Cambridge university dyson Videos

Why doesn't Dyson spend the money on the redundant workers from Malborough? Dyson's profits are derived by exploiting cheap labour in third world countries. I've never bought a Dyson product and never will.

Wow. Compelling ideas pointing to string theory. Gauge Theories, Lattice Gauge Theories, Perturbation Theory ... got to get me some understanding of these it seems ;o)

99.99% of the universe is Plasma. Relativity uses only gravity to explain the universe, therefore it is incomplete. It is an electric Universe. You egg heads won't lose your jobs if you're barking up the wrong tree by relying on Relativity to explain Quantum fields. You'll just have to bone up on Plasma physics. Obstinate as you must be, you will probably all be dead by the time you're proved wrong.

Boring presentation

Space and time do not exist.

@joenwayne I love this piece (and the other two that go with it). It's fantastic music by a British composer, and is wonderful to know his music is being kept alive all over the world. Keep up the work with your large, impressive choir. Best wishes to you all in New Jersey. Matthew

This song, this performance, should have at least 500 million hits. I hope this band becomes wildly successful Bc with more songs like this there's no way they won't. What a song

This is very confusing. Let's forget, for a moment, that Reeva Steenkamp was the victim and completely put her out of this case. Let's assume Oscar Pistorius lives by himself, has no girlfriend, and is happily single, dating no one. He hears what he believes is an intruder breaking into his residence through the bathroom window and, fearing for his life, fires through the door, killing the intruder. Would he then be found guilty of murder? He certainly could "forsee" that firing through the door would kill the intruder, but this would not constitute murder, would it? Of course not...he was defending his life and property from someone out to harm him and steal his property. At 8:49, this gentleman says, "The blow struck and killed the person behind the door. The fact that the person behind the door turned out to be the deceased and not an intruder is irrelevant." Irrelevant? I disagree (and please, I believe Pistorius is guilty of first-degree murder). It makes all the relevance in the world, for shooting at someone who one believes is coming to commit bodily harm against them is very relevant. Either I am misunderstanding something here (and probably am), or this legal ruling is convoluted, unnecessarily complicating what clearly seems to be an open and shut case: Pistorius murdered his girlfriend after an argument. He should hang.