Check url Videos

+paulczar I don't really know anything about the situation, but I would imagine that if what you said was true, then the url has grown substantially within the time period. For instance they do streaming now, and they buy bigger venues out. That would allow them to pay battle rappers more

+paulczar I'm pretty sure they locked in Lux for 2 battles so it's prob more towards 60-70. Clips prob got 30. Crazy though seriously for how much they get. This only raises their value just being on that card alone. So clips will go get 10-15k from other leagues once a month just to put on a bullshit performance

Did you read my comment? I hear what you're saying, but look at what I said. I used the words "general consensus," "ballpark," "in the range of'" etc... I never said I know this as fact. I never said I know exactly what they were paid. Of course I don't know that. But, we do know actual numbers when it comes to how much other top tier battlers have been laid in recent history. We also know from older videos, the kinds of numbers they were saying we're out of the question years ago, and today we see these numbers being mentioned with mid level battlers. We also know how much SM5 tickets and PPV cost, and how many people attended and purchased PPV. If you think I'm way off base with my estimated, ballpark, general range, educated guess of what they were most likely probably maybe paid, then what number do you reason they were paid?

+paulczar ....How do you know what he was paid? He told you that? Did you see the bank transaction? I need to know how you know first hand, not, what some other man said, tell my how you know what he got paid?

+Sean P4P try more towards 60. Crazy honestly

+Armenianhunni ..They would be where they are today, Lux, was popping until the battle with Calico, listen to the interview.

+Armenianhunni oh he's gettin that now, or around there!

+Demarcus Mack hahaha

Yep, Def his twin lol

The Earth's resources are not running out. Although this seems strange, when humans are faced with scarcity, price signals direct them towards alternatives in a way that is economically efficient. The USA had a bit of an energy crisis looming, but then they discovered Shale gas, and now have enough reserves to keep them going for hundreds of years. Yes, global warming is a serious problem, but it does not mean that we stop trying to achieve economic growth and improvements in living standards.

@funnyguise WHATs so hard in realizing the fact that there is not a single respected scientific body on this planet that would agree with that "sceptical" doubts? Your messiahs are lobbyists and "rightwing"fatass thinktanks, rush limbaughs, monckton, fox noise all created by fossil fuel scumbags. WHATs so hard to see through that? Finally a real, sneaky, DANGEROUS, important(!) +obvious CONSPIRACY. But you "truthers" look up in the sky because a misterious voice whispers about flying unicorns.

I understand your point in terms of price mechanisms. But please consider fossil fuel subsidies designed to mitigate price rises , huge mechanical reliance on FFuels etc. You overestimate the abilities of technological efficiencies as a means to achieve reductions of ecological impacts. Consider and research: Technological rebound& Relative vs absolute decoupling In order to achieve carbon reductions in a growth economy we require unprecedented levels of efficiency reductions never seen before

@aerobique It's been well documented that CO2 FOLLOWS warming. It doesn't create it. Plants love CO2. More plants more food. We aren't even close to the temperatures of the Medieval warm period. If you're happy to be taxed on your own breath, you go ahead and follow Obama, Gore et al., who are the other side of the same corporate coin run by the banks. Let's talk about carbon MONOxide, fluoride, aspartame, vaccines, etc. Now there are some pollutant to be alarmed about. saying shut up is weak

@funnyguise "taxing breath" ? lol? no it´s SAD and you guys repeat always the same ridiculous PR-attacks Im sorry but you "skeptics" are naive and LAZY "useful idiots" for a really a-moral corporate machine&politics. I mean just look WHO the people are that push the "cimate doubts".LOOK and RESEARCH. It is NOT HARD to find out where the wind is blowing. BTW: Alex jones &Co (the"mainstream resistance" lol!)WONT do that for you! They make their money by selling FEAR &creepy conspiracy stories.

@Minnesnowtakid i would think any economic reality that ignores things like possible global warming (or cooling depending on your camp) poisoning of the oceans and air in non-warming ways, depletion of vital resorces for trinkets and early replacement of trinkets,starvation on a mass scale etc is in no way economical. Maybe anti-economical. infinite growth potential in a finite space (our current economic basis) defines a black hole better than an economy, sorry for the truth hurting but DUH.

@jhunted7667 i think you are absolutely correct jhunted7667, too many humans put 'faith' in science rather than participate in science. and that is very very sad, yes. your faith in god is not incompatible with science, it is merely less relevant to humanity's survival in the long term than science and the utilization of its methodology. Its not hard to learn how to apply the scientific method to anything, and realizing you don't know the answer is not a bad thing. stop chastising yourself.

@IntuitiveLeap A "dietary requirement"? No, it's not. What money IS is a medium of exchange. A placeholder for value. The numerical basis on which to weight decisions without the requirement of knowing and calculating all possible information. "Profit" is the measure of benefit. The difference between productive work and busywork. One needn't keep their profits to themselves, but its role in the formula is essential. We may find an eventual substitute but we should fear its forceful removal.

@wrangman It *is* an issue. One of many. It's the one he's most passionate about, but even at the end, he listed a bunch of others. But the environmentalism aspect still isn't the point... he's saying our entire economic system, from government to companies to consumers, either doesn't think about the future or focuses on an endless consumer-growth future. He argues that it's time we all -- at every level -- starting thinking about the future in a smarter way. We need a new way of thinking.

words, we're all good for the most part, but we're good in different ways. How we'll be good isn't predictable. And an economy must, above all things, be perfectly predictable. If the Economy is going to fluctuate (which it always will), it must at least do so logically. There's no logical, no "optimum", form of altruism. For one person, an investment of 1% of profits in the public wheal is sane and logical gift; for another, nothing short of 100% is. If the benefits of an investment are

s in which humans from all cultures and upbringings will behave when we're being selfish is about the only universal predictors of human behavior we have (all you have to do is read international news to know that). He correctly points out that the selfishness-oriented system we live under ignores a vast swath of the "good" attributes of our nature; but his mistake, I think, is to presume that these "good" attributes are as intrinsic to our nature as our selfishness and greed. In other

@IntuitiveLeap Amazing how you derived all that from my simple statement. Which part of it shows my 10+ years of volunteer service, my bachelor's degree, and the experience I've had with the entire range of people in the first world? ok now change your diaper and go back to bed. And yes, you do need logic to read a map or a baby could read and understand it. Trying to live up to your name isn't working out for you. It sounds like you take pride in your ignorance... like a creationist.

sighted thinking, etc., has occurred ad hoc on a daily basis for hundreds (arguably thousands) of years and the system is the result. The system exists in the form that it's in because of the reality of (predictable) human behavior, not despite it. In other words, to accomplish what he's asking (it seems to me), doesn't mean changing intellectual theories or financial approaches, it means attempting to radically re-condition how humans think. His appeals to our "better nature" is an

@aklondikebar Only partly. I mean, I think most people get that there is an imperative need to handle our resources responsibly. I just don't buy humanity as The Great Evil Cause of All Things Wrong in the World Today. I think there has to be a balance between having a thriving economy and and a thriving planet. I fail to see why I should have to live like a cave-dweller and erase my "footprint". Why do I have to make it seem like I never existed? That's too extreme a perspective.

@144jr144 I think you're right that it's important to actually come up with solutions, but I think the point of the video was simply to call attention to the problem. Calling attention to this issue is an important first step because in the West (and particularly in America, where I live) because many people don't even recognize that there's a problem -- and many people who do know there's a problem don't adequately understand exactly what it is, why it exists, or what it means.

Nice sentiments. The only thing is, he seems to me to thinking under the mistaken presumption that we are *intelligently* serving the present economic engine. He spoke about "novelty" and living a "life without shame", etc., and he skipped directly to a discussion about the modern "Economy" as though the one were a deliberate outgrowth of the other. But the Economy wasn't planned. In actuality, our behaving selfishly, our efforts to elevate our own status, our hedonistic, short-

WTF!?....You economists are JUST realizing the true exploitive nature of our "economy"?... that we can not have infinite growth on a finite planet and that the true cost of our "economy" has been written off the balance sheets by you fucking "economists" for years...and now you expect us to believe you have any real solutions? Tell us the truth fucking "economist"...tell us we are enslaved by the monetary based economic system and we should put you and your kind out of business!

I really did not get the point of this video. I'm a long-time student of peak oil and I publicly forecast lots of the financial "surprises" of the last several years, but this fellow simply said "let's create a new vision" which was a very Obama-ish message of "hope, even if blindly" that had no substance that I noticed. He seems like a nice chap and all, but like all the messages of "what is not working actually is not working," there is then the question of "what IS working?"

etic versus emic fallacy. We'd LIKE to see ourselves this way, as mostly altruistic; but, in reality, despite the mountain of good behaviors we all perform every day, we also behave selfishly, every day, at crucial key moments. The Economy isn't built so much on the rank selfishness of the majority of people (because most of us are not rankly selfish), but instead on our selfish moments because it's during those moments that our behavior becomes predictable. In fact, the way

@Provakator lol @ you calling the ideas naive. Tim may indeed get bragging rights for this, but the ideas portrayed are not his alone, nor did he claim they were. he gave some credit where it was due at least. Perhaps you should give yourself a bit more credit to be an adaptable human being and not berate your own innate abilities prior to testing them.Saying something wont work proves nothing more than your own shortsightedness. Lets prove it doesnt work.

Hardly a piercing challenge...here is a REAL challenge for y'all~pull all your "investments" in this nihilist economic system and work for real change, not coins, and a future based on the "efficiency" which economists only allude to and and know full well is impossible in our current and outdated monetary based economic system. Work toward a future free from economic enslavement for our descendants...a future with a Resource Based Economy.

I see your point but I woudl argue that it is possible that the people that run Ecosia only have that one job, (running a website can take a lot more time than you might think) so they need to keep 20% so they can eat, send their children to school etc, better they keep that 20% and we have the option to use a greener search engine. But of course I may be completely wrong and they may be spending all of the money on ipods and spinning rims

Actually, there is an economic model which Tim Jackson describes operating in the US; hunting and fishing licenses. More than a billion dollars every year in license fees goes towards fish and wildlife management and conservation. You may be against hunting and/or fishing but the amount of money they put into conservation is substantial. Look up Pittman-Robertson Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Act and Dingell-Johnson Act.

He isn't saying economics has no place at all, but economics within the realms of constrained market environmentalism is a much preferential model. 20% provides incentives for innovation within the realm of ecological economics from an economic perspective. A complete reliance on NGOs or legislation involves rebound from the corporate sector. It's a case of remedying the cause versus mitigating the effects (my opinion)

@thewabbit10882 scientists do talk about what you call human nature, but usually they refer to it as human behavior, as it is being seen more and more to be less fixed and more malleable than ever previously thought.check Robert Sapolski - human behavior, its a very long and detailed look at behavior of humans from many different braches of science. very interesting information if you have time to watch it all.

@bradq nah, while probably possible technically the vehicles you describe would bankrupt the energy industry. we will have those cars after humanity evolves beyond profit motive. the power source you describe would also work for homes and businesses if it can run cars. I'm personally all for them, but realistic enough to know that profit motive will never generate them, and if it does, it will suppress them.

We have to all pitch in and send this all around the world! Almost 900 hits in three days... damn! Let's see if we can help him get a few thousand.

He's an entire Vegas act! His routine was about two minutes too long though. He should cut the Bee Gees out since that's his worst imitation.

LOL!! This is good!! (o; My Son can do a couple of tricks with his eyes!! When I showed him this @2.26 & he liked it!! (o;

someone should take him to all you can eat restaurant! Ted William got a job offer. Why not him?

He sounds like the guy on the Grand Theft Auto game, car radio lol

Pretty good man. You are not homeless though.

i think he deserves more than a dollar lol

Fantastic.... Put this guy on TV!!!

He deserve more increditable tears

haha this is really great!

whats with the siren

But he is good!

that was nice!

Great work!

awesome

great

nice

=)

+Dabias Johnson preciate that bro

Sophia the Body

Pg is also a reference for point guard (basketball)

Pg stands for proving grounds. That's the event that all new url battlers start on. Eventually it got popular to call new battlers pg's.

Sno and prep I agree Smack set Wavey up for a L he cold as fuck he should've battled like a low top tier nigga

choke

+Sei brav your racist your saying blacks are more important than whites

+Sei brav ;)

+My Anon Sorry, I was being trans black. I'm better now.

+Sei brav If it wasn't for white people, you wouldn't have electricity in your home, computers, phones, smartphones, tablets, microwaves, internal combustion engines, pneumatic tires, airplanes, internet, satellites, flatscreens, TVs, photography, cameras, films, movies, radio, recorded music, microphones, on and on. White people inventions list: endless. Shut the fuck up now, you little bitch.

+Sei brav White people invented the modern world, practically every component, technology and innovation you're using the internet with, was invented by white people, with a few japanese people helping. The inventor of the Worldwide Web was white, as well. Think I'm wrong, use your favorite search engine (Google, Yahoo, Bing) and search for inventors of components and technologies. Enjoy.

+manuforever143 yak

Kay

Very intelligent woman.

+Audrey Szemplinski I like your comment.

+DukeFan1971 I like this guy.

I'm not exactly sure who this "we" is that you're referring to.  "You" might get it and find it "retarded", but the vast majority here had a kneejerk and thought this was about something else.  Tell the mouse in your pocket hello for me.

+Scott McDonald No, actually we get the point, we just think the way it's demonstrated is a joke. If you want to make that point, just say it, don't make this retarded video.

+Scott McDonald I think people are used to seeing that type of video though. Thats why they kneejerk to that conclusion.

+Gorkamorker I think they understand alright. The problem is that these videos are made all the time to "show" men how horrible they are for looking at a nice firm pair of breasts and how much "trouble" women have walking around.

+Gorkamorker yah but the message of the ad isn't very focused.

+Lunatic108 Ha! Now what you said is cute.... and very sad at the same time. Staring is not harassment. It's not invading anybody's personal space. Grow up.

+RevenantPlanet Haha, that was cute!Yes, looking is no harassment, but staring is.You invade the personal space of other people if you stare, staring makes humans uncomfortable and didt you get told when you were little, that "staring is rude"?You know why that comes?Next time think, before you write. Have a nice day!

+Lunatic108 Looking is not harassment. You decide what you wear, you deal with the consequences. It's not everyone else's responsibility to make you comfortable. Take responsibility for yourself.

+Lunatic108 That's not remotely true. If a guy walks around without a shirt and has "washboard abz," women definitely oogle. As they should. There's no fine line between appreciating what is on open display and actual harassment .... they are very discrete behaviors and experiences. I believe that blurring the fact, even with good intentions, undermines the real plight women face on multiple fronts.

+Lunatic108 Most men do not have breasts coming off their chests so of course it's alright for them to show off their body, So what you expect us ladies to completely expose ourselves for men and women the public in general for everyone to see, Us ladies would like some privacy instead of perverts constantly staring.

+Sophiee Lewis So women are expected to cover them up, so other persons dont stare?Sure that sounds logical, coming from a women......No one should be forced to "cover" himself up just to not be harassed. Men dont get harassed for going topless, what do you think will happen if a women does that?

+Schnell Straße Es wurde schon belegt, dass die Leute dort komplett verarscht werden und Antworten zu Fragen zusammengeschnitten werden, die gar nicht zusammen passen.

+The CuB3s naja... mit den 130 Jahren kommst du auch nich ganz hin xD Soweit ich weiss wurde sie 1949 gegründet. Vor 130 Jahren gab es noch das Deutsche Kaiserreich, danach die Weimarer Republik dann halt den Nationalsozialismus bis 1945 und ab 1949 die BRD.

+The CuB3s existiert*

+Mert Bal Du hättest bei TV total teilnehmen können :D Es gab 2-3 Strophen :D Es gab 3 Strophen, keine davon greift direkt einen Ausländer an. Die Dritte wurde lediglich von den Nationalsozialisten "missbraucht", dennoch untermauerte diese nur die anstrebende Überlegenheit seitens Deutschland.. Die Zweite ist aus heutiger Sicht Frauenfeindlich einzustufen, damals war halt noch eine andere Zeit. PS: Vor 400 Jahren gabs die Strophe nicht einmal. Du weißt, dass selbst die Bundesrepublik erst seit ca. 130 Jahre alt. :D

+Mert Bal "Deutschland, Deutschland, über alles" zu singen ist nicht verboten. Es wird nur nicht mehr gesungen, weil es unter anderem zu lang und geographisch inkorrekt ist ("von der Maas bis an die Memel, von der Ätsch bis an den Belt"). Was allerdings wirklich verboten ist, ist das von den Nazis als Nationalhymne genutzte Horst-Wessel-Lied. Grüße :)

Nein, Es gab früher 2-3 Strophen die Ausländer feindlich waren. Es ist verboten sie in der Öffentlichkeit zu singen zuhause darf man es glaube ich :D

+Mert Bal"Deutschland über alles" zu singen ist nicht verboten, es sei denn man macht dabei den Hitlergruß. ;)

Dann liegst du 400 Jahre in der Vergangenheit ich als Ausländer weiss es sogar

+belladonna1999 gia 2016 hauahauhauah

+jimi shawcross the 3rd worlders

+Sandman SXi Your more then welcome

+jimi shawcross thanks. 

+Sandman SXi No offence taken

+jimi shawcross I mean no offense. I'm just saying.

+jimi shawcross this is a music video. Not a political rant.

+Kevin Heeley well I wouldn't say that those three are very talented and are geniuses in their own right of course their styles and influences are very different and it wouldn't be fair to compare them

Eminent,Biggie or Tupac are not on the same level as these musical geniuses

Well the beastie boys, Run-DMC, and Public Enemy all have rock influences while eminem tupac NWA biggie are just more straightforward hip hop