Polygamy usa show watch Videos

This seem staged..

This should not be legalised... cuz for all u know.. later on men will be forcing women in 3rd world countries to marry him.. for sake of dowry.. it will again convert into a sex trade in poor countries like a businesss... similar to ancient kingdoms and again female foeticide will rise

Any doubt. Lawrence vs Texas. Consenting Adults. I told you guys, that was commin and was from the Mormons.

polygamy is about the social, political, moral, spiritual, psychological and economic responsibility of taking care of one another. these are not facts you speak of when referring to poligamy. it has nothing to do with competition or living backwards. history reaches us that poligamy was effective and it worked. his tory teaches us that at one time it was against the law fir a woman to raise children by herself or hsve children out of wedlock. if a wife lost her husband for whatever the reasons were, it was required by law for her to find another husband or " marry into" another family to be taken care of. the definition of marriage was an institution, an educational institution, a financial entity, a spiritual base, a psyche ward, nutrition embodiment for all involved. it wasn't about sex and competition among females. it was about the total responsibility of all adults and the rearing of the children. this society is a prime example of what can and will happen when women are left to rase children by themselves. we have four generations of savage ass kids in these streets because the man is being systemically destroyed and incarcerated. this is about responsibility not about competition and sex.

To the narrator of this video, first of all, I do not know where you are getting your facts about the so-called down side of polygamy (polygyny = one man, many wives) and I feel that if you have statistics then you should present them. Secondly, I am offended by your gross generalization of the so-called backwards African societies that practice polygamy. I am also offended that you think that women are so petty that they have no clue of what it means to build a nation, or that building a nation means having many children. These women are not that naive that they don't realize that nation building will take a long time with just one wife. To these people polygamy is not a matter of how much sex a man can have but how many children a man can help to produce and quite frankly getting pregnant does not require a lot of sex. It is the Western world with its suppression of the naked body that brought down shame on the indigenous people who were quite comfortable with their style of dress. Sexual implications based on what someone had on was not as overt as it has become in western hypocritically puritanical cultures. If you want to point out backwardness of polygamous societies, then what about Saudi Arabia, The United Arab republic, Qatar, Sudan, Iran, India and others. These are predominately Islamic societies where Polygamy is practiced and they have booming cultures, technology and educational systems. None of which are "backwards" as you would define it. I find your statement about African societies where polygamy occurs, and defined by you as backwards, to be quite disingenuous and falling way short of any valid study, survey or actual living in these cultures that you call backwards. The fact that you omit the ancient history of African Cultures, the Songhai Empire, the Mali Empire, the Great Kings and Queens who came out of Africa during ancient times and from a culture where polygamy was the norm shows the limit of your knowledge on this topic. You fail to mention the impact of the European hypocritical influence on indigenous African culture and the imposition of hypocritical Western ideologies upon the African experience. You even fail to mention the irony of these so called Christians whose early prophets were all polygamous. Your protestations are ill-founded even to this day when you do not understand the mechanism of the customs and culture of the society where polygamy is intrinsic to it. The in-fighting that you speak of hardly had to do with who was married to who, and particularly, since natural selection had more women than men being in the world, then it is most advantageous for the women to be absorbed into a household or family unit, rather than having them left out. And what if the wife is barren through no fault of her own, should her husband go with out having a progeny because his only wife cannot bare him children? In strong societies where polygamy is the norm, many customs support it and encourage the family unit to work as a whole. The women and children are seen as resources and they help to build the community, take care of the children, teach and pass on the customs. The women are as industrious as the men and have markets, stores, farms and trading that increases the wealth of the family unit and community. When many of the wars and strife were started, believe me, it was not over woman and who had the best looking women or pick of the crop. It was over resources, land, politics and hegemony. It was the male desire to fight and conquer his competition which quite frankly, was not another woman but what her husband had. Wars are socio-economical-political ventures that take place between warring tribes all over the planet. And it is modern society with its monogamy that has had the absolute worse wars of aggression against each other while you, and many others, considered Western society civilized. I find your entire video disingenuous, insulting, linear in its presentation, and absent of the true facts and/or understanding of indigenous cultures and the how and why they participate in polygamy. If you believe it is not a viable option for Western men and women, I have to agree because the culture is not designed to support that type of marital relationship. Western cultures are selfish, self-centered, narcissistic and pathological. They have abandoned the extended family for the nuclear one and have isolated themselves through individualism and personal ownership, thus creating a cesspool of fear, insecurity, paranoia, co-dependency and toxic relationships which according to the latest statistics, 50% of marriages end in divorce. There are a vast array of issues, concepts, nuances of indigenous cultures that you have blatantly ignored, therefore your conclusions, based on YOUR FACTS, can only be skewed and distorted. Western cultures create laws and regulations to manage their societies thus forcing people into unnatural relationship roles that sour, end, and foster mental health issues for all involved. You do have the right to your opinion, but I think that if you are going to take on a subject such as polygamy, you either need to do better research or refrain from stating that cultures who practice it are backwards because that is patently incorrect, Sir.

probley fucking the sheep as well...those sand niggers are disgusting pig's.. all they think about is there little penis!!

or we can choose men who aren't black? which would be better for all of us.

Tazaryach in the past I've viewed you as a sincere righteous brother who appears to care for his nation. However, when it comes to promoting multiple partners amongst Israelites in today's society, that's not wise because of the diseases and wickedness of American society that plague our people today. In all honesty multiple partners nowadays will destroy Israel rather than building up the nation of Israel. I pray you haven't been infiltrated by Esau to promote this amongst the Israelites to continue to destroy us as a people with the Aides epidemic. Shalom

This clown ass nigga can't even teach his own women or pick a righteous one, his bitch snitching with Polight... These niggas bout o shame themselves, and imma stay on them

B4 you worry about more women quit f'n lying and clean them false ass misogynistic doctrines... And get them bastards/mamzers out the camp of officers and elders like deut. 23 says... And quit dissin the real daughters of Zion for Mexicans and mamzers