Home » Video » ...

Mzm money velocity Videos

Learn Business English Economics 137 money supply M1, M2, M3, MZM (Tiếng anh kinh doanh.)

Short Econ Movie - Velocity of Money

Short sloppy movie I made for my econ class. It was pretty much unrehearsed. I just winged it on my first try, then threw it into movie maker. Enjoy.

Velocity of Money

Defining Moment #1 Part 1 - Banks and The Velocity of Money

Theory of Money, Credit, Inflation

Tutorial explaining Macroeconomics, Credit, Inflation, M1, M2, Cash. Like MyBookSucks on Facebook //www.facebook.com/PartyMoreStudyLess.

User Comments

randy109 commented on 12 Apr 2012

Best books on Economics for laymen is "Economics in One Lesson" by Henry Hazlitt and "Economics for Real People" by Gene Callahan. If you find these lessons interesting they will guide you (bibliography) to appropriate learning materials written by Ludwig Von Mises, Murray Rothbard, Israel Kirzner and others. If you read about a dozen books from the "Austrian School" you will have about equivalent knowledge to an A.S. in Economics. Everyone should read "Wealth Of Nations" by Adam Smith!

Economicsfun commented on 16 Apr 2013

No you can't help out here. Savings are not idle, they don't sit in accounts and do nothing. The money is quickly moved or the banks will go out of business and/or the investor (or saver) will go elsewhere. It is worth noting that the top 1% don't keep their money in bank savings accounts either. They actively seek the best return on their money and it is typically not passbook savings accounts. Only a fool would think the top 1% actually put their money in a bank saving account.

Economicsfun commented on 16 Apr 2013

And since you and "your friend"... remain anyonmus I can only take what you write with a small grain of salt. It is worth noting this "BankerBlog1" account was created today on April 15th. So I guess Kmpreece = Bankerblog1. Again... the top 1% do not keep their money ideal. They seek the highest return possible. Perhaps their money has moved off shore since the current political movement is unfriendly to them. They don't keep their money in passbook savings accounts at banks....

Economicsfun commented on 16 Apr 2013

Nice, name calling. The question still remains. The top 1% DO NOT keep their money in passbook savings accounts. They invest it and look for the highest return. They invest in businesses, commercial real estate, apartment buildings, etc... Their money is not idle and that is one reason they are in the top 1%. So instead of name calling answer the question. What happens to the 1% "savings." What do they do with it? This is not a hard concept unless you have a built in bias.

Economicsfun commented on 12 Apr 2012

Yes those are great books. I keep "Human Action" by Von Mises on my nightstand (no kidding). I would encourage all those interested to learn more to google "von mises institute." I was in Vienna and looked for the "Austrian School of Economics." I even asked for directions. Unfortunately no one in Austria seemed to know where it was located.:)

Economicsfun commented on 02 Aug 2011

@classicallyliberal That is a good point. Yes those license and user taxes are subject to inflation too. Your question ultimately comes down to the "bundle of goods" that consumers buy. The bundle of goods the Bureau of Labor Statistics uses to measure inflation may not be the right "bundle of goods."

classicallyliberal commented on 02 Aug 2011

good video. i wonder if the federal reserve takes into account the rising prices of gov't fees ie, registration renewal, license renewal, hunting and fishing licences, taxes, ect. also are the rising costs of those subject to inflation or is the state just seeking revenue?

Economicsfun commented on 22 Jun 2012

Thanks for your comment. I have moved all my development to an Apple now and the newer videos have much better even sound. I will check out the tool normalization tho because I am always looking for ways to improve my vids.

Economicsfun commented on 13 Apr 2013

I am curious why the top 1% accumulating wealth would slow down the velocity of money -- this position really puzzles me. I guess you are maintaining the top 1% put their wealth in their mattress?

Economicsfun commented on 15 Apr 2013

The question remains. What happens to savings? In your view they just sit and nothing happens... really. No one tries to achieve a rate of return... really? Good luck with that theory.

Kyle P. commented on 14 Apr 2013

I would cite the progressive propensity to save across income groups. Savings are idle.

kusubos commented on 30 Dec 2011

great explained!

ShadowStats.com founder John Williams on M3 Money Supply

For more information, please visit: //www.freewebs.com/saveyoursavings ShadowStats.com founder John Williams points out that the Federal Reserve has ...

User Comments

sublimetrance commented on 12 Dec 2008

Because if we enter hyperinflation, there will be massive runs on the bank, the government will declare bank holidays, and while your money is sitting in the bank when hyperinflation goes into full swing, you will lose everything you own. Scenario Timeline: 1) The beginnings of Hyperinflation hit but the public is unaware. IE people like you think it is retarded to go into cash. 2) People slowly start seeing inflation spike and start withdrawing their money in mass.

sublimetrance commented on 12 Dec 2008

3) The gov steps in and creates bank holidays, effectively preventing people from getting their cash from the banks. 4) Hyperinflation goes into full swing during extended gov mandated bank holidays. 5) People unable to get their money from the banks during these bank holidays lose everything as hyperinflation destroys the currency. People mistakenly think hyperinflation is slow process. It can happen very suddenly. Research the collapse of the Weimar Republic.

ShmuelSpade commented on 21 May 2008

Oh indeed, among people who take interest in these things it's well known that most money issued on Earth today is simply fiat and not market generated. But why would CNN make it a point to mention that fact? I find it surprising that they would talk about that at all. To the news media gold is, in the words of Keynes, "a barbarous relic" and so is a dead fact not worth mentioning. At least until now...

sublimetrance commented on 12 Dec 2008

Now imagine someone like yourself that thinks it is retarded to stay in cash during a time like this. If the above scenario plays out and you have thousands of dollars in the bank, you will still have your money when the gov bank holidays are over. However you will be left with useless currency that wont buy anything.

XalphYT commented on 03 Apr 2011

His very last comment confuses me completely: No stocks. No bonds. You want to be liquid. So he's advocating holding cash when cash is about to go to zero? That sounds like absolutely the worst possible advice for people who want to prepare against hyperinflation.

sublimetrance commented on 12 Dec 2008

Now imagine if you had the foresight and had your money in cash outside the banks. When hyperinflation goes into full swing, you would want to put your money into anything tangible. IE Food. Clothing. Gas. Guns. Ammo. Tobacco. Medical Supplies. Etc.

ShmuelSpade commented on 19 May 2008

I find it interesting that they made mention of the fact that the money isn't back by anything (gold or anything). Fascinating little fact drop there.