Point break girl at the door Videos

this reminds me of that standoff with police that made national attention back in 1998 with that woman south of Springfield Illinois. They surrounded her house for over a week. Had roads blocked off........ all so they could ''take her to the doctor''. Of course there was nothing wrong with her and she was then released.

Well done, Michelle, for standing up for yourself. Remember, people, you have absolutely NOTHING TO LOSE by refusing to open the door to police, and EVERYTHING TO LOSE by opening it to them. Let them break it down before you open it to them.

Dumb corrupt pieces of stinking dog shit. No one will give a shit enough to even go to your funerals.

What???...COPS TRYING TO TAKE SOMEONE TO THEIR DOCTOR????..OH SHIT!

kill those cops. assassinate them

An order to see a doctor?

G

You real as FUK and vampire hunter d is the shit

+Roy_Thousand It's true ain't it brother?....the worst thing a man can do is live a lie.

Bad example dude, TW fucked himself... If childish behavior is what you're defending, then why don't you just go Transgender and be a woman instead of supporting practicing and defending hypocrisy... Its kinda like voting democrat all your fucked up life, then sitting around bitching about the president... You voted for him (in this example), set the president for her... This mindset is the pathetic underbelly of many a MGTOW... Have a shitty character (no matter how you defend it), then bitch about others (whoever, whatever gender, etc.) Stop defending, supporting and practicing shitty character...

+17seventySIX Also, once his dad died he had no foundation to lean on.

I've been saying the same thing for years

+17seventySIX Yes, he lost most of what he had...

+Everist Mister Yes... well... education is another thing entirely. I believe his main point was that for some people, things go in one ear and out the other. Which, as I say, is OK. People should have the right to ignore information if they so choose. But they shouldn't have the right to complain about it later when it comes to bite them in the ass.This is why I pity no one. Not even myself and when I look back at the stupid decisions I made. They were stupid, because hindsight is 20:20. At the time, with the information I had, they were actually good decisions. It's just that I didn't have all the info, unfortunately. And I now realize it.The only thing I'm ticked off at is that there was no one there at the time to give me some good info or advice. I might have made a better decision. Knowing what I know now... I definitely would.But as they say... "Every school has it's price." Or maybe... every 'education' has it's price. I just hope that people looking at all of the MGTOW videos and stuff also realize that it too is a type of school. And it is up to them to decide how much they will absorb. If they go all gung-ho red pill and not fully understand what that means... it could also hurt them too. Remember Cypher? He wanted to be plugged back into the matrix and forget everything. He would have been happier and would have done alot less damage if he never swallowed the red pill.Still... so far I don't have much of anything to complain about the MGTOW community. Mostly they are not fanatical, they are seeking the truth, and are still open enough to discuss it. Not a bad combination, and I hope it stays that way. Ultimately, the truth stands up to scrutiny, and when it is out in the open and can be discussed without retribution, people definitely feel more freedom... and hopefully that will improve things for everyone.

+Omega Joe hes talking about education and uneducating people. 

+Everist Mister I think that we are confusing truth with reality here. For instance - "1+1=2" may be an example of truth - one defined by mathematicians. Ignoring it or saying "I don't give a damn" won't really mean much in the short term. It might mean something when you have to count your money though...But, if you are standing in the middle of a highway, and you see an 18 wheeler truck barreling at you at 70 miles an hour... well, now that is reality, and you ignore it at your own peril.So where does the "red pill" lie on such a spectrum. For the most part, most MGTOWs view the red pill as an awareness of the true nature of the female mindset, her motivations, her thought patterns, etc. For the most part, it is what many MGTOWs believe is the 'truth' about female nature. As such, it can (either in whole or in part) be either accepted or rejected by people. I think (hopefully) the discussion on these forums is to try to make the red pill as close to reality as possible. It benefits no one to paint a wrong picture about reality. Imagining that the truck coming at you is a butterfly will not help.I for one am starting to believe that the 'red pill' is actually a fairly accurate portrait of women... TODAY. Maybe not in the past or all time, but I do believe it is accurate for most modern westernized women today.Does that mean that everyone has to accept it? No of course not. Just like you don't have to accept 1+1=2. The point is that everyone should be free to either accept or reject this information... but they should do to knowingly. For example, I could decide to climb Mount Everest. I may KNOW that it is dangerous, but ultimately it is up to my friends to warn me and it is up to me to decide what to do with my own life. The same goes for deciding what kind of relationships I should have with women or whether or not I should marry one.I am against anyone here trying to force a red pill down a blue pill man's throat just as much as I am against anyone trying to withhold the red pill from the blue pill man in the first place. Ultimately, it should be the responsibility of the man himself to decide if he should swallow the red pill or not... just like Neo did. THIS, I believe, is the essence of MGTOW. Freedom to choose your own way in life based on the best information (ie the best picture of reality) that you have at the current time.

Have you read 1984? There are ways to uneducate a man...cruel ways.

+Rich X what if the man allready knew the truth and didnt give a fuck?I have heard a lot of "truth", why should it change me? You make it sound like all truths are on the same scale as "the woman you fucked last knight was god"

yeah , superior at being c*nts ...

+Greyfoxdbz18 There is no concrete reliable documentation that proves he ever said or even thought such thing.

+Sandman traditional? no, fuck traditions, it holds back progress. Masculine women? a Teslas time, do you really believe that

+Greyfoxdbz18 They were superior if they stuck to their traditional gender roles. But they didn't so he wasn't interested in masculine women

+Greyfoxdbz18 you asked a question, i answered it and asked you something, relax

+Everist Mister You really think I'll bite with that lame ass baiting?

+Greyfoxdbz18 yeah, so what?

like really nikka

+HiImJames wait you work for $15 a hour and your talking shit on the internet boy get the fuck outta here broke ass hillbilly

U some ugly ass nigga

+Fergal Bálor obviously dont care lmao i work bud for $15 and im 20 so lmk when you catch up

+HiImJames says the school shooting white boy anyways you obviously don't watch wrestling to understand the name so go take that weak shit somewhere else

+Fergal Bálor do realize your name is complete shit and you irrelevant

Do realize how old this video is get the fuck out

That's not even funny

Tru it is his daily job and life wtf

Yeah but for him it's different, he does it everyday and it is practically his job.

Not really compared to EA's NHL 15.

Stfu

+Vade SynQ that is actually true 

This "game" is how he makes his money for a living.

Well games get frustrating sometimes

+Andrew Thigpen isn't that basically in all games name one game that didn't had no mistakes glitches or anytying like that

Some people aren't like you. They get pissed off when things don't make sense in games.

Why does everyone think this is funnny? Pizza guy just wants to go home and blaze not get teased.

Holy shit. Fuckin' Fatty McFatterson. Delivery guy undoubtedly went back to his car and puked.

invite him in for a blowjob and stick ur finger up his butt! that would be funny

I wonder where cute ladies were at when I delivered pizzas?

this girl would be a lot of fun in bed

Bet he likes his job a lot more now.

somebody needs to do some squats

Ewwww? Your gay bob. She's hot!

That lucky pizza delivery guy

Was that a fucking chicken??

Chunky but funky. lol

she needs to fuck 

Miley Cyrus butt ha

u girls are badd

uhm...ew!

Very nice

very hot

Sexy

+leon scott heres a simple solution, own a firearm, a tazer, and pepper spray. you have a right to defend your loved ones

+Freeflow says you. I know Jim layhe and George green. they are terrible cops...... jk lol

+Freeflow ok that's fair

+leon scott Wrong, American police behave like military soldiers occupying a foreign nation when dealing with selective neighborhoods.  I live in Canada, and our police behaves very professional compared to American cops.  Not once will you see a police officer do something this stupid as arresting a naked women and dragging her out of her apartment.

+Freeflow yes, eventually

+leon scott Really? You think cops in other countries all behave like American police? Do you see any difference between American police and 3rd world countries police? I sure don't.

+Simone Dethrow Woman in tennessee watched as TENNESSEE deputy's beat her husband by the side of a road one night,she told how three TENNESSEE deputy's where beating,kicking and spraying him until he was bloody from his head to his feet,she thought they were going to kill her and her husband because he was unconscious.She said as bad as that was its what one of the deputy's did was shocking and disgusting she said he took out his penis and started masturbating in-front of her she said his eyes where rolled back into his head and sweat was running down his face and he looked like he had went insane,the other two deputy's grabbed him threw him into the patrol car and left with her husband laying in a ditch unconscious from the beating.She was to scared to report it so only after her husband died did she come forward and tell what happened that night own a dark road and TENNESSEE deputy's,TENNESSEE is full of story's like hers where tennessee police have beaten and murdered people over the years of how men were beaten to death on chain-gangs and blacks being terrorized and killed by police who where just paid thugs and criminals themselves.Sad thing is TENNESSEE still has ole deputy's like BILLY BOB EARL and officer BOBBY JOE LITTLE JOHN around and where you find evil,cruel,despicable men you will find TENNESSEE LAW ENFORCEMENT.

+Kara Ramirez Yeah. It's going to have to be a real tough situation before I call some cops. If someone's sick, I have our areas ambulance number. Because they might get shot otherwise. I'm definitely NOT going to call some cops if I "hear a disturbance". I don't want people dieing because I was the retard who called the cops.

Exactly. They use that as an excuse to abuse innocent people.

Thank you and also why is there 50 cops arresting one women that's naked, THATS THE REASON SHE WAS RESETTING,

+Dombowerphoto It is. Back in the day when people would resist unlawful arrests and cops died because of that, those people would get self-defense charges. Cause, let's be honest, that's what it was.

+dynomitekid100If I got into a fight with someone in public, there is no way I'd plead guilty if I was defending myself. The problem with today's criminal justice system, is that the blame always gets pinned on a party during a criminal involved situation. Cops pull this same shit when a husband and wife are arguing in a house. The cops will arrest the man if the wife is yelling at him, and the man doesn't even have to be making any noise. This is why I am going into law school, because it helps you outsmart the system by knowing your rights.I would have told the judge AND the jury that I was using "self defense", and I got jumped by the gang. In the United States, you are allowed to use self defense. It doesn't matter if you get charged for fighting in public, they will typically drop it if you use this defense. The whole "fighting in public" bullshit charge is to keep the streets clean from people that just want to pick on people for no reason. This is why the country of Australia has bar fights all the time, and its because their system doesn't nit pick on this stuff.

Notice the judge also wanted to get some kind of "conviction" out of the deal--so he offered to toss the arrest if you performed "community service". He was "in" on the whole deal---the many delays were to set you up for the agreement. This is done here more often than not. One public defender verbally admonished you for wanting a jury trial--a recognized Constitutional right. If the trials are burdensome then they should stop the minor arrests. I personally know an attorney who is letting a man spend his ice behind bars for a sex crime he did not commit because the man cannot afford his prices. Pretty sorry individual I'd say. Re the arrest--it still is on your record as there is no such thing as an arrest being expunged--that only hides it form the eyes of the public but official agencies can still see it. You should have insisted on a trial--you would have been no worse off!

+JoshCube2 the first day I went to court I requested for a public defender. I was being charged for disorderly conduct. But keep in mind public defenders usually are overwhelmed with cases. So they do not hold the same bearing as if I had the money for a private lawyer. The five times I went to court i must have talked to three different public defenders of the day alongside each time there was a different DA. None of them even read my case until my name was called. Each time I arrive at 7 a.m. i waited in court for about five hours just for a public defender to talk to me for three minutes outside the court room asking if I wanted to plead guilty. Every time I said no I should not feel forced to plead guilty or pay any fines just for defending myself in return i would receive a pink slip stating to return back about a wek later each time. On the fourth time I went to court one public defender wanted to throw the case out but the DA for that morning said no. I came back for the fifth time a week later. This time I requested a jury trial. The public defender was mad at me as she mentioned she had more important cases to deal with. This is because courts feel jury trials for a low misdemeanor charge cost to much money and are time consuming. The public defender tried to intimidate me by mentioning that I can do six months of jail time if convicted guilty. I would not give in until I finally spoke to the judge. He actually gave me my dignity as he did acknowledge about how I was upset and disappointed over the cop who arrested me. He offered that if I do 40 hours of community service he would throw the case out with no misdemeanor conviction. So I agreed just because the amount of time that I was wasting showing up to court each week was wearing me out and time consuming as I had work and school to manage. The system is just confusing because I pleaded no contest to get the case dismissed agreeing to do community service. I felt that I should not have even done that and the case should have been dropped the first day I went to court. I understand why public defenders are called public pretenders. But keep on mind often times people plead guilty over crimes they did not commit because they want to just get the case over with or do not have the time and resources to deal with the court system. Just because you are provided with a public defender dosnt mean everything will be okay. If my job did not allow me to take one day out of the week for the next five to spend in a court room I would have had no choice but to plead guilty and pay fines for a charge that I did not commit. 

The current standard for detention is--1. The person IS committing a crime. 2. The person is ABOUT to commit a crime. 3. The person has committed a crime in the past and that crime is known to the officer. There is NO provision for detention under any other circumstance. "Suspicion" is not a cause for detention--see Brown v Texas. 

People are arrested because they are suspected of committing an offence worthy of arrest.What I will say is if someone needs to be brought in, the cops should first allow them to come peacefully, no cuffs, not yelling, just "You're suspected of a hit and run, would you please come with us to the station so we can sort this out."

That's a nice thought but if your in this kind of situation resisting arrest is probably not gonna make things better for you.

+Robert WatsonNot true as. ie marijuana on a coffee table. fair game. cops rummages through drawer and finds drugs. illegal search and seizure. This is why search warrants are very specific. Same goes for your car or any thing in your possession.This is the number 1 reason cops always snoop with their flashlights. Weapons or anything in plain site is fair game.

Am I free to go? if the answer is no--activate your fifth amendment rights.

+Socially UncensoredWrong sir. Miranda w/ arrest is a product of Hollywood. Miranda is only warranted prior to an interrogation. Stop quoting movies.

It is interesting comment. In Louisiana a citizen may make an arrest for a felony ONLY-committed in or out of the citizen's presence. The procedure is to tell them the same thing the police would-"You are under arrest". If they submit--then the citizen must turn the arrestee over to the nearest police officer and he or another officer is required to help you fill out the paper work. I've yet to talk to an officer who has had this happen. Should an officer try to arrest someone illegally it is only a misdemeanor. However--any illegal detention of one citizen by another while the one doing the detaining is armed--is a felony. So one could arrest and officer who is performing an illegal arrest. It would be a good idea to study case law in your state to see how the courts have viewed this before trying for real.

+Z200a Its the same as your rights afforded under citizen's arrest but the biggest problems are (1) a non-police person doesn't have immunity so even though they can exercise this right they have to be willing to go to jail to do it. They have to also call the police when it happens which is why it is so important that this be done collectively because they'll show up and shoot you! They'll always side with their own if you're all alone...you have to ask that a supervisor come to the scene and even if other officers show up you have to release him into their custody which is really nothing at all because they'll turn around and arrest you for assault on a officer, obstruction for keeping them from arresting somebody else along with a bunch of other things. You have to do it collectively or get yourself on tape....I've seen it done...it works to a point, it's not perfect but you can definitely detain an officer if they're doing way way too much or if they're being unlawful...you just have to be able to prove it and you need community support because they'll kill you.

There are laws in place to deal with this type of thing but it is expensive, time consuming, and emotionally draining. The system is counting on you not having the time or money do mount an effective defense. You can file a civil rights suit yourself by downloading the forms off the net, paying a filing fee, and then simply showing up in court (federal). To prevail you must show two things--1. Your rights were violated 2. It was done under color of law. If case law is well established in your favor then the issue is cut and dried--again in your favor. See St. John vs McColley as an example of how to pursue your own civil rights case.

+Robert Watson It's bureaucracy because the law enforcement agencies have full discretionary rights on everything and the same agency that enforces also reviews it's own practices to see if they're lawful...everything happens through law enforcement during the investigatory phases. If you want to prosecute a cop the office will tell you to first file a complaint with the police department. Even the city's council can't directly do anything without first waiting for good old internal affairs. There are no real non-police counterpart with internal affairs who have knowledge on the law and police procedure to ask the questions we as citizens want to ask and review practices. There is no representation for non-police at the investigatory level after a officer incident....It takes a lot to charge cops with anything unless the people collectively address every situation and I do mean COLLECTIVELY...try visiting the police department 60 or 70 strong or going down to the court's clerk office 70 strong asking for forms to file a complaint against a officer...nobody does that...they just march which is good for attention but what next?

The Supreme Court has said (more than once) that ALL warrantless entries are presumptively illegal and in such a case the entry is not looked at favorably. The authorities must justify their actions.

your right if you open door and let them in it's like giving permission also if they get any call to a home and you do not answer there knock and door is unlocked they can come in at least I know in Illinois they can but they normally have a specific address they are called to and not like these cops just searching for a disturbance in a general area

Officers are not stating what the charges are in a timely fashion because they're making their case as they go along. Everything starts with a allegation they can either prove or not prove...they show up and interview you to determine your credibility and somewhere along the line if they detect things aren't adding up they become "interested in you." The time between them becoming interested in you and actually making a formal arrest is taking way longer than 15 min...sometimes longer than 20 min. You can't tell when the actual detention started...its supposed to start when you don't feel free to leave but isn't that the same as arrest! So if you won't let me leave but you have no reason to talk to me you certainly will find a reason by the time our conversation is up and you will arrest me for something even as petty as "resisting" or "obstruction" when in the beginning you had no reason to talk to me in the first place other than your "interest." I'm being sarcastic but that's generally the play book, yep yep.

* Probable

There's a big difference between false arrest (or "unlawful arrest") and an innocent person being detained. Warrants are issued for innocent people all the time, and then of course there's probably cause. In this case a bruised child's complaint gives them that, even if it was a lie. She was resisting a legitimate detainment, they overdid it by dragging her out of her apartment and all that, but now (If it's true, if she really wasn't opening the door and fighting the officers) she doesn't have a case against the PD. If that ever happens to you, just go and demand your lawyer right away. Right away. Don't let them talk you out of it, they'll say they'll try. I can't stress that enough. Even if they do charge you pre-emptively, charges can be dropped in a second. Until you're arraigned, nothing's on your record.. Not even an arrest. Be smart, *call* your lawyer, don't try to fight the cops.

NEVER---for any reason--voluntarily allow the police to enter your dwelling. If you do--you have surrendered ALL your search and seizure rights---as they may then search your house at their discretion and leisure--and charge you with anything they find. Most homes have bomb making materials in them and this can be used to generate a temporary arrest. 

a public pretender is funny they work for the county and office is just down hall from DA and yes they do have to read your right I have family who worked in lawyer's offices, court house and my great uncle was an officer and my grandpa was a deputy for short time and he talks crap about police all the time I have been questioned before  for no reason in ky I wasn't charged with anything even though I was being a smart ass officer swore he got call about fighting neighbors told me he stood at my door listening for 20 minutes  when he did knock I did not let him in but told him I would come out and speak to him he told me to turn around so he could check me for bruises I complied but laughed at him and told him I was more aggressive than my hubby he said I was too small to be like that I then told him we were watching a movie and only let him look in the house to see my hubby and children sitting next to my spot with my blanky in it and that's just one time the same officer bothered us till we moved back to my home town my hubby thinks he had other intentions and actually asked him one day who he was trying to sleep with him or me lol neither of us was ever charged though when he would show up but I think officers should be drug tested and psychiatric evaluation on regular basis too many get on power trips or having a bad day and take it out on others and of course I have had some great officers really be there when we needed like last month when my dope headed sister took off with two kids she has no rights to and they searched all night long kept me updated had me call them if I found out anything they even tried to help calm me down and in the end the twins were safe at home  and no I didn't press the charges I told my sister I would never again try to help her get clean and took her to her friends house and haven't looked back   

They wouldn't know a suspect is innocent. Otherwise they wouldn't be arresting them. Most "resisting" charges do get dropped if the other charges get dropped unless the cop's a douche or you were a douche and provoked the douche. A much better strategy is to stay calm, and get your lawyer right away. When the lawyer comes in the interrogation room it's like the cops are back in 5th grade and the bell just rang. Not only will he destroy the state's case on police misconduct of some sort, but he could ruin the cop's career. In fact if I were a defense attorney (Generally they make less money, unless you're the defense attorney to the elite, doing a lot of white collar crimes) I would love to witness a cop assaulting my client, cause I'm filing a civil suit the second the courthouse opens. Those police brutality cases settle for a nice amount of cash, and the lawyer takes home at least 20%, and the state winds up paying for the cops actions but the cop loses his job and pension.However, those lawsuits are very hard to win if it's just your word against or if it looks like you provoked it. Go quietly and call your lawyer, it's his job to make the police uncomfortable and get you compensated for any damages.

What kind of "resisting arrest" do you think should be legal? Should you be able to shoot the police? Or how exactly would this legal resistance to arrest work? 

+mysticdragonwolf89 +JoshCube2 +Socially UncensoredIn this case, even though Josh is a complete nutter and I disagree with his opinions, he is correct. You only have to be read your rights if you are going to be questioned.  The warning is there to protect your rights and inform you that you can request a lawyer for counsel and to speak for you.  You can be thrown in a cop car and taken to jail without being read your rights as long as the cops don't ask you questions. //supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/384/436/

You're supposed to have the right to resist unlawful police arrest...the only problem is you have to do it collectively for it to be effective. One person doing it just gets him or her in trouble...30 people doing it just means they have to call SRT in which requires approval from higher. Higher will ask "how is it you went to one persons house on a call and we ended up with SRT for the whole unit. That's when supervisors and such start using their heads and throwing their own under the bus to protect their jobs because they know people aren't going to stand for it. Everybody has to be committed to stopping the police action..you can't have squeamish people saying "I don't wan to get involved."

Once you are under arrest--you MUST be advised of your rights. This may be sooner or later--but this will have to take place for any information obtained (during questioning) to be used in court against you. The exception is if you voluntarily and KNOWINGLY waive your rights.

+Robert Watson they only have to Mirandize if they are interrogating, not when arresting.

Everybody says they're not guilty. How are you to tell, on the street, whether they are out not? Just let them go when they resist? What if they just raped your mom?

You only have to be informed of your rights at some time during the arrest process. The police can wait until you are in the booking area before "Marandizing" you. YOU--must enforce your rights--if you do not--you surrender them. NEVER talk to the police without counsel---NEVER.

+DeagleBeagle You sound like a good obedient little boy. Aren't ya?

+JoshCube2No no, they must read you your rights before they arrest you. 

+SiLvErWaRe0000You're lucky if you've never went through a situation like that, and I hope you never will, or I'll guarantee that you'll be pissed.

Tens of thousands are arrested every day having committed NO crime---and the courts go along with it.

+zero If you didn't do anything you shouldn't be arrested.

she abused her child though. also there was lots of noise coming from the room probable cause

Zero---if you are not committing a crime--there is no legal arrest nor can the police legally "detain" you. You cannot be charged with "resisting arrest" if you are not arrested.

If the police had no RAS then the arrest is illegal on its' face. It is a travesty of our "justice" system that this is permitted by the courts. Proper enforcement of the law will stop all this over night.

you don't have to commit a crime to be charged with resisting arrest. its legal

I've never understood how someone could have resisting arrest as the only charge. In order to resist arrest you must be under arrest. If there isn't another charge then you couldn't have been under arrest and thus could not resist the arrest.

"you're"

+JoshCube2 Public defenders?? They are there to plead you guilty---not "defend" you.

+DombowerphotoAsk the police. They risk-asses the situation and adjust their arrest tactics accordingly.If their call was about a homicidal maniac of a woman waving a gun and threatening to kill her children, you can expect a rather decisive arrest deployment if you're mistaken for that person.Which obviously sucks, but it's still a reasonable decision, and just a mistake.

+DeagleBeagle If you are being being arrested as an innocent and ask why they are going to hurt you. That is the problem asking why is resistance.

which is basically 99% of the people being questioned/arrested by police. That's just stupid because everyone always claims to not be guilty of anything even when caught red handed.. Guess you didn't think that one through when typing..

if you did not do anything you should not be resisting arrest

No that's stupid. lol

I hear an amendment to the constitution coming on.

+dynomitekid100 sucks doesn't it....But seriously that was a messed up situation and it doesn't help when the victim is again victimized by the "people" who are supposed to help us.

+Dombowerphoto I did not say anything about this video. I said your idea was silly. Don't confuse the two. I think the arrest, from the information we have, is ridiculous. That said, you cannot implement a rule that says that, if you're not guilty, you get to resist arrest, because it is impractical. If the police come to get you, you comply, and then defend yourself within the legal system. In theory, at least. Of course, if the cops are there to kill you, by all means, resits, but it isn't legal. 

+Blah b I'm not some chav, I'm a former regional judo champion. I would intervene calmly, I'm kinda Zen like that, if the cops were not receptive to reason, and chose conflict, they'd get some.

+DeagleBeagle Police brutality is the choice of the officer in question, it's sad that the system enables it also, but cops have the choice of whether to be assholes or not. 

+dynomitekid100 You do realize you could have filed a major lawsuit for not being read your maranda rights and for not being appointed a lawyer since you couldn't afford one.  

+Belz Zebuthsitting in your house doing nothing, or as in this video in your house in your underware... why does that require a forced arrest?

How do they know you're not guilty until the trial ? Sorry but that's a silly idea.Police should act more responsibly, is what should happen.

+engineeredlifeformAnd you'd have received baton-to-face-therapy before getting arrested and getting done for assaulting a police officer....Look long enough and you'll find plenty similar loud disturbances in the UK. Watch Brit Cops or something, similar stuff every other episode as some chav decides he owns the world and doesn't need to obey the law.

+engineeredlifeformIn the vast majority of cases once they are handcuffed you don't see any police brutality, because they have already been restrained. Unfortunately in America you have to trust police, that is just how our system works. Unless you think we should have no cops then you can't really disagree with that. If you break out of a cop's car or assault them while in handcuffs you are breaking the SYSTEM, not the cop. So in summation the system is at the root of your "problem", not the cops. It is best to just not resist and fight it in the courts, statistically speaking. Especially since resisting arrest will only land you in deeper shit unless you happen to be superman and can take on 12 cops with weapons and then live the rest of your life in another country.

+DeagleBeagle It's a little late to argue with the cops once you're cuffed. We've seen cops cuff people, then throw them to the ground, then pin them, punch them, and kick them. I'm glad British cops don't carry guns, if I want to resist arrest, I'm perfectly capable. If I'd seen British cops act that way, I'd have intervened, using force if necessary. 

+DeagleBeagle no they Hurst people. Slammed the cuffs on me and didn't double lock them. Had tingling in my pinky and index finger for over a year. Unless you been there experienced abuse from lawcenforcement stay in your cubby hole and keep your mouth shut.

Cops act like they got so much balls when its 10 cops on 2 adults and two children. How about drop your gun, baton, oc spray, flashlight and go one on one with a grown man and not a four year old Make sure after you get your ass kicked don't play bitch and file an arrest just to compensate your cowardness.

+dynomitekid100 Did you try seeking a public defender? They're for people that can't afford a lawyer. By the way, what misdemeanor did they charge you with? I'm assuming they charged you for fighting in public, but its not a crime to defend yourself. By the way, the cops don't need to read your rights when arresting you, its a myth.

Why? Unless during the arrest they are hurting you when you aren't resisting arrest there is no point to resisting arrest. Especially when you are highly outnumbered and outweaponed.

Dam right. I got arrested after a got jumped by some thugs. After I didvm everything to defend myself I was knocked unconscious. The guys who beat me took off when the cops showed up. As I got back to conscious one of the pigs started yelling at me to walk back to the direction in which the guys who jumped me ran off to. I explained to the officer that going back to thatcm street wasn't safe and can I just walk to the hospital. He then slammed the cuffs on me, did not read me my rights and arrested me. I never Been arrested in my life and do my best to be a good citizen. To make things worse I spent the night and day in jail on the hard floor with that dirty ass bkanket as I was in so much pain after getting jumped earlier. After getting released I was charged for a misdemeanor and had to go to court. I couldn't afford a lawyer so I had to show up to court five different times just to get the case thrown out after I agreed to do community service. Only becausecshowing up to court every week was wearing me out and I was loosing money from work. I hated the fact that i did nothing wrong to be arrested and still had to deal with the system. Thanks Long Beach PD for making my spring of 2012 miserable.

+Eliseo LopezI am never on the police side unless they act according to the law... which is not very often... fuck them

+Sebastian Gałowiecki what?? ur on the police side?? omg. nasty nigga. F the police. they tazed him 4 times

+Husleag Alexandru You niggas are fucked up lolI hope the police will kill you all

Ouch that hurt...

+Hugh Janus stfu nigger

in other words , treason and contempt

+Pinche Pendejo Exigent circumstances does not apply. Exigent circumstances has very strict rules to be followed. For example if the Public Trustees hear a cry for help, or see a body on the floor. Exigent circumstances is not a catch all around all. And no the Public Trustees did not have the authority to Operate Outside of Oath and Jurisdiction Under Color of Law. All of these so called Public Trustees committed Damage and Harm, Theft, and Fraud.

+SouperScrotum really?

F I N A L O U T C O M E :Second American RevolutionLiberty = Peace & I pray you always enjoy both!

Cops fired. Lawsuit settled.

+Leonard Chornomaz Right its like an unfinished movie

+dXb The Public Trustees do not have a right do break and enter based solely on third party hearsay. We the People have the Right not to accept any offer of service. The Public Trustees are by law required to have a Forth Amendment warrant signed by a District Circuit Judge to enter.

+dXb Domestic violence and emotional abuse are behaviors used by one person in a relationship to control the other. Partners may be married or not married; heterosexual, gay, or lesbian; living together, separated or dating. What you are talking about is child abuseso as soon as both of them said that where was no domestic violence happening, the police should have left, and even before that they are not allowed to enter the residence without a warrant.

I didn't say they did. I responded to the person that said they needed a warrant or reasonable suspicion. There's other reasons that gives an officer the right to go in... like I said exigent circumstances.

+froochie123 and there wasnt any... everyone was there saying everything was ok showing themselves and talking to the cops through the window...

+nickda1 they don't need a warrant if they have exigent circumstances.

+dXb they need a warrant to enter buildings no warrant no entry simple i think you need to read the law

+Kirk Anderson they can with exigent circumstances... it kids being abused. UT they'd have to hear them screaming or something

+Forrest Freeman ur missing the point bro... state statute does not and cannot trump the Constitution. They cannot enter your house without a warrant unless there is reasonable suspicion... some neighbor calling to make a report is not reasonable suspicion it is hearsay... so sorry bro but you are wrong

+Kirk Anderson I do want to start by saying I don't have much respect for most cops..... However, you are wrong. Police under state statute can and do enter a house for a report of domestic violence. They can't search closed closets, open cabinets ect.. They can (and do) check for signs of a struggle or obvious signs some sort of altercation has taken place. BUT.. ya got a line of coke on the coffee table in plane site.... Its a jail you'll be a going. Hope this helps.

A alligation means they respond... they cannot forcibly enter without a warrent... 4th amendment : people have the right to be secure in their persons houses papers and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated and no warrants shall issue but upon probable cause.. Meaning They cannot enter without a warrant.. A call from a neighbor is hearsay and is not probable cause

Kevin are you 12 or just autistic do some research about domestic violence before you comment

Obviously you two retards don't know how domestic violence works.

You're worse than stupid. The wife even said there's no domestic violence in the house, couldn't you hear you nazi loving fuck boy?

Hey buddy, you just blow in from stupid town?

+Kevin T blacks like to date white women...and they have a choice..they think it makes the higher in the social tree...no pun intended.

+dabsforsleep I wouldn't know, fagot.  I'm getting stoned like a dumbass fagot and uploading it to youtube.  Why?

+luke cage is retardedExcept I just flushed something that was 1000 times smarter than you;ll ever be pathetic, stalking, no life, no job, no girlfriend, loser, fagot, dog fucker.  Or should I say Lucifer Homosexual or John Smith wishes he was Luke Cage instead of a pathetic stalking fagot with no life?  What's the matter, that dog won't let you rape him anymore, you filthy reprobate?  Don't forget to kill yourself, loser!!!  Just end it, its the only solution to your pathetic non-existence.