex they'll do it without protection, then want to shout it's
my right to kill my baby. That is the only time I may touch on a person's
lifestyle. I just don't get why it's so hard to practice safe sex. Isn't it
cheaper to buy a condom than pay for an abortion?
You are right vshinn101, you don't deserve to die. My daughter didn't
deserve to die either and she is the product of rape too. Yes I thought
about it after I found out I was pregnant by my rapist but when I saw those
pictures of aborted babies and I changed my mind. No child should get the
death penalty because of the wrong a parent does. I believe children of
rape are angels from Heaven. That's what you are, an angel from Heaven.
Don't loose your way by listening to the evil things people say.
I can understand wanting to save the mother if you can't save the baby too
but there has to be a humane way to do it. I mean animals even get a better
way to die than what abortion does to unborn babies. A dog gets to be "put
to sleep" by Pentobarbital which is said to be quick and peaceful and takes
about 30 seconds for them to die. A human baby have to feel the extreme
pain of having their body parts torn away limb by limb or to feel the pain
of being burned to death with saline. It not fair.
sorry about that sparcal54, I was referring to your comment when you asked
"So it's right to kill the rapist, should he be found, correct?" I was
trying to say it's not right to kill the rapist no more than it is right to
kill the unborn child. I wasn't saying you approved of abortion because
your comment didn't say whether you did or didn't. I was saying what
happened to me to show I still say don't kill the rapist, after I was
raped. I was thinking I was on your side when I typed my comment.
Pkr: So then a pregnant woman is just a carrier does that mean she has 20
toes,20fingers,4 eyes,4ears,2brains,4 kidneys,and if she were carrying a
Boy, does that mean she has a Penis too?? No one ever answers that, but
wait,some fucker will twist it & say its just flesh,not alive or viable or
some stupid shit like that. Your analogy of egg & sperm is wrong,& an egg
is hollow,its nothing without the sperm. Its not a Human embryo.its nothing
without eachother.everything in our body is alive dude
I agree with you kompixity. I don't know of anything that grows that isn't
alive. I don't understand why people don't see that. Just because we can't
hear the baby scream in pain doesn't mean it isn't feeling it's body torn
apart. The hottest part of hell is reserved for those who partake of such
evil. They want to use rape as an excuse to allow abortion to stay legal? I
was raped and I didn't kill my daughter. I even ended up keeping her to
raise myself. She's almost 16 years old. No regrets.
Ford, You are speaking with a nurse that worked OB for 7 years. Don't even
try to tell me that the trauma of aborting a baby isn't a risk. Abortion is
still invasive to Mom I have seen how abortion is performed. That Mother
still has to give birth to that baby, only they kill it first. They still
have to labor and deliver the dead baby. You trying to tell me that a baby
born dead is less risky to the mother than a baby born breathing? That is
the biggest cop out I have ever heard in my life!
it's not right to kill the rapist either sparcal54. It was a hard decision
for me to choose to just let God punish him. Whatever God did to him would
be more than anything I could do to him. I also didn't want to be in a room
full of people and have them judging me. I still don't think I could have
done anything to protect myself and my 1 year-old son from a man with a
gun. At least he had the decency not to kill us or rape me in front of him.
btw I have a daughter by the man who raped me.
If I get pregnant again and yet again have another ectopic I will end that
pregnancy immediately. I've already lost one tube and nearly my life
because of an ectopic pregnancy that burst before I found out I was even
pregnant. I would like to have a child someday but if I have another
ectopic and I 'wait and see" what happens I will lose my only remaining
tube, my chances of having a baby someday, and maybe my life. If you've
never experienced an ectopic don't even respond with an opinion!
I'm just completely against stupid abortions. 'I'm not ready to be a
mother', or 'I don't know if I can afford a baby' is stupid. Women in
Africa afford babies- and most people in Africa go to bed hungry every
night. Why can't you give up a laptop or whatever computer you're on for
your living unborn child? And I don't think it matters if the person is in
school or whatever; normally it's the girl's fault because thier sleeping
around in highschool. And if the baby is deformed- so what?
I agree with rosaryfilms that is so hypocritical to say pro-lifers such as
myself need to have more compassion. We have an abundance of compassion for
an unborn child that is defenseless where so many people are so eager to
murder them. How much intelligence does it take to realize that abortion is
evil and murder. How can anyone who is pro-choice spend so much time trying
to defend the right to murder babies but don't seem to have time to
practice protective sex? It would be cheaper.
The old arguments regarding abortion are dead. Someone mentioned below
"brainwaves" well they are in fact measurable. Pain is measurable. Fetal
human characteristics are measurable. So the argument can only be that of a
womens right to "chose". There is no scientific data to use in the pro
choice argument unless of course you believe abortion is a means of
population control. That is the single logical argument on the pro choice
side. That is the argument lets put it on the table.
@OhaiMegazine It is definitely wrong to smoke and drink while you are
pregnant, there is no doubt about that. But what about women who do not
realize they are pregnant and are smoking and drinking? Should they also be
charged with child abuse since they are not yet aware of the pregnancy? I
do not feel that they should be charged with child abuse. That said, I
really don't have an opinion as to whether or not women who smoke and drink
during pregnancy should be charged with...
C'mon it's about Eugenics pure and simple. Maybe not to the stupid masses
that have been duped by slick socialist/fascist groups into believing it's
just a pile of goo. But it is simply population control. PP pushes hard on
the most unproductive citizens for "birth control" and abortion. That is
why most offices are in the poorest areas. You can double step all you want
but abortion is, in fact, murder as a means of population control. Science
proves all other arguments false.
67lyman, many hundreds of physicians have all signed statements of
agreement with the following declaration. "I agree that there is never a
situation in the law or in the ethical practice of medicine where a preborn
child's life need be intentionally destroyed by procured abortion for the
purpose of saving the life of the mother. A physician must do everything
possible to save the lives of both of his patients, mother and child. He
must never intend the death of either."
Anencephaly is a sad situation for a mother. I don't know much about it but
I don't think that would be murder since that disorder doesn't allow the
child to function or feel pain. I don't think it does. But anyway in such
rare cases like Anencephaly it should be an option. Although there really
should be a humane way to do it. It is the 21st century there has to be a
better way than tearing the baby's body apart. Don't you think it should at
least be better than that?
bottom line is if you dont want to end up pregnant, use a condum get on
birth control, or simply keep your legs closed! abortion is murder! if you
end up pregnant there is a reason that child is there god gave that baby
life for a reason, who are you to kill it? i am so completely against
abortion! there is adoption there are so many people out there who cant
have children and want them so women who can become pregnant need to
realize ho wlucky they are!
"What if someone brought up these arguments to justify the killing of an
infant: " Okay, the fact that you call a fetus an INFANT (way to get your
biology mixed up, an infant is a newborn in the stage between child birth
and puberty, a fetus is the stage between 2 weeks and birth) gives me no
reason to take your video seriously without even needing to watch it,
thanks for proving your stupidity like the rest of these so-called
"pro-life" idiots.
im not sayin that EVERY sexually active woman is a whoe i just saying thats
they make a mistake and this innocent life has to pay for it thats not
right. and maybe it might come out mentally dissables but who are you to
decide if that baby wants its chance at life??? so if your arms and leggs
get blown off then some body should just put you out of your misery huh?
but that would be your choice and the babies should have that choice as
well.
And besides, if Mom has a 95% percent chance of survival with chemo, the
cancer is probably not going to advance very fast anyway...so, Mom could
delay chemo treatments until after she delivers a healthy baby. And if Mom
comes to the point of really needing to start chemo earlier than the
duration of the pregnancy, the baby could be taken earlier by c section and
do quite nicely in a neonatal unit until baby grows and gains
strength...cont
I actually know personally a little girl I baby sat as a teen..she's an
adult now..she was raised by her grandparents and was loved. Her Mother
chose to not abort her and she actually did take chemo drugs during that
pregnancy...Mom passed away and the baby survived... That baby is now a
physical therapist, and she has a heritage of a poem her Mom wrote to her
near the end of her life about saving that childs life while she was dying.
I also think the video is trying to say...that is a living being inside you
as much as your already born child is... If your boyfriend and daughter
needed the same organ from you in order to survive, which would you choose?
Do you give one organ and pull the plug on the other loved one..or do you
give one organ and NEVER give up to find another donor for your other loved
one?? You should never choose intentional ending of a life.
My opinion is this: If the Mother has a 98 chance of survival, then in most
cases, the treatment can wait until baby is mature enough to survive
delivered early..once baby is delivered preterm and doing well, Mom can
receive treatment.. But, if Mom has cancer that is terminal and treatment
will not save the Mother, the baby should be saved. Mother should not be
treated just to prolong an already terminal life and kill the child.
Mattel toy recall has little effect on China's domestic market
SHOTLIST 1. Close-up of entrance to Xin Zhong Guo Kids stuff shopping mall, tilt down to people outside 2. Various of people searching for toys 3. Man and son ...
Are There Two Chinas?
Two governments claim to be the one and only China. This video discusses a short history of why this is. Territory Color Key: RED - People's Republic of China ...
I'm a Taiwanese. Just to be exact, under the legal framework of ROC, the
Republic of China (ROC) controls a territory known as "Free Territory of
ROC" (also called "Taiwan region"), which includes Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen
and Matsu island. There are actually two provinces under this free
territory controlled by ROC, which are Taiwan province (island of Taiwan
and Penghu 98%) and Fujian Province (Kinmen and Matsu island 2%). ROC also
lay claims to mainland China, Hainan Island and Hongkong as its territory
(known as "lost territory"), which is controlled now by PRC (by communist).
Although PRC tries to claim Taiwan region as its province, it has never
ruled Taiwan before, neither does it have any legal rights over Taiwan. ROC
ruled Taiwan from 1945 till now, under democratically elected government,
and under Cairo Declaration and Taipei Treaty, Taiwan was returned to ROC
from Japan. ROC ruled mainland China from 1911 till 1949 and has
implemented a progressive development towards democracy established by Dr.
Sun Yat Sen, the founder of ROC (namely military unification of 1928,
political teaching of democracy from 1928-1945, constitutional democracy
phase 1946 onwards ). The first election held in mainland China was in
1911, and last few elections in 1946,1947 and 1948. During World War II,
the ROC Military fought against the Japanese, while the Chinese communists
did not fight much against the Japanese, and took advantage of the
Sino-Japanese war to expand their forces from 70,000 to 1.2 million.
Although ROC Forces emerge victorious after WWII, the threat from Chinese
communists and eventual defeat in Chinese civil war led ROC to retreat to
Taiwan in 1949.
Technically, ROC is the only legitimate China. It has ruled both mainland
China and Taiwan before, while PRC has not ruled Taiwan before. That gives
ROC the legitimate right to rule both mainland China and Taiwan.
Secondly, ROC Forces did 95% of fighting to defend China and Chinese people
against Japanese invasion during WWII and emerge victorious. That leads to
Taiwan being returned to ROC, and Japanese instrument of surrender to ROC
and ROC held a permanent seat to "China" in the United nations from 1945
till 1975. It also participated in the universal declaration of human
rights. The Chinese communists never did much of the fighting. Their main
enemy was not the Japanese but ROC forces.
Thirdly, ROC was well on its way towards freedom and democracy in Chinese
mainland in 1946 with the promulgation towards Constitutional Democracy and
ROC Constitution. National Elections were held from 1946 till 1948
throughout whole of China, that gives ROC legitimate right to China.
Although Martial Law was imposed in Taiwan from 1948-1987 following a
relocation of ROC government to Taiwan, regional elections were still held.
Eventually, in 1987, martial law was uplifted and democratic reform (ROC
democracy was restored and developed) was implemented. Today, ROC is a free
liberal multi-party democracy. Its government was democratically elected.
Fourthly, ROC remains true ally with the West. This not only dated from the
time of World War II Ally with US and Britain, but also because it has
implemented freedom and democracy. ROC's political ideology is based on Dr.
Sun Yat Sen's 3 Principles of People (Nationalism, Civic-Socialism and
Democracy) , which is to build China into a strong prosperous Nation using
Western Democracy. Today, ROC has a free and liberal press and media, good
human rights record, free elections and is recognized as a true democracy
in the Chinese-speaking world. And if you notice PRC, it is still a
one-party communist dictatorship (totalitarian state) that has never
implemented any form of democracy since 1949, much even destroy democracy
that was built in mainland China before 1949. Media and Internet remains
tightly controlled, and there was no free speech and press in PRC. There
was constant human rights abuse ranging from Great Leap Forward famine,
Cultural revolution disaster, Tiananmen Massacre of 1989, Persecution
against democracy activists and human rights lawyer, persecution of against
Falungong..
Fifthly, ROC represents and preserves the best of authentic Chinese
Culture. Most of the great modern Chinese literati, scholars, thinkers,
historians, writers, poets of the 20th century came from ROC times when ROC
was in mainland China before 1949. After 1949, ROC relocated to Taiwan, and
Taiwan emerges as a new Chinese culture center to bulwark against communist
China. Today, in ROC Taiwan, traditional Chinese character was still used.
Confucianism permeated throughout Taiwan, and various Chinese religion such
as Taoism and Buddhism were vibrant in Taiwan, partly because of the
practice of freedom of religion. At that same time, ROC Chinese literature
continues to prosper under freedom of thoughts, free speech and was
critical to further develop Chinese culture.
Comparatively, PRC destroyed Chinese culture during Chinese cultural
revolution. It also implemented a butchered form of Chinese writing
(simplified character) that destroyed the logical meaning and culture of
Chinese character. Chinese religions such as Taoism and Buddhism were
nearly destroyed during cultural revolution. Confucianism was also
destroyed during cultural revolution. Although Chinese religions and
culture were revived after 1980s in mainland China, they remained tightly
controlled by the Chinese communist, and often corruption by Chinese
communists often causes these religion to deviate from its real purpose.
Needless to say, there was no freedom of religion in PRC.
In addition, there was no freedom of thoughts and press, leading to
literature being suppressed in PRC. With severe corruption within Chinese
communists, massive social unrests due to corruption, economic collapse due
to housing bubble and stock crash, it would be a matter of time before
Chinese communist regime will collapse. In short, it has lost its
legitimacy and lost its support from mainland Chinese.
With more mainland Chinese traveling abroad and to Taiwan, many have come
to recognize that ROC is the true China and that their true motherland is
the Republic of China. Many are abandoning PRC and embracing ROC. They have
also embraced freedom and democracy. In short, Republic of China is True
Democratic China.
It would be envisioned that should Chinese communist regime collapses,
mainland China will be returned to ROC, with the support from many mainland
Chinese. Freedom and Democracy will be implemented across whole of China,
and China will become truly democratic. The West will recognize ROC as the
true China, welcoming its return to United Nation. Let us all hope for that
day.
I totally agree, also the PRC is destroying evidences of traditional chinese culture to antagonise the dynasties rather than embrace their cultural uniqueness. they industrialized the country i give them that though