The VMware analogy isn't very accurate and here's why:
Admin access to a VMware host (ESX) doesn't allow me access on any of the
guests. I can turn them on or off, I can give or take resources to or from
them but I can't do anything on the OS level of the guest just with admin
access the host. Whereas you can do all this to all the vrfs (guests) just
with admin access to the host router.
A better analogy in my opinion would be that two instances of a routing and
forwarding application running on the same machine.
A good analogy for a VMware quest/host scenario would be the VDC feature
present in NXOS.
Try CBT Nuggets free for 7 days: //cbt.gg/1tfgXX5. Trainer Anthony Sequeira demonstrates the power and simplicity of VRF Lite to segregate a Layer 3 ...
+Rami Rasikh OSPF is not configured on routers LabClient1 & Client1...Instead there must be a default route pointing towards the EDGE router. As you can see on 11:28, the OSPF neighbors to EDGE router are router LabWWW and WWW.
you did very fast. I think it would be better if you slow down and show
concept with diagram labeling along with vrf because i am confused here
since both router has different vrf also they have their tunnel interfaces
in different vrf still they ping each other with routing protocol ? could
you explain ?
Thanks for sharing your knowledge, you make great videos. You work very
fast and it make it difficult to keep up so if you could please slow down a
little that would be great.
@Z3nfU31 Well...router Sulu has 1.1.1.1/24 and 11.11.11.11/24. Chekov has
2.2.2.2/24 and 22.22.22.22/24. If both had the same IP addresses we would
have overlapping subnets...