Performance of my piece Riverfront, on April 14th - 2012 at Bates Recital Hall, Austin-Texas. This was my last performance with the UT Jazz Orchestra after 4 ...
Formidable, l'inspiration Methenesque est évidente, il suffit d'écouter
First Circle, même esprit mélodique, même découpage rythmique. Mais l'élève
dépassera-t-il le Maître ? Je le pense, les musiciens brésiliens sont
pleins de ressources. Marc
Merci pour les mots! Metheny est une grande influence, ainsi qu'un énorme
musique mon pays, le Brésil. Glad vous a plu! GS
shows bride-to-be how much he loves her by giving her a 3D printed model of his BRAIN in a jar
TX POWER HOUSE TV - CYPHER Pt. 3 (Austin, Tx)
Power House Media, in association with NVision Films & Grind Life Films, presents... TX Power House TV Cypher Pt. 3, Featuring: Lil J (LOEGz), PacBoi Tank ...
Search Best Light & Your Unique Source! Buy Lighting You Love.org
//www.buylightingyoulove.org Think best ideas for positive attitude online gifts in the right direction go nyc for it online go for the the gold gifts new york ...
Dallas Notary - Notary Dallas - Notary in Dallas - Dallas Notary Public - Dallas Notaries
Dallas Notary - Notary Dallas - Notary in Dallas - Dallas Notary Public - Notary Public in Dallas - Notaries in Dallas https://www.mobileaustinnotary.com ...
SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTISM TOPICAL VIDEO #2: WAS ELLEN G. WHITE A "PROPHETESS" OF GOD OR NOT?
See our playlist of 20 videos on the SDA at //www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL5316CC6F66F24283&feature=plcp. See //www.
See our videos "Is Sabbath Keeping Essential to Be a Real Christian? Former
SDA Pastor Answers This Question" at
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w0L3rSSL_H8, "Sabbath Keeping Is Not
Required For New Testament Christians: Seventh-Day Adventists Beware" at
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TEFt4TOR6E8&index=8&list=PL5316CC6F66F24283 &
"KEEPING THE OLD TESTAMENT LAWS & COMMANDMENTS CANNOT EARN HEAVEN OR
SALVATION WITH GOD!" at
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aIh3T31ujuU&list=PL5316CC6F66F24283&index=14.
See also
//www.scribd.com/doc/110229267/Sabbatismos-the-Sabbath-under-the-Gospel
.
John 5:8 Jesus said to him, “Get up, take up your bed, and walk.” 9 And at
once the man was healed, and he took up his bed and walked. Now that day
was the Sabbath. 10 So the Jews said to the man who had been healed, “It is
the Sabbath, and it is not lawful for you to take up your bed.” 11 But he
answered them, “The man who healed me, that man said to me, ‘Take up your
bed, and walk.’” 12 They asked him, “Who is the man who said to you, ‘Take
up your bed and walk’?” 13 Now the man who had been healed did not know who
it was, for Jesus had withdrawn, as there was a crowd in the
place. 14 Afterward Jesus found him in the temple and said to him, “See,
you are well! Sin no more, that nothing worse may happen to you.” 15 The
man went away and told the Jews that it was Jesus who had healed
him. 16 And this was why the Jews were persecuting Jesus, because he was
doing these things on the Sabbath. 17 But Jesus answered them, “My Father
is working until now, and I am working.” 18 This was why the Jews were
seeking all the more to kill him, because not only was he breaking the
Sabbath, but he was even calling God his own Father, making himself equal
with God.
Response:
Scripture plainly states that the Jewish leaders were upset with Jesus for
breaking the Sabbath, not that they were upset with Him because they
thought He was breaking the Sabbath. Concluding that Scripture doesn’t
always mean quite what it says begins a dangerous and slippery slope that
ends with ourselves, rather than Scripture, as the final authority.
Jesus didn’t claim that He wasn’t working on the Sabbath. Instead, He
compared His work with the fact that the Father was working. It is not a
sin, it does not break any commandment, for God to work on the Sabbath. But
what about Jesus instructing the man to carry his bed? This also broke the
Sabbath Law (and not just the added Rabbinical Laws as Adventism claims).
Jer 17:21 Thus says the Lord, “Take heed for yourselves, and do not carry
any load on the sabbath day or bring anything in through the gates of
Jerusalem. 22 You shall not bring a load out of your houses on the sabbath
day nor do any work, but keep the sabbath day holy, as I commanded your
forefathers. … 27 But if you do not listen to Me to keep the sabbath day
holy by not carrying a load and coming in through the gates of Jerusalem on
the sabbath day, then I will kindle a fire in its gates and it will devour
the palaces of Jerusalem and not be quenched.”
The only realistic explanation is understanding that this law was a shadow
pointing to Christ. Since the Light had arrived, the purpose of the shadow
was completed. Jesus’ rest was available during His ministry and
intensified when the New Covenant was fully ushered in. Jesus was
establishing the teachings of this Covenant before His death, including His
commandments.
Jesus defended His non-observance of the Sabbath by pointing out that this
shadow didn’t apply to Him. He is Lord of the Sabbath, and He (like His
Father) is working all the time. That explains His actions on the Sabbath,
but having the man carry the load on the Sabbath seems to require that the
shadow was fading away in light of the arrival and teaching of the
Lord.Should our desire to follow Jesus’ example translate into
Sabbath-keeping? I’d like to highlight a couple of points about how Jesus
related to the rituals of his day. First, when he touched lepers to heal
them, he became unclean himself. Though he sent these men to the priests to
re-establish their “cleanness,” there is no record of him going through the
cleansing rituals himself. When touched by the woman who had been bleeding
for years on the way to Jairus’ house, and then later when he held Jairus’
daughter by the hand and raised her from the dead—these were both
situations where he was made ritually unclean. This did not concern Jesus,
of course. He had a much higher purpose, and was soon to make this
statement,
“Nothing outside a man can make him unclean by going into him. Rather, it
is what comes out of a man that makes him unclean…Don’t you see that
nothing that enters a man from the outside can make him ‘unclean’? For it
doesn’t go into his heart, but into his stomach, and then out of his body.
(In saying this, Jesus declared all foods ‘clean.’) He went on: What comes
out of a man is what makes him ‘unclean.’ For from within, out of men’s
hearts, come evil thoughts, sexual immorality, theft, murder, adultery,
greed, malice, deceit, lewdness, envy, slander, arrogance, and folly. All
these evils come from inside and make a man ‘unclean.’” Mark 7:14-23. There
are several implications from this passage. Jesus is showing that ritual
law is being superceded by the eternal principles on which they were based.
The Christian, reading these writings, realizes that the Jewish practices
of cleansing, though clearly mandated in the books of the Law, are now
irrelevant since Jesus became the complete revelation to which the Law and
its rituals were pointing. The cleansing rituals, once learned, were
actually so much easier to follow than the standard Jesus set. Instead of
ritual purification, the Christian is called to clean living through
his/her actions. Several of the principles contained in the commandments
are mentioned (though not Sabbath-keeping, or even worship). But others
(malice, lewdness, slander, and arrogance) while not addressed in the 10
commandments, are still clearly “unclean” behavior. That sexual immorality
and lewdness go beyond simple adultery is clear, as they are mentioned in
addition to adultery. It is clear that the principles contained within the
10 commandments are more important than ever, but are only the beginning of
the lifestyle we will try to live through the Spirit and the grace of God.
The critical distinction will become clear in Romans and is this: Our
salvation is not dependent on us achieving that lifestyle. Rather it is
based on Jesus who successfully lived that life in our place. Our gratitude
and love is what motivates us as Christians to follow in his example.
Lastly from this verse, the groundwork is laid for setting aside the system
of clean and unclean foods. Paul will later quote from this scripture in
making the same case when discussing clean and unclean meats. More on this
later.
My point from the previous paragraph is that Jesus, while living in a
Jewish society, growing up as a Jewish boy in the usual ways (circumcised,
law-school, etc.), would begin to move his followers out of Jewish methods
of religion and worship. The very Laws he gave to Moses, he would take the
liberty of setting aside. Besides the uncleanness discussed above, there
was the harvesting of grain while passing through the field by his
disciples on the Sabbath. This was clearly a violation of Sabbath law, but
Jesus justifies it using an example of David violating a different ritual
aspect of the same law, but who obviously received God’s blessing. Jesus is
elevating his listeners, early Christians, and you and me, to principles
above and beyond the law. What Jesus is doing in this passage (John 5:16-18) is
using the Sabbath to teach them something about himself. You cannot
separate these verses from the broader theology of John and what John is
setting out to do. Jesus is not teaching us about the Sabbath, as we
typically hear on these stories of Sabbath healings. Jesus is teaching us
something about himself. I can say that with confidence because it is all
over this story. Jesus makes the point that God works on the Sabbath (and
no one is calling God a law breaker – John 5:17), so when Jesus works on
the Sabbath he can break the Law of Moses because He and God are the same.
Jesus point is not about the Sabbath. Jesus is using the Sabbath as an
opportunity to teach them something about his identity. We are not called
to have faith in the Sabbath but faith in Christ. We often miss the forest
for the trees on this one and get all caught up on the Sabbath rather than
on the Lord of the Sabbath. Often this point is entirely missed because we
are unaware or unconcerned with the broader theology of the Gospel of John
that this fits so well into.
Sabbatarians enjoy pointing to Jesus as our example to keep the Sabbath. Is
this a valid argument? If we are to follow Jesus' examples of how he lived
under the old covenant, should consider this?
Do Seventh Day Adventists Follow Jesus' Example? No!
Jesus wore tassels on a robe with a blue cord.
Jesus paid tax to the temple and supported temple worship
Jesus went to a Jewish synagogue on Sabbath and read from the Torah in
Hebrew.
Jesus spoke out against the Jewish Leaders.
Jesus limited his study only to the Torah.
Jesus kept all 12 sabbaths including eating the Passover lamb.
Jesus did not baptize anyone.
Jesus did not own a home, did not marry, was not employed, had no income,
stayed in other peoples homes, rode a donkey.
Let’s evaluate specific statements Jesus made about the law, starting with
the passage in Matthew 5:17-19. Many believe that Jesus is establishing
with his own words the everlasting application of the 10 commandments. This
is not the case, however. Here is why…first, the text, “Do not think that I
have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets: I have not come to abolish
them but to fulfill them. I tell you the truth, until heaven and earth
disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen will by
any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished. Anyone
who breaks one of the least of these commandments and teaches others to do
the same will be called least in the kingdom of heaven, but whoever
practices and teaches these commands will be called great in the kingdom of
heaven.” The first key feature is in the first sentence and the term, “Law
or the Prophets.” This is a clear reference to the entire Old Testament,
which is divided into Law (1st 5 books), Prophets (all the other books).
Evidence for this is contained in these verses, “For all the prophets and
the Law prophesied until John” Matt 11:13. This is a clear reference to the
body of Old Testament scripture. “Or have you not read in the Law, that on
the Sabbath the priests in the temple break the Sabbath, and are innocent”
Matt 12:5. This was in defense of his disciples’ Sabbath-harvesting. The
portion of the Law He is referring to is in Leviticus where the priest’s
duties are described. “Teacher, which is the greatest commandment in the
Law? Jesus replied, ‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with
all your soul and with all your mind. This is the first and greatest
commandment. And the second is like it: Love your neighbor as yourself. All
the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments.’” Matt 22:36-40.
Note the use of the term “the Law and the Prophets” which clearly
references the entire Old Testament scripture. Further, “the Law” is
clearly a reference to the Torah, or Pentateuch as we call the first five
Bible books. Both of the commandments Jesus quotes are from these books,
but neither is one of the Ten. The first is from Deut 6:5, and the second
is from Lev 19:18. Of course Adventists are quick to point out that the 10
commandments can be divided by first 4 (love for God) and last 6 (love for
fellow man). This is an assumption. Jesus does not make this point. Rather,
he broadly states that the message from the entire Old Testament scripture
can be summed up this way.
So, I think you’ll agree that what Jesus is stating in verse 17 is that He
has come to fulfill the entire Old Testament. Then in verse 18, the term
“the Law” can not be seen to mean “the 10 commandments” and must instead be
seen to mean the whole Torah – first 5 books of the Bible. This is the way
the term “the Law” is used throughout Matthew and the rest of the Gospels.
The Greek word is “nomos” and will be discussed further regarding its usage
in the NT Epistles. Even in the encounter with the rich young ruler, Jesus
uses the term “commandments” (Greek word “entole”), not “the Law” – and
that was only to test this man, who was evidently very good at keeping the
commandments (the Ten plus others), but did not want to turn his life over
to Jesus. The point of this story is that the keeping of the commandments
does not change the heart. But, back to my point about the original verse:
the term “the Law” has to mean the entire Pentateuch. Given this
interpretation, the meaning of the verse is this: the Jewish system of
worship (the Old Covenant) will not pass away until I (Jesus) have
fulfilled it. Well, either we had better be sticking to the sacrificial
system in its entirety, or we need to be able to point to a time when Jesus
fulfilled that system of worship. I believe the Bible is clear about this.
Gospel writers use the terms “fulfill” and “accomplish” as markers for the
end of this system described in the Law and the Prophets. Notice the
parallel between this verse in John 19:28 “Later, knowing that all was now
completed, and so that the Scripture would be fulfilled, Jesus said, I am
thirsty.” Matthew as well uses the term “fulfilled” in a final way, never
in a state of on-going fulfillment. For instance, “But all this has taken
place that the Scriptures of the prophets may be fulfilled…” Matthew 26:56.
I believe a correct interpretation of this verse in Matthew 5 shows that
the Old Covenant system of worship practiced by the Jews was fulfilled by
the life and death of Christ and have now lost their importance, making
room for a new system of worship and a new understanding of our
relationship with God: the New Covenant. This makes many uncomfortable, but
I emphasize again that the eternal moral principles contained throughout
the Old Testament and Old Covenant system are timeless and are incorporated
into the New Covenant system as well. The focus, however, is (and has to
be) different. It is now based on Jesus and his accomplished sacrifice,
instead of the promise of the coming sacrifice which was the focal point of
the Old Covenant. The Old was leading up to that triumph, and the New is
life after the triumph – related, but very different perspectives – like
Adam before and after the fall. Same man, but entirely different “state.”
One more point about this verse…When Jesus uses the term “commandments” in
verse 19 (Anyone who breaks one of the least of these commandments…,) he
appears to be using a general term that applies to the many God-given
directions in the Torah, including, but not limited to the Ten
Commandments. (The Greek word is “entole.” We will examine its usage
throughout the New Testament later in this paper.) This is supported by the
whole context of the verse, and the usage of the term elsewhere in the
gospels. Again, see the verses in Matt 22 which also incorporate all these
exact terms. (When asked about the greatest commandment, He responds with
statements found elsewhere in the Torah.) He is upholding the entire Torah,
not just the Ten. I believe a different conclusion is speculation, which is
fine to do, but not when formulating doctrine. Adventists think they have
Ellen White to validate their speculation, but without her validation,
these proof texts are much less clear.
I want to take some time here to examine what Jesus does emphasize from the
10 commandments in his pivotal sermon on the mount. He cuts through the
letter of the law to reveal the eternal principle behind this covenant made
between God and the Israelites. Principles which make perfect obedience to
the law impossible, yet are still what we strive for. 1. In addition to
refraining from murder, don’t even be angry. Avoid lawsuits. Don’t hold
grudges. 2. In addition to refraining from adultery, don’t even look at a
woman with lustful thoughts. Exactly where does one cross the line from
admiring beauty to lustful thinking? That is not spelled out for us. People
who would prefer to live by a well-defined law don’t know what to do with
this because it is not black and white. Then Jesus moves outside of the 10
commandments into other principles of the Law, including divorce, and the
use of oaths. There is no hint that these are any less important, or
separated in any way. He then breaks more new ground introducing the New
Covenant principles of turning the other cheek, loving ones enemies,
stewardship and the attitude of the heart behind giving and prayer life.
The idea of “eye for an eye” is indeed a Biblical principle, enunciated in
Exodus 21:24. Yet Jesus shows a more mature approach. My two points of
emphasis are these: 1. Jesus does not make a distinction between the 10
Commandments and the rest of the Law. 2. Jesus does emphasize a new focus
beyond the letter of that Law – not setting it aside, but in fact making it
even harder to follow – impossible in fact without the Holy Spirit. (Good
news – obeying the Law, or the principles behind it, is not a requirement
for salvation! Thanks be to God.) There is no sign that 7th-day worship is
one of those eternal principles. But worship itself certainly is, as is
Sabbath rest, and this will be examined at length in Hebrews.
“If you love me, you will obey what I command.”
Adventists like to reference John 14:15 as a specific direction by Jesus to
uphold the Ten Commandments, including the Sabbath. “If ye love me, keep my
commandments. (KJV)” Or in the NIV that I’ve been using for this study, “If
you love me, you will obey what I command.” Elder Vandeman, in his book A
Day to Remember, made a point of emphasizing that it was really Jesus who
met with Moses on Mount Sinai, and wrote the Ten on the tablets of stone
with his finger. I don’t think this is crystal clear from scripture, but I
wouldn’t argue the point. Either way, Jesus is a full member of the
Trinity, and thus wholly God. However, and most importantly, this argument
in no way establishes that Jesus is referring to the 10 commandments in
this verse. In fact, the context of this verse strongly promotes the “Law
of Love” that Jesus is emphasizing to his disciples during the Last Supper.
Vandeman tries to brush this off, but gives no justification for doing so.
Simply read the chapters from John 13-15 to see that Jesus is preparing his
disciples for his death and resulting separation from them. Yet he
encourages them with the promise of the powerful presence of the Holy
Spirit. He assures them that the character of God has been manifested to
them through him, so they can love and trust God in a richly personal way –
patterned after their human relationship with Him (Jesus.) Over and over
Jesus states clearly what command he is giving to his disciples: Love one
another as Jesus has loved them (us). John 13:34, 35 “A new command I give
you: Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another.
By this all men will know that you are my disciples, if you love one
another.” Keeping the Sabbath is not how all men will recognize Christ’s
true followers! Instead, it is the first fruit of the Spirit – Love. (And
along come Joy, Peace, etc.)
Let me summarize a bit at this point: I hear it said often by
Sabbath-keepers that since Jesus kept Sabbath, we should as well. Of
course, Jesus was Jewish, and so was circumcised, educated by the Rabbis,
celebrated the Jewish holidays, paid the temple tax, and still managed to
convince the local experts on the Law that he was breaking the Sabbath on a
regular basis. We don’t do all those other parts of the Jewish customs that
Jesus did, so what again is the rationale for keeping the Sabbath? There is
no mention of the Sabbath prior to the Ten Commandments. Though God rested
on the 7th day after creation, He did not call it the Sabbath. There is no
indication that humans rested on the 7th day until instructed to do so in
the Old Covenant described by Moses in Exodus. This covenant was clearly
made between God and Israel. Converts to Judaism first had to be
circumcised (entrance sign) before they could worship in the
Synagogue/Temple with the Jewish people on Sabbath (ongoing sign of the
covenant). This covenant between God and Israel contains a ritualistic
system of worship that even Adventists largely discard, though they and
others hang onto the Sabbath because of its special inclusion in the Ten
Commandments. However, it is clear that Christian living goes far beyond
the 10 Commandments, as demonstrated by Jesus’ discourse on the subject,
and later expanded by the New Testament writers.
The Covenants
Seventh-day Adventists arbitrarily divide the Sinaitic old covenant into
two divisions, moral and ceremonial. They claim that the Ten Commandments
are moral and the rest of the law/covenant is ceremonial. They have offered
no biblical evidence to support a two-part division of the old covenant.
There are moral and ceremonial commands in the whole law as well as a
ceremonial command in the Ten Commandments.
The Bible writers never declared the old covenant was a two-part covenant.
The Jews understand that there is but one law/covenant and it is all
equally holy and was ratified by the blood of animals.
Ex 24:3 (NIV) When Moses went and told the people all the LORD’S words and
laws, they responded with one voice, “Everything the LORD has said we will
do.”
There are 613 commands in the old covenant that Israel were required to
keep perfectly. These are found in the Torah, the first five books of the
Old Testament.
The Ten has one ceremonial command, the sabbath, which is not a moral
command. Sabbath keeping was given to Israel as a weekly ritual "to rest"
from labor. It was never commanded as a communal day of worship. Israel was
commanded to remember their deliverance from Egypt and that God created the
world. The sabbath is not a moral command as no person has ever been
charged with sin for breaking the sabbath except Israel of the old covenant.
The Old Covenant is a binding agreement God made with Israelites alone at
Sinai. It was made with no other nation on earth. It includes the entire
Mosaic Law which includes the Ten Commandments written on tablets of stone
by God. The entire covenant was ratified by the blood of animals.
Ex 24:8 (NIV) Moses then took the blood, sprinkled it on the people and
said, “This is the blood of the covenant that the LORD has made with you in
accordance with all these words.”
Adventists teach that the sabbath is binding on all nations and all people
for all time when in fact it was given only to one nation—Israel.
Circumcision was the entry sign into the covenant. Gentiles could only
legally keep the sabbath and be accepted by God, if they joined the
Israelite community through circumcision and keep all the covenant.
The sign of the old covenant between God and Israel was the sabbath. God
never made the sabbath a sign for Christians in the new testament. Do you
find Christians mentioned in the text? Can you legally enjoin on Christians
that which God has not enjoined on them?
Circumcision is just as much a perpetual covenant for Israel asis the
sabbath. Circumcision was first made with Abraham as an "everlasting
covenant"—but not the sabbath.
Ex 31:16-17 (NRSV) Therefore the Israelites shall keep the sabbath,
observing the sabbath throughout their generations, as a perpetual
covenant. It is a sign forever between me and the people of Israel that in
six days the LORD made heaven and earth, and on the seventh day he rested,
and was refreshed.”
Gen 17:9-10, 13 (NIV) Then God said to Abraham, “As for you, you must keep
my covenant, you and your descendants after you for the generations to
come. This is my covenant with you and your descendants after you, the
covenant you are to keep: Every male among you shall be circumcised.
Whether born in your household or bought with your money, they must be
circumcised. My covenant in your flesh is to be an everlasting covenant.
14Any uncircumcised male, who has not been circumcised in the flesh, will
be cut off from his people; he has broken my covenant.”
God then gave circumcision to the Israelites along with the sabbath in the
law of Moses.
John 7:21-24 (NIV) Jesus said to them, “I did one miracle, and you are all
astonished. Yet, because Moses gave you circumcision (though actually it
did not come from Moses, but from the patriarchs), you circumcise a child
on the Sabbath. Now if a child can be circumcised on the Sabbath so that
the law of Moses may not be broken, why are you angry with me for healing
the whole man on the Sabbath? Stop judging by mere appearances, and make a
right judgment.”
The old covenant ended at Calvary with the death of Jesus. When a party to
a covenant dies, said covenant ends. In this case it was Jesus who died,
and He made that covenant with Israel. Thus the old covenant ended, even as
a marriage covenant ends upon the death of either party. The surviving
person is free to marry again, even as Jesus now takes the church as His
new bride. If a mate dies, the surviving person is no longer married to a
corpse. Rom. 7 shows this comparison of marriage and dying to the law
through Christ. SDAs are married to the old covenant corpse. They read
sabbath keeping in the old covenant (contract) God made with Israel and
apply it to themselves. They do not accept the fact that they were never a
party to that covenant. The only way for them to legally keep the sabbath
is through circumcision and they are then obligated to keep ALL the old
covenant with its 613 commands, which they do not do. They refuse to kill
sabbath breakers and stay at home on sabbaths as the law requires. Thus
they are lawbreakers, and subject to the condemnation of that law.
What Ended at the Cross?
Jesus Abolished Israel's Old Covenant law with Ten Commandments and
regulations.
Eph 2:15 (NIV) ...by abolishing in his flesh the law with its commandments
and regulations.
Notice, "the law" is singular that was abolished, not laws. There was just
"one law"—the Mosaic law—with many commands and regulations, that was
abolished by Jesus.
God canceled the written code and regulations nailing it to the cross. SDAs
claim that the "written code" was not the Ten, but the law that Moses wrote.
Both God and Moses wrote the Ten Commandments. The Ten Commandments written
on stone tablets by the finger of God and were placed inside the Ark of the
Covenant, and they were also written by Moses on parchment with ink and
placed outside the Ark in the Book of the Covenant. Otherwise you would not
be reading it in your Bible. Col 2 and Ex 24 explains this.
Col 2:13-14 (NIV) When you were dead in your sins and in the uncircumcision
of your sinful nature, God made you alive with Christ. He forgave us all
our sins, having canceled the written code, with its regulations, that was
against us and that stood opposed to us; he took it away, nailing it to the
cross.
Ex 24:3-4 (NIV) When Moses went and told the people all the LORD’S words
and laws, they responded with one voice, “Everything the LORD has said we
will do.” Moses then wrote down everything the LORD had said. He got up
early the next morning and built an altar at the foot of the mountain and
set up twelve stone pillars representing the twelve tribes of Israel.
vs. 7, Then he took the Book of the Covenant and read it to the people.
They responded, “We will do everything the LORD has said; we will obey.”
Jesus was taken down from the cross, and the law with the sabbath remains
nailed to the cross for eternity. SDAs try their best to pry the nails from
the cross to make the sabbath binding on Christians.
"The first Covenant" had "stone tablets of the covenant."
Heb 9:1-4 (NIV) Now the first covenant had regulations for worship and also
an earthly sanctuary. A tabernacle was set up. In its first room were the
lampstand, the table and the consecrated bread; this was called the Holy
Place. Behind the second curtain was a room called the Most Holy Place,
which had the golden altar of incense and the gold-covered ark of the
covenant. This ark contained the gold jar of manna, Aaron’s staff that had
budded, and the stone tablets of the covenant.
The old covenant included the Ten Commandments as well as the Sanctuary
furnishings not found in the Ten Commandments showing that the old covenant
is not a two-part covenant claimed by Seventh-day Adventists.
The Old Covenant with the Ten Commandments are obsolete.
Heb 8:7-13 (NIV) For if there had been nothing wrong with that first
covenant, no place would have been sought for another. 8But God found fault
with the people and said, “The time is coming, declares the Lord, when I
will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of
Judah. It will not be like the covenant I made with their forefathers when
I took them by the hand to lead them out of Egypt, because they did not
remain faithful to my covenant, and I turned away from them, declares the
Lord. This is the covenant I will make with the house of Israel after that
time, declares the Lord. I will put my laws in their minds and write them
on their hearts. I will be their God and they will be my people. No longer
will a man teach his neighbor, or a man his brother, saying, ‘Know the
Lord,’ because they will all know me, from the least of them to the
greatest. For I will forgive their wickedness and will remember their sins
no more.” By calling this covenant “new,” he has made the first one
obsolete; and what is obsolete and aging will soon disappear.
The Ten Commandments were a ministration of death and condemnation.
2 Cor 3:6-9 (NIV) He has made us competent as ministers of a new
covenant—not of the letter but of the Spirit; for the letter kills, but the
Spirit gives life. Now if the ministry that brought death, which was
engraved in letters on stone, came with glory, so that the Israelites could
not look steadily at the face of Moses because of its glory, fading though
it was, will not the ministry of the Spirit be even more glorious? If the
ministry that condemns men is glorious, how much more glorious is the
ministry that brings righteousness!
Only one who was a party to that law/sabbath could die to that law/sabbath.
No one alive today was a party to the old covenant. For someone to insist
on keeping the sabbath and other old covenant points of law is to insist on
being bound to a dead mate.
Christian Jews are "released from the Law" and now serve the Spirit and not
in the way of "the written code".
If you have not died to the law/sabbath you are holding onto a corpse. Good
luck with that!
Rom 7:4-6 (NIV) So, my brothers, you also died to the law through the body
of Christ, that you might belong to another, to him who was raised from the
dead, in order that we might bear fruit to God. For when we were controlled
by the sinful nature, the sinful passions aroused by the law were at work
in our bodies, so that we bore fruit for death. But now, by dying to what
once bound us, we have been released from the law so that we serve in the
new way of the Spirit, and not in the old way of the written code.
The law was a witness against Israel not Christians.
God gave the law to Israel to show them their sins and the law was a
witness to it. They were a stiff-necked, rebellious, idolatrous, faithless
nation.
Deut 31:26-27 (NIV) “Take this Book of the Law and place it beside the ark
of the covenant of the LORD your God. There it will remain as a witness
against you. For I know how rebellious and stiff-necked you are. If you
have been rebellious against the LORD while I am still alive and with you,
how much more will you rebel after I die!
The law was a school master (paidagogos) to bring Israel to Christ, not
Christians who were never under that law. How can SDAs who claim to be
justified by faith, want to be under Israel's schoolmaster (law)?
Gal 3:23-25 (KJV) But before faith came, we were kept under the law, shut
up unto the faith which should afterwards be revealed. Wherefore the law
was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ, that we might be justified by
faith. But after that faith is come, we are no longer under a schoolmaster.
A paidagogos was one who accompanied a child, who was usually a slave of
the parents of the child, and even administered punishment as required.
Once the child came of age and was mature, the paidagogos was dismissed
from this oversight of the child. Those who insist on living by that law
demonstrate their immaturity; still needing a law to tell them everything
they are to do or not do.
Christ is the end of the Law for Israel. The law made no one righteousness
or moral and no one could keep it perfectly.
Rom 10:4 (NIV) Christ is the end of the law so that there may be
righteousness for everyone who believes.
Rom 3:20 (NIV) Therefore no one will be declared righteous in his sight by
observing the law; rather, through the law we become conscious of sin.
The Law of Sin and Death is the Ten Commandments.
2 Cor 3:6-7 (NIV) He has made us competent as ministers of a new
covenant—not of the letter but of the Spirit; for the letter kills, but the
Spirit gives life. Now if the ministry that brought death, which was
engraved in letters on stone, came with glory, so that the Israelites could
not look steadily at the face of Moses because of its glory, fading though
it was,
The law was made for rebellious Israel, not Christians with the spirit of
God. Do Christians need a law to tell them not to worship idols, not to
murder and steal?
1 Tim 1:9-11 (NIV) We also know that law is made not for the righteous but
for lawbreakers and rebels, the ungodly and sinful, the unholy and
irreligious; for those who kill their fathers or mothers, for murderers,
for adulterers and perverts, for slave traders and liars and perjurers—and
for whatever else is contrary to the sound doctrine that conforms to the
glorious gospel of the blessed God, which he entrusted to me.
How can Christians be righteous before God without the law? Christians
receive their righteousness from the gospel and will live by faith.
Rom 1:17 (NIV) For in the gospel a righteousness from God is revealed, a
righteousness that is by faith from first to last, just as it is written:
“The righteous will live by faith.”
Paul was not under the Law. Be like Paul and win SDAs and other
sabbatarians that put themselves under the law.
1 Cor 9:20 (NIV) To the Jews I became like a Jew, to win the Jews. To those
under the law I became like one under the law (though I myself am not under
the law), so as to win those under the law.
Rom 6:14 (NIV) For sin shall not be your master, because you are not under
law, but under grace.
Gal 5:14 (NIV) The entire law is summed up in a single command: “Love your
neighbor as yourself.”
Gal 5:18 (NIV) But if you are led by the Spirit, you are not under law.
The Apostles opposed the Judaizers that were trying to impose the law on
Gentiles. The issue was keeping the law of Moses all of it. Notice that the
sabbath was not included in the discussion. In the Jewish mind a gentile
must first be circumcised before he could keep the sabbath. This would have
been an excellent time to tell the gentiles to keep the Ten as do SDAs.
Acts 15:5 (NIV) Then some of the believers who belonged to the party of the
Pharisees stood up and said, “The Gentiles must be circumcised and required
to obey the law of Moses.”
Acts 15:10-11 (NIV) Now then, why do you try to test God by putting on the
necks of the disciples a yoke that neither we nor our fathers have been
able to bear? No! We believe it is through the grace of our Lord Jesus that
we are saved, just as they are.”
Acts 15:19-21 (NIV) “It is my judgment, therefore, that we should not make
it difficult for the Gentiles who are turning to God. Instead we should
write to them, telling them to abstain from food polluted by idols, from
sexual immorality, from the meat of strangled animals and from blood. For
Moses has been preached in every city from the earliest times and is read
in the synagogues on every Sabbath.”
Mount Sinai Covenant is Slavery represented by earthly Jerusalem. Jewish
and gentile Christians are free in the New Jerusalem in heaven which is of
faith.
What was given on Mount Sinai? The Ten Commandments with the sabbath.
Gal 4:21-31 (NIV) Tell me, you who want to be under the law, are you not
aware of what the law says?For it is written that Abraham had two sons, one
by the slave woman and the other by the free woman. His son by the slave
woman was born in the ordinary way; but his son by the free woman was born
as the result of a promise. These things may be taken figuratively, for the
women represent two covenants. One covenant is from Mount Sinai and bears
children who are to be slaves: This is Hagar. Now Hagar stands for Mount
Sinai in Arabia and corresponds to the present city of Jerusalem, because
she is in slavery with her children. But the Jerusalem that is above is
free, and she is our mother. For it is written: “Be glad, O barren woman,
who bears no children; break forth and cry aloud, you who have no labor
pains; because more are the children of the desolate woman than of her who
has a husband.” Now you, brothers, like Isaac, are children of promise. At
that time the son born in the ordinary way persecuted the son born by the
power of the Spirit. It is the same now. But what does the Scripture say?
“Get rid of the slave woman and her son, for the slave woman’s son will
never share in the inheritance with the free woman’s son.” Therefore,
brothers, we are not children of the slave woman, but of the free woman.
The New Covenant is God writing his laws on the Christian's heart.
Hebrews 8:10 (NIV) This is the covenant I will make with the house of
Israel after that time, declares the Lord. I will put my laws in their
minds and write them on their hearts. I will be their God and they will be
my people.
What are the laws that God has written on our hearts?
SDAs would have you believe that God is writing the same old covenant law
of sin and death on our hearts. The Apostles tell us what they are.
Law of Faith. To know we are justified before God without keeping the old
covenant.
Rom 3:27-28 (NRSV) Then what becomes of boasting? It is excluded. By what
law? By that of works? No, but by the law of faith. For we hold that a
person is justified by faith apart from works prescribed by the law.
Law of the Spirit. Has set us free from the law of sin and death.
Rom 8:1-4 (NIV) Therefore, there is now no condemnation for those who are
in Christ Jesus, because through Christ Jesus the law of the Spirit of life
set me free from the law of sin and death. For what the law was powerless
to do in that it was weakened by the sinful nature, God did by sending his
own Son in the likeness of sinful man to be a sin offering. And so he
condemned sin in sinful man, in order that the righteous requirements of
the law might be fully met in us, who do not live according to the sinful
nature but according to the Spirit.
Live by the Spirit. If you are led by the Sprit you are not under the law.
Gal 5:16-21 (NIV) So I say, live by the Spirit, and you will not gratify
the desires of the sinful nature. For the sinful nature desires what is
contrary to the Spirit, and the Spirit what is contrary to the sinful
nature. They are in conflict with each other, so that you do not do what
you want. But if you are led by the Spirit, you are not under law. The acts
of the sinful nature are obvious: sexual immorality, impurity and
debauchery, idolatry and witchcraft; hatred, discord, jealousy, fits of
rage, selfish ambition, dissensions, factions and envy; drunkenness,
orgies, and the like. I warn you, as I did before, that those who live like
this will not inherit the kingdom of God.
Law of Christ.
Gal 6:2 (NIV) Carry each other’s burdens, and in this way you will fulfill
the law of Christ.
Law of liberty.
James 2:8-11 (NIV) If you really keep the royal law found in Scripture,
“Love your neighbor as yourself,” you are doing right. But if you show
favoritism, you sin and are convicted by the law as lawbreakers. For
whoever keeps the whole law and yet stumbles at just one point is guilty of
breaking all of it. For he who said, “Do not commit adultery,” also said,
“Do not murder. ”if you do not commit adultery but do commit murder, you
have become a lawbreaker.
James mentions two distinct laws—that is, (1) the royal law and the law of
liberty (which are identical) and (2) "the whole law" (which includes the
entire Torah, all the Laws of Moses). James tells us that the royal law is
“Love your neighbor as yourself.” This law, found in Leviticus 19:18, is
one of many laws that the Lord gave to Moses to instruct Israel regarding
how to live moral lives and develop good interpersonal relationships with
others. James also states that, as in the old covenant law, if you broke
even one point of the whole law, you were guilty of the entirety of the old
covenant, likewise, if you fail to show proper love for even one person by
showing partiality, you are guilty of breaking the law of Liberty.
Therefore to break one point in the Ten or in the "whole law" consisting of
613 commands, YOU are a lawbreaker.
Jesus gave a new commandment to love one another.
Will a Christian that loves one another, murder, steal, commit adultery,
and worship idols? There is no need for that obsolete law or the Ten
Commandments. Love does no harm to one’s neighbor therefore love fulfills
the law. Keeping the law does not fulfill it. Another way to look at this
is that, if a Christian has love for even his enemies, he would not commit
these acts, seeing as these things are a result of an unconverted heart,
not motivated by love. Do you trust the spirit to guide you? If not you
have no faith just as Israel.
John 13:34-35 (NIV) “A new command I give you: Love one another. As I have
loved you, so you must love one another. By this all men will know that you
are my disciples, if you love one another.” The world will know you are
Jesus' disciples if you love one another.
Paul tells Titus what to teach. Do you notice nothing is said about
teaching the law/sabbath.
Titus 2:11-15 (NIV) For the grace of God that brings salvation has appeared
to all men. It teaches us to say “No” to ungodliness and worldly passions,
and to live self-controlled, upright and godly lives in this present age,
while we wait for the blessed hope—the glorious appearing of our great God
and Savior, Jesus Christ, who gave himself for us to redeem us from all
wickedness and to purify for himself a people that are his very own, eager
to do what is good. 15These, then, are the things you should teach.
Encourage and rebuke with all authority. Do not let anyone despise you.
Finally, Sabbath Keeping in Alaska is a Problem.
This shows that the Sabbath was a regional, temporary command for Israel
and not for the world. Interesting problem in Alaska. According to the
officious SDA sunset calculator, on Friday eve, May 30th, in Prudhoe Bay,
Alaska, the sun set below the horizon, bringing with it the Jewish Shabbat,
at 11:38 PM, almost midnight. Note: AK is so far west, it is on Hawaiian
time. Here is the quote:
Calculations for: Longitude: -148.34000 Latitude: 70.27000 Prudhoe Bay,
Alaska Time Zone: Hawaiian Standard Time, HSTDate: 5/30/03 Friday Sunrise:
0:07am HST (sunrise Friday morning)Sunset: 11:38pm HST (sunset, Friday
night, becoming sabbath)
Next, we find sunrise on Sabbath, May 31st, actually starts before midnight
Friday night and el sol invictus stays up all day Sabbath, and into Sabbath
night, and into Sunday morning, and into Sunday night, for the next two
months!
Date: 5/31/03 Sunrise: Sun above horizon HST Sunset: Sun above horizon HST
(meaning the sun never sets). Meaning: if you live and work in Prudhoe Bay,
Alaska, extracting dino remains buried and liquified by Noah's flood less
than 4500 years ago, you have a problem! (no!! dummy! not the recent age of
the earth!)... you have to quit working!
Because on Friday night, May 30th, when the sun went down at 1l:38,
bringing in the holy Lord's day, you had to stop working, thou, and thy
manservant, and thy maidservant, and all the strangers within thy igloo.
But the sun came up again on Sabbath just a few minutes later, but never
went down after that!!!
As I scribble this nonsense it is still Sabbath in Prudhoe Bay...cause the
sun never went down....no Saturday sunset. So if you believe literally that
you must keep sabbath from sunset on Friday night to Sabbath sunset.....the
next day, Sabbath, did NOT have a sunset this summer! Won't be a sunset for
another two months! So you are faced with keeping Sabbath for two months
straight, and giving up your job with Exxon! Unless of course, you are the
camp padre, trying to spread the word that black gold comes from dead dinos
who missed the ark, or in the medical profession raking in piles of dough
and salving your conscience by paying plenty of tithe to keep the
hired-archy gainfully employed.... —sent by reader
Seventh Day Adventists follow their false prophetess Ellen G. White (a
woman authority over her religious followers which violates 1 Timothy 2:12,
"But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man,
but to be in silence.") & her idol of Sabbath keeping for salvation
requirement (violating Galatians 1:6-9) rather than what the Bible plainly
teaches about Sabbath keeping for New Testament believers. For more see our
playlist "Dealing with Seventh-day Adventism & Their "Prophetess"" with 23
videos at https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL5316CC6F66F24283. See the
websites: www.TruthorFables.com, www.ExAdventist.com,
www.LifeAssuranceMinistries.org & www.GreatControversyExposed.com.
Titus 1:9-16
1 Timothy 2:12, "But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority
over the man, but to be in silence." See links: "The Sheep Need Men to be
Their Pastors - The Blasphemy of Women Pastors" at
//www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=112706102442, "Can Women Be
Pastors?" at //www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=59131749272 & "Unpopular
Bible Doctrines #7: God Condemns Astrology, Witchcraft, & Sin; No Women
Pastors Allowed" at
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ql_obI6wA9w&index=12&list=PLE04A1D0DFE95B95E
).
Question: "Women pastors / preachers? Can a woman be a pastor or preacher?"
Answer: There is perhaps no more hotly debated issue in the church today
than the issue of women serving as pastors/preachers. As a result, it is
very important to not see this issue as men versus women. There are women
who believe women should not serve as pastors and that the Bible places
restrictions on the ministry of women, and there are men who believe women
can serve as preachers and that there are no restrictions on women in
ministry. This is not an issue of chauvinism or discrimination. It is an
issue of biblical interpretation.
The Word of God proclaims, “A woman should learn in quietness and full
submission. I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a
man; she must be silent” (1 Timothy 2:11–12). In the church, God assigns
different roles to men and women. This is a result of the way mankind was
created and the way in which sin entered the world (1 Timothy 2:13–14).
God, through the apostle Paul, restricts women from serving in roles of
teaching and/or having spiritual authority over men. This precludes women
from serving as pastors over men, which definitely includes preaching to
them, teaching them publicly, and exercising spiritual authority over them.
There are many objections to this view of women in pastoral ministry. A
common one is that Paul restricts women from teaching because in the first
century, women were typically uneducated. However, 1 Timothy 2:11–14
nowhere mentions educational status. If education were a qualification for
ministry, then the majority of Jesus’ disciples would not have been
qualified. A second common objection is that Paul only restricted the women
of Ephesus from teaching men (1 Timothy was written to Timothy, the pastor
of the church in Ephesus). Ephesus was known for its temple to Artemis, and
women were the authorities in that branch of paganism—therefore, the theory
goes, Paul was only reacting against the female-led customs of the Ephesian
idolaters, and the church needed to be different. However, the book of 1
Timothy nowhere mentions Artemis, nor does Paul mention the standard
practice of Artemis worshipers as a reason for the restrictions in 1
Timothy 2:11–12.
A third objection is that Paul is only referring to husbands and wives, not
men and women in general. The Greek words for “woman” and “man” in 1
Timothy 2 could refer to husbands and wives; however, the basic meaning of
the words is broader than that. Further, the same Greek words are used in
verses 8–10. Are only husbands to lift up holy hands in prayer without
anger and disputing (verse 8)? Are only wives to dress modestly, have good
deeds, and worship God (verses 9–10)? Of course not. Verses 8–10 clearly
refer to all men and women, not just husbands and wives. There is nothing
in the context that would indicate a narrowing to husbands and wives in
verses 11–14.
Yet another objection to this interpretation of women in pastoral ministry
is in relation to women who held positions of leadership in the Bible,
specifically Miriam, Deborah, and Huldah in the Old Testament. It is true
that these women where chosen by God for special service to Him and that
they stand as models of faith, courage, and, yes, leadership. However, the
authority of women in the Old Testament is not relevant to the issue of
pastors in the church. The New Testament Epistles present a new paradigm
for God’s people—the church, the body of Christ—and that paradigm involves
an authority structure unique to the church, not for the nation of Israel
or any other Old Testament entity.
Similar arguments are made using Priscilla and Phoebe in the New Testament.
In Acts 18, Priscilla and Aquila are presented as faithful ministers for
Christ. Priscilla’s name is mentioned first, perhaps indicating that she
was more prominent in ministry than her husband. Did Priscilla and her
husband teach the gospel of Jesus Christ to Apollos? Yes, in their home
they “explained to him the way of God more adequately” (Acts 18:26). Does
the Bible ever say that Priscilla pastored a church or taught publicly or
became the spiritual leader of a congregation of saints? No. As far as we
know, Priscilla was not involved in ministry activity in contradiction to 1
Timothy 2:11–14.
In Romans 16:1, Phoebe is called a “deacon” (or “servant”) in the church
and is highly commended by Paul. But, as with Priscilla, there is nothing
in Scripture to indicate that Phoebe was a pastor or a teacher of men in
the church. “Able to teach” is given as a qualification for elders, but not
for deacons (1 Timothy 3:1–13; Titus 1:6–9).
The structure of 1 Timothy 2:11–14 makes the reason why women cannot be
pastors perfectly clear. Verse 13 begins with “for,” giving the “cause” of
Paul’s statement in verses 11–12. Why should women not teach or have
authority over men? Because “Adam was created first, then Eve. And Adam was
not the one deceived; it was the woman who was deceived” (verses 13–14).
God created Adam first and then created Eve to be a “helper” for Adam. The
order of creation has universal application in the family (Ephesians 5:22–33)
and in the church.
The fact that Eve was deceived is also given in 1 Timothy 2:14 as a reason
for women not serving as pastors or having spiritual authority over men.
This does not mean that women are gullible or that they are all more easily
deceived than men. If all women are more easily deceived, why would they be
allowed to teach children (who are easily deceived) and other women (who
are supposedly more easily deceived)? The text simply says that women are
not to teach men or have spiritual authority over men because Eve was
deceived. God has chosen to give men the primary teaching authority in the
church.
Many women excel in gifts of hospitality, mercy, teaching, evangelism, and
helps. Much of the ministry of the local church depends on women. Women in
the church are not restricted from public praying or prophesying (1
Corinthians 11:5), only from having spiritual teaching authority over men.
The Bible nowhere restricts women from exercising the gifts of the Holy
Spirit (1 Corinthians 12). Women, just as much as men, are called to
minister to others, to demonstrate the fruit of the Spirit (Galatians 5:22–23),
and to proclaim the gospel to the lost (Matthew 28:18–20; Acts 1:8; 1 Peter
3:15).
God has ordained that only men are to serve in positions of spiritual
teaching authority in the church. This is not because men are necessarily
better teachers or because women are inferior or less intelligent (which is
not the case). It is simply the way God designed the church to function.
Men are to set the example in spiritual leadership—in their lives and
through their words. Women are to take a less authoritative role. Women are
encouraged to teach other women (Titus 2:3–5). The Bible also does not
restrict women from teaching children. The only activity women are
restricted from is teaching or having spiritual authority over men. This
precludes women from serving as pastors to men. This does not make women
less important, by any means, but rather gives them a ministry focus more
in agreement with God’s plan and His gifting of them.
Women pastors - what does the Bible say?
The only way to have a productive dialogue on the women pastors issue is to
discuss it biblically. Yes, undeniably, there are men whose views on the
issue are clouded by chauvinism. At the same time, there are men and women
on both sides of the discussion. So, it should never be assumed that one
holds a particular view due to latent chauvinism. The issue should be
decided based on what the Bible teaches, not on who can make the strongest
ad hominem attack.
The key passage on the women pastors issue is 1 Timothy 2:11-12, which
reads, "Let a woman learn quietly with all submissiveness. I do not permit
a woman to teach or to exercise authority over a man; rather, she is to
remain quiet." At its face, this passage is abundantly clear. Paul
restricts women from teaching or having spiritual authority over men. While
it is not explicitly laid out in the text, the focus seems to be on the
concept of pastoring/shepherding. A pastor's duties are primarily teaching
and leading. It is this shepherding role over men that God, through Paul,
restricts to men.
There are several lines of argument against this interpretation of the
women pastors issue in 1 Timothy 2:11-12:
(1) Women were uneducated at that time, and therefore not qualified to be
teachers. The passage nowhere mentions education. Education is not
mentioned as a qualification for church leadership in 1 Timothy 3:1-13 or
Titus 1:6-9. If education was a requirement, few, if any, of Jesus'
disciples would have been qualified.
(2) Paul was only dealing with Artemis worship at Timothy's church in
Ephesus. The context, and all of 1 Timothy for that matter, nowhere mention
Artemis or the prominence of women in the worship of Artemis. If there was
a problem with women usurping authority over men in the church in Ephesus,
Paul would have addressed it directly.
(3) Paul is referring to husbands and wives, not men and women. Wives are
not to teach or have authority over their husbands. The Greek words could
refer to husbands and wives, but the context indicates otherwise. Are only
husbands to lift up holy hands in prayer? Are only wives to dress modestly
(1 Timothy 2:8-10)? The immediate context indicates that men and women in
general are the subject, not husbands and wives exclusively.
(4) There are women in the Bible who served in ways that contradict this
interpretation of 1 Timothy 2:11-12. Miriam, Deborah, Huldah, Priscilla,
and Phoebe are the most commonly given examples. Ultimately, Miriam,
Deborah, and Huldah are meaningless to the issue, as Paul is addressing
leadership in the church. Leadership in old covenant Israel is not the
subject at hand. In regards to Priscilla and Phoebe, the New Testament
nowhere describes them serving in a way that contradicts 1 Timothy 2:11-12.
Priscilla, with her husband Aquila, discipled Apollos in their home (Acts
18:26). Phoebe is simply identified as a servant/deaconess of the church
(Romans 16:1).
(5) Galatians 3:28 says that men and women are equal in God's eyes. Men and
women are absolutely equal in God's eyes, but that is not the issue. The
subject of Galatians 3:28 is equality in Christ, equal access to the
salvation Christ offers. Men and women, Jews and Gentiles, slave and free
are absolutely equal in this context. Church leadership is not the subject
of Galatians 3:28. Further, we cannot take one verse and use it to cancel
out another verse. Both Galatians 3:28 and 1 Timothy 2:11-12 are absolutely
true. They do not contradict each other.
If education, culture, or marriage are not the reason for the restriction
on women in 1 Timothy 2:11-12, what is the reason? The answer is given in
the next two verses: "For Adam was formed first, then Eve; and Adam was not
deceived, but the woman was deceived" (1 Timothy 2:13-14). The order of
creation and the nature of the fall impacts spiritual leadership in the
church, and in the family (see Ephesians 5:22-33). Women are not to teach
or have spiritual authority over men because women were created to be
"helpers" to men and because Eve was deceived into sin. Through creation,
and because of the Fall, God has chosen to give men the primary teaching
authority in the church.
So, what exactly does this mean practically? What are women restricted from
doing? The clear implication is that women are not to serve in any role
which involves the authoritative spiritual teaching of men. By this
definition, the role of teaching pastor/shepherd is reserved for men. This
is confirmed in the two passages which deal specifically with the
qualifications for church leadership (1 Timothy 3:1-13; Titus 1:6-9).
Church leaders are described as the "husband of one wife," "a man whose
children believe," and "men worthy of respect."
Rather than focusing on what ministries women are restricted from, the
focus should be on the multitude of ways God calls and gifts women to
serve. Women are nowhere restricted from proclaiming the gospel to the lost
(Acts 1:8; 1 Peter 3:15). Women are encouraged to teach other women (Titus
2:3-5). Women are nowhere restricted from teaching children. Women seem to
excel, far beyond men, in some of the spiritual gifts and fruit of the
Spirit (1 Corinthians 12; Galatians 5:22-23). Women being restricted from
spiritual teaching authority over men is not a punishment. Rather, it is a
refocusing to the ministries, skills, and gifts God with which blesses
women.
Question: "What roles can women fill in ministry?"
Answer: Women in ministry is an issue upon which Bible-believing Christians
can and do disagree. The point of separation centers on the passages of
Scripture that forbid women to speak in church or "assume authority over a
man" (1 Timothy 2:12; cf. 1 Corinthians 14:34). The disagreement is whether
or not those passages were relevant only to the era in which they were
penned. Some contend that, since there is neither “Jew nor Greek . . . male
nor female . . . but you are all one in Christ” (Galatians 3:28), women are
free to pursue any field of ministry open to men. Others hold that 1
Timothy 2:12 still applies today, since the basis for the command is not
cultural but universal, being rooted in the order of creation (1 Timothy
2:13-14).
First Peter 5:1-4 details the qualifications for an elder. Presbuteros is
the Greek word used sixty-six times in the New Testament to indicate
“seasoned male overseer.” It is the masculine form of the word. The
feminine form, presbutera, is never used in reference to elders or
shepherds. Based on the qualifications found in 1 Timothy 3:1-7, the role
of an elder is interchangeable with the bishop/pastor/overseer (Titus
1:6-9; 1 Peter 5:1-3). And since, according to 1 Timothy 2:12, a woman
should not “teach or exercise authority over a man,” it seems clear that
the position of elders and pastors—who must be equipped to teach, lead the
congregation, and oversee their spiritual growth (1 Timothy 3:2)—should be
reserved for men only.
However, elder/bishop/pastor appears to be the only office reserved for
men. Women have always played a significant role in the growth of the
church, even being among the few who witnessed the crucifixion of Christ
when most of the disciples had run away (Matthew 27:55; John 19:25). The
apostle Paul held women in high regard, and in many of his letters to the
churches he greeted specific women by name (Romans 16:6, 12; Colossians 4:15;
Philippians 4:2-3; Philemon 1:2). Paul addresses these women as
"co-workers," and they clearly served the Lord to the benefit of the whole
church (Philippians 4:3; Colossians 4:15).
Offices were created in the early church to fit the needs of the body.
Although many modern churches interchange the positions of elder and
deacon, they were not the same office. Deacons were appointed to serve in a
physical capacity as the need arose (Acts 6:2-3). There is no clear
prohibition against women serving in this way. In fact, Romans 16:1 may
indicate that a woman named Phoebe was a respected deaconess in the church
at Rome.
There is no scriptural precedent that forbids women from also serving as
worship leaders, youth ministers, or children’s directors. The only
restriction is that they do not assume a role of spiritual authority over
adult men. Since the concern in Scripture appears to be the issue of
spiritual authority rather than function, any role that does not bestow
such spiritual authority over adult men is permissible.
Question: "What does the "husband of one wife" phrase in 1 Timothy 3:2
mean? Can a divorced man serve as a pastor, elder, or deacon?"
Answer: There are at least three possible interpretations of the phrase
“husband of one wife” in 1 Timothy 3:2. 1) It could simply be saying that a
polygamist is not qualified to be an elder, a deacon or a pastor. This is
the most literal interpretation of the phrase, but seems somewhat unlikely
considering that polygamy was quite rare in the time that Paul was writing.
2) The phrase could also be translated “one-woman man.” This would indicate
that a bishop must be absolutely loyal to the woman he is married to. This
interpretation focuses more on moral purity than marital status. 3) The
phrase could also be understood to declare that in order to be an
elder/deacon/pastor, a man can only have been married once, other than in
the case of a remarried widower.
Interpretations 2) and 3) are the most prevalent today. Interpretation 2)
seems to be the strongest, primarily because Scripture seems to allow for
divorce in exceptional circumstances (Matthew 19:9; 1 Corinthians 7:12-16).
It would also be important to differentiate between a man who was divorced
and remarried before he became a Christian from a man who was divorced and
remarried after becoming a Christian. An otherwise qualified man should not
be excluded from church leadership because of actions he took prior to
coming to know the Lord Jesus Christ as his Savior. Although 1 Timothy 3:2
does not necessarily exclude a divorced or remarried man from serving as an
elder/deacon/pastor, there are other issues to consider.
The first qualification of an elder/deacon/pastor is to be “above reproach”
(1 Timothy 3:2). If the divorce and/or remarriage results in a poor
testimony for the man in the church or community, it may be the “above
reproach” qualification that excludes him rather than the “husband of one
wife” requirement. An elder/deacon/pastor is to be a man that the church
and community can look up to as an example of Christ-likeness and godly
leadership. If his divorce and/or remarriage situation detracts from this
purpose, perhaps he should not serve in the position of
elder/deacon/pastor. It is important to remember, though, that just because
a man is disqualified from serving as an elder/deacon/pastor, he is still a
valuable member of the body of Christ. Every Christian possesses spiritual
gifts (1 Corinthians 12:4-7) and is called to participate in edifying other
believers with those gifts (1 Corinthians 12:7). A man who is disqualified
from the position of elder/deacon/pastor can still teach, preach, serve,
pray, worship, and play an important role in the church.
Question: "What are the responsibilities of deacons in the church?"
Answer: In the New Testament, the word usually translated "serve" is the
Greek word diakoneo, which literally means "through the dirt." It refers to
an attendant, a waiter, or one who ministers to another. From this word we
get the English word “deacon.” We first see the word "deacon" used this way
in the book of Acts. “And the twelve summoned the full number of the
disciples and said, "It is not right that we should give up preaching the
word of God to serve tables” (Acts 6:2). The men who were giving themselves
to feeding the flock by preaching and teaching realized that it wasn’t
right for them to leave those activities to wait tables, so they found some
other men who were willing to serve, and put them in place to minister to
the church’s physical needs while the elders or pastors ministered to their
spiritual needs. It was a better use of the resources they were given, and
a better use of everyone’s gifts. It also got more people involved in
serving and helping one another.
Today, for the biblical church, these roles are essentially the same.
Elders and pastors are to “preach the word…reprove, rebuke, and exhort,
with complete patience and teaching” (2 Timothy 4:2), and deacons are to be
appointed to take care of everything else. In a modern church, this might
include taking on administrative or organizational tasks, ushering, being
responsible for building maintenance, or volunteering to be the church
treasurer. It depends on the need and the gifts of the available men.
The responsibilities of a deacon are not clearly listed or outlined; they
are assumed to be everything that does not include the duties of an elder
or pastor, which is to preach, teach, and exhort. But qualifications for a
deacon’s character are clearly outlined in Scripture. They are to be
blameless, the husband of one wife, a good household manager, respectable,
honest, not addicted to alcohol and not greedy (1 Timothy 3:8-12).
According to the Word, the office of deacon is an honor and a blessing.
“For those who serve well as deacons gain a good standing for themselves
and also great confidence in the faith that is in Christ Jesus” (1 Timothy
3:13).
Is God/the Bible sexist? Sexism is generally defined as one gender having
dominance over another and is usually applied to men dominating women.
Because the Bible includes many references to women that appear demeaning
from our contemporary context, some conclude that God and/or the Bible are
sexist. Is this true?
The time period of the Old Testament included a cultural system that was
patriarchal. Rather than viewing men and women as created in God's image as
the Bible states (Genesis 1:27), women were typically seen as less
important than men in society. This is part of fallen human nature in which
people lived in ways contrary to God's design. To discover and develop the
view God has given for the roles of men and women in society, we must look
to Scripture.
Though in Old Testament accounts many references to women appear sexist
from our modern perspective, two things must be considered before making
such an accusation. First, many references in the Bible that appear sexist
are simply stating actions that took place without reference to whether
they were right or wrong. For example, in Judges 11 Jephthah appears to
have sacrificed his own daughter to keep a vow he made to the Lord.
Scripture does not state that God approved this action; it only records it
as a fact of history.
Second, many references to women that appear sexist based on contemporary
standards were appropriate or even better than the norm of the original
cultural setting. For example, 1 Timothy 2:9 says Christian women should
not adorn themselves with braided hair. Why not? In that time, braided hair
was associated with the practices of immoral women in the area. Further,
braided hair as understood in that cultural context was a costly,
extravagant luxury. However, even in a time when women's rights were
different than today, there are several biblical accounts of women being
treated with dignity and respect above the level of cultural norms. For
example, Jesus publicly spoke with a Samaritan woman at a well, something
that even she noted as uncommon (John 4:9). Jesus also allowed women to
serve among His followers (including Mary and Martha and Mary Magdalene),
and even appeared first to women after His resurrection rather than to men.
Far from being sexist, Scripture presents both men and women in high
regard. In the beginning, woman was made in God's image, complementing man
as a helper with him. She would serve as woman, wife, mother, and various
other roles.
In the Old Testament, women are seen in many influential roles. In addition
to Eve, the mother of all people, Scripture speaks highly of Abraham's wife
Sarah, Isaac's wife Rebekah, Deborah who served as a judge in the book of
Judges, the mother of Moses, Miriam the sister of Moses, Ruth the faithful
Moabite, Hannah the mother of Samuel, and Queen Esther who saved the Jewish
people.
In the New Testament, women served in prominent roles as well. Mary the
mother of Jesus is presented as an ideal servant of God. Four women are
mentioned by name in the family lineage of Jesus. Mary's relative Elizabeth
obediently raised John the Baptist. Many women also served Jesus during His
ministry, with Mary Magdalene in particular noted. Several women existed
among the 120 first followers of Jesus in the upper room when the church
began (Acts 1—2) and led in a variety of roles within the early church.
While it is unlikely that women served as apostles and did not serve as
elders, some women served as prophets or at least gave prophecies. Acts
21:8-9 shares, "On the next day we departed and came to Caesarea, and we
entered the house of Philip the evangelist, who was one of the seven, and
stayed with him. He had four unmarried daughters, who prophesied."
Further, the New Testament speaks highly in favor of strong families and
discourages divorce, something that culturally hurt women greatly at the
time of writing. James 1:27 is exemplary of Scripture's instructions to
care for widows, those women without husbands to provide for the needs of
their family.
Though some portions of the Bible may appear sexist, the overall teaching
of Scripture presents a beautiful view of women that provides much insight
for today.
Question: "What does the Bible say about the form of church government
(polity)?"
Answer: The Lord was very clear in His Word about how He wishes His church
on earth to be organized and managed. First, Christ is the head of the
church and its supreme authority (Ephesians 1:22; 4:15; Colossians 1:18).
Second, the local church is to be autonomous, free from any external
authority or control, with the right of self-government and freedom from
the interference of any hierarchy of individuals or organizations (Titus
1:5). Third, the church is to be governed by spiritual leadership
consisting of two main offices—elders and deacons.
“Elders” were a leading body among the Israelites since the time of Moses.
We find them making political decisions (2 Samuel 5:3; 2 Samuel 17:4, 15),
advising the king in later history (1 Kings 20:7), and representing the
people concerning spiritual matters (Exodus 7:17; 24:1, 9; Numbers 11:16,
24-25). The early Greek translation of the Old Testament, the Septuagint,
used the Greek word presbuteros for “elder.” This is the same Greek word
used in the New Testament that is also translated “elder.”
The New Testament refers a number of times to elders who served in the role
of church leadership (Acts 14:23, 15:2, 20:17; Titus 1:5; James 5:14) and
apparently each church had more than one, as the word is usually found in
the plural. The only exceptions refer to cases in which one elder is being
singled out for some reason (1 Timothy 5:1, 19). In the Jerusalem church,
elders were part of the leadership along with the apostles (Acts 15:2-16:4).
It seems that the position of elder was equal to the position of episkopos,
translated “overseer” or “bishop” (Acts 11:30; 1 Timothy 5:17). The term
“elder” may refer to the dignity of the office, while the term
“bishop/overseer” describes its authority and duties (1 Peter 2:25, 5:1-4).
In Philippians 1:1, Paul greets the bishops and deacons but does not
mention the elders, presumably because the elders are the same as the
bishops. Likewise, 1 Timothy 3:2, 8 gives the qualifications of bishops and
deacons but not of elders. Titus 1:5-7 seems also to tie these two terms
together.
The position of “deacon,” from diakonos, meaning “through the dirt,” was
one of servant leadership to the church. Deacons are separate from elders,
while having qualifications that are in many ways similar to those of
elders (1 Timothy 3:8-13). Deacons assist the church in whatever is needed,
as recorded in Acts chapter 6.
Concerning the word poimen, translated “pastor” in reference to a human
leader of a church, it is found only once in the New Testament, in
Ephesians 4:11: “It was he who gave some to be apostles, some to be
prophets, some to be evangelists, and some to be pastors and teachers.”
Most associate the two terms “pastors” and “teachers” as referring to a
single position, a pastor-teacher. It is likely that a pastor-teacher was
the spiritual shepherd of a particular local church.
It would seem from the above passages that there was always a plurality of
elders, but this does not negate God’s gifting particular elders with the
teaching gifts while gifting others with the gift of administration,
prayer, etc. (Romans 12:3-8; Ephesians 4:11). Nor does it negate God’s
calling them into a ministry in which they will use those gifts (Acts
13:1). Thus, one elder may emerge as the “pastor,” another may do the
majority of visiting members because he has the gift of compassion, while
another may “rule” in the sense of handling the organizational details.
Many churches that are organized with a pastor and deacon board perform the
functions of a plurality of elders in that they share the ministry load and
work together in some decision making. In Scripture there was also much
congregational input into decisions. Thus, a “dictator” leader who makes
the decisions (whether called elder, or bishop, or pastor) is unscriptural
(Acts 1:23, 26; 6:3, 5; 15:22, 30; 2 Corinthians 8:19). So, too, is a
congregation-ruled church that does not give weight to the elders’ or
church leaders’ input.
In summary, the Bible teaches a leadership consisting of a plurality of
elders (bishops/overseers) along with a group of deacons who serve the
church. But it is not contrary to this plurality of elders to have one of
the elders serving in the major “pastoral” role. God calls some as
“pastor/teachers” (even as He called some to be missionaries in Acts 13)
and gives them as gifts to the church (Ephesians 4:11). Thus, a church may
have many elders, but not all elders are called to serve in the pastoral
role. But, as one of the elders, the pastor or “teaching elder” has no more
authority in decision making than does any other elder.
Some liberal theologians, cultists, New Agers & apostates have argued that
the "Jezebel spirit" allows for the Christian church to have women pastors
which only shows the absurdity that they will go to disobey God's
straightforward & clear commands in scripture that women pastors are not
allowed. The people that would use the "Jezebel spirit" argument to allow
for any kind of church leadership model whatsoever have clearly
demonstrated that they themselves have the very "Jezebel" spirit they claim
for their authority to have women pastors, etc. What a ridiculous position
to hold since they themselves are condemned by the very argument they use.
Question: "What is the Jezebel spirit?"
Answer: There is a variety of opinions about what constitutes a Jezebel
spirit, everything from sexual looseness in a woman to the teaching of
false doctrine—by a man or a woman. The Bible does not mention a Jezebel
spirit, although it has plenty to say about Jezebel herself.
Jezebel’s story is found in 1 and 2 Kings. She was the daughter of Ethbaal,
king of Tyre/Sidon and priest of the cult of Baal, a cruel, sensuous and
revolting false god whose worship involved sexual degradation and lewdness.
Ahab, king of Israel, married Jezebel and led the nation into Baal worship
(1 Kings 16:31). Ahab and Jezebel’s reign over Israel is one of the saddest
chapters in the history of God’s people.
There are two incidents in the life of Jezebel which characterize her and
may define what is meant by the Jezebel spirit. One trait is her obsessive
passion for domineering and controlling others, especially in the spiritual
realm. When she became queen, she began a relentless campaign to rid Israel
of all evidences of Jehovah worship. She ordered the extermination of all
the prophets of the Lord (1 Kings 18:4, 13) and replaced their altars with
those of Baal. Her strongest enemy was Elijah, who demanded a contest on
Mount Carmel between the powers of Israel’s God and the powers of Jezebel
and the priests of Baal (1 Kings 18). Of course, Jehovah won, but despite
hearing of the miraculous powers of Jehovah, Jezebel refused to repent and
swore on her gods that she would pursue Elijah relentlessly and take his
life. Her stubborn refusal to see and submit to the power of the living God
would lead her to a hideous end (2 Kings 9:29-37).
The second incident involves a righteous man named Naboth who refused to
sell to Ahab land adjoining the palace, rightly declaring that to sell his
inheritance would be against the Lord’s command (1 Kings 21:3; Leviticus
25:23). While Ahab sulked and fumed on his bed, Jezebel taunted and
ridiculed him for his weakness, then proceeded to have the innocent Naboth
framed and stoned to death. Naboth’s sons were also stoned to death, so
there would be no heirs, and the land would revert to the possession of the
king. Such a single-minded determination to have one’s way, no matter who
is destroyed in the process, is a characteristic of the Jezebel spirit.
So infamous was Jezebel’s sexual immorality and idol worship that the Lord
Jesus Himself refers to her in a warning to the church at Thyatira
(Revelation 2:18-29). Most likely referring to a woman in the church who
influenced it the same way Jezebel influenced Israel into idolatry and
sexual immorality, Jesus declares to the Thyatirans that she is not to be
tolerated. Whoever this woman was, like Jezebel, she refused to repent of
her immorality and her false teaching, and her fate was sealed. The Lord
Jesus cast her onto a sick bed, along with those who committed idolatry
with her. The end for those who succumb to a Jezebel spirit is always death
and destruction, both in the physical and the spiritual sense.
Perhaps the best way to define the Jezebel spirit is to say it
characterizes anyone who acts in the same manner as Jezebel did, engaging
in immorality, idolatry, false teaching and unrepentant sin. To go beyond
that is to engage in conjecture and can possibly lead to false accusations
and divisiveness within the body of Christ.
Female based religious cults such as Seventh Day Adventism (see our
playlist "Dealing with Seventh-day Adventism & Their "Prophetess"" with 24
videos at https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL5316CC6F66F24283),
Christian Science of Mary Baker Eddy & other New Age cults (see our
playlist "Dealing with Anti Christ Cults, "New Age" & World Religions" with
42 videos at https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL69A3047B3497590A &
many of today's modern Charismatic & Pentecostal TV preachers like Joyce
Meyer & Paula White (see our playlist "Dealing with Phony TV Preachers
(TBN) & King James Onlyites" with 26 videos at
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL2CDA855486B09128) promote the type
of "Jezebel spirit" & "doctrine of the Nicolaitans" the scripture warns
about.
Question: "Who are the Nicolaitans mentioned in Revelation 2:6, 14-15?"
Answer: The exact origin of the Nicolaitans is unclear. Some Bible
commentators believe they were a heretical sect who followed the teachings
of Nicolas—whose name means “one who conquers the people”—who was possibly
one of the deacons of the early church mentioned in Acts 6:5. It is
possible that Nicolas became an apostate, denying the true faith and became
part of a group holding "the doctrine of Balaam," who taught Israel "to sin
by eating food sacrificed to idols and by committing sexual immorality."
Clement of Alexandria says, “They abandoned themselves to pleasure like
goats, leading a life of self-indulgence.” Their teaching perverted grace
and replaced liberty with license.
Other commentators believe that these Nicolaitans were not so called from
any man, but from the Greek word Nicolah, meaning "let us eat," as they
often encouraged each other to eat things offered to idols. Whichever
theory is true, it is certain that the deeds of the Nicolaitans were an
abomination to Christ. They, like the Gnostics and other false teachers,
abused the doctrine of grace and tried to introduce licentiousness in its
place (2 Peter 2:15, 19; Jude 1:4).
According to the writings of the Early Church leaders, Nicolas taught a
doctrine of compromise, implying that total separation between Christianity
and the practice of occult paganism was not essential. From Early Church
records, it seems apparent that this Nicolas of Antioch was so immersed in
occultism, Judaism, and Christianity that he had a stomach for all of it.
He had no problem intermingling these belief systems in various concoctions
and saw no reason why believers couldn't continue to fellowship with those
still immersed in the black magic of the Roman empire and its countless
mystery cults.
Occultism was a major force that warred against the Early Church. In
Ephesus, the primary pagan religion was the worship of Diana (Artemis).
There were many other forms of idolatry in Ephesus, but this was the
primary object of occult worship in that city. In the city of Pergamos,
there were numerous dark and sinister forms of occultism, causing Pergamos
to be one of the most wicked cities in the history of the ancient world. In
both of these cities, believers were lambasted and persecuted fiercely by
adherents of pagan religions, forced to contend with paganism on a level
far beyond all other cities.
It was very hard for believers to live separately from all the activities
of paganism because paganism and its religions were the center of life in
these cities. Slipping in and out of paganism would have been very easy for
young or weak believers to do since most of their families and friends were
still pagans. A converted Gentile would have found it very difficult to
stay away from all pagan influence.
It is significant that the "deeds" and "doctrines" of the Nicolaitans are
only mentioned in connection with the churches in these two occultic and
pagan cities. It seems that the "doctrine" of the Nicolaitans was that it
was alright to have one foot in both worlds and that one needn't be so
strict about separation from the world in order to be a Christian. This, in
fact, was the "doctrine" of the Nicolaitans that Jesus "hated." It led to a
weak version of Christianity that was without power and without conviction
- a defeated, worldly type of Christianity.
Nicolas' deep roots in paganism may have produced in him a tolerance for
occultism and paganism. Growing up in this perverted spiritual environment
may have caused him to view these belief systems as not so damaging or
dangerous. This wrong perception would have resulted in a very liberal
viewpoint that encouraged people to stay connected to the world. This is
what numerous Bible scholars believe about the Nicolaitans.
This kind of teaching would result in nothing but total defeat for its
followers. When believers allow sin and compromise to be in their lives, it
drains away the power in the work of the Cross and the power of the Spirit
that is resident in a believer's life. This is the reason the name Nicolas
is so vital to this discussion. The evil fruit of Nicolas' "doctrine"
encouraged worldly participation, leading people to indulge in sin and a
lowered godly standard. In this way he literally conquered the people.
God wants to make sure we understand the doctrine the Nicolaitans taught,
so Balaam's actions are given as an example of their doctrine and actions.
Revelation 2:14,15 says, "But I have a few things against thee, because
thou hast there them that hold the doctrine of Balaam, who taught Balac to
cast a stumblingblock before the children of Israel, to eat things
sacrificed unto idols, and to commit fornication. So hast thou also them
that hold the doctrine of the Nicolaitans, which thing I hate."
When Balaam could not successfully cure the people of God, he used another
method to destroy them. He seduced them into unbridled, sensual living by
dangling the prostitutes of Moab before the men of Israel. Numbers 25:1-3
tells us, "And Israel abode in Shittim, and the people began to commit
whoredom with the daughters of Moab. And they [the daughters of Moab]
called the people [the men of Israel] unto the sacrifices of their gods:
and the people [the men of Israel] did eat, and bowed down to their gods.
And Israel joined himself unto Baal-peor...."
Just as the men of Israel compromised themselves with the world and false
religions, now the "doctrine" of the Nicolaitans was encouraging
compromise. As you are well aware, compromise with the world always results
in a weakened and powerless form of Christianity. This was the reason Jesus
"hated" the "doctrine" and the "deeds" of the Nicolaitans.
Jesus commends the church of Ephesus for hating the deeds of the
Nicolaitans as He does (Revelation 2:6). No doubt the leaders of the
Ephesian church protected their flock from these destructive heresies and
kept their people from committing the same evil deeds. All sin is hateful
to Christ, as it should be to His followers, as we hate men’s evil deeds,
not the men themselves. For the church at Pergamos, Jesus had not
commendation, but censure. Unlike the Ephesians, they actually embraced the
teachings of the Nicolaitans (Revelation 2:15). Jesus warns them that
unless they repent, they are in danger of the judgment that is sure to fall
on those who teach false doctrine, attack His church, and destroy His
people. The sword of judgment is poised over their heads, and His patience
is not limitless (Revelation 2:16; 19:15).
The lesson for us is that the church of the Lord Jesus throughout the ages
has been plagued by those of the Nicolaitan spirit. The only way to
recognize false teaching is to be intimately familiar with truth through
the diligent study of the Word of God. See our website www.BibleQuery.org which
answers over 8000 bible questions. 2 Timothy 2:15
The ten commandments were given only to the nation of Israel & not
to anyone else (Gentiles). The New Testament only reaffirms nine out of the
ten commandments under the terms of the New Covenant. Sabbath keeping as
found in the ten commandments is a ceremonial law associated only with Old
Testament Israelites & is not a moral law that must be followed by
Gentiles. The Old Testament Scriptures always state that the covenant
written on the Tablets of Stone was made only with Israel at Sinai. Look at
the first time the words "Ten Commandments" were used in the Bible. This
same text states that the Ten Commandments, as the covenant document, was
given only to the nation of Israel:
And the LORD said unto Moses, Write thou these words: for after the tenor
of these words I have made a covenant with thee and WITH ISRAEL. And he was
there with the LORD forty days and forty nights; he did neither eat bread,
nor drink water. And he wrote upon the tables the words of the covenant,
the ten commandments. Ex 34:27,28
When Moses refreshed Israel's mind concerning their covenant relationship
with God, he specifically says that the covenant (Ten Commandments) was
given at Horeb. This is clear in the following text:
The Lord our God made a covenant [Remember the covenant is the Ten
Commandments or Tablets of Stone] with us at Horeb. The Lord did not make
this covenant with our fathers, but with us, with all of us alive here
today. Deut. 5:2,3
Moses insists that the covenant was "not made with our fathers," meaning
the patriarchs, 11 but with the people that came out of Egypt. He then
repeats the words of the covenant, or Ten Commandments, that were written
on the Tablets of Stone.
The Prophets saw the coming of a New Covenant and spoke of it in glowing
terms. Whenever they contrasted the Old Covenant with the New Covenant,
they always state when and with whom the Old Covenant was made. Notice this
in a classic passage in Jeremiah:
Behold days are coming, declares the Lord, when I will make a new covenant
with the house of Israel..., not like the covenant which I made with their
fathers in the day I took them by the hands to bring them out of the land
of Egypt..." Jer. 31:31.32.
Notice the following things clearly set forth in this passage:
1.There was going a New Covenant. "I will make a new covenant."
2.The New Covenant was going to be different in nature from the Old
Covenant. "Not like the covenant I made with their fathers"
3.The Old Covenant being replaced was made at Sinai and made only with
Israel. "Made with their fathers in the day I took them by the hand to
bring them out of the land of Egypt"
How is it possible to read these words in Jeremiah and say, "God was not
actually promising to make a new and different covenant with Israel. He was
really promising a new administration of the same covenant they were
already under?" It seems to us that such statements are literally
contradicting what Jeremiah said. The rest of the Bible always says the
same thing that Jeremiah said when it speaks on this subject. The following
passage from I Kings appears to be going out of its way to affirm the facts
we are setting forth:
There was nothing in the ark save the two tables of stone, which Moses put
there at Horeb, WHEN the LORD made a covenant with the children of Israel,
WHEN they came out of the land of Egypt. I Kings 8:9
The phrases "Tables of Stone," "Moses at Horeb," "made a covenant" and
"children of Israel," in this text are the same key ingredients that we
always find connected with the Ten Commandments. This passage of Scripture
uses the word "when" two times. We could put a period after "children of
Israel" and not lose the thought or argument. The last phrase in the
sentence "When they came out of the land of Egypt" is almost redundant. The
Holy Spirit must have wanted to impress this point on our minds.
The NT Scriptures always connect the Old Covenant with Israel.
Heb 8:6-9 is the Apostolic interpretation of Jer 31:31,32. The author of
Hebrews clearly states: (1) when the Old Covenant was made; (2) with whom
the Old Covenant was made; (3) the fact the New Covenant would be different
than the Old Covenant. The passage is clear:
.......... the time is coming, declares the Lord, when I will make a new
covenant with the house of Israel .......... It will not be like the
covenant I made with their forefathers when I took them by the hand to lead
them out Egypt.......... Heb 8:7,8
It is not possible to make this verse promise a new administration of the
same covenant. Nor is it possible relate this covenant back to Adam in the
garden. Neither the words in prophecy of Jer 31:33 nor the Apostolic
interpretation in Heb 8:7,8 will allow such an idea.
"Having the law" as a covenant and the Gospel as a promise as opposed to
"not having the law" and being without covenant or hope was the great
difference between the nation of Israel and the Gentiles (Eph 2:11-21).
The following text is a key passage on this particular point:
For when the Gentiles, which have not the law, do by nature the things
contained in the law, these, having not the law, are a law unto themselves:
Which show the work of the law written in their hearts, their conscience
also bearing witness..... Rom 2:14.
First of all, the word "law" in this passage clearly refers to the Tablets
of Stone. It cannot refer to "a sense of moral duty" since all men have
that by virtue of being God's image bearers. Paul is talking about a law
that all men definitely do not have. If all men have "the law" in the sense
that Paul is using the word in this passage, his argument does not make
sense. He is contradicting himself in the same breath. Paul's whole point
in the context of this passage is to show that the Jews are more guilty
than the Gentiles. The basis of his proof is that the Gentiles "without the
law" live better lives than the Jews do "with the law." The Jews alone have
the special gift of the Law. And the specific law that he is talking about
is the law written on the Tablets of Stone as a covenant.
Rom 2:14 is not talking about a so called "ceremonial law." Whatever the
"law" is in this passage, it convicts the conscience of sin. Conscience, by
nature and without special revelation, cannot convict men of disobedience
to "ceremonial" laws. One of the many proofs that the Sabbath is not a
"moral law" is the fact that we have never discovered a single instance of
anyone knowing, by nature, the Sabbath law. This particular law must always
be taught as special revelation just as it was to Israel at Sinai. 12
Gentiles intuitively knew that adultery was wrong but they know that the
seventh day is to be kept holy.
Most people misquote this passage of Scripture. Paul does not say, "The
law" is written in the Gentile's heart. He says that certain behavior
proves that there is a conviction of right and wrong in all men. This fact
shows that conscience is alive and well even in the Gentiles. In fact, it
is more alive and well in them than it is in the Jew. This power of
conscience "shows the work of the law written in their hearts." The "work"
of the law is to accuse or excuse according to the standard given to it. It
condemns all violations of known wrong and rewards obedience to what is
known to be right. All men have a conscience and they all experience, to a
greater or lesser degree, conviction they have done wrong.
The Gentiles did not have "the law" but they did have the "work of the law"
in their hearts. The law can only "work" true repentance that leads to
faith if there is (1) a covenant with clear terms and (2) the individual
has a knowledge of those terms. In giving Israel the law as a covenant, God
enlightened the mind and sharpened the conscience. He sandwiched conscience
under the Old Covenant and its threat of judgment. This caused a very
painful death to all hope of eternal life in those who truly experienced
the end for which the law covenant was given, namely, genuine "conviction
of guilt." The same law actually "blinded" the rest of the Jews and made
them worse off spiritually than the Gentiles.
We say again, it was most gracious of God to kill Israel's hope in their
own efforts. However, it took a covenant of pure law with the power of life
and death to do the job. There was not an ounce of grace in the Tablets of
Stone but it was most of God to give them to Israel as a covenant that
could prepare the heart to receive grace!
Regardless of whether the reader agrees or disagree with what has just been
said, one thing is certain. We cannot change a passage that emphatically
states that Israel had a specific law that the Gentiles did not have into a
text that says "all men have the same law." This is to destroy the text.
Paul can only be referring to the Tables of Stone as a covenant.
It both amazes and amuses us to watch people waver back and forth when they
cannot fit clear passages of Scripture into their theological system. They
usually want to "eat their cake and have it too." If they are discussing
the "unchanging moral law," they will insist that "the moral law (Ten
Commandments) is written on ever man's heart." However, if they are
discussing the canon of conduct for believer's today, these same people
will insist that in regeneration "the moral law" (Ten Commandments) is
written on the heart" by the Holy Spirit. In both cases it is said to be
the same law that Scriptures clearly state was given only to the nation of
Israel at Sinai on the Tablets of Stone.
Something seems to be a bit out of focus when all of this is put together.
(1) If the first point is true, and the same law that was given to Israel
at Sinai (the Ten Commandments) is indeed written on every man's heart, it
is impossible to say the Gentiles are "without the law." They cannot be
"without" the very law that is written "in" them. (2) If the second point,
affirming that the same law written in the heathen, and given to Israel at
Sinai, is also written on the heart of believer in regeneration, is true,
there appears to be a contradiction. What need is there to write something
on the heart that is already there? (3) If, in regeneration, the Holy
Spirit writes the Ten Commandments on the heart of every believer, what
then is the necessity of preaching those commandments to the Christian?
We must distinguish between the Ten Commandments as the terms of a legal
covenant and the duties commanded by the individual commandments. The
moment we do this a lot of confusion disappears and some difficult passages
of Scripture become clear and simple. We will illustrate this point with
one passage of Scripture. This passage in its context is pivotal to any
correct understanding of the change of covenants:
But the ministry Jesus has received is as superior to theirs as the
covenant of which he is mediator is superior to the old one, and it is
founded on better promises. For if there had been nothing wrong with that
first covenant, no place would have been sought for another. But God found
fault with the people and said: "The time is coming, declares the Lord,
when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house
of Judah. It will not be like the covenant I made with their forefathers
when I took them by the hand to lead them out of Egypt, because they did
not remain faithful to my covenant, and I turned away from them, declares
the Lord. This is the covenant I will make with the house of Israel after
that time, declares the Lord. I will put my laws in their minds and write
them on their hearts. I will be their God, and they will be my people. No
longer will a man teach his neighbor, or a man his brother, saying, 'Know
the Lord,' because they will all know me, from the least of them to the
greatest. For I will forgive their wickedness and will remember their sins
no more." By calling this covenant "new," he has made the first one
obsolete; and what is obsolete and aging will soon disappear. Heb 8:6-13
We have already noted the three distinct contrasts in verse 6. We saw the
following: (1) Christ has a better ministry than Aaron; (2) because
Christ's ministry is based on a new and better covenant; (3) the covenant
Christ administers is superior to the covenant under which Aaron ministered
because it is based on better promises.
Heb 8:7-9 settles any discussion as to either when (at Sinai) or with whom
(Israel only) the Old Covenant was made. Heb 8:11 shows that everyone,
without a single exception, in the New Covenant community, or Church, "know
the Lord." In other words, the text proves that the Church born under the
New Covenant has a totally regenerate membership. We will now look at verse
10:
This is the covenant I will make with the house of Israel after that time,
declares the Lord. I will put my laws in their minds and write them on
their hearts. I will be their God, and they will be my people. HEB 8:10
The text emphasizes several important things. First, God promises to make a
new covenant, and this covenant will be with the "house of Israel." We will
not digress from the point under discussion except to say that the "house
of Israel" in Heb 8-10 must be the Church. The writer is not talking about
the future but the present. This covenant cannot be pushed into a future
millennium. Hebrews is talking about the priestly ministry of Christ over
the Church. However, that is not our subject in this book.
The second major thing in the text is God's promise to put his laws in the
mind and write them on the hearts of His New Covenant people. Now here is
the question: "What is the difference, if any, between the "covenant" and
the word "laws" in this passage?" Exactly what is God promising to do in
this verse? Exactly what is the "New Covenant" He is making and precisely
what "laws" is He going to write on the heart?
We should carefully note that God did not say, "In that day I will give a
new administration of the same covenant that I gave Israel. I will write
the old law of Sinai into the new heart of the Christian." That is how some
theologians read this passage. Likewise, the text does not say, "I will
make a New Covenant that destroys all of the Ten Commandments and allows a
believer to do as he pleases." That is how some liberals view the text. No,
the text, and its context, is talking about both a new and better covenant
than the old covenant at Sinai and the new experience of the law being
written on the heart by the indwelling Spirit.
The clear answers to the two questions that we asked lies in understanding
the three comparisons made in verse 6. Why did the Old Covenant fail and
thereby need to be replaced by a new and better covenant? The answer is
that it could not secure the necessary obedience to its terms. It could not
write on the heart the desire to do the things that were written on the
Tablets of the Covenants. It could write on stone but not on flesh (II Cor
3). By nature all men hate God's authority (Rom 8:7) and even the mighty
Law of God cannot change that rebellion into a sincere desire to obey. The
Old Covenant failed to bring sinners into God's presence because it could
not change the sinner's heart. It could not conquer sin in the flesh nor it
could cleanse the conscience from the guilt of sin.
Now read carefully! The greater glory of the New Covenant is not that the
standards or laws have been either lowered or done away. It is not that the
moral duties demanded on the Tables of Stone are no longer binding on a
Christian. No, No, that is to miss the whole point. The greater glory of
the New Covenant is that no obedience at all is required as the terms of
being saved simply because the very terms of the Tablets of the Covenant
have been finally and fully met in the Person and work of Surety, the Lord
Jesus Christ. The glory of the New Covenant is in the words, "IT IS
FINISHED." Paul states the glory of the New Covenant in the classic passage
in Rom 4:5. Here is a paraphrase of that text:
However, to the man who does not work but trusts God who justifies the
wicked, his faith is credited as righteousness.
Rom 4:5 This is the "rest" that weary souls enter into when they come under
the yoke of Christ and are liberated from the yoke of the covenant given to
Moses on Sinai. We doubt not that our Lord Jesus had this very contrast in
mind when He gave that great gospel invitation in Matthew 11:
Come to me, all you who are weary and burdened, and I will give you rest.
Take my yoke upon you and learn from me, for I am gentle and humble in
heart, and you will find rest for your souls. For my yoke is easy and my
burden is light." Matt 11:28-30.
Every thing in that passage is a contrast with Moses and old law covenant.
The yoke of the covenant written on the Tables of Stone was a burden
impossible to bear. The yoke written in the blood of Calvary is a privilege
and delight to bear. The New Covenant is nothing less than Christ Himself
and His finished work. When God said, "I will make a new covenant," He was
saying, "I will give you Christ to be your covenant Keeper. He will both
keep the law and die under its curse." The message has now become "It is
finished" instead of "Do or Die." The New Covenant is grace and not works.
What then are the "laws" spoken of in Heb 8:10? Exactly what "laws" does
the Holy Spirit write on the heart of a New Covenant believer? These laws,
as far as their content, are basically the very same moral laws that were
written on the tables of stone. Heb 8:10 is not talking about two different
"sets" of laws that totally contradict each other as if there were two
"kinds of morality." The morality of the New Covenant does not destroy the
true morality demanded in the laws of the Old Covenant. It takes that
morality to a higher level. It is true that Christ adds laws that were
impossible for Moses to ever give but that does not mean Christ contradicts
Moses. 13 Hebrews is talking about two different motivations that grow out
of two different kinds of covenants." II Cor 3 is the Holy Spirit's
commentary on Heb 8:10. Neither of these passages are teaching that God
"tattoos" the exact words of the Decalogue on our hearts. Both passages are
talking about the powerful effect of regeneration that results in a totally
new and different attitude toward God. These two passages are picturing the
removal of the stony heart that hated the Tablets of Stones and all they
represented. It is describing the effect of regeneration in replacing the
stony heart with a heart of flesh. The new heart of flesh loves all of
God's revealed laws, not just a one small code, simply because it loves the
new Lawgiver Who teaches us those laws.
The difference is not in the specific duties demanded but the difference
between law and grace as covenants. It is the difference, in some cases, of
the identical duties being enforced from without by fear and force, in the
case of the Old Covenant, and being constrained by love from within a heart
rejoicing in a covenant of grace. These two passages are talking about the
difference between the conscience being under the old Pedagogue, the Tables
of Stone, and being under the new Pedagogue, the indwelling Holy Spirit.
11. The writer of Hebrews, as well as the prophecy in Jer 31:33, establish
beyond question that the "fathers" referred to in this passage are the
patriarchs. To make the statement refer to the immediate fathers of the
people to whom Moses is speaking would involve a contradiction. It was
specifically to these very "fathers" that God gave the covenant at Sinai.
12. John Bunyan wrote an excellent article proving the Seventh Day Sabbath
could not possibly be a so called "Creation Ordinance." To our knowledge,
no one has attempted to answer his arguments. See, "Questions about the
Nature and Perpetuity of the Seventh-Day Sabbath," by John Bunyan, The
Works of John Bunyan, Vol. II, pp 359-387, Baker Book House.
13. We have worked this out in a book entitled But I Say Unto You. This
book shows that Christ supercedes and replaces Moses as the New Lawgiver.
Christ changes some of the laws of Moses; raises some others to a higher
level; discards some others altogether; and adds some laws that are totally
new. However, this is not contradicting Moses as he were wrong.
Why do we worship on Sunday instead of Saturday?
In the Old Testament, God stated,
"Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy. Six days you shall labor and do
all your work, but the seventh day is a Sabbath of the Lord your God; in it
you shall not do any work, you or your son or your daughter, your male or
your female servant or your cattle or your sojourner who stays with you,"
(Exodus 20:8-10, NASB).
It was the custom of the Jews to come together on the Sabbath, which is
Saturday, cease work, and worship God. Jesus went to the synagogue on
Saturday to teach (Matt. 12:9, John 18:20) as did the apostle Paul (Acts
17:2; 18:4). So, if in the Old Testament we are commanded to keep the
Sabbath and in the New Testament we see Jews, Jesus, and the apostles doing
the same thing, then why do we worship on Sunday?
First of all, of the 10 commandments listed in Exodus 20:1-17, only 9 of
them were reinstituted in the New Testament: five in Matt. 19:18, murder,
adultery, stealing, false witness, and honor parents; in Rom. 13:9,
coveting; worshiping God properly covers the first three commandments. The
one that was not reaffirmed was the one about the Sabbath. Instead, Jesus
said that He is the Lord of the Sabbath (Matt. 12:8).
Upon the completion of Creation, God rested on the seventh day. However,
since God is all-powerful, He doesn’t get tired. He doesn’t need to take a
break and rest. So, why did/does it say that He rested? The reason is
simple: Mark 2:27 says, "The Sabbath was made for man, and not man for the
Sabbath." In other words, God established the Sabbath as a rest for His
people--not because He needed a break but because we are mortal and need a
time of rest--a time to focus on God. In this, our spirits and bodies are
both renewed.
The Old Testament system of Law required keeping the Sabbath as part of the
overall moral, legal, and sacrificial system by which the Jewish people
satisfied God’s requirements for behavior, government, and forgiveness of
sins. The Sabbath was part of the Law in that sense. In order to "remain"
in favor with God, you had to also keep the Sabbath. If it was not kept,
then the person was in sin and would often be punished (Ezekiel 18:4; Rom.
6:23; Deut. 13:1-9; Num. 35:31; Lev. 20:2, etc.).
But with Jesus’ atonement, we are no longer required to keep the Law. We
are not under Law but grace (Rom. 6:14-15). The Sabbath is fulfilled in
Jesus. He is our rest. We are not under obligation, by Law, to keep it; and
this goes for the Sabbath as well. It is not a requirement that we keep the
Sabbath. If it were, then we would still be under the Law; but we are not.
Evidence of the Change of Days can be Seen in the NT
The New Testament has ample evidence that the seventh day Sabbath is no
longer a requirement.
Rom. 14:5-6, "One man regards one day above another, another regards every
day alike. Let each man be fully convinced in his own mind. 6 He who
observes the day, observes it for the Lord, and he who eats, does so for
the Lord, for he gives thanks to God; and he who eats not, for the Lord he
does not eat, and gives thanks to God."
The entire section of Rom. 14:1-12 is worth careful study. Nevertheless,
the instructions here are that individuals must be convinced in their own
minds about which day they observe for the Lord. If the seventh day Sabbath
were a requirement, then the choice would not be man's but God’s.
Col. 2:16-17, "Therefore let no one act as your judge in regard to food or
drink or in respect to a festival or a new moon or a Sabbath day--17things
which are a mere shadow of what is to come; but the substance belongs to
Christ."
Notice here that time sequence mentioned. A festival is yearly. A new moon
is monthly. A Sabbath is weekly. No one is to judge regarding this. The
Sabbath is defined as a shadow; the reality is Jesus. Jesus is our Sabbath.
Acts 20:7, "And on the first day of the week, when we were gathered
together to break bread, Paul began talking to them, intending to depart
the next day, and he prolonged his message until midnight."
The first day of the week is Sunday, and this is the day the people
gathered. This passage can easily be seen as the church meeting on Sunday.
It has two important church functions within it: breaking bread (communion)
and a message (preaching). Additionally, Luke did not use the Jewish system
of counting days: sundown to sundown. He used the Roman system: midnight to
midnight. This is a subtle point that shows the Jewish Sabbath system was
not the one utilized by Luke.
1 Cor. 16:1-2, "Now concerning the collection for the saints, as I directed
the churches of Galatia, so do you also. 2 On the first day of every week
let each one of you put aside and save, as he may prosper, that no
collections be made when I come."
Notice here that Paul is directing the churches to meet on the first day of
each week and put money aside. It would seem that this is tithing. So, the
instructed time for the church to meet is Sunday. Is this an official
worship day set up by the church? You decide.
Rev. 1:10-11, "I was in the Spirit on the Lord’s day, and I heard behind me
a loud voice like the sound of a trumpet, 11saying, "Write in a book what
you see, and send it to the seven churches: to Ephesus and to Smyrna and to
Pergamum and to Thyatira and to Sardis and to Philadelphia and to Laodicea."
The New Bible Dictionary says regarding the term, ‘The Lord’s Day’ in
Revelation 1:10: "This is the first extant occurrence in Christian
literature of τῇ κυριακῇ ἡμέρᾳ, "ta kuriaka hamera." The adjectival
construction suggests that it was a formal designation of the church’s
worship day. As such, it certainly appears early in the 2nd century
(Ignatius, Epistle to the Magnesians, 1. 67).
In many churches today, the term "The Lord’s Day" is used to designate
Sunday--the same as it was in the second century.
I hope this is evidence enough to show you that the Bible does not require
that we worship on Saturday. If anything, we have the freedom (Rom.
14:1-12) to worship on the day that we believe we should. And, no one
should judge us regarding the day we keep. We are free in Christ and not
under law (Rom. 6:14). See our videos "Christ Has Fulfilled & Replaced the
Law of Moses With Higher Laws of the New Covenant, Hebrews 8:6-13" at
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EkZ2Cn8TLzE&list=UUQ_EDvOtDAAWfCvGUhd6y3A, "Sabbath
Keeping Is Not Required For New Testament Christians: Seventh-Day
Adventists Beware" at
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TEFt4TOR6E8&list=PL5316CC6F66F24283&index=6 &
"Is Sabbath Keeping Essential to Be a Real Christian? Former SDA Pastor
Answers This Question" at
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w0L3rSSL_H8&list=PL5316CC6F66F24283&index=2.
2 Timothy 2:15
Jesus broke the Sabbath & was accused of this by the Jews (see our video
"Is Sabbath Keeping Essential to Be a Real Christian? Former SDA Pastor
Answers This Question" at
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w0L3rSSL_H8&index=2&list=PL5316CC6F66F24283).
The expression "the Lord's day" is found only once in the Bible. In
Revelation 1:10 John relates the beginning of his visionary experience to
being in the Spirit "on the Lord's Day." The phrase seems to have become
more common in the second century a.d., where it is found in such early
Christian writings as Ignatius's Epistle to the Magnesians 9:1 (c. a.d.
108), the Didache 14:1 (c. a.d. 100-125), and the Gospel of Peter 9:35;
12:50 (c. a.d. 125-50). The presence of the adjective kuriakos [kuriakov"]
makes the expression grammatically different from the common biblical
phrase "the Day of the Lord, " which uses the genitive form of the noun
kurios [kuvrio"]. The adjective is found only one other time in the New
Testament, in 1 Corinthians 11:20, where Paul speaks of "the Lord's
Supper." Non-Christian parallels suggest that the adjective was used with
reference to that which belonged to the Roman emperor; early Christians
seem to have used it, perhaps in conscious protest, to refer to that which
belonged to Jesus.
The particular "day" that belonged to Jesus seems to have been Sunday, or,
by Jewish reckoning, Saturday sundown until Sunday sundown. According to
the Gospels, Jesus was raised from the dead on "the first day of the week"
( Matt 28:1 ; Mark 16:2 ; Luke 24:1 ; John 20:1 ), that is, Sunday. New
Testament evidence suggests that by the 50s, if not earlier, Christians
were attaching special significance to Sunday. In 1 Corinthians 16:1-3 Paul
exhorts the church at Corinth to set aside a sum of money "on the first day
of every week" for the church at Jerusalem, as the Galatian churches were
already doing. Similarly, Luke notes that when Paul arrived at Troas near
the end of his third missionary journey, the church gathered together to
break bread "on the first day of the week" ( Acts 20:6-7 ). Although the
identification is not made explicit, there is therefore good reason to
believe that John has Sunday in mind when he mentions "the Lord's Day" in
Revelation 1:10. Certainly the second-century Gospel of Peter, which twice
speaks of the day of Jesus' resurrection as "the Lord's Day" (9:35; 12:50),
makes the connection. Similarly, the Epistle of Barnabas (c. a.d. 130)
notes that Christians celebrate Jesus' resurrection of "the eighth day"
(15:9; cf. John 20:26 ), or Sunday, which is the day after the seventh
daythat is, the Jewish Sabbath (Saturday). Justin Martyr affirms that Jesus
was raised on "the day of the Sun" (Apology 67).
How quickly the Lord's Day emerged as a specific day of worship for the
early church is not clear. Luke observes that in the period immediately
following the outpouring of the Holy Spirit at Pentecost the earliest
Christians met "every day" in the temple courts. Whether their breaking of
bread in their homes was a daily or weekly occurrence he does not specify,
but the former seems more likely ( Acts 2:46 ). Alternately, Paul's
comments to the Corinthians concerning the laying aside of money on the
first day of the week do not indicate whether this action was connected
with a formal gathering of the church ( 1 Cor 16:13 ). Luke's description
of the meeting of believers at Troas is the first clear indication of a
special gathering as taking place in the evening, by which he probably
means Sunday, using Roman reckoning from midnight to midnight, rather than
the Jewish system. By the second century the Lord's Day was clearly set
apart as a special day for worship. In a letter to the emperor Trajan (c.
a.d. 112), the Roman governor Pliny the Younger notes that Christians
assembled before daylight "on an appointed day" (Epistle 10:96),
undoubtedly Sunday. The Didache specifically exhorts believers to come
together on the Lord's Day (14:1), and the Epistle of Barnabas sees it as a
special day of celebration (15:9). Indeed, Justin Martyr (c. a.d. 150)
gives a detailed account of typical Sunday worship (Apology 67).
A clear picture of how the early Christians celebrated the Lord's Day
emerges only gradually. Luke records that the Christians at Troas came
together to break bread, which may well denote a meal that included the
Lord's Supper (cf. Acts 2:42 ; 1 Cor 11:20-22 ). That Paul spoke (at great
length!) to the assembled believers ( Acts 20:7-11 ) implies nothing about
their typical practice, since Paul was a special guest and intended to
leave the next day. The Didache makes explicit the connection between the
breaking of bread and the Lord's Supper on the Lord's Day but says little
else concerning the meeting, apart from mentioning the practice of
confession of sin (14:1). Pliny mentions two meetings on the "appointed
day": the Christians first meet before dawn to sing a hymn to Christ "as to
a god" and to affirm certain ethical commitments; then they depart and
reassemble for a meal. Not being a Christian himself, Pliny would not have
understood the significance of the meal as a setting for the Lord's Supper;
for him it was enough that the meal consisted "of ordinary, innocent food"
(Epistle 10:96).
The most extensive account of an early Christian Sunday worship service is
provided by Justin Martyr (Apology 67, cf. 65). According to Justin, the
gathering begins with readings from "the memoirs of the apostles" the
Gospelsor the writings of the prophets for "as long as time permits." The
"president" then delivers a sermon consisting of instruction and
exhortation. Next, the congregation rises for prayer, following which the
bread and wine are brought in for the Lord's Supper. After prayers and
thanksgivings by the president and a congregational "Amen, " the deacons
distribute the bread and wine to those who are present (and then carry some
to those who are absent). There follows a collection of "what each thinks
fit" for the needy, and, apparently, the end of the service.
Noteworthy in these early texts is the lack of identification of Sunday
with the Jewish Sabbath. Luke has little to say about early Christian
observance of the Sabbath, apart from recording Paul's preaching on the
Sabbath in Jewish synagogues ( Acts 13:14 Acts 13:42 Acts 13:44 ; 17:2 ;
18:4 ; 16:13 ), which perhaps says less about Paul's commitment to Sabbath
observance than about his missionary strategy. Indeed, Paul has little
interest in observing special days as sacred ( Rom 14:5-6 ; Gal 4:9-11 ;
Col 2:16 ). Ignatius contrasts observance of the Sabbath with living for
the Lord's Day (Magnesians 9:1). The Epistle of Barnabas views the
significance of the biblical Sabbath as being a symbol of the future rest
established at the return of Jesus (15:1-8; cf. Heb 4:3-11 ). Justin Martyr
speaks of the Sabbath in terms of a perpetual turning from sin (Dialogue
with Trypho 12). In 321 Constantine proclaimed Sunday to be official day of
rest in the Roman Empire (Codex Justinianus 3.12.3), but this does not seem
to have been related to any concern with the Jewish Sabbath. By the end of
the fourth century, church leaders such as Ambrose and John Chrysostom were
making such a connection, defending relaxation from work on Sunday on the
basis of the Fourth Commandment and paving the way for later Catholic and
Protestant elaboration on Sunday as the Sabbath.
In the early church, then, the Christians began to give a special place to
Sunday as the day on which Jesus was raised from the dead. It soon became a
fixed day for worship, a celebration of the resurrection centered around
the Lord's Supper. As Christianity distanced itself from Judaism, it is not
surprising that eventually the church would see its special day in terms of
the special day of the Jews, the Sabbath, and would transfer the provisions
of the Fourth Commandment to Sunday.
Does the Bible allow Christians to worship on Sunday?
In the Old Testament, God stated, "Remember the Sabbath day to keep it
holy. Six days you shall labor and do all your work, but the seventh day is
a Sabbath of the Lord your God; in it you shall not do any work, you or
your son or your daughter your male or your female servant or your cattle
or your sojourner who stays with you," (Exodus 20:8-10, NASB). It was the
custom of the Jews to come together on the Sabbath, which is Saturday,
cease work, and worship God. Jesus went to the synagogue on Saturday to
teach (Matt. 12:9; John 18:20) as did the apostle Paul (Acts 17:2; 18:4).
So, if in the Old Testament we are commanded to keep the Sabbath and in the
New Testament we see Jews, Jesus, and the apostles doing the same thing,
then why do we worship on Sunday?
First of all, of the 10 commandments listed in Exodus 20:1-17, only 9 of
them were restated in the New Testament. (Six in Matt. 19:18, murder,
adultery, stealing, false witness, honor parents, and worshiping God; Rom.
13:9, coveting. Worshiping God properly covers the first three
commandments) The one that was not reaffirmed was the one about the
Sabbath. Instead, Jesus said that He is the Lord of the Sabbath (Matt.
12:8).
In creation, God rested on the seventh day. But, since God is all powerful,
He doesn’t get tired. He doesn’t need to take a break and rest. So, why
does it say that He rested? The reason is simple: Mark 2:27 says, "The
Sabbath was made for man, and not man for the Sabbath." In other words, God
established the Sabbath as a rest for His people, not because He needed a
break, but because we are mortal and need a time of rest, of focus on God.
In this, our spirits and bodies are both renewed.
The OT system of Law required keeping the Sabbath as part of the overall
moral, legal, and sacrificial system by which the Jewish people satisfied
God’s requirements for behavior, government, and forgiveness of sins. The
Sabbath was part of the Law in that sense. In order to "remain" in favor
with God, you had to also keep the Sabbath. If it was not kept, then the
person was in sin and would often be punished (Ezek. 18:4; Rom. 6:23; Deut.
13:1-9; Num. 35:31; Lev. 20:2, etc.).
But with Jesus’ atonement, we no longer are required to keep the Law as a
means for our justification. The requirements of the Law were fulfilled in
Christ. We now have rest from the Law. We now have "Sabbath", continually.
Are we free to worship on Sunday?
Within the New Testament is ample evidence that the seventh day Sabbath is
no longer a requirement.
"One man regards one day above another, another regards every day alike.
Let each man be fully convinced in his own mind. 6 He who observes the day,
observes it for the Lord, and he who eats, does so for the Lord, for he
gives thanks to God; and he who eats not, for the Lord he does not eat, and
gives thanks to God," (Rom. 14:5-6).
The entire section of Rom. 14:1-12 is worth careful study. The
instructions here are that individuals must be convinced in their own minds
about which day they observe for the Lord. If the seventh day Sabbath were
a requirement, then the choice would not be mans’, but God’s. To me, this
verse is sufficient to answer the question beyond doubt. Furthermore,
"Therefore let no one act as your judge in regard to food or drink or in
respect to a festival or a new moon or a Sabbath day— 17things which are a
mere shadow of what is to come; but the substance belongs to Christ." (Col.
2:16-17).
Notice the time sequence mentioned in Col. 2:16-17 above. A festival is
yearly. A new moon is monthly. A Sabbath is weekly. No one is to judge in
regard to this. The Sabbath is defined as a shadow, the reality is Jesus.
Jesus is our Sabbath. So, if someone is judging you because you worship
on the Sabbath, they are wrong. Likewise, if you regard Sunday above
Saturday (Rom. 14:5-6), all you need to do is be convinced in your own mind
that that is alright.
Is there any evidence in the NT that Christians met on Sunday?
"And on the first day of the week, when we were gathered together to break
bread, Paul began talking to them, intending to depart the next day, and he
prolonged his message until midnight," (Acts 20:7).
The first day of the week is Sunday and this is the day the people
gathered. This passage can easily be seen as the church meeting on Sunday,
though it does not necessitate it. It has two important church functions
within it: breaking bread (communion) and a message (preaching/teaching).
Additionally, Luke included the Roman system as well as the Jewish system
of counting days. The Jewish system was sundown to sundown. But Luke also
used the Roman system: midnight to midnight (Luke 11:5; Acts 16:25; 20:7;
27:27). This is a subtle point that shows the Jewish Sabbath system was not
exclusively used by Luke.
If the Sabbath was mandatory, why the use of the non-Jewish system?
"Now concerning the collection for the saints, as I directed the churches
of Galatia, so do you also. 2On the first day of every week let each one of
you put aside and save, as he may prosper, that no collections be made when
I come," (1 Cor. 16:1-2).
Notice here that Paul is directing the churches to meet on the first day of
each week and put money aside. It would seem that this is tithing. So, the
instructed time for the church to meet is Sunday, the first day of the week
and it is that day the Galatians were to set money aside collections. Is
this an official worship day set up by the church? You decide. Does this
verse apply to Christians today? It most certainly does.
"I was in the Spirit on the Lord’s day, and I heard behind me a loud voice
like the sound of a trumpet, 11saying, "Write in a book what you see, and
send it to the seven churches: to Ephesus and to Smyrna and to Pergamum and
to Thyatira and to Sardis and to Philadelphia and to Laodicea," (Revelation
1:10-11).
The New Bible Dictionary says regarding the term, ‘The Lord’s Day’ in Rev.
1:10: "This is the first extant occurrence in Christian literature of "te
kuriake hemera." The adjectival construction suggests that it was a formal
designation of the church’s worship day. As such it certainly appears early
in the 2nd century" (Ignatius, Epistle to the Magnesians, 1. 67).
In many churches today, the term "The Lord’s Day" is used to designate
Sunday, the same as it was in the second century.
I hope this is evidence enough to show you that the Bible does not require
that we worship on Saturday. If anything, we have the freedom (Rom.
14:1-12) to worship on the day that we believe we should. And, no one
should judge us in regard to the day we keep. We are free in Christ and not
under law, (Rom. 6:14).
Conclusion
The Seventh Day Adventists have every right to worship on the Sabbath and
they should if they are convinced that is the right thing to do. However,
if any sect or group such as the SDA were to require a person to worship on
the Sabbath as a sign of "true" Christianity or "true" redemption then that
organization would be promoting a false gospel of salvation & would be
cursed by God for it (Galatians 1:6-10). This then means the Seventh-day
Adventists are dead wrong when they accuse true Christians of having the
"mark of the beast" for worshipping on Sunday & thus they have brought
themselves under the divine curse "if anyone preaches any other gospel to
you than what you have received, let him be accursed" by adding Sabbath
keeping as a condition of obtaining eternal salvation. According to Rom.
14:1-12, true Christians are free in this matter & thus are not under
bondage to Old Testament Sabbath keeping.
Additionally, Sunday is the day that the Lord Jesus rose from the dead.
The Jewish people who had rejected Jesus continued to worship on Saturday,
the Sabbath. But it was the Christians who celebrated Jesus' resurrection
and this was most probably the driving force to gather on the first day of
the week.
The Law of God promises blessings & curses (read Leviticus 26:3-13 for
blessings & read Leviticus 26:14-39 for cursing). During these New
Testament times the Paul said the Ten Commandments, etc. were a ministry of
death & condemnation (2 Corinthians 3:3,7-9). Why? The Law of God shows
sinners that they are not able to keep the whole law of God & are therefore
condemned to eternal doom. In fact just committing one sin against God
means the sentence of eternal perdition (James 2:10, "For whosoever shall
keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all.").
Thus the Law of God is a curse to the sinner but a blessing to the sinner
who puts his trust & faith in Jesus Christ who kept the Law of God
perfectly for those who believe on His name (John 3:18). The Law of God
reflects the holiness & righteousness of God & therefore is a tremendous
blessing to repentant sinners who strive to please God not to get saved by
good works but because they have already been saved by the sovereign grace
& love of God (Ephesians 2:8-10, 3:16-21; John 3:3-8, Romans 8:1-17, Titus
3:5, 1 Corinthians 2:10-16, 3:16; Romans 5:4-5, Galatians 2:16, 4:6; see
our video "KEEPING THE OLD TESTAMENT LAWS & COMMANDMENTS CANNOT EARN HEAVEN
OR SALVATION WITH GOD!" at
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aIh3T31ujuU&index=14&list=PL5316CC6F66F24283).
Thus the Man of God reflects on the Law of God all the days of his life
(Psalm 1, Psalm 119).
What is legalism?
In Christianity, legalism is the excessive and improper use of the law (10
commandments, holiness laws, etc.). This legalism can take different
forms. The first is where a person attempts to keep the Law in order to
attain salvation. The second is where a person keeps the law in order to
maintain his salvation. The third is when a Christian judges other
Christians for not keeping certain codes of conduct that he thinks need to
be observed. Let’s examine each one more closely.
The first kind of legalism is where the law of God is kept in order to
attain salvation. This is a heresy, a completely false doctrine. We are
not able to attain salvation by our keeping the law. Rom. 3:28, "For we
maintain that a man is justified by faith apart from works of the Law.
Rom. 4:5, "But to the one who does not work, but believes in Him who
justifies the ungodly, his faith is reckoned as righteousness.” Gal. 2:21,
“I do not nullify the grace of God; for if righteousness comes through the
Law, then Christ died needlessly.” It is simply not possible to keep the
Law enough to be saved. Therefore, to try and gain salvation through one’s
efforts is a false teaching. It is so bad that those who hold to it cannot
be Christians since it would deny salvation by grace through faith.
The second kind of legalism is where a person tries to keep or maintain his
salvation by keeping the law. This is also a false doctrine. We receive
our salvation by faith (Eph. 2:8-9), not by our ability to be good because
no one does good (Rom. 3:10-12). As Rom. 3:28, 4:5, and Gal. 2:21 clearly
show, we are justified by faith, not by faith and works. Furthermore,
there are strict warnings about attempting to keep the law in order to
maintain salvation: Gal. 3:10, “For as many as are of the works of the Law
are under a curse; for it is written, “Cursed is everyone who does not
abide by all things written in the book of the law, to perform them.” And
James 2:10, “For whoever keeps the whole law and yet stumbles in one point,
he has become guilty of all.” So, if a person is seeking to be either
saved by his works (Law) or maintain his salvation by his works (Law), then
he is under obligation to keep all of it, and if he does not then he is
guilty before God. Furthermore, consider Jesus’ words in Matt. 7:22-23,
“Many will say to Me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in Your
name, and in Your name cast out demons, and in Your name perform many
miracles?’ 23 “And then I will declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart
from Me, you who practice lawlessness.’” Jesus condemns them because they
were appealing to their salvation based on their faith and doing good. So
it should be obvious that we do not keep our salvation by our efforts.
The last kind of legalism, where a Christian keeps certain laws and regards
other Christians who do not keep his level of holiness with contempt, is a
frequent problem in the church. Now, we want to make it clear that all
Christians are to abstain from fornication, adultery, pornography, lying,
stealing, etc. Christians do have a right to judge the spirituality of
other Christians in these areas where the Bible clearly speaks. But, in
the debatable areas we need to be more careful, and this is where legalism
is more difficult to define. Rom. 14:1-12 says that we are not to judge
our brothers on debatable issues. One person may eat certain kinds of
foods where another would not. One person might worship on a particular
day where another might not. We are told to let each person be convinced
in his own mind (Rom. 14:5). As long as our freedom does not violate the
Scriptures, then everything should be acceptable in the sight of the Lord.
2 Timothy 2:15
But "faith without works is dead ... James 2:20." If you are Roman Catholic
see our playlist "Dealing with Roman Catholicism, Idolatry & the Virgin
Mary" with 123 videos & counting at
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLFFA8D69D1B914715. If you are a
Seventh-day Adventist see our playlist "Dealing with Seventh-day Adventism
& Their "Prophetess"" with 23 videos & counting at
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL5316CC6F66F24283. If you are a
Campbellite follower of the "Church of Christ" see our playlist "Dealing
with "Saved by Works & Baptism", "Church of Christ"" with 72 videos &
counting at https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLBD55090718DA6D3D. See
our video "KEEPING THE OLD TESTAMENT LAWS & COMMANDMENTS CANNOT EARN HEAVEN
OR SALVATION WITH GOD!" at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aIh3T31ujuU. Are
We Justified by Faith (Romans) or by Works (James)? In Romans it says,
"because by the works of the Law no flesh will be justified in His sight .
. . " (Rom. 3:20) "for we maintain that a man is justified by faith apart
from works of the Law." (Rom. 3:28) "For what does the Scripture say? ‘And
Abraham believed God, and it was reckoned to him as righteousness.'" (Rom.
4:3) "Therefore, having been justified by faith . . . " (Rom. 5:1) "But to
the one who does not work, but believes in Him who justifies the ungodly,
his faith is reckoned as righteousness." (Rom. 4:5). In James it says, "You
see that a man is justified by works and not by faith alone." (James 2:24)
" . . . so also faith without works is dead." (James 2:26). Which is it?
Are we justified by faith or by works? Does the Bible Contradict--Itself?
It is a fundamental Christian belief that we are justified by faith.
Justification means that God declares a sinner to be righteous. He does
this by crediting--by reckoning the righteousness of Jesus to the sinner.
This is done by faith. That is, when the sinner puts his faith in the
sacrifice of Jesus and trusts in Him and not himself for righteousness,
then God justifies him. "And Abraham believed God and it was reckoned to
him as righteousness." (Rom. 4:3). But, if the Bible teaches that we are
justified by faith, does it also teach we are justified by works as James
"seems" to say? Do we have a contradiction? The answer is no. Context is
Everything It is erroneous to take a verse, read it without its context,
and then attempt to develop a doctrine from that verse alone. Therefore,
let's take a look at the context of James 2:24 which says that a man is
justified by works. James chapter 2 has 26 verses: Verses 1-7 instruct us
not to show favoritism. Verses 8-13 are comments on the Law. Verses 14-26
are about the relationship between faith and works. Notice that James
begins this section by using the example of someone who says he has
faith--verse 14. He then immediately gives an example of what true and
false faiths are. He begins with the negative and demonstrates what an
empty faith is (verses 15-17). Then he gives an example of the type of
faith that isn't much different from the faith of demons (verse 19).
Finally, he gives examples of living faith by showing Abraham and Rahab as
the type of people who demonstrated their faith by their deeds. James is
examining two kinds of faith: one that leads to godly works and one that
does not. One is true, and the other is false. One is dead, the other
alive; hence, "Faith without works is dead." (James 2:20). This is why in
the middle of his section on faith and works, he says in verse 19, "You
believe that God is one. You do well; the demons also believe, and
shudder." James says this because the demons believe in God; that is, they
have faith, but the faith they have is useless. It does not result in
appropriate works. Their faith is only a mental acknowledgment of God's
existence. Ascentia and Fiducia Two words are worth introducing here:
ascentia and fiducia. Ascentia is the mental assent--the mental
acknowledgment of something's existence. The demons acknowledge and believe
that God exists. Fiducia is more than mental acknowledgment. It involves
a trust in something--a giving over to it, a complete believing and
acceptance of something. This is the kind of faith that a Christian has in
Christ. A Christian, therefore, has fiducia; that is, he has real faith
and trust in Christ and not simply an acknowledgment that He lived on earth
at one time. Another way to put this is that there are many people in the
world who believed that Jesus lived: ascentia. But they do not believe
that He is their savior, the one to whom they should look and trust for the
forgiveness of their sins. Ascentia does not lead to works. Fiducia does.
Ascentia is not of the heart. Fiducia is. What is James Saying? James is
simply saying that if you ‘say' you are a Christian, then there had better
be some appropriate works manifested, or your faith is false. This
sentiment is echoed in 1 John 2:4 which says, "If you say you have come to
know Him, yet you do not keep His commandments, then the truth is not in
you and you are a liar." Apparently, there were people who were saying they
were Christians but were not manifesting any of the fruit of Christianity.
Can this faith justify? Can the dead ‘faith' that someone has which
produces no change in a person and no good works before men and God be a
faith that justifies? Absolutely not. It is not merely enough to say you
believe in Jesus. You must actually believe and trust in Him. If you
actually do, then you will demonstrate that faith by a changed and godly
life. If not, then your profession is of no more value than the same
profession of demons: "We believe Jesus lived." Notice that James actually
quotes the same verse that Paul uses to support the teaching of
justification by faith in Rom. 4:3. James 2:23 says, "and the Scripture
was fulfilled which says, ‘and Abraham believed God, and it was reckoned to
him as righteousness.'" If James was trying to teach a contradictory
doctrine of faith and works than the other New Testament writers, then he
would not have used Abraham as an example. Therefore, we are justified by
faith. That is, we are made righteous in the eyes of God by faith as is
amply demonstrated by Romans. However, that faith, if it is true, will
result in deeds appropriate to salvation. After all, didn't God say in
Eph. 2:8-10, "For by grace you have been saved through faith; and that not
of yourselves, it is the gift of God; not as a result of works, that no one
should boast. For we are His workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good
works, which God prepared beforehand, that we should walk in them." What is
the relationship between faith & works? The relationship between faith and
works is that works are the result of faith. In the Bible, faith and works
are very often contrasted. They are not the same thing, and the
combination of faith and works does not bring salvation. Salvation is by
faith alone. Rom. 3:28, “For we maintain that a man is justified by faith
apart from works of the Law.” Rom. 4:5, “But to the one who does not work,
but believes in Him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is reckoned as
righteousness.” Gal. 2:16, “nevertheless knowing that a man is not
justified by the works of the Law but through faith in Christ Jesus…” False
religious systems always teach that faith plus a person's works result in
salvation. This is false, because our good works are filthy rags before
God (Isa. 64:6). Therefore, we can’t do anything to please God by our good
works. Gal. 2:21 says that if righteousness comes by the law (works), then
Christ died needlessly. Faith without works is dead James 2:26 says that
faith without works is dead, but what James is talking about is that dead
faith produces no works. The context of the chapter begins in verse 14
where James says, “What use is it, my brethren, if a man says he has faith,
but he has no works? Can that faith save him?” Notice that James asks,
“can that faith save him?" The faith he is talking about is false faith,
which he further clarifies when he mentions how the devil also believes in
God (v. 19). The Devil has dead faith. He only acknowledges God’s
existence. So, with a real Christian, good works are the result of saving
faith, not a contributing factor to salvation. Nor do our good works keep
us saved. If that were the case, then salvation would be by works. Are we
saved by faith alone, or do we need works, too? Roman Catholics often
mention that the Bible never says we are saved by faith alone and that the
phrase "faith alone" occurs only once in James where it says that we are
not saved by faith alone. If this is so, then why do the Protestants say we
are justified by faith alone and not by works? Because the Bible teaches
that we are justified by faith alone--and not by works. The following is a
list of verses about being saved by faith. Please take note that faith and
works are contrasted. In other words, we are saved by faith "not by works"
and "apart from works," etc. The point is that there are only two options.
We are saved by faith alone, or we are not. Since we have faith and works
(both conceptually and in practice), then we are either saved by faith
alone or by faith and works. There is no other option. If we see that the
Scriptures exclude works in any form as a means of our salvation, then
logically, we are saved by faith alone. Let's take a look at what the
Bible says about faith and works. Then, afterwards, we will tackle James'
statement about "faith alone." Rom. 3:28-30, "For we maintain that a man is
justified by faith apart from works of the Law. 29Or is God the God of Jews
only? Is He not the God of Gentiles also? Yes, of Gentiles also, 30since
indeed God who will justify the circumcised by faith and the uncircumcised
through faith is one." Rom. 4:5, "But to the one who does not work, but
believes in Him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is reckoned as
righteousness," Rom. 5:1, "therefore having been justified by faith, we
have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ;" Rom. 9:30, "What shall
we say then? That Gentiles, who did not pursue righteousness, attained
righteousness, even the righteousness which is by faith;" Rom. 10:4, "For
Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to everyone who believes."
Rom. 11:6, "But if it is by grace, it is no longer on the basis of works,
otherwise grace is no longer grace." Gal. 2:16, "nevertheless knowing that
a man is not justified by the works of the Law but through faith in Christ
Jesus, even we have believed in Christ Jesus, that we may be justified by
faith in Christ, and not by the works of the Law; since by the works of the
Law shall no flesh be justified." Gal. 2:21, I do not nullify the grace of
God; for if righteousness comes through the Law, then Christ died
needlessly. Gal. 3:5-6, "Does He then, who provides you with the Spirit and
works miracles among you, do it by the works of the Law, or by hearing with
faith? 6Even so Abraham believed God, and it was reckoned to him as
righteousness." Gal. 3:24, "Therefore the Law has become our tutor to lead
us to Christ, that we may be justified by faith." Eph. 2:8-9, "For by grace
you have been saved through faith; and that not of yourselves, it is the
gift of God. 9Not by works, lest any man should boast." Phil. 3:9, "and may
be found in Him, not having a righteousness of my own derived from the Law,
but that which is through faith in Christ, the righteousness which comes
from God on the basis of faith." Again, works/Law is contrasted with faith
repeatedly; and we are told that we are not justified by works in any way.
Therefore, we are made right with God by faith--not by faith and our works,
hence, faith alone. James 2:24, not by faith alone The Scriptures clearly
teach that we are saved (justified) by faith in Christ and what He has done
on the cross. This faith alone saves us. However, we cannot stop here
without addressing what James says in James 2:24, "You see that a man is
justified by works, and not by faith alone." There is no contradiction.
All you need to do is look at the context. James chapter 2 has 26 verses:
Verses 1-7 instruct us not to show favoritism. Verses 8-13 are comments on
the Law. Verses 14-26 are about the relationship between faith and works.
James begins this section by using the example of someone who says he has
faith but has no works, "What use is it, my brethren, if a man says he has
faith, but he has no works? Can that faith save him?" (James 2:14). In
other words, James is addressing the issue of a dead faith--a faith that is
nothing more than a verbal pronouncement, a public confession of the mind,
and is not heart-felt. It is empty of life and action. He begins with the
negative and demonstrates what an empty faith is (verses 15-17, words
without actions). Then he shows that type of faith isn't any different from
the faith of demons (verse 19). Finally, he gives examples of living faith
that has words followed by actions. Works follow true faith and
demonstrate that faith to our fellow man but not to God. James writes of
Abraham and Rahab as examples of people who demonstrated their faith by
their deeds. In brief, James is examining two kinds of faith: one that
leads to godly works and one that does not. One is true, and the other is
false. One is dead, the other alive; hence, "Faith without works is dead,"
(James 2:20). But, he is not contradicting the verses above that say
salvation/justification is by faith alone. Also, notice that James actually
quotes the same verse that Paul quotes in Rom. 4:3 amongst a host of verses
dealing with justification by faith. James 2:23 says, "and the Scripture
was fulfilled which says, and Abraham believed God, and it was reckoned to
him as righteousness.'" If James was trying to teach a contradictory
doctrine of faith and works than the other New Testament writers, then he
would not have used Abraham as an example. Therefore, we can see that
justification is by faith alone and that James was talking about false
faith--not real faith--when he said that we are not justified by faith
alone. What about Faith vs. Works? Question: What about Faith vs. Works?
Answer: Faith vs Works--a quick and simple explanation James 2:22 is
addressing a worldly way to show our faith to others who watch us operate
as a church. We know this because he says "Pure religion is . . . to visit
the fatherless and widowed" (James 1:27). The Apostle Paul is explaining
faith as God sees it. "What then shall we say that Abraham our father has
found according to the flesh?* 2 For if Abraham was justified by works, he
has something to boast about, but not before God. 3 For what does the
Scripture say? "Abraham believed God, and it was accounted to him for
righteousness." 4 Now to him who works, the wages are not counted as grace
but as debt. 5 But to him who does not work but believes on Him who
justifies the ungodly, his faith is accounted for righteousness, 6 just as
David also describes the blessedness of the man to whom God imputes
righteousness apart from works: 7 "Blessed are those whose lawless deeds
are forgiven, And whose sins are covered; 8 Blessed is the man to whom the
Lord shall not impute sin," Rom 4:1-8. Now, let's see how James looks at a
dead faith without works: "What doth it profit, my brethren [target
audience=church], though a man say he hath faith, and have not works? Can
faith save him? [that faith is a false or a DEAD faith] 15 If a brother or
sister be naked, and destitute of daily food, 16 And one of you say unto
them, Depart in peace, be ye warmed and filled; notwithstanding ye give
them not those things which are needful to the body; what doth it profit?
17 Even so faith, if it hath not works, is dead, being alone. 18 Yea, a man
may say, Thou hast faith, and I have works: shew me thy faith without thy
works, and I will shew thee my [true] faith by my works. 19 Thou believest
that there is one God; thou doest well: the devils also believe, and
tremble. 20 But wilt thou know, O vain man, that faith without works is
dead? 21 Was not Abraham our father justified by works, when he had offered
Isaac his son upon the altar? 22 Seest thou how faith wrought with his
works, and by works was faith made perfect? 23 And the scripture was
fulfilled which saith, Abraham believed God, and it was imputed unto him
for righteousness: and he was called the Friend of God. 24 Ye see then how
that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only [a false faith],"
James 2:14-24. James is saying that a person with dead faith will walk by
the hungry because he or she is not really saved. When a Christian feeds
the hungry, that is how he or she shows others that he has a real faith. On
the other hand, the Apostle Paul says that Abraham was not justified by his
works because his works do not justify him "before God," Romans 4:2. This
is a true faith that God sees apart from works. What does Romans 4:1-4 say?
“What shall we say then that Abraham our father, as pertaining to the
flesh, hath found? 2 For if Abraham were justified by works, he hath
whereof to glory; but not before God. 3 For what saith the scripture?
Abraham believed God, and it was counted unto him for righteousness. 4 Now
to him that worketh is the reward not reckoned of grace, but of debt. 5 But
to him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly,
his faith is counted for righteousness,” Romans 4:1-4. True faith will be
enough for God. However, to the church, faith is revealed in our efforts.
Thus, there is no contradiction between the book of James and the book of
Romans. Galatians 1:6-9, "I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him
that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel: 7 Which is
not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the
gospel of Christ. 8 But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any
other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be
accursed. 9 As we said before, so say I now again, if any man preach any
other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed." For
more information see our website www.BibleQuery.org.
Investigate whether Seventh Day Adventism is real Christianity or a
counterfeit cult. Please check the following: "Does Seventh Day Adventism
have a damnable gospel, what do they really believe?" -
//www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=813141143413, "Is Seventh Day
Adventism a Cult?" -
//www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=429152354502; the contrast
between a biblical worldview and an Adventist, great controversy worldview
-
//www.lifeassuranceministries.org/proclamation/2011/2/greatcontroversy.html;
discusses the somewhat hidden but horrific fact of Adventists widespread
practice of abortion and the organization's two sets of guidelines, one of
which is known by the members, and one of which is “secret”, available to
doctors and Adventist hospitals -
//www.lifeassuranceministries.org/proclamation/2014/2/abortioninadvent.html;
examines the roots of Ellen White’s and the SDA’s “health message”, the
Adventists’ “right arm of the gospel”. It begins on page 14 of the PDF:
//lifeassuranceministries.org/Proclamation2015_1web.pdf; see the
playlists which includes videos from the annual Former Adventist
Conferences with multiple testimonies of Former Adventists as well as the
weekly inductive studies through books of the Bible taught at their Word
Search studies https://www.youtube.com/user/FormerAdventist/playlists, see
the following websites: www.TruthorFables.com,
www.LifeAssuranceMinistries.org, www.ExAdventist.com, &
www.GreatControversyExposed.com. 2 Timothy 2:15, "Study to shew thyself
approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly
dividing the word of truth." The previous resources will be very valuable
in an investigative study of whether Seventh Day Adventism is a Biblically
true Gospel believing organization or if it is a false cultic religion
peddling a false gospel invented by Ellen G. White & her associates thus
violating Galatians 1:6-9, " I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him
that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel: Which is not
another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel
of Christ. But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel
unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.
As we said before, so say I now again, if any man preach any other gospel
unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed." The original
Greek word for "accursed" is "anathema" which means "condemnation to Hell
by the decree of God" & is consistent with other scriptural passages
containing it: Acts 23:14 cf. David's oath in 2 Samuel 3:35, Romans 9:3, 1
Corinthians 12:3, 1 Corinthians 16:22). It is also significant to note that
the Septuagint (the oldest Greek translation of the Old Testament, dating
from the third century B. C.) uses the word anathema in a similar sense in
every case where someone is described as being set apart and devoted to
destruction, because that person is abhorrent to God (e.g., the inhabitants
of Jericho in Joshua 6:17). It is also used of persons or things what were
given up to God and could not be redeemed (e.g., Leviticus 27:28-29.). the
un-Biblical sense of anathema as a declaration of condemnation by man began
to enter the church in its early centuries. By the time of the Protestant
Reformation, the Roman Catholic church not only used the term in the sense
of excommunication from the visible church, but also used it to usurp the
exclusively Divine right to pronounce condemnation to Hell upon a person.
It was thus that Rome, in Canon 11 of the Sixth Session of the Council of
Trent (1547) said of anyone who believed in justification by faith alone,
"let him be anathema." At the same council Rome also said, of anyone who
denied that salvation is a cooperative effort between man and God, "let him
be anathema" (Canon 4). Rome declares men condemned to Hell for believing
and preaching the one true Gospel. Five hundred years after the
Reformation, Rome continues to misuse and abuse anathema in this way. The
current edition of the Catholic Encyclopedia says this: Anathema remains a
major excommunication which is to be promulgated with great solemnity. A
formula for this ceremony was drawn up by Pope Zachary (741-52) in the
chapter Debent duodecim sacerdotes...The Roman Pontifical reproduces it in
the chapter Ordo excommunicandi et absolvendi, distinguishing three sorts
of excommunication: minor excommunication, formerly incurred by a person
holding communication with anyone under the ban of excommunication; major
excommunication, pronounced by the Pope in reading a sentence; and
anathema, or the penalty incurred by crimes of the gravest order, and
solemnly promulgated by the Pope. In passing this sentence, the pontiff is
vested in amice, stole, and a violet cope, wearing his mitre, and assisted
by twelve priests clad in their surplices and holding lighted candles. [The
symbolism of all of this is the damnable falsehood that the Roman pope is
the "vicar of Christ" or vice-Christ, the visible representation of Christ
on earth.] He takes his seat in front of the altar or in some other
suitable place, and pronounces the formula of anathema which ends with
these words: "Wherefore in the name of God the All-powerful, Father, Son,
and Holy Ghost, of the Blessed Peter, Prince of the Apostles, and of all
the saints, in virtue of the power which has been given us of binding and
loosing in Heaven and on earth, we deprive [name of person] himself and all
his accomplices and all his abettors of the Communion of the Body and Blood
of Our Lord, we separate him from the society of all Christians, we exclude
him from the bosom of our Holy Mother the Church in Heaven and on earth, we
declare him excommunicated and anathematized and we judge him condemned to
eternal fire with Satan and his angels and all the reprobate, so long as he
will not burst the fetters of the demon, do penance and satisfy the Church;
we deliver him to Satan to mortify his body, that his soul may be saved on
the day of judgment." Whereupon all the assistants respond: "Fiat, fiat,
fiat." [That is, we concur that this declaration is legally binding.] The
pontiff and the twelve priests then cast to the ground the lighted candles
they have been carrying, and notice is sent in writing to the priests and
neighboring bishops of the name of the one who has been excommunicated and
the cause of his excommunication, in order that they may have no
communication with him.11. Catholic Encyclopedia, entry on "Anathema,"
//www.newadvent.org/cathen/01455e.htm, as viewed on 11/7/2009. The
meaning of anathema in Galatians chapter one is clearly, "let him be
condemned to Hell." No lesser penalty can be exacted against those who
persist in proclaiming a counterfeit gospel of any kind. Rome's concept of
anathema is clearly un-Biblical, since it is centered upon the judgment of
man and not of God. Worse yet, Rome uses its un-Biblical anathema most
often to enforce conformity to its false gospel and its man-made doctrines
and regulations, and loyalty to a papal hierarchy that Scripture condemns.
After thorough examination Seventh Day Adventism qualifies as a non
Christian anti Christ cult due to the following reasons: 1. It is built
on the woman Ellen G. White & her teachings despite the Bible saying women
are not permitted to teach or usurp authority over men (1 Timothy 2:12,
"But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man,
but to be in silence.") See links at
//www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=112706102442,
//www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=59131749272 &
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ql_obI6wA9w&index=12&list=PLE04A1D0DFE95B95E).
2. Ellen White claimed to be equal with the Biblical prophets & apostles
through her many writings (sort of a "Spirit of Prophecy") & her SDA
followers believed her (2 Peter 3:16); see
//www.truthorfables.com/EGW_Writings_Infallible.htm. Question: Are
there modern day prophets or is there a need for prophets today? Answer: In
the New Testament, the gift of the office of prophet was a temporary one
granted by God for the purpose of building His Church. Contrary to the
apostles, who had broad ministries, these men had localized ministries
within local churches, as we see illustrated in such places as Acts 11:21-28
and Acts 13:1.Scripture shows us that the prophets of the New Testament had
two primary purposes:They were gifted men given to the Church and appointed
by God (Eph. 4:11, 1 Cor. 12:28) for the purpose of helping to lay the
foundation of the Church (Eph. 2:20). They, like the apostles, received
God’s revelation (Eph. 3:5) and truth and proclaimed it to their churches.
It is important to remember that the early Church did not have a completed
Bible, so God granted this revelation for the purpose of teaching His
message to the Church. The New Testament prophets also spoke forth and
taught the apostles’ doctrine. Everything taught by these prophets had to
be consistent with the teaching of the apostles (1 Cor. 14:36-37). So, are
prophets still needed today? Looking at the two functions listed above, we
can see that the office of prophet is one that is no longer necessary and
has ceased within the Church because:The foundation of the Church was laid
long ago. God’s revealed Word was completed with the close of the New
Testament canon. The Church’s foundation does not need to be laid again and
there is no need for further revelation beyond what God has provided for us
in His complete Word, the Bible. Today we are blessed to have Scripture as
our complete and final authority in all things (2 Tim. 3:16-17). If someone
now claims to have received a “special revelation,” we must test it against
Scripture. If it is contrary to the Word of God, then it must be rejected.
If it is consistent with Scripture, then we have to ask why an “extra” word
was necessary if its truth is already contained in the Bible. So while we
always need men who are willing to proclaim boldly the Word of God as
contained in Scripture (as pastors, teachers, and evangelists), there is no
need for the office of “prophet” as it existed in the New Testament. 3.
Ellen G. White is a false prophet due to her false & failed prophecies
(Deuteronomy 18:19-22); see
//www.mmoutreachinc.com/seventh_day_adventists/egw_false_prophet.html,
//1timothy4-13.com/files/bible/sda_morefailed.html &
//www.bible.ca/7-prophecy-blunders.htm. 4. Ellen G. White had
delusional dreams & visions much like phony Charismatic & Pentecostal TV
preachers do today; see
//www.truthorfables.com/Visons_of_%20EGW_by_Snook_&_Brinkerhoff.htm &
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kbv7YsyMf0I. 5. Seventh Day Adventism has a
damnable false gospel (Galatians 1:6-10) for several reasons: a) Satan is
the final sin bearer for Seventh Day Adventists; see
//www.truthorfables.com/Scapegoat.htm &
//www.truthorfables.net/50-contradictions-satan-bears-sins.htm, b)
They say Jesus had a sinful nature just like fallen man otherwise He can't
be a Savior; see
//kentbrandenburg.blogspot.com/2011/09/seventh-day-adventisms-anti.html &
//jesus-is-savior.com/False%20Religions/Seventh-Day%20Adventist/sda_exposed.htm,
c) Ellen G. White taught the cult doctrine of the 1844 investigative
judgment of Jesus in the heavenly sanctuary for the purpose of allowing
Seventh Day Adventists final access to heaven while all others would be
destroyed; see
//www.truthorfables.com/investigative_judgment_made_simple.htm,
//www.truthorfables.com/white_elephant.htm,
//www.truthorfables.com/My_Testimony.htm,
//www.truthorfables.com/SDA_Cult.htm &
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J50HlZFYHtY, d) Seventh Day Adventism
denies the New Testament Christian gospel by saying Old Testament
"Saturday" Sabbath keeping is essential for salvation; see
//www.truthorfables.com/Sabbath_Not_A_Law.htm,
//www.truthorfables.net/who-changed-the-sabbath-a.htm,
//www.truthorfables.com/Sabbath_is_Friday.htm &
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w0L3rSSL_H8, e) Although SDAs say they
believe in salvation by grace they redefine the meaning of grace in order
to incorporate into their religious system a salvation by law keeping to
achieve final works righteousness;
//mmoutreachinc.com/seventh_day_adventists/sda_law.html,
//searchingthescriptures.net/main_pages/answering_cults/seventh_day_adventism/sda_a_cult.htm
& https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aIh3T31ujuU. If the apostle Paul cursed
the Galatian Judaizers to hell for adding only one stipulation to the
gospel which was circumcision then how much more would he curse the SDAs
for all their added terms & conditions to the simple gospel of grace
(Ephesians 2:8-9, "For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of
yourselves: it is the gift of God: 9 Not of works, lest any man should
boast." Cross reference this to Galatians 2:16, "Knowing that a man is not
justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ, even
we have believed in Jesus Christ, that we might be justified by the faith
of Christ, and not by the works of the law: for by the works of the law
shall no flesh be justified."). 6. Seven Day Adventists teach the false
doctrine of soul sleep; see https://carm.org/soul-sleep,
//www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=12151314134510,
//www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=85122122530 &
//www.casagrandebaptistchurch.com/SoulSleep.html. 7. SDAs teach the
false doctrine of the annihilation out of existence of the wicked including
Satan & his demons rather than an eternal conscious punishment in a never
ending lake of fire; https://carm.org/clear-word-bible-annihilationism, "Eternal
Punishment, part 1" at
//www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=12607145320 & "Eternal
Punishment, part 2" at
//www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?sid=12607143539 where at the same
time this refutes the arguments of universalists, annihilationists
& heretics who say God is "all loving" & would not torment the wicked
forever while they ignore the fact that God hates the wicked (Psalm 5:4-6,
11:5, Hosea 9:15, etc.; see our video "The God of the Bible Does Not Love
Everybody But Actually Hates Many Instead (Romans 9:22)" at
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0zHEJCHgQVg,
//www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=91713193277,
//www.jashow.org/wiki/index.php?title=Annihilationism,
//www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=94081054442,
//www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=9110884114,
//www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=219131311338,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_O-LMpP6bAg & see our playlist "Dealing
with Hell, Lake of Fire, Unpopular Bible Doctrines" with 30 videos at
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLE04A1D0DFE95B95E. 8. SDAs support
alternate Bible translations that pervert the written word of God thus
placing themselves under the curse of Revelation 22:18-19, "For I testify
unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any
man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that
are written in this book: 19 And if any man shall take away from the words
of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book
of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in
this book." See
//exadventist.com/Home/Articles/clearwordbible/tabid/450/Default.aspx,
//www.truthorfables.com/SDAs_Destroyers_of_the_Bible.htm &
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7EsY1srHYJc. For more information on
Seventh Day Adventism see our playlist "Dealing with Seventh-day Adventism
& Their "Prophetess"" with 23 videos at
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL5316CC6F66F24283, see also "Cult of
Seventh Day Adventism" at
//www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=61210437590 & "Damnable
Heresies of Seventh Day Adventism" at
//www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=6201014412510. See the
following websites: www.TruthorFables.com, www.LifeAssuranceMinistries.org,
www.ExAdventist.com, www.RethinkingAdventism.com, www.Sabbatismos.com, &
www.GreatControversyExposed.com. Titus 1:9-16
See our video "Adam & the Ten Commandments - Are the Commandments Creation
Ordinances & Eternal Moral Laws of God?" at
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DtNOycuiPMM&list=UUQ_EDvOtDAAWfCvGUhd6y3A.
NEW COVENANT THEOLOGY by Dr. Gary D. Long* (//www.ptsco.org). A. NCT
Defined. NCT may be defined broadly as "God’s eternal purpose progressively
revealed in the commandments and promises of the biblical covenants of the
OT and fulfilled in the New Covenant (NC) of Jesus Christ. Its major themes
may be summarily described with reference to: (1) God’s eternal purpose of
redemption: covenantally revealed and administered through biblical
covenants beginning with a pre-Fall covenant of obedience with Adam (Rom.
5:12-19) and a post-Fall covenant of promise (Gen. 3:15): (2) Hermeneutics:
consistent interpretation of the OT in light of the NT (Luke 24:27, 44; II
Cor. 1:20); (3) The people of God: all the elect of God throughout time
first constituted as the church at Pentecost (Acts 2), but not before (John
7:39; 17:21; Col. 1:26-27; Heb. 11:39-40), as one corporate spiritual body
in union with Christ (I Cor. 12:13; Eph. 2:19-21; Col. 1:18, 24); and (4)
The law of God; the two greatest commandments of God—love of God and
neighbor (Matt. 22:36-40)—are innate law known instinctively by man (Rom.
2:14-15) created in God’s image (Gen. 1:27). Upon these two greatest
commandments all the Law and the Prophets depend as administered under
biblical covenants which culminate in the NC law of Christ (I Cor. 9:20-21;
Gal. 6:2; Heb. 8:6, 13: James 2:8; I John 5:3). Innate law is righteous and
unchanging; covenantal law is written, righteous and changeable (Heb. 7:12)
worked out in history in accordance with God’s eternal purpose (Eph. 1:11;
3:11; II Tim. 1:9).
B. NCT Described. NCT is a developing system of theology that strives to
provide a more accurate way to interpret the Scriptures by questioning key
theological presuppositions which undergird the principles of
interpretation (hermeneutics) that exist in both Covenant Theology (CT) and
Dispensational Theology (DT). NCT is based upon a redemptive history
approach to understanding the fulfillment of God’s eternal purpose on
earth. Its Christotelic Hermeneutic with Christ as the focus "in all the
Scriptures" (Luke 24:27) is based upon a biblical theology that stresses
the theology of the Bible itself. NCT challenges explanation of the
theological presuppositions of the one overarching covenant of grace
teaching of CT, including its understanding of the "moral law" of God and
the nature of the Church. NCT also challenges the two redemptive purposes
of DT, one for the Church and one for Israel, and it challenges some of
DT’s presuppositions and literal hermeneutic for understanding key elements
of Bible prophecy. The driving motive of NCT is "Back to the Bible." NCT
emphasizes the inductive study of the Bible. A major objective of NCT is
that its hermeneutic will help bring doctrinal unity in this sin-wrecked
world by helping to break down the middle walls of doctrinal partition that
exist between DT and CT.
C. NCT Characteristics. The following lists some of the major NCT
characteristics. NCT teaches that:
1. The discernment of the Holy Spirit is absolutely essential for
accurately handling the Word of God because there is no authentic leading
of the Holy Spirit that is not contextually wedded to the words of the
Bible (I Cor. 2:13-14; II Tim. 2:15; 3:16). (NCT is not affiliated with
present-day "New Calvinism" and "Charismatic Calvinism.")
2. The most important principle of interpretation is "contextual biblical
exegesis." It demands grammatical/historical/theological principles of
interpretation.
3. The imputation of Adam’s first sin to all mankind (Rom. 5:12d, 18a-19a),
the elect’s sin to Christ (II Cor. 5:21), and Christ’s righteousness to the
elect (Rom. 5:18b-19b) are vital for the Christian faith. Without the
doctrine of imputation the whole doctrine of the substitutionary atonement
and justification by faith alone in Christ alone are undermined (Rom. 5:12
-19).
4. The type anti-type teaching of Adam and Christ in Romans 5:12-19 demands
that a covenant relationship existed between God and Adam both before and
after the Fall.
5. God’s plan of salvation is revealed and administered according to His
eternal purpose (II Tim. 1:9) through the unfolding of biblical covenants
in the flow of redemptive history, but not as explained through the
theologically deduced system of CT’s Covenant of Works/Covenant of
Grace/Covenant of Redemption schema.
6. Christians "are not under law (hupo nomon), but under grace (hupo
charin)" (Rom. 6:14), meaning that the believer in Christ is no longer
under the Mosaic law as covenant law but under the grace of the NC—a
covenant that not only has the internal leading of the Holy Spirit (Rom.
8:4, 11), but also external commands to be obeyed (Rom. 12:9-21), summed up
in the NC declaration: "You shall love your neighbor as yourself" (Rom.
13:8-10; Gal. 5:14).
7. The law of God is both absolute and covenantal (Matt. 5:17-20). God’s
"absolute law" is innate, written on the heart of man created in the image
of God. It is God’s unchanging standard of righteousness. God’s "covenantal
law," however, is written and changeable according to the covenant being
administered.
8. The love of God and the love of neighbor are the two greatest
commandments (Matt. 22:36-40) upon which the whole Law and the Prophets
hang. This means that the Ten Commandments, the Decalogue, hang upon these
two greatest commandments, not the reverse as CT teaches.
9. The Ten Commandments are a covenantal outworking of the two greatest
commandments in redemptive history, not the reverse. They were given
through the hand of Moses to the nation of Israel first at Mount Sinai
(Exod. 20).
10. The Fourth Commandment, the Sabbath Commandment, being the sign of the
Mosaic Covenant (Exod. 31:15-17), is not a creation ordinance as taught by
CT.
11. The Ten Commandments are not moral law "forever," first written in the
heart of man at creation and forever binding upon all mankind as CT teaches
in its confessions of faith; e.g., the Westminster Confession of Faith
(1647-49) and the Second London Baptist Confession of Faith (1677/1689). In
fact the term "moral law" does not occur in the original languages of the
Bible. Although under any given covenantal administration, man is morally
obligated to obey all of God’s commandments, yet the Bible does not
separate God’s law into three parts: moral, ceremonial and civil.
Historically, this threefold separation was not substantially taught until
the time of Thomas Aquinas in the 13th century and in the 16th century by
Calvin.
12. The Decalogue is not "transcovenantal" and, therefore, does not
function outside the Old Covenant as a unit as much of CT teaches.
13. Christ came not to destroy the OT Scriptures but to fulfill them, which
includes the Decalogue (Matt. 5:17-18). The New Covenant law of Christ is
distinguished from the Mosaic law (Luke 9:35) and from the Gentiles who do
not have a written revelation of God’s law (I Cor. 9:20-21).
14. The law of Christ is not to be equated with the Decalogue. Although the
law of Christ, the law of the NC people of God, is related to the Decalogue
in that it incorporates nine of the Ten Commandments. The law of Christ is
a better law than the law of Moses (Matt. 5:21-48; Heb. 7:19) in the sense
that (1) it is a higher revelation of the righteousness of God (Matt. 5:20);
(2) it is based upon a higher standard of love (Matt. 5:44); and (3)
Christ’s inauguration of the New Covenant brings in things that are
qualitatively "newer," expressed in developing the theological significance
of such basic concepts as new wineskins, new teaching, new commandment, new
creation, new man, new name, new song, New Jerusalem and all things new
(Rev. 21:5).
15. The OC Sabbath commandment is typologically fulfilled by Christ for the
people of God who rest in Him by faith (Heb. 4:9-10; Col. 2:16-17).
16. New Covenant believers are in-lawed to Christ; they are not under the
OC law of Moses but under the grace of the NC (Rom. 6:14). NCT does not
equate the law of Christ with the Decalogue as do many holding to CT.
17. The indwelling of the Holy Spirit is the norm for Christian living. NCT
does not teach that the Ten Commandments are the only objective standard
for evaluating the Christian life. Rather, NCT emphasizes that it is the
Spirit who through Scripture enables the Christian to have a godly walk
(Rom. 8:4) acknowledging that all Scripture is profitable for instruction
in righteousness (II Tim. 3:16).
18. Christ merited righteousness for the elect only and imputed it to them
based upon His total obedience to the will of the Father in His life and
death (Matt. 3:15; Rom. 5:19).
19. The Church, which is the body of Christ (Eph. 1:22-23; Col. 1:18; see
Eph. 2:13 to 3:12), was first formed in history when the Spirit was poured
out at Pentecost not in past history under the OC. Most holding to CT see
the Church existing in the OT before Pentecost; NCT does not. Contrary to
Classical DT but in agreement with CT, NCT sees only one redemptive purpose
for the one people of God, the good olive tree (Rom. 11).
20. Christ gave both permanent spiritual gifts to the church for exercise
throughout the entire age of the NC—from Pentecost to the Second Advent—and
temporary gifts (largely sign or miraculous gifts, including that of
apostleship and prophecy) exercised during its foundation (Eph. 2:20; 3:5).
21. The ordinance of water baptism is the pledge of membership in the New
Covenant for believers alone and the sign of the NC is not baptism, rather
the sign is the cup, which memorializes the NC in Christ’s blood (Luke 22:20;
I Cor. 11:25).
22. The "now-not yet" principle of interpretation is essential to
understand the teaching of the NT. The Christian experiences the
commencement of "every spiritual blessing in the heavenly places in Christ"
(Eph. 1:3); yet he still awaits the consummation of these blessing at
Christ’s return. The whole theology of the NT is qualified by this tension:
between the "already" or "now" and the "not yet" (I John 3:2).
23. The "recapitulation" principle is essential to understand the NT
prophetic Scriptures (Matt. 24:4-14 and 24:15-31; Rev. 11:15-19 and 12:1-6).
24. The "blessed hope" will occur when Christ returns (Titus 2:13) to earth
bodily and visibly (Acts 1:11) at the Second Advent to resurrect, judge and
consign the saved to heaven and the lost to a Christless eternity (John 5:28
-29).
*Gary D. Long, Th.D., is the Faculty President of Providence Theological
Seminary located in Colorado Springs, CO. //www.ptsco.org;
[email protected].
Question: "How is Jesus our Sabbath Rest?"
Answer: The key to understanding how Jesus is our Sabbath rest is the
Hebrew word sabat, which means "to rest or stop or cease from work." The
origin of the Sabbath goes back to Creation. After creating the heavens and
the earth in six days, God "rested on the seventh day from all His work
which He had made" (Genesis 2:2). This doesn’t mean that God was tired and
needed a rest. We know that God is omnipotent, literally "all-powerful." He
has all the power in the universe, He never tires, and His most arduous
expenditure of energy does not diminish His power one bit. So, what does it
mean that God rested on the seventh day? Simply that He stopped what He was
doing. He ceased from His labors. This is important in understanding the
establishment of the Sabbath day and the role of Christ as our Sabbath rest.
God used the example of His resting on the seventh day of Creation to
establish the principle of the Sabbath day rest for His people. In Exodus
20:8-11 and Deuteronomy 5:12-15, God gave the Israelites the fourth of His
Ten Commandments. They were to "remember" the Sabbath day and "keep it
holy." One day out of every seven, they were to rest from their labors and
give the same day of rest to their servants and animals. This was not just
a physical rest, but a cessation of laboring. Whatever work they were
engaged in was to stop for a full day each week. (Please read our other
articles on the Sabbath day, Saturday vs. Sunday and Sabbath keeping to
explore this issue further.) The Sabbath day was established so the people
would rest from their labors, only to begin again after a one-day rest.
The various elements of the Sabbath symbolized the coming of the Messiah,
who would provide a permanent rest for His people. Once again the example
of resting from our labors comes into play. With the establishment of the
Old Testament Law, the Jews were constantly "laboring" to make themselves
acceptable to God. Their labors included trying to obey a myriad of do’s
and don’ts of the ceremonial law, the Temple law, the civil law, etc. Of
course they couldn’t possibly keep all those laws, so God provided an array
of sin offerings and sacrifices so they could come to Him for forgiveness
and restore fellowship with Him, but only temporarily. Just as they began
their physical labors after a one-day rest, so, too, did they have to
continue to offer sacrifices. Hebrews 10:1 tells us that the law "can
never, by the same sacrifices repeated endlessly year after year, make
perfect those who draw near to worship." But these sacrifices were offered
in anticipation of the ultimate sacrifice of Christ on the cross, who
"after He had offered one sacrifice for sins forever, sat down on the right
of God" (Hebrews 10:12). Just as He rested after performing the ultimate
sacrifice, He sat down and rested—ceased from His labor of atonement
because there was nothing more to be done, ever. Because of what He did, we
no longer have to "labor" in law-keeping in order to be justified in the
sight of God. Jesus was sent so that we might rest in God and in what He
has provided.
Another element of the Sabbath day rest which God instituted as a
foreshadowing of our complete rest in Christ is that He blessed it,
sanctified it, and made it holy. Here again we see the symbol of Christ as
our Sabbath rest—the holy, perfect Son of God who sanctifies and makes holy
all who believe in Him. God sanctified Christ, just as He sanctified the
Sabbath day, and sent Him into the world (John 10:36) to be our sacrifice
for sin. In Him we find complete rest from the labors of our self-effort,
because He alone is holy and righteous. "God made him who had no sin to be
sin for us, so that in him we might become the righteousness of God" (2
Corinthians 5:21). We can now cease from our spiritual labors and rest in
Him, not just one day a week, but always.
Jesus can be our Sabbath rest in part because He is "Lord of the Sabbath"
(Matthew 12:8). As God incarnate, He decides the true meaning of the
Sabbath because He created it, and He is our Sabbath rest in the flesh.
When the Pharisees criticized Him for healing on the Sabbath, Jesus
reminded them that even they, sinful as they were, would not hesitate to
pull a sheep out of a pit on the Sabbath. Because He came to seek and save
His sheep who would hear His voice (John 10:3,27) and enter into the
Sabbath rest He provided by paying for their sins, He could break the
Sabbath rules. He told the Pharisees that people are more important than
sheep and the salvation He provided was more important than rules. By
saying, "The Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath" (Mark 2:27),
Jesus was restating the principle that the Sabbath rest was instituted to
relieve man of his labors, just as He came to relieve us of our attempting
to achieve salvation by our works. We no longer rest for only one day, but
forever cease our laboring to attain God’s favor. Jesus is our rest from
works now, just as He is the door to heaven, where we will rest in Him
forever.
Hebrews 4 is the definitive passage regarding Jesus as our Sabbath rest.
The writer to the Hebrews exhorts his readers to "enter in" to the Sabbath
rest provided by Christ. After three chapters of telling them that Jesus is
superior to the angels and that He is our Apostle and High Priest, he
pleads with them to not harden their hearts against Him, as their fathers
hardened their hearts against Jehovah in the wilderness. Because of their
unbelief, God denied that generation access to the holy land, saying, "They
shall not enter into My rest" (Hebrews 3:11). In the same way, the writer
to the Hebrews begs them—and us—not to make the same mistake by rejecting
God’s Sabbath rest in Jesus Christ. "There remains, then, a Sabbath-rest
for the people of God; for anyone who enters God's rest also rests from his
own work, just as God did from his. Let us, therefore, make every effort to
enter that rest, so that no one will fall by following their example of
disobedience" (Hebrews 4:9-11).
There is no other Sabbath rest besides Jesus. He alone satisfies the
requirements of the Law, and He alone provides the sacrifice that atones
for sin. He is God’s plan for us to cease from the labor of our own works.
We dare not reject this one-and-only Way of salvation (John 14:6). God’s
reaction to those who choose to reject His plan is seen in Numbers 15. A
man was found gathering sticks on the Sabbath day, in spite of God’s plain
commandment to cease from all labor on the Sabbath. This transgression was
a known and willful sin, done with unblushing boldness in broad daylight,
in open defiance of the divine authority. "And Jehovah said to Moses, ‘The
man shall surely be put to death’" (v. 35). So it will be to all who reject
God’s provision for our Sabbath rest in Christ. "How shall we escape if we
neglect so great a salvation?" (Hebrews 2:3).
"What does it mean that Jesus is the Lord of the Sabbath? -
//www.gotquestions.org/Lord-of-the-Sabbath.html
"What is a sabbatical year?" -
//www.gotquestions.org/sabbatical-year.html
"What does shabbat mean?" - //www.gotquestions.org/shabbat.html
"What day is the Sabbath, Saturday or Sunday?" -
//www.gotquestions.org/Saturday-Sunday.html
"Does God require Sabbath-keeping of Christians?" -
//www.gotquestions.org/Sabbath-keeping.html
Finally, Sabbath Keeping in Alaska is a Problem. This shows that the
Sabbath was a regional, temporary command for Israel and not for the world.
Interesting problem in Alaska. According to the officious SDA sunset
calculator, on Friday eve, May 30th, in Prudhoe Bay, Alaska, the sun set
below the horizon, bringing with it the Jewish Shabbat, at 11:38 PM, almost
midnight. Note: AK is so far west, it is on Hawaiian time. Here is the
quote: Calculations for: Longitude: -148.34000 Latitude: 70.27000 Prudhoe
Bay, Alaska Time Zone: Hawaiian Standard Time, HSTDate: 5/30/03 Friday
Sunrise: 0:07am HST (sunrise Friday morning)Sunset: 11:38pm HST (sunset,
Friday night, becoming sabbath) Next, we find sunrise on Sabbath, May 31st,
actually starts before midnight Friday night and el sol invictus stays up
all day Sabbath, and into Sabbath night, and into Sunday morning, and into
Sunday night, for the next two months! Date: 5/31/03 Sunrise: Sun above
horizon HST Sunset: Sun above horizon HST (meaning the sun never sets).
Meaning: if you live and work in Prudhoe Bay, Alaska, extracting dino
remains buried and liquified by Noah's flood less than 4500 years ago, you
have a problem! (no!! dummy! not the recent age of the earth!)... you have
to quit working! Because on Friday night, May 30th, when the sun went down
at 1l:38, bringing in the holy Lord's day, you had to stop working, thou,
and thy manservant, and thy maidservant, and all the strangers within thy
igloo. But the sun came up again on Sabbath just a few minutes later, but
never went down after that!!! As I scribble this nonsense it is still
Sabbath in Prudhoe Bay...cause the sun never went down....no Saturday
sunset. So if you believe literally that you must keep sabbath from sunset
on Friday night to Sabbath sunset.....the next day, Sabbath, did NOT have a
sunset this summer! Won't be a sunset for another two months! So you are
faced with keeping Sabbath for two months straight, and giving up your job
with Exxon! Unless of course, you are the camp padre, trying to spread the
word that black gold comes from dead dinos who missed the ark, or in the
medical profession raking in piles of dough and salving your conscience by
paying plenty of tithe to keep the hired-archy gainfully employed.... —sent
by reader Seventh Day Adventists follow their false prophetess Ellen G.
White (a woman authority over her religious followers which violates 1
Timothy 2:12, "But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority
over the man, but to be in silence.") & her idol of Sabbath keeping for
salvation requirement (violating Galatians 1:6-9) rather than what the
Bible plainly teaches about Sabbath keeping for New Testament believers.
For more see our playlist "Dealing with Seventh-day Adventism & Their
"Prophetess"" with 23 videos at
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL5316CC6F66F24283. See the websites:
www.TruthorFables.com, www.ExAdventist.com, www.LifeAssuranceMinistries.org &
www.GreatControversyExposed.com. Titus 1:9-16
Are Christians still under the Law of Moses or have the terms of the New
Covenant as found in the New Testament changed Old Covenant requirements
that were originally designated for the Old Testament Israelites (Hebrews
7:12, 8:6-13, 10:9)? No, true Christians are not under the Law of Moses
but under Grace (this does not mean antinomianism however, see our video
"Apostate Grace Evangelical Society (GES) Teaches Phony Grace & the Easy
Believism of Another Gospel" at
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wMMvdPtyYvM&list=UUQ_EDvOtDAAWfCvGUhd6y3A).
When you are under New Covenant grace true Christians still try to keep the
moral laws of God because they love God & His righteousness. They are not
trying to keep those moral laws of God in order to accomplish their
salvation with God but because they have already received salvation by
God's grace through being "born again" supernaturally by the Holy Spirit -
John 3:3-8, Romans 8:1-17, 1 Corinthians 2:10-16, Ephesians 4:30, John 6:37,
39, 44, 63, 65 - see our video, "Sabbath Keeping Is Not Required For New
Testament Christians: Seventh-Day Adventists Beware" at
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TEFt4TOR6E8). Too many so-called legalistic
& heretical "Christians" think they have to work to keep the law in order
to either earn their salvation or try hard to keep from losing it (see our
videos "True Christians Cannot Lose Their Salvation But Fake & Deluded
"Christians" Never Had It At All" at
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=meUD2vCv3oo & "DEBATE: ONCE SAVED ALWAYS
SAVED (CALVINISM) OR DOING ENOUGH WORKS TO KEEP SALVATION (PELAGIANISM)?"
at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H7e1aWfrQHg). To be under the Law means
that a person is under the power and authority of the Law to judge and
condemn anyone who breaks the Law. Take a look at these verses that talk
about being under the Law.
Rom. 2:12, "For all who have sinned without the Law will also perish
without the Law; and all who have sinned under the Law will be judged by
the Law," (ἐν νόμῳ, en nomo, literally 'in law').
Gal. 3:23, "But before faith came, we were kept in custody under the law,
being shut up to the faith which was later to be revealed," (ὑπὸ νόμον,
hupo nomon, literally 'under law').
Gal. 4:5, "in order that He might redeem those who were under the Law, that
we might receive the adoption as sons," (ὑπὸ νόμον, hupo nomon, literally
'under law').
As you can see, to be under the Law means you will be judged by the Law.
In the Old Testament Law found in Deuteronomy 27:26 it says, "‘Cursed is he
who does not confirm the words of this law by doing them.’ And all the
people shall say, ‘Amen.’" So, to be under the Law means you have to keep
it all. In Galatians 3:10 Paul said, "For as many as are of the works of
the Law are under a curse; for it is written, 'Cursed is everyone who does
not abide by all things written in the book of the law, to perform them.'”
That is what it means to be under the Law.
But, as I said above, Christians are not under the Law. In other words,
Christians are not obligated to keep the Law so as to be saved from God's
righteous judgment, so they don't go to hell.
Rom. 6:14, "For sin shall not be master over you, for you are not under
law, but under grace."
Gal. 5:18, "But if you are led by the Spirit, you are not under the Law."
Christians are freed from having to please God and be saved by keeping the
Law of God. We are not under the Law. We are not under its authority. It
has no power over us.
Why are Christians not under the Law?
Christians are not under the Law because they have died to the Law. They
have died with Christ, and those who have died are not bound by the Law.
"for the Law brings about wrath, but where there is no law, neither is
there violation." (Rom. 4:15).
"knowing this, that our old self was crucified with Him, that our body of
sin might be done away with, that we should no longer be slaves to sin;"
(Rom. 6:6).
"Now if we have died with Christ, we believe that we shall also live with
Him," (Rom. 6:8).
"Therefore, my brethren, you also were made to die to the Law through the
body of Christ, that you might be joined to another, to Him who was raised
from the dead, that we might bear fruit for God." (Rom. 7:4).
"But now we have been released from the Law, having died to that by which
we were bound, so that we serve in newness of the Spirit and not in oldness
of the letter." (Rom. 7:6).
So, Christians have died with Christ. They are identified with Christ so
closely that it can be said that when Christ died, they died with him.
Since Christians have died with him, they are no longer under the Law
because he who has died is freed from the Law (Rom. 7:6). That is why
Christians are not obligated to keep the Law of God in order to be saved
from God's righteous judgment. Christians are saved from that requirement
and penalty.
Does Romans 2:13 mean that we are justified before God by keeping the Law?
"For there is no partiality with God. 12 For all who have sinned without
the Law will also perish without the Law; and all who have sinned under the
Law will be judged by the Law; 13 for not the hearers of the Law are just
before God, but the doers of the Law will be justified. 14 For when
Gentiles who do not have the Law do instinctively the things of the Law,
these, not having the Law, are a law to themselves, 15 in that they show
the work of the Law written in their hearts, their conscience bearing
witness, and their thoughts alternately accusing or else defending them, 16
on the day when, according to my gospel, God will judge the secrets of men
through Christ Jesus.” (Romans 2:11-16).
Verse 13 is often used by people (Roman Catholics, Mormons, etc.,) to say
that we must keep the Law (along with faith in Jesus) to be saved, but this
isn’t so. Paul was talking to the Jews (Romans 2:17) about their judging
of the Gentiles, and then points them to their own Law (standard of
judgment) and hypocrisy and tells them that the doers of the Law are just
before God (v. 13).
The standard they wanted to keep was the Law. Paul was telling them that
they could be justified before God by keeping it. So, keep the Law. Keep
all of it, but if you don’t, you’re in trouble. It is the doers of the Law
who are justified before God. He tells them that the Gentiles who didn't
have the Law according to the knowledge of the Jews were instinctively
keeping the Law (v. 14) and will be judged accordingly. How much more the
Jews?
Paul was showing the self-righteous Jews who judged the Gentiles that they
were not able to keep a perfect standard. They were hypocrites. This is
why Paul tells us in the very next chapter, in Romans 3:28, that we are
justified by faith apart from the works of the Law--which includes the Law
of loving God (Deut. 6:5), and loving your neighbor (Lev. 19:18). No one
is able to keep the Law. If you fail even once, then you become guilty of
it all.
James 2:10, “For whoever keeps the whole law and yet stumbles in one point,
he has become guilty of all.”
Gal. 3:10, “For as many as are of the works of the Law are under a curse;
for it is written, “Cursed is everyone who does not abide by all things
written in the book of the law, to perform them.”
The Jews (and anyone else) can be justified before God by keeping the Law,
but he or she has to be perfect. A person can’t fail even once--ever. But
since all fail, that is why we have the gospel that tells us Jesus kept the
Law perfectly (1 Pet. 2:22), and that we can be justified before God by
faith in Him (Romans 4:3, 5; 5:1; John 1:12; 3:16).
See our video "KEEPING THE OLD TESTAMENT LAWS & COMMANDMENTS CANNOT EARN
HEAVEN OR SALVATION WITH GOD!" at
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aIh3T31ujuU.
Galatians 2:16, "Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the
law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ, even we have believed in Jesus
Christ, that we might be justified by the faith of Christ, and not by the
works of the law: for by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified."
Philippians 3:2-3, 9, "Beware of dogs, beware of evil workers, beware of
the concision.
3 For we are the circumcision, which worship God in the spirit, and rejoice
in Christ Jesus, and have no confidence in the flesh. And be found in him,
not having mine own righteousness, which is of the law, but that which is
through the faith of Christ, the righteousness which is of God by faith:"
Death can come suddenly & unexpectedly. Hear deathbed testimonies of the
damned during their last days, hours & moments before going into eternity:
"Horrifying & Terrifying Death Bed Scenes Of Atheists, Apostates &
Reprobates (1/3)" at
//www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?sid=731131047310, "Horrifying &
Terrifying Death Bed Scenes Of Atheists, Apostates & Reprobates (2/3)" at
//www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?sid=731131111372, "Horrifying &
Terrifying Death Bed Scenes Of Atheists, Apostates & Reprobates (3/3)" at
//www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?sid=731131132150, "Death-Bed of a
Free-Thinker, Exemplified in the Last Hours of Hon. Francis Newport" at
//www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?sid=72913130359, "Death-Bed
Scenes, Death-Bed Repentance Rarely Occurs, As Men Live, So Do Men Die #1"
at
//www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?sid=927131122460, "Death-Bed
Scenes, Death-Bed Repentance Rarely Occurs, As Men Live, So Do Men Die #2"
at //www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?sid=927131158132;
"Dying Testimonies Of The Unsaved, The Awful Death Of An Infidel Son Who
Hated Jesus" at //www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?sid=104131120148,
& although this next recording is not an actual deathbed testimonial it is
highly informative concerning Judas & other reprobates, "The Repentance of
Judas, or, the Lamentable Effects of a Startled Conscience" at
//www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?sid=310141542316. Listeners will
notice numerous similar patterns among the final words & actions of the
damned. Many seem to sense the flames of hell & the presence of demonic
entities before death overtakes them. An excellent Biblical analysis
of eternal punishment in hell & the lake of fire is given by
the outstanding theologian A.W. Pink - "Eternal Punishment, part 1" at
//www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=12607145320 & "Eternal
Punishment, part 2" at
//www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?sid=12607143539 where he at the
same time refutes the arguments of universalists, annihilationists
& heretics who say God is "all loving" & would not torment the wicked
forever while they ignore the fact that God hates the wicked (Psalm 5:4-6,
11:5, Hosea 9:15, etc.; see our video "The God of the Bible Does Not Love
Everybody But Actually Hates Many Instead (Romans 9:22)" at
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0zHEJCHgQVg). Hear also Charles Haddon
Spurgeon on this subject in his sermon "The Sinner's End, Hell Opens Wide
Her Jaws, the Sinner Falls To Destruction" at
//www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=1014131452290 & Jonathan
Edward's famous sermon "Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God" at
//www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=113003134610. Besides all
this readers can click on our playlist "Dealing with Hell, Lake of Fire,
Unpopular Bible Doctrines" with 30 videos & 31 hours of teaching material
at https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLE04A1D0DFE95B95E. Don't depend
on a last second deathbed conversion to save you from the wrath of a holy
God. Come to the Biblical Jesus Christ today for salvation in repentance &
faith (2 Corinthians 6:2, "behold, now is the accepted time; behold, now is
the day of salvation; Acts 16:31, "And they said, Believe on the Lord Jesus
Christ, and thou shalt be saved;" Mark 1:15, "The time is fulfilled, and
the kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye, and believe the gospel;" 1
Corinthians 15:1-4, "Moreover, brethren, I declare to you the gospel which
I preached to you, which also you received and in which you stand, 2 by
which also you are saved, if you hold fast that word which I preached to
you—unless you believed in vain. 3 For I delivered to you first of all that
which I also received: that Christ died for our sins according to the
Scriptures, 4 and that He was buried, and that He rose again the third day
according to the Scriptures," Revelation 1:8, Jesus is the "Alpha and
Omega, the beginning and the ending, saith the Lord, which is, and which
was, and which is to come, the Almighty.", Revelation 1:18, Jesus says "I
am he that liveth, and was dead; and, behold, I am alive for evermore,
Amen; and have the keys of hell and of death." Becoming a true Christian is
not easy therefore count the cost. Becoming a true Christian is not saying
a quick prayer & thinking you're okay. Becoming a true Christian is not
getting water baptized as a baby or as an adult (see our video "IS WATER
BAPTISM NECESSARY TO ESCAPE HELL & BE SAVED & ARE YOU "BORN AGAIN" (JOHN
3:3-8) BY IT?" at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wYJtMV9qrWg. You must be
supernaturally "born again" by a sovereign act of God through the power of
the Holy Spirit (John 1:12-13, 3:3-8; Titus 3:5-7; John 6:37, 39, 44, 63,
65; Ephesians 3:16-21; Romans 8:1-17; 1 Corinthians 2:10-16; Luke 14:26-35,
“If anyone comes to Me and does not hate his father and mother, wife and
children, brothers and sisters, yes, and his own life also, he cannot be My
disciple. 27 And whoever does not bear his cross and come after Me cannot
be My disciple. 28 For which of you, intending to build a tower, does not
sit down first and count the cost, whether he has enough to finish it—
29 lest, after he has laid the foundation, and is not able to finish, all
who see it begin to mock him, 30 saying, ‘This man began to build and was
not able to finish’? 31 Or what king, going to make war against another
king, does not sit down first and consider whether he is able with ten
thousand to meet him who comes against him with twenty thousand? 32 Or
else, while the other is still a great way off, he sends a delegation and
asks conditions of peace. 33 So likewise, whoever of you does not forsake
all that he has cannot be My disciple.34 “Salt is good; but if the salt has
lost its flavor, how shall it be seasoned? 35 It is neither fit for the
land nor for the dunghill, but men throw it out. He who has ears to hear,
let him hear!” Luke 6:46, Jesus said, "And why call ye me, Lord, Lord, and
do not the things which I say?" Becoming a true Christian will change your
life forever in this life & the next (2 Corinthians 5:17, "Therefore, if
anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation; old things have passed away;
behold, all things have become new."). Beg God to save you since you cannot
get into heaven by your own righteousness & good works (Ephesians 2:8-10,
"8 For by grace you have been saved through faith, and that not of
yourselves; it is the gift of God, 9 not of works, lest anyone should
boast. 10 For we are His workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good
works, which God prepared beforehand that we should walk in them."). Keep
begging God for salvation through Jesus Christ until the day comes that He
grants your request (Acts 13:48, "Now when the Gentiles heard this, they
were glad and glorified the word of the Lord. And as many as had been
appointed to eternal life believed." & 2 Timothy 2:25-26, "24 And a servant
of the Lord must not quarrel but be gentle to all, able to teach, patient,
25 in humility correcting those who are in opposition, if God perhaps will
grant them repentance, so that they may know the truth, 26 and that they
may come to their senses and escape the snare of the devil, having been
taken captive by him to do his will."). When you are supernaturally
regenerated by the Holy Spirit you will know it & suddenly have the power
to repent of your evil ways & for the first time you will actually love God
more than your own life knowing that nothing in creation is more important
than God alone. You will then spend the rest of eternity loving, serving &
praising God for He is worthy. John 14:6, "Jesus said to him, “I am the
way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through
Me." See our video "IS JESUS GOD ALMIGHTY IN THE FLESH MEANING THE SECOND
PERSON OF THE TRINITY OR IS HE SOMETHING ELSE?" at
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_BlPm7M7uv8&list=PL9931642C7C8FFEAB.
See our videos "Christ Has Fulfilled & Replaced the Law of Moses With
Higher Laws of the New Covenant, Hebrews 8:6-13" at
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EkZ2Cn8TLzE&list=UUQ_EDvOtDAAWfCvGUhd6y3A,
"Adam & the Ten Commandments - Are the Commandments Creation Ordinances &
Eternal Moral Laws of God?" at
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DtNOycuiPMM&list=UUQ_EDvOtDAAWfCvGUhd6y3A,
"Is Sabbath Keeping Essential to Be a Real Christian? Former SDA Pastor
Answers This Question" at
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w0L3rSSL_H8&index=2&list=PL5316CC6F66F24283,
"Sabbath Keeping Is Not Required For New Testament Christians: Seventh-Day
Adventists Beware" at
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TEFt4TOR6E8&index=6&list=PL5316CC6F66F24283 &
"KEEPING THE OLD TESTAMENT LAWS & COMMANDMENTS CANNOT EARN HEAVEN OR
SALVATION WITH GOD!" at
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aIh3T31ujuU&index=14&list=PL5316CC6F66F24283.
Why do we worship on Sunday instead of Saturday?
In the Old Testament, God stated,
"Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy. Six days you shall labor and do
all your work, but the seventh day is a Sabbath of the Lord your God; in it
you shall not do any work, you or your son or your daughter, your male or
your female servant or your cattle or your sojourner who stays with you,"
(Exodus 20:8-10, NASB).
It was the custom of the Jews to come together on the Sabbath, which is
Saturday, cease work, and worship God. Jesus went to the synagogue on
Saturday to teach (Matt. 12:9, John 18:20) as did the apostle Paul (Acts
17:2; 18:4). So, if in the Old Testament we are commanded to keep the
Sabbath and in the New Testament we see Jews, Jesus, and the apostles doing
the same thing, then why do we worship on Sunday?
First of all, of the 10 commandments listed in Exodus 20:1-17, only 9 of
them were reinstituted in the New Testament: five in Matt. 19:18, murder,
adultery, stealing, false witness, and honor parents; in Rom. 13:9,
coveting; worshiping God properly covers the first three commandments. The
one that was not reaffirmed was the one about the Sabbath. Instead, Jesus
said that He is the Lord of the Sabbath (Matt. 12:8).
Upon the completion of Creation, God rested on the seventh day. However,
since God is all-powerful, He doesn’t get tired. He doesn’t need to take a
break and rest. So, why did/does it say that He rested? The reason is
simple: Mark 2:27 says, "The Sabbath was made for man, and not man for the
Sabbath." In other words, God established the Sabbath as a rest for His
people--not because He needed a break but because we are mortal and need a
time of rest--a time to focus on God. In this, our spirits and bodies are
both renewed.
The Old Testament system of Law required keeping the Sabbath as part of the
overall moral, legal, and sacrificial system by which the Jewish people
satisfied God’s requirements for behavior, government, and forgiveness of
sins. The Sabbath was part of the Law in that sense. In order to "remain"
in favor with God, you had to also keep the Sabbath. If it was not kept,
then the person was in sin and would often be punished (Ezekiel 18:4; Rom.
6:23; Deut. 13:1-9; Num. 35:31; Lev. 20:2, etc.).
But with Jesus’ atonement, we are no longer required to keep the Law. We
are not under Law but grace (Rom. 6:14-15). The Sabbath is fulfilled in
Jesus. He is our rest. We are not under obligation, by Law, to keep it; and
this goes for the Sabbath as well. It is not a requirement that we keep the
Sabbath. If it were, then we would still be under the Law; but we are not.
Evidence of the Change of Days can be Seen in the NT
The New Testament has ample evidence that the seventh day Sabbath is no
longer a requirement.
Rom. 14:5-6, "One man regards one day above another, another regards every
day alike. Let each man be fully convinced in his own mind. 6 He who
observes the day, observes it for the Lord, and he who eats, does so for
the Lord, for he gives thanks to God; and he who eats not, for the Lord he
does not eat, and gives thanks to God."
The entire section of Rom. 14:1-12 is worth careful study. Nevertheless,
the instructions here are that individuals must be convinced in their own
minds about which day they observe for the Lord. If the seventh day Sabbath
were a requirement, then the choice would not be man's but God’s.
Col. 2:16-17, "Therefore let no one act as your judge in regard to food or
drink or in respect to a festival or a new moon or a Sabbath day--17things
which are a mere shadow of what is to come; but the substance belongs to
Christ."
Notice here that time sequence mentioned. A festival is yearly. A new moon
is monthly. A Sabbath is weekly. No one is to judge regarding this. The
Sabbath is defined as a shadow; the reality is Jesus. Jesus is our Sabbath.
Acts 20:7, "And on the first day of the week, when we were gathered
together to break bread, Paul began talking to them, intending to depart
the next day, and he prolonged his message until midnight."
The first day of the week is Sunday, and this is the day the people
gathered. This passage can easily be seen as the church meeting on Sunday.
It has two important church functions within it: breaking bread (communion)
and a message (preaching). Additionally, Luke did not use the Jewish system
of counting days: sundown to sundown. He used the Roman system: midnight to
midnight. This is a subtle point that shows the Jewish Sabbath system was
not the one utilized by Luke.
1 Cor. 16:1-2, "Now concerning the collection for the saints, as I directed
the churches of Galatia, so do you also. 2 On the first day of every week
let each one of you put aside and save, as he may prosper, that no
collections be made when I come."
Notice here that Paul is directing the churches to meet on the first day of
each week and put money aside. It would seem that this is tithing. So, the
instructed time for the church to meet is Sunday. Is this an official
worship day set up by the church? You decide.
Rev. 1:10-11, "I was in the Spirit on the Lord’s day, and I heard behind me
a loud voice like the sound of a trumpet, 11saying, "Write in a book what
you see, and send it to the seven churches: to Ephesus and to Smyrna and to
Pergamum and to Thyatira and to Sardis and to Philadelphia and to Laodicea."
The New Bible Dictionary says regarding the term, ‘The Lord’s Day’ in
Revelation 1:10: "This is the first extant occurrence in Christian
literature of τῇ κυριακῇ ἡμέρᾳ, "ta kuriaka hamera." The adjectival
construction suggests that it was a formal designation of the church’s
worship day. As such, it certainly appears early in the 2nd century
(Ignatius, Epistle to the Magnesians, 1. 67).
In many churches today, the term "The Lord’s Day" is used to designate
Sunday--the same as it was in the second century.
I hope this is evidence enough to show you that the Bible does not require
that we worship on Saturday. If anything, we have the freedom (Rom.
14:1-12) to worship on the day that we believe we should. And, no one
should judge us regarding the day we keep. We are free in Christ and not
under law (Rom. 6:14).
The wicked hate the wrath, justice & judgment of a Holy God. Get an
in-depth study of the Biblical Doctrine of Hell besides videos on our
playlist "Dealing with Hell, Lake of Fire, Unpopular Bible Doctrines" at
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLE04A1D0DFE95B95E by going to
"Eternal Punishment, Part 1" at
//www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=12607145320 & "Eternal
Punishment, Part 2" at
//www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=12607143539 by A.W.
Pink. Great preaching on this subject can be found at "Heaven & Hell" by
Charles Haddon Spurgeon at
//www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=8702112616 & "The Sinner's
End, Hell Opens Wide Her Jaws, the Sinner Falls To Destruction, Spurgeon"
at //www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=1014131452290; "A Few
Sighs From Hell" by John Bunyan at
//www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=112903233617; "The Eternity
of Hell Torments" by George Whitefield at
//www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=11307232342; Men Don't Regard
Warnings of Future Punishment As Hell Doesn't Seem Real - Edwards" at
//www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=1031121125362, "The Torments
of Hell Are Exceeding Great, A Rich Man Went to Hell and Was Tormented" at
//www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=51513154140, "They That Are
Gone to Hell Are All of Them in Despair, Eternal Damnation by Edwards" at
//www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=219131311338 & "Sinners in
the Hands of an Angry God" at
//www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=113003134610 by Jonathan
Edwards, "God's Hell" by John Wagner at
//www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=6501212239; "A Tour of Hell"
by E.A. Johnston at //www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=7251216250; other
great Biblical messages about the doctrine of Hell can be found at
//www.sermonaudio.com/search.asp?currSection=sermonstopic&keyworddesc=Hell&keyword=hell
.
See our newsletter on Hell with plenty of Biblical references on our
website //www.biblequery.org/ (once on the homepage click on the
"experience" box to the left then scroll down to the newsletter section &
click on "Turn or Burn."
The wicked hate the Biblical doctrine of Hell & will create any myth
to pretend it is not real or eternal in the conscious divine punishment of
the damned. "Be not deceived, GOD IS NOT MOCKED: For whatsover a man
soweth, that shall he also reap" (Galations 6:7). "VENGEANCE IS MINE; I
WILL REPAY SAITH THE LORD" (Rom. 12:19). "Keeping mercy for thousands,
forgiving iniquity and transgression and sin, and THAT WILL BY NO MEANS
CLEAR THE GUILTY" (Exodus 34:7). Jesus said, "It would have been good for
that man if he had not been born" (Matthew 26:24). Why would Jesus say this
if there wasn't something far worse waiting for that man after this life is
over? Interestingly enough, over the years many atheists have flocked to
our YouTube hell videos with unusual curiosity. Why do they bother if they
don't think it is real?
2 Timothy 2:15
Seventh-day Adventism was invented about the same time as Mormonism,
Jehovah's Witnesses, Christadelphians & others. See our video "RISE OF THE
CULTS: WHERE DID ALL THESE STRANGE AMERICAN RELIGIOUS SECTS COME FROM?" at
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfVTXbFrvh8&list=PL5316CC6F66F24283&index=15. See
our latest video on the Jehovah's Witnesses called "Who's Knocking? #2:
Jehovah's Witnesses Hidden History, Spiritism, Racism, Doctrines of Demons"
at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b9LFhzOb-_g&list=UUQ_EDvOtDAAWfCvGUhd6y3A.
Although this video is from a lecture I gave to one of my apologetic
classes back in the 1990s on the subject of Jehovah's Witnesses my video
man & myself spent weeks in editing this particular video (we usually edit
once a week for 4 to 5 hours). I decided to put the time & effort into
placing primary Jehovah's Witness source material into this video which
then made it into a very tedious project. Since I own many Jehovah's
Witness books that are over 100 years old & are little known I thought it
would be useful for viewers to see with their own eyes this material. With
knowledge of these original Watchtower publications true Christians can
then use this information as an effective tool in witnessing to Jehovah's
Witnesses who have been deceived by this false prophet organization (I even
included some of the court documents from Watchtower founder Charles Taze
Russell's divorce case with his wife Maria over his affair with an underage
female). Over the past 33 years I have been able, by God's grace, to lead
many people & families out of the Watchtower Bible & Tract Society. This
has been done not so much by arguing Bible verses with them (playing "Bible
ping pong") but by knowing their history (which they cannot change). Once
you can crack their faith in the Watchtower with their own history then
they are much more open to discussing what the Bible actually says rather
than what the Watchtower tells them the Bible says. Be prepared to meet the
Jehovah's Witnesses who come knocking at your door. 1 Peter 3:15, "But
sanctify the Lord God in your hearts: and be ready always to give an answer
to every man that asketh you a reason of the hope that is in you with
meekness and fear:"
Hundreds of thousands of Seventh-day Adventists have left Adventism after
realizing they've been duped by a false cult. There is now a mandate for
true Christians to learn how to minister to these spiritually deceived
victims. See "Former Seventh-day Adventist Pastor for 13 Years Gives His
Testimony Why Adventism is Wrong" at
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c37bNhYzdbE&index=1&list=PL5316CC6F66F24283,
"Is Sabbath Keeping Essential to Be a Real Christian? Former SDA Pastor
Answers This Question" at
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w0L3rSSL_H8&index=2&list=PL5316CC6F66F24283, "False
SDA Gospel of Ellen G. White Leads to Baby Abortions Just Like Planned
Parenthood" at
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7EsY1srHYJc&index=3&list=PL5316CC6F66F24283,
"Cult Doctrine of Seventh-day Adventism: 1844 Probation & Satan As A Final
Sin Bearer for Adventists" at
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J50HlZFYHtY&index=4&list=PL5316CC6F66F24283 &
"Did God Really Give Ellen G. White "Divine" Health Reform Visions From
Book of Revelation Angels?" at
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nhKoS2Fk1Y4&index=5&list=PL5316CC6F66F24283.
For further information see the websites www.TruthorFables.com,
www.GreatControversyExposed.com, www.ExAdventism.com &
www.LifeAssuranceMinistries.com. Email: [email protected]. Jude 3,
"Beloved, when I gave all diligence to write unto you of the common
salvation, it was needful for me to write unto you, and exhort you that ye
should earnestly contend for the faith which was once delivered unto the
saints."
It's always exciting to see the Sovereignty of God in action during true
evangelism activities. You don't need fake "sales techniques" to get
"converts." Recently SermonAudio put a testimony of a French lady who came
to the Lord out of Roman Catholicism through our videos on YouTube in their
"Staff Picks" section. You can hear "Testimony: Camille Jolly" at
//www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?sermonID=6414192554 (or on
YouTube at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-oXfZEP6hL4). Glory to God alone
for this.
Larry Wessels, Director, Christian Answers of Austin, Texas / Christian
Debater
YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/CAnswersTV
Home Church: Dayspring Fellowship, Austin, Texas //www.dsf.org/,
Reformed Baptist
Pastor: Greg Van Court at
//www.sermonaudio.com/search.asp?speakeronly=true&currsection=sermonsspeaker&keyword=Greg_Van_Court
2 Timothy 4:2-5
Based on your nonsense comment you evidently have not watched this video.
You have failed to answer arguments made against the false "prophetess"
Ellen White made in this video (or this complete series of videos for that
matter) or on such websites as EXADVENTIST COM or LIFEASSURANCEMINISTRIES
COM. You're as brain washed by this cult as any member of the Mormon
"Church," Jehovah's Witnesses, or any other false religious cult would be.
Your faith in Ellen White will not save you. Matthew 7:15.
Like anything this takes time & research. Please go to our YouTube channel
page CANSWERSTV & once on our homepage notice the right hand side of the
screen & scroll down past all our websites into the playlist section. Click
on the fifth playlist entitled "Dealing with Seventh-day Adventism & Their
"Prophetess" with 13 videos for much more info. Besides this research the
following websites: LIFEASSURANCEMINISTRIES ORG, EXADVENTIST COM &
GREATCONTROVERSYEXPOSED COM. Ellen White is not necessary.