Gmo rap Videos

List of Citations:1) Common sense

And clothing isn't natural your right but clothing doesn't infiltrate the body causing harm...

+bjam89 I never said science was bad. It is when people who put their own common sense below the words of paid authorities with credentials that is bad- especially when those authorities are funded by corporations who benefit financially from the product they are demanding the scientists' approval for- regardless of whether it is ethical, and worth the money or not. And the education system grinds that unconditionally obedient mindset into us. It is factually veritable that corporations are huge sponsors of our education system. Why do you think people all about money want the education system to continue? Because it gives that mindset to the future generation, making them much easier to handle- more tolerant of abuse, unfair wages, and being overworked. They fund schools to adopt their recommended practices under all kinds of slogans.You take one look at an a high-school student who is often pressured to take over 2 AP classes, and you've got a person with little to no time to balance their life.Productivity and work achievement are placed higher in value than family, morals, and truly creative thinking. Of course- schools will never admit this- even though collegeboard's CEO made over $1 million in 2009 alone, and 18 other members got a salary above $300,000 in the same year. They are professionals at lip service. It's the same exact thing America did to garner support for WWI! You'll be famous! You'll be successful! You'll be adored! You'll be a hero! You'll be awesome! None of those WWI propaganda posters said a thing about athlete's foot, shell shock, deafness, blown-off limbs, gnawing hunger, maddening sleep deprivation, or anything of the sort. My point? Actions speak louder than words- and it's no different here- You know what my principal once told me in school, when I tried to get out of APUSH, a class that sucked the life out of me only to get a B, where more than half the students in that class got an F? "Your first priority in life should be college."I told him, "No, it isn't.""Yes, it is.""No- a fulfilling life is my first priority""You need to go to college.""I don't need AP US History. I'm confident in my capabilities of getting into college without it- this isn't for me."My teachers would pressure me to get into AP classes every dang year. My sanity didn't fit into the equation, somehow. Whenever I asked, if there were non-AP alternatives to a course for next year, I would be asked, in a rather arrogant way, "Do you want to go to college?" I am amazed that I never screamed "THAT'S NOT WHAT I'M ASKING!" AP courses were supposed to be college level. I was asking for a "Normal" (Apparently inferior), high school class.Oh, sure. They have remarkable lip service in schools. They talk about it with kids who aren't even in first grade. "This is just the beginning to a wonderful opportunity." "College is great if you want to get a job that doesn't involve transporting garbage for little to no pay." But in the end, you see the teachers- and they are not happy. No sir- they mostly are sleep-deprived, overworked, sadly either brainwashed or spirit-broken pawns of the system. They struggle just to have time for their family and themselves- if at all. They are by no means qualified to talk of opportunity and fulfillment when they are sick, miserable, sleep deprived, grading 160 unique kids' research papers, tests, quizzes, homework- it never ends. And, since they were always taught that this is "how things are- and should be", they don't fight- because they'll lose their jobs if they do.I remember getting a massive envelope of various advertisements, catalogs, and order forms that were passed out to the senior students in a meeting- mostly to tell the seniors about the "mandatory" "graduation-information cost ($75), and to say that graduation is such an important part of your life- you really will regret not going to it- supposedly it being "One of the biggest moments of your life". And then, the speaker (Who was undoubtedly paid), gave us all this huge, sob-story about a student's mother who called him, saying that she was unaware of the deadline, and did not pay in time for reservations at the graduation- how she begged, "Please, sir. Do you need an extra fee? I'll do anything, just please let my baby graduate." "Sorry, its too late. The arrangements and orders are already made."I should tell you this, first: The catalog was full of "School-spirit" accessories and clothing articles that never cost below $10 and frequently scaled up to $35. There were at least 40 different items to buy, plus a $110 "High school memories graduation ring" that would likely be made with your senior picture, a plastic bead in school colors, and maybe some other cheap little trinkets. Second of all, they never mentioned that you could nix the ridiculously overpriced ceremony and just claim your diploma and walk out of school $250 richer than you would be for buying all their extras. Third of all: They offered no rental graduation uniforms. And they changed their uniform design every year, and required students attending graduation to wear them. In short, you had to pay to do anything at all in this ceremony. I had to look up state laws to see if it was legal for them to withhold my diploma if I didn't pay the "necessary" graduation information fee- which I found- after much searching- that it wasn't mandatory.Does that not have the foul stench of corporate greed in it? Do you not smell a rat in that? In the end- I know what I see. And just about every single board of respected scientists in this country are sponsored by corporations, one way or another.Not that I expect you'll actually take my word for it. You can go on about how I have "No proof", even if it isn't necessary to draw a good conclusion about my situation. My point is: People are losing their voices, and what's scary is that they hardly know it- if at all.

+DAPTXDC4869 and let me guess you wont go to doctors to treat your paranoia due to corporations too, but oh no guess who made your internet device, your browser, heck even youtube 

My two cents, here: When did scientists rule the nation? Should we be unallowed to vote because we lack the "necessary qualifications" to make good decisions? When did paid scientists rule the people in replacement of common sense? You people who think you need a scientific citation for everything are blind idiots that bought into the corporate-captured education system. The corporations sell their material to children, why? Is it because they have some grand, noble cause?I doubt John D. Rockefeller was kidding when he said that he would pay more for the ability to work with people than anything else. He wanted obedient, docile employees. Funny, he also sponsored our current education model! Whistles Good job, Rockefeller! You've succeeded at just that! Enjoy your legacy.

@zash you are correct that natural selection can happen in nature. I believe in natural selection, however I also believe in technology. I am not a farmer but I can still have an opinion I work in stem based disciplines,

+Za1SH Hmm, can you spot the fallacies in your arguments? We can disagree, there is no need to result to name calling.

+Za1SHselective breeding, human altered stuff, still not a natural diet sorry

+Ambersway1 Technically then no foods are natural, look at what in the wild apples and bananas look like. Through generations of farming (10,000 years) we have evolved foods that people like to eat and are of higher nutrituional value or convenient. The internet is not a natural thing, cars are not either. Man has been playing an active role in what food looks like, granted there are some benefits to organic farming, one being is that the meat produced through natural methods is much tastier and tender. The vegetables and bananas well the jury is out on that one. Most people would probably not be able to discern one from the other as long as they were not aware of which was which. [//smhttp.32478.nexcesscdn.net/80E972/organiclifestylemagazine/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/banana-with-seeds.jpg?1ed5e4]

+Za1SH well you clearly dont know how science work

+Za1SH let me just ask you this, why do you trust some scientists say the ones that has made your pc, or your internet or your t or history or any of the countless other modern things you take for granted, but not the ones that deal with bioengineering? 

and while we are at it, how do you like oh i dont know the internet, funny how we can talk isnt it, i mean it is totally natural for people to be able to communicate across wast distances, you want to live on an all natural way well you better not wear anything synthetic, have any modern technology , all man made non natural stuff, meanwhile you are freaking out about something you clearly dont know shit about while using laughable arguments that you dont even seem to be able to tell dont even work defending what you think you can defend with it

+Za1SH  you need to look up selective breeding before you start talking about nature,like oh i dont know did you know humans have produce animals that can ONLY give birth with human help, you like corn, look up how it looks in its natural form, you like bananas? yeah well those are freaks of humanity, so you might want to think about what you count as normal, humans have been screwing with nature for millennia 

+Michael Felton  and are these experts in the right field? and not quote mined?

+bjam89 and guess what the documentories include. EXPERTS. hahaha.

well if you dont know what the fuck you are talking about then yes, yes you do need to take classes to know what you are talking about, see there is a thing called experts, do you know how they became experts? they gained knowledge, knowledge that has undergone the scientific process and well dont play on emotions, what you gone qoute the roundup study, with the tumour rats well have you read it, have you seen what kind of rats they used and what they are known for, have you seen the living conditions they lived under, oh maybe the danish pig farmer who has been criticized for how he allowed so many of his pigs to get sick and didnt even make sure the non gmo fed pigs got 100% non gmo foods

+bjam89 like I really need to take classes to learn about the dangers of GMO foods. fucking laughable.

+Michael Felton  and you might want to take a few biology and chemistry classes

+bjam89 you gotta stop drinking your fluoride man, its really starting to show.

so you are not eating any cooked foods then since that is not natural, what about wearing clothing, or corn, or cows, hope you dont have a dog since they are not natural at all, please just read about how potent your digestive system is and you might be better of in life 

Hey! Just wondering if there was a way to get in touch with the guy who wrote the song down here! :D I'm an English teacher in France, and I intend to work on this track with my students, but some of the lyrics still remain a mystery to me, even after several listenings and the use of all my good will, if I dare say! :D Need help!

Eating genetically modified foodstuffs doesn't make you morbidly obese, eating things that come out of a bucket for every main meal makes you morbidly obese. I mean fuck, ALL of our food is genetically modified through crossbreeding, now we're just skipping the steps and doing it faster. I hope you all starve.

I hope some day you realize how ridiculous is this fight of yours. GMOs are as safe and tasty as conventional crops and they can be more ecological and nutritious. Monsanto is not even half the monster you created with all this fearmonger propaganda and lies you read on eco-pretentious websites and media.

Are you serious? you want to blame GMO's for people being fat? It's not a genetic modification that's makes it so people have so self control! Do you research before you attack the agriculture industry.

AWESOME VIDEO THANK YOU FOR MAKING THIS VIDEO. I WILL SHARE IT OUT AND HOPE TO GET THE MESSAGE ACROSS. #TEAMUNITY

I hope you realise that Europe has an obesity problem too, even though most GMOs are banned in the EU.

Listening to this a couple of times now. I actually like it the more I listen.

Thanks Everyone.... We cannot stop till we stop IT...aka as MONmonster....

I call it Monsatan!!!!! >:{ Notice how I said "it" instead of "them"!!!!!

wen your dog don`t eat alot of people food ,it makes you wonder?

you guys amazing !!! many regards from Italy, aNd GO AHEAD

Best song ever! I love it! Thank you for sharing!

Thanks Karen--- collectively we can stop this.

Horusyouyoung ---Thanks all the way to Italy.

Truth spoken and rapped! Amazing job guys!

Great song! I must share. Thank you

hahahaha! Is this The Onion?

I love this lol, spot on

well done !!!

RT this!!!

yeah!

So whether it is done through crossbreeding, natural selection, selective breeding, or gene splicing - genetic modification is happening every single time an organism reproduces. This is how we get such a varied population. Back to the resistance genes, two separate organisms from different environments can develop the same exact gene; this is because the protein is all that matters, and if it allows the breakdown of a compound (think enzymes) then that reaction is going to be very similar.

It has not been proven to have any particular health effect (you are undoubtedly referring to Seralini's pathological science which no scientific body takes seriously due to numerous fatal flaws). It's not doing anything to bees, sorry. I'm not sure where that Monsanto story came from (something about how they only serve organic in their cafeterias, right?) but it's another fabrication. In fact, talking about GMO's doesn't even make sense. Talk about specific modifications, in any case.

Genes are genes, just because they happen to be expressed in one organism at one particular moment means nothing. That would be like having issue with using a certain word because it already appears in a different book. DNA is simply a code that is used by organisms to build proteins, where we first found the order of the nucleotides does not matter. Think of letters as nucleotides, words as genes, and meaning as protein - the first use isn't what is important - it's what you do with it.

Also the pesticide portion makes it seem like the crops modified to express pesticides do so in their fruit, which is not the case at all. The pesticides produced in the leaves and only come into effect when the leaf cells are lysed by the target pest. You aren't going to be eating these pesticides in GMO crops, unlike regular crops where the pesticides are just dumped over everything - hence why people like organic. GMO crops don't produce "super bugs" either, that would be pesticides.

This is why I'm saying that the method doesn't matter and that we've been doing genetic modification for years, because it happens in nature regardless of whether or not we do anything ourselves. Without genetic mutations we wouldn't be here. Literally, no evolution would have occurred to get us to this point. I'm not trying to overload you with comments, you just seemed genuinely interested and I figured you deserved as in depth an answer as YouTube comments would allow. -Peter-

Wrong. You are confusing selective breeding of plants and animals which has been occurring for centuries. Plant breeders created new hybrid varieties of vegetables and flowers from established lines via cross-pollination. Cross-pollination also occurs naturally among plants. What distinguishes hybridization and cross-pollination from genetically engineered varieties is the introduction of a gene or set of genes unrelated to the genetic material of the parent organism (species).

Double in Biomolecular Engineering and Molecular, Cellular, & Developmental Biology with a minor in Bioinformatics at UCSC (2nd most influential University in research). Traits expressed by animals and plants have been positively selected for by their environment. A great example of this is resistance genes, which allow an organism to access resources and reproduce. There are no foreign or natural genes, just the ones that evolutionary have been selected for and expressed.

Rubbish. Genes have multi functions within an organism, and there are also switcher genes that turn functions on and off. When genetic material is transfered to a different speices, it can have different functions, and unintended consequences. If you really are scietnifically trained you should know that.If you know that, then you are being deceptive. If you dont know it you are ignorent. Either way you are not to be trusted.

You are missing the point. The point is that what distinguishes GMO is the introduction of a gene or set of genes unrelated (or foreign) to the genetic material of the parent organism. If that's what you do (do what?), you probably should know to make that distinction. Your original statement seems to imply that GMO, the way you very well know it is understood here, is but part of "what we always have done."

Yeah, that sounds about right. That's where I would guess they might have gotten that story unless they are merely repeating a talking point from an anti GMO website (which is more likely). Of course, it actually shows nothing about Monsanto employees avoiding their own products. Read the top hit when you google "metabunk Debunked Monsanto canteens cafeterias serve".

Have they been proven to cause cancer in humans? No. If I'm not mistaken, that's the point of roundup. If humanitly wants to survive, we aren't going to sustain 7+ billion people on natural produce. To feed the US alone in non-GMO crops would mean 6 BILLION more acres of farm land. And that's factoring out poor feritlity, crop diseases, and droughts.

GMO's are danger to health. Take the experiment to tranfer genetic information from a brazi nut to soys. What happened ? The brazil but can causes life threatening alergic reactions to some people, and this was trasnfered to the GM Soya. You think this danger is present with traditional cross fertilisation within speices ?

it's proven to cause cancer in rats, it may not have been proven to cause cancer in humans (yet), but give it a few years. it can't be good for humans if it's killing rats (and causing bees to migrate to countries where they are not using roundup). it's also known that monsanto employees avoid their own products.

Hasn't it also been proven that the GMOs where the plants produce their own pesticides are incapable of harming us? Nothing will EVER be the perfect little solution. However, I would rather take a chance at feeding the world than worry about potential hazards. Have you ever heard of Schrodinger's cat?

So you recon a fish mates with a tomatoe in nature ? GMO is nothing to do with cross breeding within a species. Nature or evolution has bought barriors there for a reason, and we are risking creating new diseases through this. And what for ? For Monsanto to have power controle and profit.

At least these idiots don't hate GMOs for no reason. No matter what you do, people will profit. There is no way around that that actually is sustainable and realistic. Who cares if they make a mint and world hunger ends and you get juicier tomatoes? God, people are idiots.

Scarcity isn't the cause for hunger and so it shouldn't be a reason to encourage GMOs. 1 billion people in the world are classed as hungry by the W.H.O. but there's enough food to feed 3 billion more people than the world's current population!

We don't know what GMOs do to our bodies. Actually toxicity testing can reveal alot about what the crop may do. There are many promising ways for dealing with resistance, such as refuges. A proportion of the crop that is not GMO.

I am not confusing anything, selective breeding and gene splicing are both forms of genetic modification - they are simply different methods of modification. I would know, this is what I do.

That's awesome! You bring it up and you don't know what you are talking about? I guess one doesn't have to know what they are talking about when they are merely repeating talking points.

A company CLEARLY does not care about feeding the world when they're so hell-bent on suing for patent infringement. They only care about monopolizing the food supply and profits.

i care because the food like products they produce cause cancer. the pesticides they sell (roundup) kills plants (unless they are gmo plants). enjoy your jucier tomatoes....

a 1999 new article where a journalist got a statement from a catering company who monsanto had eloped for some events at one of their uk offices

Really now? Since you apparently have done this research please share it with everyone. Because that's a pretty big claim you are making there.

Educated then to the point of stupidity if you really think that transfering genes from an artic fish to tomatoes also happenes in nature.

Sure we do; ALL food grown by man is genetically modified, this includes all "organics".

Ok. Figure out how to transport cheap corn from rural Kansas to rural Somalia.

This is the worst collection of sentences ever to assault my eardrums.