Ontario canada gun laws Videos

Yup! Sucks really.

They can collect them but they can't pass them on right . So when they die what then ? Destroy them ?

+Al Codie you can't anymore. You had to have been grandfathered in back when the Firearms act was first re-regulated. So people have who have them can continue to have them and collect them.

+Majorpain762 Our Hand-picked Govts (the puppets we are allowed to choose between) only arm foreign countries they want to bring to their knees via their "freedom fighters" ... last thing they want is a populace capable of taking their country back if/when need be. We got too comfortable  ...

+R.F.S. Bros Full auto = Prohibited, yes.

+Aaron Kellar And Canadians are laughing at you :(

ya

+Aaron Kellar haha, good for you! Good luck friend!

+luvmyctd oh i trust the canadian government right now about as far as i can throw it

+Aaron Kellar Right, and do what with it? Ask for permission to take it to the range? What about those without the resources to have a "Legal" range to take it to? And we'll see how long this lasts too, you know damn well the UN mission is to disarm and Trudeau is their poster boy.You know exactly what I meant too, or should.

+luvmyctd i own a restructed licences, i could buy a handgun wgenever i desire. 

+Aaron Kellar Our laws are bullshit. You obviously have no desire to go purchase a simple new handgun. Just because you don't feel the need doesn't mean you speak for the rest of Canada.

+Archie Rodenbo our laws are perfect. i own 9 guns and none of them need to be registered

should have shot each one of them, twice

+DAVE YOUNGMAN Serioualy. That's not a ban. Not at all. Nothing is being taken away. They are just changing the rules. And it's not even finished yet.

+DAVE YOUNGMAN I just heard about this last night. I'm not freaked out, but I am surprised. So.....no semi-suto. Wtf?

+Stephen Arseneau ...//www.therebel.media/canadian_firearms_expert_predicts_massive_non_compliance_with_new_law

+DAVE YOUNGMAN Also that so called "new law"fucking bill-223didn't even get closed to being passedretard

+DAVE YOUNGMAN honestly you have to be retarded if you think they can ban all guns in canada. so many people rely on them for farm protection and hunting it's literally fucking impossible

+DAVE YOUNGMAN so far the only bill they've attempted to pass is s-223and that was denied by like everyone

" i seriously doubt he'll even be able to get semi autos banned"That's what gun owners in the UK and Australia said.

+Slav Man ... The LIEberals have a massive majority and they can (and WILL) do anything they want.//www.therebel.media/canadian_firearms_expert_predicts_massive_non_compliance_with_new_law

how about redrawing the map of Canada from Thunder Bay all the way to the B.C the West will take. Build a wall at the border, put land mines, the army, and surveillance cameras there. Also write on threat wall "FUCK OFF WE ARE FULL" AND "NO LIBERALS OR FRENCH FUCKS PAST THIS BORDER"

Every province must separate and form a Republic with an American type constitution.

+meals24u buy one used  then its not in the green books

+meals24u call your MP and all the othere stuff as well

+A Bible and A Gun the chinese invented crossbows.

+A Bible and A Gun its all about having the power to crush "the people "

The cross bow was made against the law late 1500's by the Jesuits in 'reformation' Europe because the cross bow could pierce the Knights armour - the gun control legislation is all about control and enslavement and bringing us all back to the depressive and oppressive 'dark' ages. - if you own a gun and a Bible there is no way the Catholic Pope can oppress and control and enslave you.

I just thought I should tell you, there is an international team-up of gun rights advocates. The IAPCAR (International Association for the Protection of Civilian Arms Rights). Look them up and take a look at their website. You'd be surprised how many countries are involved. I do wish that more people can get involved to empower gun rights advocates and get a foot hold to bring back the rights around the world.

took me 10mins to notice the medieval sword in the background .. what do ya split fire wood with that?..lol.. ..nice.. gun control is a bunch of bull crap ..especially when you really look at the stats on violent crime in relation to gun ownership.. or when you look at countries and peoples who have been disarmed .. many times it has lead to genocide .

yes I was trying to remember that , we had something like that here in 1989 14 women were killed in Montreal .

Im australian. In 1996 a guy massacred a popular family restaurant in port arthur

to anti gunners its all about the eutopian ideal no matter how flawed it is

'check out the crime rate in australia now...

Port Arthur OK that's the one I ment

ya she steals the show sometimes lol

Seeing the dog was the best part.

what are some of the NZ laws ?

yip

and yet the kadir family promotes terrorism,live in a $400,000 home while living on welfare and continue to berate canada.to stop drug dealers and gangs,the majority of which are black,these gang members need to be deported.but the NDP and liberals know that if this happens they will lose their main constituants when it comes to the vote and if guns are made legal to carry the majority of said criminal constiuants will be probably shot and killed by their victims.thats the way i see it anyway.

@SovereignStatesman In the case at hand, the house was stolen by Canuck gummint under the "proceeds of crime act" similar to the forfeiture crap we have in the states. The house was in no way obtained through finances obtained by a criminal activity which consisted of failure to fill out a form - or posession of an illegal gun -however you choose to view it. There was no MONEY involved. 14th Am. wouldn't help our northern friend anyway, even if it (unlikely) would help here. Complete B-------

In other words: your dad was arrested after his provocation, as he deliberately let his licence to expire - and then you are surprised that they do what you want them to do? Own the gun - I'm fine with it - but respect the regulations; one day, when a drug addict will shoot someone you know or love, you will find out that some regulations are indeed necessary... I am not writing about strict regulations - just some regular psychic and health checks (yearly, for example)... BTW: wanna date? :)

@mwillblade Fortunately firearms are illegal where I live. And the chance that I'll ever need one is slim. The risk of me being killed in traffic is aprox 100 times greater than me being killed in a home robbery. Yet I don't walk around in reinforced steel plating and wearing a crash helmet on the street. So why would I want to own a gun then? Better than owning a gun is living somewhere it is not needed. That is my method of self defense - and statistics show that it works better than yours.

Yes the government (any) is an awful evil, and no individual can defend oneself from the government. We can not live without government but we do need to restrict them as much as possible. That's why constitutions were put in place. And the rest of legal stuff id stuffed with tricks to defeat Constitutions here and there. Even worse: US constitution is not to be taken literally. It is what US Supreme Court says the Constitutional statements mean, not what they mean in plain English language.

There is a couple in New England area who are being bullied by their local police and the Dept of Justice into giving up their land under the civil forfeiture law (not unlike your proceeds of crime legislation). This couple owns, free and clear, a motel sitting on numerous acreage that they (local, state and federal authorities) want and have found that a few crimes were committed at this motel unbeknownst to the owners and are completely innocent of any wrong doings yet the DOJ persists

HAHAHA, Bruce is a fool and will lose everything because of it. I agree with him in principle that the gun registry he was fighting was wrong and it has been repealed. But the thing is he became a criminal with the manner in which he decided to fight it and will most likely never be able to own a firearm again. Plus he lost a estimated 100.000$ private collection and his family's house. I collect guns for pleasure, not self defence. StatsCan says lowest rate per 100.000 in 40 years BTW.

im no fan of of liberal acts, im very conservative, but a family losing a home over a gun rights demonstration is rediculous, and sounds largely and unjustafiably punitive, it also doesnt sound like a proceed of crimes. did he buy this home with money from drugs or prostitution? i dont think so, to me proceeds of crime doesnt apply, can this be appealed to another court? letting a license lapse should be only a fine, or at most loss of guns in a worst case scenario, not taking ones home

@adambrgh3 If this guys protest and failure to renew his permit reached the level of "criminal" needed to take the families home, and you agree with that, then YOU AND YOUR COUNTRYS GOVERNMENT SUCKS!! Thank God I live in a country where the majority of the people haven't devolved into a bunch of SHEEP, and we actually believe in personal freedom. And once we vote out the socialist/liberal Obama in 2012 the US will come screaming back to Reagan era greatness......... thats right :-)

Full disclosure not in the video: Mr. Montague was a weapons dealer and manufacturer. Given that the money he made paid for their house, and using the profits of illegal activity (in this case failure to store a firearm safely, possession of a weapon without a license, carrying prohibited firearms, illegal modification of a firearm to fully automatic, and carrying a weapon that had it's serial number removed)... yea, it's fair to say that repossession of their house fit the crime.

How can you compare Apartheid to the long gun registry? Are you that uneducated? Bruce was not a hero for what he did, he was simply put a fool. He broke a number of laws regarding the running of any business plus engaged in the illegal sale of a controlled product, guns. In Canada owning and selling firearms is a privilege and not a right, he knowingly broke the law and continued selling. He brought any resulting issues on himself. More people now = more crime.

Why does your dad need a gun in the first place? And why does he think it's a good idea to break the law? And why is he surprised that the government punishes him for doing illegal things? To me it sound as if he got what was coming to him. If anything is stupid it's him. If I started running around in the streets with a gun I'd also be arrested - and rightly so. The only ones who need a gun in civilized society are criminals. Get the guns off the streets!

they had similar laws in California back in the 80s took peoples homes and cars huge corruption scandals cops planting evidence so the could seize million dollar homes , my friends brother was murdered by the LAPD in his own home when the broke in unannounced and shot him in his own hallway. lawsuits stopped it at last .. stand up and fight before your freedoms are history. Daddy tell me again about what it was like back when people were free .........

@mwillblade Oh please - I don't for one second believe that you ever went through such an experience. You just made that up. And in any case - let me ask you this. How often do armed home robberies occur in the US where guns are readily available compared to Canada or most of Europe where they are not? To me it looks like guns are costing more innocent lives than they save - and especially so in countries where they are legal and available.

Ok, so the story goes he intentionally let his firearms business licence to expire in November 2002 and his firearms acquisition certificate in November 2003. Then he carried on with his gunsmith business. Any body with half a brain would tell you that's a bad idea. While i AGREE with his cause his manner was all wrong, he intentionally put his families well being at risk to buck the system and hides behind his daughter to get pity.

No, owning a gun is not a right, it's a privilege that comes with obligations. That is not an opinion but simply a fact in Canada. Gun crime is just as likely to be committed by a first time criminal as a legal gun owner so the pro gun argument is asinine. Also fact. Greater population has everything to do with greater crime, more people= more crime. Your deceiving people when the truth is murders are at a 40 year low.

@mwillblade So did Gandhi. So what of it? Referring to dictators saying something and equating it with something being bad is stupid. Hitler also thought that it was a really good idea for women to have lots of children. Does that mean that maternal instinct is Nazi as well. Or how about motorways and cars - Hitler was a great fan of those. Does that mean you drive a horse buggy? Your argument is just plain stupid.

+Leone Montana I mean we have the ATF. They're the ones who set restrictions on barrel lengths, automatics and all that crap. You need to pay a tax stamp (more complicated for automatics) to be able to own certain weapons.But they dont have the power the RCMP seems to have.

They confiscated the guns because they were stored illegally, they were supposed to be locked and out of sight. Also they broke into the houses because... Well, why the fuck not? Everyone's gone, now's our chance to rake in millions in fines because that's what governments do

+red Stallinist дночерпатель It is not Obama sweetie, it is the Zionists.

+Edwin DueckLike with the TPP

+Billy Calder I heard of a town where they went into closets and got gun and said they where in plain site, that's a bit crazy, a person should still have rights. It's getting to the point where you don't have rights and it's only going to get worse.

+Edwin Dueck The police representative straight up admitted they consider ANYWHERE a gun could be hidden as being "in plain sight".

+Michelle B very true, but there are places in this country where I can go with out wifi.

+Michelle B Thats actually true. Sadly..

+Edwin Dueck Hey Ed, you might want to keep those thoughts to yourself. All anyone has to do is put your name into a Google search and your posts such as this one above comes up. Godspeed..

+Bill Meeh i do ,remember i was 13 at the time but its like yesterday to me till those day i hated pe trudeau and now waht canadian didi put his kid there whatch what he will do whanting to be remember like his shit father

+B Ann "Sight" vs "site". No offence intended.

I don't no looked like ur media reporting he just posted it on utube but we have a saying here in America if u don't like the contest of freedom go from us in peace we ask not ur arms or counsel crouch down and lick the hands that feed u may ur chains sit lightly upon u. and another anybody who would give up a little liberty for a little security deserves neither liberty or security fyi

The Firearms regulations have to be changed.I'm sick of the fascist government charging firearms owners.due to Firearms act.I'm OK with the licensing.not everyone is familiar with Firearms.

Donate to Mr. Thomson's defense fund!!! Ian and Ed's hard fought win benefits all of us.

Excellent job as usual Mr. Friedman, we need more people like you

You are a true Patriot Mr. Friedman, I salute you.

Welcome to Kanada. What a farce.

Dream on m8y

They aren't enforced, and it's only some firearms that require an auth. To transportI own 7 firearms and can transport any and all of them in the back of my car no problem... I only have paper work for 2 of them and they're just a sheet of paper each, one from Cabelas and one from the Army Navy Surplus... This really isn't a problem and if the RCMP wants to make it a problem... Well... Come take 'em

Know kidding fucked up this country

+The Prestigious that reminds me, in Germany today people use use silencers on rifles so they don't disturb others, In Canada any silencer I'm pretty sure will get you jail time.

I do. Don't you?

+CARBIDE TV - The Machinist Channel Two words: Rodney King. He was impervious to pain and could not be subdued. This isn't a zero-sum game for the police. Either comply with police commands, or face the consequences of them using deadly force.

+CARBIDE TV - The Machinist Channel And the law forbids even these. Try getting a stun gun or pepper spray. Also It's been my experience that People who are intent on harming or killing you will overcome these and still kill you.

I'm already armed to the teeth and if my guns got stolen well I have more... Not the only place I store firearms they would have to rob 2 people at the same time so I just walk over and pick it up no problems you can store firearms at other peoples house. It's legal to do that as long as you follow proper storage. Transportation if it's a restricted firearm or you ship it from your door to the other place with a company that can ship firearms and pick them up. More then 1 way to move guns with out telling the CFO and you can do it legally. They don't dick me around when I explain well hell if you don't give me what I want I will just ship it from the door to the place I want and I don't even have to lock the case or box. they don't like that not 1 bit :p 

+Sam Sharma Show me the law that say's it's illegal it falls under the explosives act there is no legal requriment to lock ammo for transport or storage it justs say this is the max amount of ammo you can have by weight.

There is no legal requirement to lock ammo up. It's only if it's with the firearms at the same time leaving it out is 100 percent legal. Plus that whole room is locked by it self meaning I cover my rear end in more ways then 1. They were going to make a law under the expolsive act and it got kicked out of it they tried that crap but I can have ammo rolling around on the seat of my car 100 percent legal. If I leave a firearm with that ammo I just have to throw a blanket over a non restricted rifle it can't be seen so a blanket covering the rifle is 100 percent legal with lose ammo when in transist say you stopped for lunch ect. There are lots of ways around certain laws

I might just redo the whole video and reupload it due to the fact for some reason youtube made it go funky. 

I like the poke the people you vote for with a stick that seems to work best. Showing up at there door and going hello here is what I want to see and they actually went I want the same thing want to see my gun collection :p That works way better. 

+Kindanyume .Kindanyume At the end of the day it all depends on what the judge says. Most of the time they look at the punishment for what you did and go holy crap that's a nasty punishment 2 years manditory up to 10 1 of them is 25 years and they go I rather not give that sentence so we find you guilty of some unrelated crime so they can use that as a punishment instead instead of you broke this or that law and get 2 years they will simply go you broke something you never did and the punishment is a fine or way less time. They do that in court all the time sometimes they charge people witht he same thing twice so they get a longer sentence even though they broke a differen't law. They did this for a person that broke into a gun store and stole firearms they charged him with break and enter twice but never charged him with break and enter to steal a firearm which he was guilty of the police stated that the judge wouldn't want to give that perosn 25 years in jail even though the guns were given to gang members who killed people and that was the whole point of the law to begin with. It's stupid crap like that the person also refused to id the people who he gave the guns to and was laughing at the police because he broke into over 160 companys and did millions of dollars worth of damage to them from stolen items to damage from the break in. That is why our system is screwed up they don't hold people that taunt the system and keep breaking the law they don't care they just keep letting them out even though they have a chance to stop it with that 1 law. I even suggested making a plea deal with the guy saying we won't charge you with the one that comes with life in jail if you tell us who you gave the guns to instead of telling the police to go F them self and laughing at them. They didn't want to do that which I went well it would of gave you leverage to get the guy to talk as he wouldn't want life in jail so he would roll over on the gang members who would roll over on other people and you nail the people that make a difference. 

It's CFO policy. Policy vs law a whole another can of worms. I know people with 12.2 that went to the edge of the property and threw the guns across the street so they could be stored at another 12.2 holder while they get inspected and are going haha not in here. They got caught doing it and when asked what happens if it lands in the middle of the road they said i brought out my fishing pole to drag it out if that happened. The judge sided with the 2 war vets and ruled they did follow the law. Now another person carried a pistol outside and they ruled it was in transport. They also had a video the CFO released that explained that if you have a shed you want to take it to it has to be covered to be considered part of your dewling (it's stupid bullshit type of stuff) But that's what they made into a policy. People have been charged taking it out side the door step because the judge ruled it was being transported at that point. If you ship a firearm in a box in a locked case with a trigger lock but it can be picked up by a company that is allowed to ship firearms you have 3 in Canada that can 1 is Canada post expodited, 1 is Purlator (have to be a busniess) and the 3 is DHL they keep saying dangerous goods that's only if you ship ammo with the firearm or the firearm is loaded. 

If it's in a safe or closet that is designed to hold firearms it can be stored with the firearm. If it's anything else they will charge you I've spoken to officers who are deal with weapons enforcment type of things. They can really screw with people at times. If they find a shotgun with a trigger lock and boxs of ammo beside it under the bed they will charge you with unsafe storage now if you lock it in a safe beside your bed your fine or if you lock it in a case your also fine. It's pure Bull shit but that's what these police officers who are responsable for weapon enforcement do and they tend to win the cases because of the way the law is poorly written.

Im just saying, i wouldnt wanna get caught with an unlocked loaded unattended firearm with the way the anti gun people are pushing things and have no concept that pal holders are safer than most people and go through a daily background check by the rcmp computer and the reports sent to the provincial cfo's every day, when's the last time any one of those liberals did a background check or had their fingerprints done to check for past crimes etc.

+dajhrm They also threw out the manditory sentences for gun laws it went through the courts and was thrown out. It would be intresting to see what would happen now htt p://www.torontosun.com/2013/11/12/mandatory-minimum-gun-sentences-unconstitutional-ontarios-top-court-rules

because it was said they came into the house and found an unlocked loaded shotgun, its pretty clear, the judge has no discretion beyond the law regarding minimum and maximums, he must apply a penalty within those standards, there is no changing or going easy, people need to understand the laws

+dajhrm They never are but depending on what happens the judge may or may not throw the whole charge out and charge the person with something unrelated to give less time ect. How do they know the firearm was loaded illegally if someone could of loaded it because they feared for their life it would be a reasonable thing to do. The laws are screw yes but the things they do in court are more screwy. 

the judge isnt there to be forgiving and asses a penalty based on the law, it sounds like you had a loaded gun illegally, its a 3 year minimum sentence

Now was ammo stored within easy access and is there a need for predator control ie black bears, mountain lions ect. The problem is when you open your mouth with the police around prepare to be screwed over. That's what they do now not every officer is that way but there are enough out there that you should say nothing and that's why people say nothing. If you said it was loaded your screwed. If you said ammo was beside it your screwed best thing is to higher a good lawyer and then see if going public will help or hurt your case. Chances are unlawful storage mandatory sentence or plead guilty and get a prohibited from owning firearms for a certain amount of time. 2-10 years is common in a case like this life is for someone who stole the firearm. Now the people if they get caught the max sentence is life but that will never happen because the court system doesn't want to give them that much time. It's a crap shout higher a lawyer quick because it's a big fight at this point.