Dream marriage gratis Videos

Me

me

me!!!

Me

Meh

Alex G (:

As long as they are UL approved, they should be fine (check the box). If they are unsafe to put on a headboard, they would also be unsafe to put on a Christmas tree.

+Matty H no problem just be careful because hairspray is flammable and idk if it would catch on fire with the candle. you could totally experiment and let me know though!! (: lol

bath and body works

+Vy Le Phim empire of gold bạn ơi

+mile Thanks for the info...if you haven't check out 'Queen In Hyun's man' It is really good . Although there are a lot of Cliche like memory loss and time travel

+이지연 Really good

+이지연 Really drama. But it's about greed and fight for power

+pink heart viki sa marche pas d'ou je suis et good drama ces en anglais. mais merci quand même ces super apprécié.

Cc, ta essayer Viki ou Gooddrama ??

beige's chuno ost is too amazing.

Angry mom ost by ali

Carry on by Ali too. Amazing song

Thank you guys, I will listen to all of them DAEBAK :p

+CarbedMiyeon Why would you spoil it for people who haven't watched it?

try Ali hurt

Woah.quite a positive way."bcoz love will come again.

Iam listening now!!!

+Dori Grey have you heard her song 365 days?

+Dori Grey and daemul ost sung by gummy..

+Dori Grey listen to horse doctor ost.

I do like them but don't care for a performance this poor because they couldn't control themselves and got high before the performance.

Why be so insulting to the band? If you don't like them, why be watching these videos?

+Michael HammerOh i know I love that they're so high and mumble through the song it's just great. One question have you had a hearing test lately? Might want to schedule one.

+lee graves you must be tone deaf. this is a very good live version of this difficult song.

+lee graves Well actually this is probably one of the closest to the studio performance that Ij have heard. Joe Perry looks a little out of it, but it is one of their slower songs rather than something like Train Kept a Rollin or Sweet Emotion.

lol

+Wtf Steven Tyler hilarious

+Johnna Gregory Fuck you.

lakefloor: ~ Yeah -, according to Wikipedia, "Dream On" was released as a "single" in early Jan. of 1976. However, the main Rock radio-station in my hometown of Birmingham, Alabama would routinely get most singles early -, and so I seem to recall hearing this song circulating on radio beginning around Nov. of `75. Back then bands could be "regional stars" in one area of the U.S., and largely unknown in other areas. Aerosmith were already "stars" in New England as-of 1973, but (unless you kept up with "Rock 'fan magazines' ", or TV shows like The Midnight Special) they were unknown in the South. The exact reverse was true of Z Z Top; they were stars IN THE SOUTH as-of 1973, but were largely unknown elsewhere until their  song "Tush" in 1875. ~ By the way, here is the "link" to that Wikipedia entry for "Dream On": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dream_On_(Aerosmith_song

I pretty sure you are thinking about the MTV performance. In 1976 they re-released this song under 3:25 to get it on the radio again.

KISS is shit live

idiot

+kayteeelle Back then they weren't that good live cuz of drugs but this is on performance I like of them in the early days of getting high

+kayteeelle What the fuck are you talking about, they fucking rocked live. This is a TV show, as you can see they are positioned tightly together and not moving too much so they all stay in the frame. Aerosmith had bad nights , like a lot of bands, especially when they had their issues with drugs, but please...

What?! Lol are you kidding? I just saw them in August and they were fuckin awesome!!

+Stereo Mime It's because most bands had producers who hired studio session musicians (real talents) to perform the best possible version for the studio release. That being said, many many bands from the 60s and 70s were great live bands, some better than others (The Eagles, Deep Purple, Frank Zappa, Cream, Blue Oyster Cult, Journey, Yes, Lynyrd Skynyrd, Pink Floyd, etc.) It's mostly prog rock groups that succeeded live, mainly because they were professional musicians who weren't just copying blues music.Some bands were better than others live, for a few reasons: 1) Many "pretty" bands were more image than talent. That goes for most rock bands of any era. 2) Touring takes a tole on the vocals of a man trying to reach insane falsetto notes every night over the course of a 2 hour concert. 3) All throughout the 50s and 60s up until this point, bands had been lyp-syncing TV appearances. This was not the case for Aerosmith here. It's surprising because this is a really hard song to perform live. 4) Not only that but TV performances like this were not intended to resurface many decades in the future. 5) DRUGS. That's the big one.

+Stereo Mime I was honestly contemplating whether Judas Priest had a backing track during a concert I went to, but no, they were just that perfect, fucking amazing musical ability.

+Jason Hather Only thing weak is me when I'm getting off your mom.

+kayteeelle  Go see the Blue Army tour - you'll change your mind

+Stereo Mime The Dead were also BRILLIANT live.

I find that to be very true. When my 4th grade music teacher told me anything but country and classical music was fake, I reacted instinctively against her. But I can see where she was coming from. Moving from the 70s onward, many musicians were releasing studio altered albums that were vastly different from their ability to perform live. She was, however, still wrong, and by pure logic I could deduce that at age 10. I have found myself very disappointed sometimes to witness live for the first time a band I have grown to truly enjoy. To my great excitement, two bands I have been more than surprised by their live performances are Judas Priest, and Dio.

+kayteeelle few are

I disagree

+Jason Hather  weak? i think its excellent

Such a weak performance...

multumesc prietene+DANNY ALEX COSMA 

thank you,., +Mariana Bejinaru