Home » Video » ...

Acceleration bmw 320d Videos

2015 BMW 320d xDrive (184 HP) Touring Acceleration 0-210 km/h

2015 BMW 320d xDrive Touring 135 kW / 184 HP Acceleration 0-210 km/h.

BMW E91 320d 163PS M47TU2 acceleration

without DPF (removed) with Powerbox up to ~203PS (i think less)

User Comments

Bumbu Claudiu commented on 29 Nov 2014

With mine 320d stock without DPF 163hp, I do 240km/h

Chris topher commented on 08 Dec 2014

The M47TU2 has a limiter at 248 km/h (speedometer). Without DPF and Box it runs into the limiter.)

BMW 520d vs BMW 320d - Acceleration Test

BMW F10 520d Stock. BMW F30 320d Stock. Good Time. Strictly Follow: ▻E36 M3 0-270 km/h https://goo.gl/1ffLPg ▻E46 M3 0-270 km/h https://goo.gl/e9S1u0 ...

User Comments

Lubo Mesaros commented on 12 Nov 2015

shit engine shit cars

berkan2racer commented on 25 Nov 2015

+Lubo Mesaros Why would you say that? The 520D is a Shuttle... Is one of the best rated Cars from the ADAC

Ian Townsend commented on 11 Sep 2015

The F320d is a great car, smooth, quite, in gear performance is great, I think a lot of people would be surprised when they gave it the beans

BFD15i commented on 17 Nov 2015

+Ivo DelevWell, we can't argue about personal preferences, I guess. ;)But if you take a look at the area around the climate- & radio-control and around the shift-stick, the F30 simply looks and feels cheap. The cabin is well put together, but the materials don't fit the prices.

Ivo Delev commented on 08 Nov 2015

+BFD15i i cant agree with you, its all about personal preference i have the f30(leather, sat nav etc.), one of my friends got the f10(ssame leather sat nav etc.). and i must say i like the my f30( not because its mine) 10 times more on the inside and the ride is not that better.

BFD15i commented on 10 Oct 2015

+Ian Townsend The F30 might be a good car. A "true BMW", since it is quite lightweight and sporty. But the cabin-quality compared to the F10 is just crap. There is more than 1 class difference between an 5 series and the 3 series when it comes down to materials and craftsmanship. If you like it comfy (with a note of sportiness), spacious, quiet and good looking and feeling: go for the 5 series.If you like it sporty and agile with a tighter cabin: go for the 3 series.For me, even coming from an E60, the F30 was a disappointment at the interieur. Don't want to spend tenthousands of kilometres in there every year.

gingerbread man commented on 11 Jul 2015

think u must be crazy to get anything under a 3.0 in a car the size and weight of a 5 series…… but then again perform does not matter to some people

BFD15i commented on 21 Oct 2015

+gingerbread manWell, I can't argue with personal feelings but remember: Nobody said that a 530i E60 had a "too small engine", even though a current 520d outperforms the old 530i (except topspeed). Plus the fact, that the F10 is way heavier than the E60.It's just that you get used to the power, and you want more. And more. And more.You mentioned the 2006 525d. My mother had that car, while I had a 2009 520d. Same HP, less torque at the 20d. Overall, my 520d was quicker. It was lighter, better aerodynamics, better transmission.And currently, you can get the 525d with a 2 litre engine with 218HP and 450(?)Nm of torque. That's almost the same power that the E60 530d delivered.You only need the 3 litre-engines if you really want to be faster than 90% of the other cars on the streets (at least in europe, don't know how powerful / fast the cars in the U.S. are)

DaSmooth commented on 13 Oct 2015

+gingerbread man - BTW, all drove them all, my best friend sells second hand BMW and Benz.

DaSmooth commented on 13 Oct 2015

+gingerbread man - I drove the 525D 2006 (180/400) myself and that one was indeed slower and heavier then the last generation but like a dog, not really. My other car, a Mercedes C200 2006 (160/270), that felt like a dog. Anything under 300Nm is slow for a diesel.

gingerbread man commented on 13 Oct 2015

+DaSmooth well i feel able to comment as iv had a 525d about 7 years ago (2006 model) and to me that felt like a dog. its just my opinion that IF you like driving and 180hp is not enough in a car the size of the 5 series BUT i admit the 480nm u quoted for the newer 5s i did not know! and tbh is kind of impressive that would make them fell pretty quick.

DaSmooth commented on 12 Oct 2015

+gingerbread man - euhm, don't get me wrong but shouldn't you leave the discussion to people who actually drive a 5-series?! The new 2 liter is a perfect engine for the 5 series. 180hp/430nm is great. You can even go higher up to 220/460 but I choose to eco tune. In case of the 518D edition, you are right, just enough while there is something a lot better. But tuned up to the figures I mentioned before (in fact those are figures to what the engine was engineered and if there is one company that can engineer engines it's BMW)? Just perfect.

gingerbread man commented on 12 Oct 2015

+BFD15i don't get me wrong i do agree that a 2.0 is enough for everyday driving, iv got a 320d e90 184hp and it does its job very well but sometimes i feel i want a little more il be honest i do wish i could have gone for the 330d but the insurance was 3k a year ON TOP of what the 320d was!. I'm coming from a point of view where I'm border line happy with the 320 that engine in a 5 is asking a little to much for the weight of the car in my opinion. everyday around town yes motorways no

BFD15i commented on 10 Oct 2015

+gingerbread man In 95% of all situations in all countries of the world, you don't need more than the 20d in a 5 series.The 520d F10 even delivers better all-day-performance than an old 530i E60, just because of that enormous torque from the turbodiesel.

DaSmooth commented on 14 Jul 2015

+gingerbread man - Nah, I know both engines and the 2.0 is a wonderful piece of BMW engine technology that performs just enough for the 5 series. I had to go even lower to a 518d (same 2.0!) to avoid extreme taxes. Tuned it from 136hp/360nm to 178hp/430nm and it performs very well. There's always boss above boss. People who are really into performance won't even take the 3.0 but will look for engines going under 5 seconds to accelerate from 0 to 100. In Europe, on the German highway, the 3.0 will totally outperform the 2.0 (from 160km/h tot 240km/h is just amazing with the 3.0 where the 2.0 meets its limits). Somewhere else in Europe, Belgium in my case, you don't need it because you can simply never use it.

Murat Pektaş commented on 10 Jul 2015

5 is slower than I thought

Murat Pektaş commented on 26 Sep 2015

Yes and they have the same engine

Sporter sportman commented on 06 Sep 2015

Its a heavy car compared to the 3 series...

박성철 commented on 27 Jun 2015

320d sports????

racingvideo tv. commented on 29 Jun 2015

+박성철 320d-520d sport mod.

BMW M3 E36 vs BMW 320d F30 - Acceleration Test

Car1: BMW E36 M3 321hp (stock) Car:2 BMW F30 320d 184hp (stock) City: Istanbul / Turkey Good Time. Strictly Follow: ▻E36 M3 0-270 km/h ...

User Comments

mal osmani commented on 10 Dec 2015

This video is REAL what the hell is you guys' problem? By the time the 320d hits 200km/h the M3 already hit 250... on the other hand the M550d would be faster than the M3 since its 0-100km/h is 4.8s. Besides it has 381hp and 800nm.. M3 e36 is somewhere between 330d and 335d

mal osmani commented on 11 Dec 2015

+Ahrle Bengtsdotter Okay your data seems very off to me. Look at any video of m550d and you know that the M3 e36 doesnt stand a chance 0-200... Besides here is some data: M550d M3 (321hp)0-60: 2.4 3.20-100: 5 5.50-160: 12.2 12.50-200: 15 20.1Respect to the e36, it catches up with the m550d in the range from 100 to 160, but after that no chance.. here you can verify this://accelerationtimes.com/models/bmw-m550d-xdrive//accelerationtimes.com/models/bmw-m3-e36PS: send me a link to the data you are using, it seems off to me.Also, we weren't talking track time, M3 would obviously win. And lastly, as I said, the M3 e36 is most likely somewhere between 330xd and 335xd (f30).

RÅLAND commented on 11 Dec 2015

+mal osmani M550d 2012 vs M3 E36 1995Verified Performance0-100 km/h 5.2/5.7s0-140 km/h 9.7/10.0s0-160 km/h 12.7/12.6s0-200 km/h 21.3/21.6s1/4 mile 13.5/13.8sTop speed 248/252 km/hHockenheim short 1:20/1:17So they're very identical with the m3 slightly faster on the track. M550 weighs about half a ton more and it shows..

Cristian John commented on 13 Nov 2015

I think the 320d F30 is remapped or Chiped, GOOD LUCK! M3 STOCK does about 215rwhp M3 whit S50B30 engine, does 0/100 = 5.6s M3 whit S50B32 engine, does 0/100 = 5.4s Source: WIKIPEDIA BMW 3 Series (E36) Engines. F30 320d STOCK does about 218rwhp 0-60 mph (sec): 7.1 0-100 km/h (sec): 7.5 Source: //www.automobile-catalog.com/car/2013/1757645/bmw_320d_xdrive.html 0-100 = 7.13s (automatic transmission - D, motion mode - sport) 0-100 = 7.18c (automatic transmission - DS, comfort, DSC - off) 0-180 = 23.69s 0-200 = 31.20s 80-180 = 18.68s 80-200 = 26.11s Source: //f30.bimmerpost.com/forums/showthread.php?t=883680

RÅLAND commented on 15 Dec 2015

+Cristian John Yeah.. if your drivetrain loss is 70-100hp on a 300hp engine I guess something is wrong ;)

Cristian John commented on 11 Dec 2015

+Ahrle Bengtsdotter rwhp = rear wheel Horse power

RÅLAND commented on 11 Dec 2015

+Cristian John M3 3.0 = 286hp, 3.2 = 321hp

Erik Linder commented on 29 Sep 2015

Many goons here trolling about Diesel.. Bet alot of you haven't felt the torque of a 350hp BMW diesel.. ;)

DanK.98 commented on 23 Nov 2015

+Erik Linder yea shame we dont get that shit in N/A jeez. the best is 335d

REALSlutHunter commented on 03 Oct 2015

+Erik Linder Yeah high Torque over a very short rpm range ^^

1ns4ne1d10t commented on 07 Aug 2015

The BMW M3 extremists commenting down below me are not doing the maths and calculating the sums. The M3 has a 3.2 litre engine. The 320d has a 2.0 litre engine. Right... Now we are getting somewhere with the maths. The 3.2 litre engine has got six cylinders. The 2.0 litre engine has got four cylinders. Now we've covered that bit. A much bigger engine with more cylinders is usually more powerful then a smaller engine with less cylinders. It doesn't take Albert Einstein to work it out. Plonk your arses inside the seat of a BMW 335d (282ps) or a Mercedes C350 CDI (2011 onwards) and the E36 M3 becomes nothing but a backwards travelling rusty old pile of scrap that will blow its last head gasket trying to stay on their rear bumpers. While the E36 farts loudly and drops it's bolts on the floor the fully standard C350 CDI and 282ps 335d are disappearing into the sunset enjoying the air conditioning and silence of a diesel at high speed while the old BMW M3 is somewhere far behind dropping oil on the floor, Scraping An Exhaust, Undressing Itself, Claiming No Victory As It Gets Left Behind By A pair of diesels. The 335d is here folks so scrap your 30-yearold E36 sheds while the engines can start and send them down to your scrap dealer now.

RagingOrb commented on 19 Oct 2015

+1ns4ne1d10t around here there are modified diesels too.. and yes they are loud haha. why the hate on ice engines though hmm?

1ns4ne1d10t commented on 19 Oct 2015

+RagingOrb Oh I'm sorry I didn't realise it was "Cool" to like petrols and "Uncool" to like diesels. Only I didn't hang around with the other 12 yearold tobacco smokers at school unlike some. Such a childish mentality seems to be demonstrated quite well with the likes of you. I don't need a particular engine sound to add spice into my life because if I did my life would almost be as sad as yours now wouldn't it? However my disagreement with the highly dangerous, highly flammable, outdated, petroleum fuel is here to stay and I don't fancy lowering myself to the same suspension level (As some of your modified chavalicious petrol cars) with incompetent, childish remarks. You people make me laugh you mention diesel being a louder running idle then a petrol and laugh at the clatter yet you enjoy raising the volume of your garden lawnmower putters with stupid exhaust pipes. One might ask why petrol cars get pulled over more then diesel cars because of decibel issues so that puts your theory in the trash can. I'm satisfied that diesel engines were used in Tractors just as you are equally satisfied to admit that petrol engines were used to power hedge strimmers and grass cutting equipment which puts their purpose under the agricultural sector too.

RagingOrb commented on 19 Oct 2015

+1ns4ne1d10t also you do realise most petrols are quieter than diesels? :') just people who are interested in cars don't like their car muted, what kind of boring person likes that?

RagingOrb commented on 19 Oct 2015

+1ns4ne1d10t guys look at this person, he is the definition of not a petrol/gearhead. yeah you're not a car guy at all haha. if you think a sweet sounding n/a v12, or a nice braap braap ;) rotary is a bad racket then you really aren't a petrol head. it's okay though it's just you, we the rest of us can enjoy our loud noises while you drive your boring diesel that you love that idles like a tractor in comparison ;)

1ns4ne1d10t commented on 19 Oct 2015

So does petrol it puts me to sleep. Just more noise, a bigger fuss and a terrible racket just to reach the same power and speed. All this excitement over another type of internal combustion engine that only sits in a car. Next it'll be the volts and amps of shop rider shop mobility scooters. Which one gives you more driver involvement and thrill when riding through a shopping precinct.

RagingOrb commented on 19 Oct 2015

+1ns4ne1d10t Diesels are boring, I have been in a 335d. yes they pull well, but they just put me to sleep, also they don't hold a candle to performance petrols. this is e36 engine is old vs new, not really a fair comparison.

1ns4ne1d10t commented on 14 Sep 2015

+μπεκακος ευθυμιος As I said before: Remove the 6,000 RPM 'Extra Advantage' a petrol engine has over a Diesel with a Turbo and we will have a proper discussion. If you took the turbo charger AWAY from a diesel the comparison would still be unfair because a BMW petrol engine will still go 2,000 RPM higher. If I raced a 3.0 litre 'Pushrod' petrol engine against a 3.0 litre twin Camshaft/24v engine that wouldn't be fair either. Like I said until then... no further discussion.

RÅLAND commented on 14 Sep 2015

+μπεκακος ευθυμιος Don't feed the troll lol

μπεκακος ευθυμιος commented on 14 Sep 2015

No it doesn't seem fair enough to me. the 335d also has 2 cams,6cyl and 24 valves.And why to limit the M3 TO 4k's?It is not a batlle at certain rpm hp but a comparison between 2 n/a (if we can remove the t/c advantage from the 335) engines.Each one has it's technology and potential.A fair rival(if you insist to find one from the M division) for a machine such as the 335d is the new t/c,not so M,M3.

1ns4ne1d10t commented on 13 Sep 2015

You also forgot to mention that the N/A M3 lifts past 6,000 RPM. And all the diesels are lucky to reach 4,000 RPM. You mention getting my equasions right but I don't think you realise it but Petrol is also generously 'assisted' or 'Boosted' by having Camshafts and valves i. Place which offer it a power range that spans out much much further then that of a Pushrod petrol engine. I'll tell you what... I'll happily remove the 335d turbo if you are willing to limit the M3 revolutions to 4,000 RPM by taking off the extra valves and camshaft 'Assistance' and reverting it to pushrod. I think that's fair don't you?

μπεκακος ευθυμιος commented on 13 Sep 2015

+1ns4ne1d10t You forgot to mention that the M3 is a N/A and all the diesels are T/C.So,if you want to get your equation right you have to put a turbo to the M3 or to remove it from the 335d and the merc.

1ns4ne1d10t commented on 19 Aug 2015

+Ahrle Bengtsdotter Here we go again....

RÅLAND commented on 18 Aug 2015

+1ns4ne1d10t Time to change nappies, kid. No, not in your mom's tractor.

BMW 420d vs BMW 320d (F30) - Acceleration test

BMW 420d vs BMW 320d (F30) - Acceleration test. Car1: 2015 BMW 420d 190hp M Sport Package. Car2: 2013 BMW F30 320d 184hp. Country: Turqie/Istanbul.

User Comments

Bugra Ozugurlu commented on 21 Dec 2015

Maşallah iyi gidiyor :) Bide şu 320d ile 320ied yi mi denesek napsak :)

Bugra Ozugurlu commented on 21 Dec 2015

+racingvideo tv. Ben nevsehirde oturuyorum malesef.

racingvideo tv. commented on 21 Dec 2015

+Bugra Ozugurlu İstanbul'da ikamet ediyorsanız müsait olduğunuz bir gün hızlanma videosu çekebiliriz.

Bugra Ozugurlu commented on 21 Dec 2015

+racingvideo tv. Evet

racingvideo tv. commented on 21 Dec 2015

+Bugra Ozugurlu 320i ED 'mi var sizde?

TheFunkyair commented on 20 Dec 2015

Tam aradığım ve tabi ki beklediğim video 190hp 160kmh sonra çok iyi gidiyor tekrar teşekkürler

racingvideo tv. commented on 21 Dec 2015

+TheFunkyair İki çekim arasında yol ve hava şartlarına bakarsak farklılıklar var fakat 190'lık 420d gerçekten güzel gidiyor ve bu araç ekonomik bir araç olarak nam yapmış.

250km/h BMW 320d E90 Acceleration

Follow us on Twitter: Channel: https://twitter.com/racingvideotv Driver: https://twitter.com/sametarmann Follow us on Facebook: Chanel: ...

User Comments

pep joan roy mir commented on 02 Dec 2014

is it the 3 series normal? or is it the touring? btw, nice car! no sound, no vibration! feels like it's flying!!

racingvideo tv. commented on 05 Dec 2014

Stock.

Link for boards:

Link for your site:

Current link: