Appendix removal bill Videos

+jx14aby The content of the flyer is in the video description.

+Sarah CooneyTranslation: I don't like you. Despite your lengthy response to my criticisms I will ignore all of it in order to disregard the logical position you have taken against my irrational response of emotionally invested pandering.I dont have time because I know im wrong and dont hold integrity high in my list of priorities.If I felt I would win, I would invest time and energy in responding to you, apart from this childish response in order to save face.You're arrogant, and I don't like you. Because you offended me, and offense is bad, and bad is not good, therefore you are bad. So I Don't like you and you should care that I don't like you because reasons.If you wish to respond, start by responding to my criticism of your original response. Stop wasting my time with this pedantic display of ignorance.

+CircumcisionIsChildAbuse Wow, you must have spent an entire week writing what you think shows what a rational intellectual person you are. I have actually only scanned your lengthy, proud, so-called justification because I have bigger fish to fry and I have no intention of engaging with you further. I get the gist: your way is superior and we are all over emotional fools or liars whose body language lets us down. Look, if you're anti-circ you're on the same side as me and I really don't have time to engage in your self indulgent pride about how you go about it. Such a waste of time and energy. Clearly you see yourself as superior to other intactivists and spend all your time trying to prove that to them instead of actually doing some real intactivism. I wonder if  you are that fool who writes that blog called "the case against intactivism." If not, please go there, read it and enjoy! You will truly love it.

+CircumcisionIsChildAbuse "You can tell someone is lying when they immediately touch their nose after saying something" Evidence for this claim?

+Bonobo3D "inactive-ists" or inactive-sits .

+Sarah Cooney Thank you Sarah Cooney, well said!Human rights are not spectator sports but in these struggles many of us are well aware of those (couch potato inactive-ists) who sit behind keyboards voicing destructive criticism without otherwise contributing positively to end the atrocity.Thank you for your positive suggestion that they review the interview and revise their comment.

+CircumcisionIsChildAbuse What are you doing lately in the battle to stop this abuse of baby boys or are you too busy calling other intactivists liars?! Your misguided nitpicking and misinformed comment here is really sad. First of all, he did NOT say there isn't minimal benefit - he said that the AAP"s statement "the benefits outweigh the risks" is absolutely not the case i.e. they are underplaying the risks and the harms. If you listen to the rest of the interview (instead of trying to impress from your armchair with some body language so-called expertise) you would hear that he IS in fact doing what you claim he is not i.e informing people about the misinformation and that the risks and harms outweigh any perceived benefits and that doctors are deceiving people. I guess none of this is important to you because he scratched his nose?! And so you call him a liar?! Yes, he stumbled on a phrase. Shit happens when you are being interviewed on the fly on the street. I suggest if you think you can do better that you contact the filmmaker, James Loewen, get yourself on the street and speak up for baby boys Mr or Ms CircumcisionisChild Abuse. I totally agree that it is child abuse and I can assure you so does the speaker in this video. We're all on the same side - but when you start off a comment by saying "You can tell someone is lying..." that's not very helpful to the cause is it? Especially, when it turns out you were so distracted by the nose scratch you failed to listen to everything else he said. Constructive criticism has a place. Total destructive criticism such as yours has no place. I am seriously pissed that I have to spend my time and energy telling you this (as do others on here) which is time and energy I'd much rather aim at the real pro-cutting problem we're all battling. Why don't you just review the interview and revise your comment?

agreed. please edit your ending to say CRNH not his first name. thanks :)

The actual statement was "the benefits outweigh the risks, and that is..ca..that is is absolutely not the case" followed by the nose touch. I felt like he almost said "and that is categorically wrong", but he hesitated because that wasn't really the phrase he was searching for and then I viewed the nose touch as a bit of being flustered by almost misspeaking, but he regained his composure almost instantly after. I thought he was a very good speaker, it's difficult to be put on the spot and interviewed and he did a great job!

+Extraterrestrial Proseif that were true wouldn't you think the horde of anti-circ lawyers would be presenting a case against the supreme court?

+CircumcisionIsChildAbuse Well it's technically illegal for a few reasons. Organ trading (only reason it's not seen as this is because they don't class it as an organ, even though it is).  But it is also illegal on the basis of equality law, and on human rights, e.g. the UN charter of human rights.  The list goes on and on.  Assault is against the law and this is assault when there are no medical reasons for doing it.In the UK, MGM is illegal under the Offences Against the Person Act 1861, and subsequent legislation.  But it's still being done.  

+Extraterrestrial Prose I wish the legal system saw it that way, but im sure there are stipulations and caveats to that area of medicine and law. It's pretty disgusting that they use infant circumcision so frequently for skin care products.

+sniper hit Un urs ish terry perry tad.

Your English is bery bery good

It's my understanding that Obamacare reimburses hospitals at higher rates than it would a physician in private practice, thereby coercing physicians to work for hospitals. This is horrendous.

Thought the same

No if you are under 18 in uk nhs cover all of the dental care

Yes only if your under 16, otherwise you have to pay :)

In Canada many universities cover the prescription drugs and other medical stuff too like upto 80% of it but one thing that sucks in Canada is dentistry it sucks that dental problems even worst cavity cases are not covered if you don't have some sort of insurance. Was wondering about dental coverage in UK, is it fully covered?

No thanks Mexico is good xD

Lol

+Olaf In Disguiseim from canadian mars

+BananaManART Cool I'm from Mexican Mars

+Olaf In Disguise im from mars

I'm Mexican

eww Nicki may have a big ass but her face is nasty

+Brendon00000 I was joking 

As a Canadian i've seen alot of Americans pack their bags and head for the border, it doesn't work like that

+blair insertlastnamehereOh... but... how many people (%) go to collage? about 45? or 75? 

+HappyFace sschool is free, the only school you actually need to pay for is privet school and college

i guess if you said rude things about canada no one would really care?

The U.S.A is all fucked up man, never noticed?  it is not like in you're damn littlemovies.. dipshit open you're mother fucking eyes see the truth...and no dipshit i do not live in us... but i do live in EU, theschool is free unlike what you have... free fucking medical evrything...