Enter your query, example: how not cry when slicing onion or how to enter an Free Italian Sex Webcams?

Prager university are we born good Videos

Are humans basically good: Prager University

Is Evil Rational?

Is evil rational? If it is, then how can we depend on reason alone to make a better world? Best-selling author Dennis Prager has a challenging answer. You can ...

User Comments

https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-RbJJsn6NGD0/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAACg/v0qsfNNo5gY/photo.jpg?sz=64
There is a flaw in some of the arguments in this video. When you used the argument about the killing of the disabled baby, you say you cannot find any rational arguments and the only argument you can find is a religious one; would't that be essentially implying is that religion is irrational? You also say that good sometimes has no rationality to it. There is a one rational reason for all good and that is creating a better society and civilization to live in. Imagine if everyone used this reasoning then there would be no jerks.
https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-RbJJsn6NGD0/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAACg/v0qsfNNo5gY/photo.jpg?sz=64
+anthony hamilton Did they actually; why wasn't it in the news?
https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-PybN60J3DHY/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAYQ/Br__r4Z59jQ/photo.jpg?sz=64
+Jakub Trybek No. First obama lets in refugees by the tens of thousands and hundreds of those tens of thousands at least support isis.  Its more significant than you think. By the way, isis launched an attempted assault on a nuclear power plant so they mean business.
https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-RbJJsn6NGD0/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAACg/v0qsfNNo5gY/photo.jpg?sz=64
+anthony hamiltonIt is true that you cannot be too nice but How many refugees Obama lets in? I think it's about few thousand, which is minuscule in the grand scheme of things.And if some of these do turn out to be terrorists then they are irrational because they are damaging the society and making the world a more shit place.
https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-PybN60J3DHY/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAYQ/Br__r4Z59jQ/photo.jpg?sz=64
+Jakub Trybek Not necessarily. Obama is letting in refugees because its the right thing to do but america suffers for it since its paying to relocate and house them in addition to the terrorists there.
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-XdUIqdMkCWA/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/4252rscbv5M/photo.jpg?sz=64
LETS HEAR FROM IRRATIONAL IDIOT ABOUT WHATS RATIONAL AND WHATS NOT.
https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-PybN60J3DHY/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAYQ/Br__r4Z59jQ/photo.jpg?sz=64
+86Corvus Well tell me where he is wrong if he is so irrational.
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-NEaOFhRrrRE/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAABQ/Mp_uzVHdBWI/photo.jpg?sz=64
it is not like people who kill are always evil,imagine a man who is forced to pay a huge amount of money for child support and if he fails to pay that he goes to jail.his only options are either to live and suffer,commit suicide,or kill the mother trying to get away with it.can you blame him if he commits a murder the people responsible are the government with that hasn't done anything to fix that broken system and the woman who did not abort the baby when she had the chance.
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-NEaOFhRrrRE/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAABQ/Mp_uzVHdBWI/photo.jpg?sz=64
+86Corvusbut he is not responsible for that,his only other options were to commit suicide,risk go to jail,or get psychological problems.he is the victim of the system,if the child support laws were did not exist he would have no reason to commit a murder or suicide.
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-XdUIqdMkCWA/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/4252rscbv5M/photo.jpg?sz=64
+videakias3000 yes killing isnt always evil, but in the example you made up yes that would be evil.
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-XdUIqdMkCWA/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/4252rscbv5M/photo.jpg?sz=64
I wonder how "infinitely precious" slaveholders thought their slaves were back when people actually followed the Bible and treated them as property, as the Bible promotes; Or wife-beaters,; or stone-throwers. If life is "infinitely precious" then I don't like whatever definition of precious Prager is using, because it sounds like some precious lives are worthy of suffering and injustice, especially in the eyes of God, their supposed creator. Ok, maybe I'm cherry-picking to all you butt hurt religious folk out there, but it's just infuriating to me when believers cherry pick which parts to believe in.
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-XdUIqdMkCWA/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/4252rscbv5M/photo.jpg?sz=64
+Keith H Atheist should be consistent with their world view too...A consistent atheist is always a Moral Nihilist..."In a universe of electrons and selfish genes, blind physical forces and genetic replication, some people are going to get hurt, other people are going to get lucky, and you won't find any rhyme or reason in it, nor any justice. The universe that we observe has precisely the properties we should expect if there is, at bottom, no design, no purpose, no evil, no good, nothing but pitiless indifference." Richard Dawkins
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-XdUIqdMkCWA/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/4252rscbv5M/photo.jpg?sz=64
Yes, I know that.
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-XdUIqdMkCWA/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/4252rscbv5M/photo.jpg?sz=64
+mchume65 the common misconception is that atheists "believe there is no God". The true definition of atheism is "a lack of belief in a God". Agnostics are saying "I don't know" which is the same thing atheists are saying because regarding not knowing as your "title" is still saying you have a lack of belief. Positive atheism (a belief that there is no God) requires just as big of a leap of faith (aka lack of evidence) as theism.
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-XdUIqdMkCWA/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/4252rscbv5M/photo.jpg?sz=64
I say somewhere in between because some days I'm quite sure about being an atheist and then some days I have just enough doubt to make me slide just a tiny bit towards agnostic as I don't think the two are entirely the same. Close but not exactly the same. That's my opinion and I'm sticking to it.
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-XdUIqdMkCWA/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/4252rscbv5M/photo.jpg?sz=64
+mchume65 ah i see how you're confused. I thought you were defending the Bible or being sarcastic towards the end there. but its still a decent question that i asked lol.p.s. there is no difference between agnostic and atheist. look up Penn Jillette's video on the subject. I think it's also in his book "God, No" which is a great read.
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-XdUIqdMkCWA/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/4252rscbv5M/photo.jpg?sz=64
I have no idea what you just said has anything to do with what I said. Besides, I'm somewhere between an agnostic and an atheist.
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-XdUIqdMkCWA/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/4252rscbv5M/photo.jpg?sz=64
+mchume65 then why did an omniscient God give his word exclusively thousands of years ago and leave it up to us to decide what to do with future moral questions?
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-XdUIqdMkCWA/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/4252rscbv5M/photo.jpg?sz=64
+Keith H Slaveholders didn't see slaves as humans of the same level or not human at all. They were lesser beings in their eyes. It wasn't right, but that's the way it was. 150 years from now, they will be criticizing us for something that we believe is good in our time. Probably something we would never had considered. Maybe we will be accused of "herbicide". "Back in 2016 they were too stupid and evil to realize that plants have feelings too. But they ate them anyways."

How Do We Make Society Better? Left vs. Right #5

How do you want to improve America? By focusing on improving and refining yourself? Or by transforming society? The answer to that question will reveal ...

User Comments

https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-8nO3LEUwW8I/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAR0/3Thk4L7m0mE/photo.jpg?sz=64
A few points to make that PragerU can't view without it hurting their propaganda perspectives: 1) Christian Americans (often right wing) are just as guilty of demanding social change as most left wing SJWs. In fact, feminism is often considered a 'religion' not because it is, but because the dynamics of it so closely resemble how Americans portray Christianity. 2) The video is right that conservatives are fundamentally opposed to transforming America. That is literally the definition of conservative. But is that necessarily good or bad? Depends. If something is bad, transforming it is good. If something is good, transforming it can be bad. Stating that conservatism is ALWAYS the right answer assumes that one already has a good environment. And this is not only arrogant, it is ignorant. There is ALWAYS something that can be done to improve. Maybe not something transformative, but society is never perfect and to assume perfection (or close to it) has been achieved is exactly the reason America has descended in every positive metric compared to other nations.
https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-8nO3LEUwW8I/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAR0/3Thk4L7m0mE/photo.jpg?sz=64
Almost forgot to mention: This video seems to indicate that in a "Free America" there is no need to do battle with the problems of society. Why not? Is a free society incapable of having social problems? I get that individuals should introspect and deal with their own demons but it is completely FALSE to assume that everyone else is doing the same. It is NEVER true that one can assume that dealing with one's own demons will result in there being no demons in society. Only in a perfectly ideal world can we assume that everyone else will be as studios with their own failings as we do ourselves.
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-XdUIqdMkCWA/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/4252rscbv5M/photo.jpg?sz=64
This is junk ....
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-XdUIqdMkCWA/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/4252rscbv5M/photo.jpg?sz=64
+Miguel Antunes Mind telling how and why? Basic leftist, ''I dont feel this way, this is bad, I'll go cry in a corner now...''.
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-GkzxDiR5Gjc/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAHQ/pnVq4tdMOns/photo.jpg?sz=64
Few things; global warming is happening and religion is not an indicator of one's self-control.
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-Ul9XaagawH4/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAABc/0l0bTWLt0AM/photo.jpg?sz=64
And this is caused by Green house gases? And thousands of years ago when Mammoths existed during an ice age, and all the ice ages before those, they were ended by Green house gases as well? There is a very obvious cycle that repeats itself, it heats up, cools down, heats up, cools down.
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-XdUIqdMkCWA/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/4252rscbv5M/photo.jpg?sz=64
Who are the mental midgets who mark thumbs down on this? Is there any other vehicle, other than religion, which is oriented to the improvement and moral development of individuals?
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-Cr9_0s6c4vM/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAFg/M-epFh68S4Y/photo.jpg?sz=64
Also, our moral code has been developing trough the process of evolution.The better you are to others, the more likely you are to survive and reproduce therefor teaching your children to do the same.
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-Cr9_0s6c4vM/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAFg/M-epFh68S4Y/photo.jpg?sz=64
If religion was the only way to obtain morals we'd be hearing about atheists bombing schools, not radical Muslims.
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-Cr9_0s6c4vM/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAFg/M-epFh68S4Y/photo.jpg?sz=64
Yes, common sense.
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-M9GxyUCsrRE/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAKk/_Ww223BgX24/photo.jpg?sz=64
Wait until Trump goes to the white house. Islamophobia is now everywhere Rethink about that, Mr. Prager.
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-XdUIqdMkCWA/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/4252rscbv5M/photo.jpg?sz=64
+NourGodly1592 He doesn't want to import muslims at this time because there is a clear threat of terrorism. Not because he hates muslims. Also he says what the people want. 
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-M9GxyUCsrRE/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAKk/_Ww223BgX24/photo.jpg?sz=64
Kind of irony, considering Trump wants a total ban on muslims. So... yea.
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-XdUIqdMkCWA/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/4252rscbv5M/photo.jpg?sz=64
+NourGodly1592 Islamophobia isn't even a thing, it's a word made up by leftists to make wanting potential terrorist in ones country to sound somehow bad. If that includes not wanting any muslims then so be it, if people want that and elect people who think the same way then that's how the country wants it to be.
https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-DuoTsVU611k/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAL4/Y0zQLzPyBDY/photo.jpg?sz=64
I just love the way feminist libtards get on these links, and try an spread their psychobabble about rape culture that does not exist in America, and say shit like words meanings are subject to change over time . Only those who sever Satan would make Gods most beautiful creation like a rainbow, and distort it in to something evil !
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-Cr9_0s6c4vM/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAFg/M-epFh68S4Y/photo.jpg?sz=64
Wait, gay marriage is evil? Why?
https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-6zTpNcdMAFs/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAACE/UjHApXT1CmE/photo.jpg?sz=64
How to make the us better stop selling guns death in prison the chair is gone get rid of the Internet only for the government so they can use it for combat the Internet spreads evil and you learn more which is good but some things are bad and makes you evil and daily workouts for everybody
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-Cr9_0s6c4vM/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAFg/M-epFh68S4Y/photo.jpg?sz=64
The fact you don't use punctuation makes me think you are not the most qualified person on the subject of matter.
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-EhHeHFOP4I8/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAXQ/XuzKMGLGE7k/photo.jpg?sz=64
This entire chanel is so cringy when you're not american! How can educated humans think like that!
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-Cr9_0s6c4vM/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAFg/M-epFh68S4Y/photo.jpg?sz=64
Most of us (Europeans) were born in secular families with social democrat republics or even socialist ones.While America is capitalistic and highly religious.

Do We Have Free Will?

Do humans have free will or are our decisions entirely products of chemistry, physics, and genetics? Is there a difference between the brain and the mind?

User Comments

https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-ykIR4mJZ2e8/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAD8/0L_mjYmuIGA/photo.jpg?sz=64
If you're 'weighing up the options' to decide something then your 'choice' is by definition determined by causes. There is no ghost in the machine. What we experience as conscious thought is just the processing of inputs to produce an output - even if those inputs are coming from the brain itself they have some initial root in the external world. Memories and opinions are forged by our experiences and biology.
https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-UxGwICJZqYI/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAABI/j0OqMQm108M/photo.jpg?sz=64
+Sam Ford weighing the options doesn't force a result. How many peole do you know that ask for other people's opinions sincerely and then seem to fly in the face of that weight of alternative perspective , or they "wanted to try something new". Weighing doesn't mean that the decision is nothing more than the heaviest option weighed wins. Even then weighed in what way, emotional association? Logical utility towards a nebulous "greater good"? Efficiency toward a predecided personal goal rooted in other desires or rational wagers even more complex? We are influenced by a myriad of causes and yet sometimes we rebel against them and choose to ignore or select our influences based on how we choose to apply certain safe-guard principles of simplicity we learned from experience.Is it not more feasible and reasonable to assume that if we "have to weigh the options" it's because we aren't simply following a mechanistic formula? Our brains are supercomputers that have no equal as of yet, yet we can't mechanically "weigh" such options instantly as a computer would a math equation? Clearly we have to "consciously" deliberate it because it isn't so clean and discrete as simple input output, it's something that you can choose to think about on a different level. SUch thinking is thinking ABOUT thinking and can take as long as you want or need it to. This by no means proves some sort of philosophical form of libertarian free will, but ask yourself this, why would anyone ever teach someone that they have no free will? WHat mechanistic logical, scientific purpose would that serve? If all thought is mechanistically determined then there's never any "convincing" anyone, there's merely brain viruses that pass via abstract code from mouth to ear and it produces a predetermined interaction with other pre-experienced code, and for what purpose? TO discuss truth, surely not, but like all genetic conveyances and drives that spread and evolve, they obey the natural forces that drive darwinist forces... by their ability to spread and propagate without being readily eliminated. Or, it's convenient poppycock that sets forth a mystery as a pat reduction so that a collectivist concept of top-down, technocratic control might use the idea that you don't choose as justification to convince you that you can't choose (in other words, they choose to influence you to give up your choices in order to form a lockstep body, or a kind of super-body of non-thinking people that obey the technocracy. And it's a self-deluding belief that the propagator isn't self-aware is contradictory.It's a belief that, if true, has no meaning or value for those who believe it except to simplify and silence competing perspectives, eliminating social pluralistic confusion without actually rendering useful information that requires further investigation of competing claims. But if it isn't true, then it's utterly insidious in it's ability to almost hack other people like a computer virus and get them to believe they don't have something that, if they do, it utterly valuable and vital for individual potential and expression. Why else believe it? It can't be proven, since one can't destroy a brain to prove it is or isn't the self (all one gets is a cessation of certain functions, and mind has never been satisfactorily reduced to mere functions alone. That's like saying air no longer is present because the wind isn't blowing. Does it prove it is there? No, but my only point is that true critical thought cannot be totally satisfied with a settled reductionist position based on the existing and historical investigations into these matters. It's utterly unsettled, but youngins and partisans seem to be totally unaware of this.
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-XdUIqdMkCWA/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/4252rscbv5M/photo.jpg?sz=64
The premise that "if you are just a brain, you can't have free will," is flawed. We cannot say that with certainty or even confidence right now, as scientists have not even come close to fully understanding the brain, and cannot determine whether it is driven by pure physics or not. Even if they do someday fully map the brain and discover that it is perfectly understandable using physics, you can't say that disproves free will with certainty. That's because quantum physics, definitely at play in chemical and electrical responses in the brain, doesn't follow newtonian causality, but instead reacts probabilistically, which still allows for the existence of a self and free will.
https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-GTvqjLwYUvM/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAD_U/TDAL0VaWRL4/photo.jpg?sz=64
Einstein who discovered the theory of relativity and theorized that time is relative and present past and future all exists all the same time, theremore we must not have free will, Im just watching this video just to reassure me I do have free will because Im not cool with that
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-XdUIqdMkCWA/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/4252rscbv5M/photo.jpg?sz=64
This is so simple. You are not a brain, but you are a process of your brain.
https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-UxGwICJZqYI/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAABI/j0OqMQm108M/photo.jpg?sz=64
+Hit Mania try explaining that to the mind numbed robots in the comments section. I'm starting to think that this is an academic absolutist mini-revolution that happened in colleges int he last 15 years. I attended a public college institution and took both non-religious philosophy courses and psychology courses before later expanding my religious education. No one in any of those secular programs taught anyone "you are your brain". They taught that some people believe this, but that ultimately the nature of identity and perception makes it impossible to say for sure that mind is a process, a separate entity which connects to that process and gains all of it's context and experience from it, or the physical object itself. None of these premises can be proven true via science because the observer and experimenter themselves are such an entity and if they experimented with their own consciousness they'd invalidate their test since they'd lose an impartial foundation to judge it (they might experience the illusion of an out of body experience, or nothing at all and draw conclusions from the inevitable alteration of their mental process by said experience despite such experiences already being known via literature and past subjects and not being externally convincing to a non-experiencer) conversely the lack of transcendent experience doesn't prove anything, since anyone who hasn't been to Africa can't use that as proof that Africa doesn't exist.The fact that your perception and your mind and consciousness are all inexorably linked to your ability to form a belief on the issue makes it almost impossible to stay impartial, all the while any investigation into non-physical connections would be difinitively outside the realm of science and very suspect under it's rubric, so that whole avenue of thought couldn't be either proven or disproven to the affirmative. Only cessation of brain function being corollary to observation of overt and ancillary signs of consciousness can be proven, and that ultimately proves nothing about competing (non-mechanistic materialist views) since they also predict a loss of connection to mind when physical function ceases.Saying all this doesn't prove my own views right, but it proves I can think about competing views and how they can potentially be effected by scientific inquiries without knee-jerk reacting toward materialistic dogmatics. It's always so odd to me that those who deride "belief" and "dogma" are often the most vocal to actually use both so stridently without any self-awareness.
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-XdUIqdMkCWA/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/4252rscbv5M/photo.jpg?sz=64
Of course you are your brain.
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-XdUIqdMkCWA/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/4252rscbv5M/photo.jpg?sz=64
So what? Then you are 1/2 brain.
https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-q_PzRzl8mnQ/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAG8/H3NAdrFNlOM/photo.jpg?sz=64
If mind is outside of physical existence, why is it affected by brain chemistry?
https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-oUNJFCwaoiA/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAOCM/r9xP4Gtgfnc/photo.jpg?sz=64
Reflex actions are intitiated by the spinal cord, not the brain...
https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-t3gC-v6vbJM/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAB8/T8u3F3_yuQo/photo.jpg?sz=64
+Sahil Gupta Not only that; this video is a total bullshit.
https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-GZQ3Sy2LFuY/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAABI/5IT-uu7JZOQ/photo.jpg?sz=64
so you think you can just drop a bombshell like the concept of a "Great Mind" and think you have answered all the questions while in reality you just raised more questions than answered. What a bunch of lousy thinking/ And why have you not entertained the idea of not having a free will, our thoughts being the result of a complex series of physical stimuli? What gave you the right to dismiss it? Once again - lousy thinking.
https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-GZQ3Sy2LFuY/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAABI/5IT-uu7JZOQ/photo.jpg?sz=64
+powninfinity pretty much.
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-XdUIqdMkCWA/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/4252rscbv5M/photo.jpg?sz=64
+Peppermint yea, but the great mind will be able to answer all those questions, so I don't have to... duh. Don't think that that great mind must need a mind to exist or anything like that, just answer all I don't knows with God, no need to think anymore, done, it's easy.
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-XdUIqdMkCWA/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/4252rscbv5M/photo.jpg?sz=64
I'm not even a minute in and I already have to laugh. When we touch a hot pan, our brain doesn't say to pull away at all. That's a reflex connection at the spine. By the time that our brain is receiving the information, we're already letting go and pulling away. Same thing happens every day at the doctor's office with the knee-jerk test. The fact that they don't understand such a widely known and documented phenomenon really removes a lot from their credibility.
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-XdUIqdMkCWA/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/4252rscbv5M/photo.jpg?sz=64
Oh man, it just got funnier. Man has clearly never seriously studied neuroscience. Or if he has, he's just manipulating the facts to demonstrate his agenda of a greater being. As though machines as complex as humans don't have the ability to weigh taste preferences, commute time, or calories.
https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-NDylshjU3y0/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAE2Q/SRqoaRi2RcU/photo.jpg?sz=64
Sometimes I doubt if people have a free will! Even when it comes down to the example of choosing where do we want to go for a lunch, I have doubts how much free will is really there. We are just programmed by our past experiences and the brain is just the CPU to process that code.
https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-NDylshjU3y0/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAE2Q/SRqoaRi2RcU/photo.jpg?sz=64
+Martin Růžička Hmm. Interesting... Thanks Prager University for realizing I am most probably a materialist!

6. Do Not Murder

You Can Kill, but You Can't Murder If asked to state this Commandment, most people would say "Do Not Kill." This is understandable because the classic King ...

User Comments

https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-yKFpmwVqAco/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAADI/dIZaESMMv7E/photo.jpg?sz=64
So, the genocide of american indians by european settlers was a killing, and not a murder. -- What a relief!
https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-Hvs3PuN0Ohg/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAEY/iXBP5UdyAlU/photo.jpg?sz=64
+Josef Trumpeldor Many people forget that Indian tribes were cruel to each other. Sure they were conquered by Europe, but let us not claim the Indians were innocent bystanders in the big picture. Anyways, America is getting punished by God today - just look who is running for office and I rest my case.
https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-EzMF1FOK5Og/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAADA/wmtbTgeBV-0/photo.jpg?sz=64
+Khaim Gulkovich Don't forget that loooooooooooooooooooong before ENGLISH-speaking Europeans arrived, the Spaniards were treating the Indians even worse, not to mention the savagery of internecine wars of the Indians......
https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-Vf6TAdjaMMk/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAACY/jlsZoQTa0qE/photo.jpg?sz=64
what about abortion?
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-tTqQCm4964c/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAADA/dLUc1sefNjo/photo.jpg?sz=64
+Elena Urda that would be murder,
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-MmnjUelMbRI/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAHU/qOwnIJtJ81M/photo.jpg?sz=64
The Bible itself admits that Yahweh ordered mass murder of defenseless men, women, and children.
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-MmnjUelMbRI/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAHU/qOwnIJtJ81M/photo.jpg?sz=64
+Mark PrasekThanks for further proving that Christians are pro mass murder. You are truly a disgusting person.
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-wJ2r8KA5HsU/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAJo4/AAIFtvbFieE/photo.jpg?sz=64
+Citizen of Rome OK, we're done.
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-MmnjUelMbRI/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAHU/qOwnIJtJ81M/photo.jpg?sz=64
+Mark PrasekIt is the exact same thing. If you make excuses for genocide and mass murder by claiming that Adolf Hitler or whoever you worship can do so, then YOU ARE PRO GENOCIDE.No one cares about your little neo-nazi excuses, your slave mentality, your authoritarian ideology. No one cares. The only thing that matters is whether you approve of genocide.And you do. Thus proving everything I said so far.
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-wJ2r8KA5HsU/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAJo4/AAIFtvbFieE/photo.jpg?sz=64
+Citizen of Rome​Never said anybody but God had the authority. Your false accusations are a sign you're position here is weak.
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-MmnjUelMbRI/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAHU/qOwnIJtJ81M/photo.jpg?sz=64
+Mark PrasekSaying that Adolf Hitler had the authority to slaughter innocent men and women is paramount to approval. If you make excuses for genocide, you are supporting genocide.
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-wJ2r8KA5HsU/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAJo4/AAIFtvbFieE/photo.jpg?sz=64
+Citizen of Rome Nonsense. Nobody said they "approve of slaughtering those who do not follow your religion". Simply stating that God has the authority to do it.
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-wJ2r8KA5HsU/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAJo4/AAIFtvbFieE/photo.jpg?sz=64
+Rose NoHo ... anyone but God killing anyone for an immoral reason would be a murderer. Unrepentant murderers go to hell. Not at all good for the person doing the killing. //www.gotquestions.org/original-sin.html//www.gotquestions.org/questions_salvation.html
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-MmnjUelMbRI/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAHU/qOwnIJtJ81M/photo.jpg?sz=64
+john oyangurenThankyou for admitting that you approve of slaughtering those who do not follow your religion.You have proven that you are a terrorist.
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-gpMz8uvonyY/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAIY/DtnnJTZNqRc/photo.jpg?sz=64
+Mark PrasekIf that's the case, killing a baby would be doing it the ultimate favor. (I'm saying if that's the case, not advocating infanticide. Your beliefs about original sin and salvation are absurd.)
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-wJ2r8KA5HsU/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAJo4/AAIFtvbFieE/photo.jpg?sz=64
+Rose NoHo all of us have original sin. Some believe that because the infants had not reached the age of accountability, they would be saved.
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-gpMz8uvonyY/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAIY/DtnnJTZNqRc/photo.jpg?sz=64
+john oyangurenGod ordered babies killed, babies too young to have done anything other than suck on the tit and eliminate. Are sucking on the tit and eliminating disobeying God?
https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-VCGCqhkFQqU/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAACM/412jYTOCPn4/photo.jpg?sz=64
They disobeyed God....they weren't exactly innocent...
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-gpMz8uvonyY/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAIY/DtnnJTZNqRc/photo.jpg?sz=64
+john oyanguren "Samaria shall become desolate; for she hath rebelled against her God: they shall fall by the sword: their infants shall be dashed in pieces, and their women with child shall be ripped up." Hosea 13:16
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-MmnjUelMbRI/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAHU/qOwnIJtJ81M/photo.jpg?sz=64
+john oyangurenYou need to read the Bible my friend. Let's start with a simple example like the mass murder of helpless religious dissenters by Moses in Exodus 32
https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-VCGCqhkFQqU/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAACM/412jYTOCPn4/photo.jpg?sz=64
+Citizen of Rome where?

8. Do Not Steal

Keep This and You'll Keep Them All There is one commandment that, if followed by all of humanity, would instantly create a peaceful world: Do not steal.

User Comments

https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-XihIQVY_lFQ/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAD8/ZZuUpmMwaTg/photo.jpg?sz=64
Am I going to hell for stealing some of my dad's candy & forgetting to give a pencil back to my friend, then losing it? Honest question
https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-XihIQVY_lFQ/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAD8/ZZuUpmMwaTg/photo.jpg?sz=64
+Magna-Z TheAnnihilator so youre saying all sinners, no matter how bad the sin is, are going to hell?
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/--olLak_NQVY/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAACI/MM5rH_haC5s/photo.jpg?sz=64
If you are depending on your own good works to get into heaven than "Yes" you are going to Hell. The Bible says "The wages of sin is Death": meaning death is what you earned for your evil works (sin against God.)The Biblical definition for Death is: "Separation from God"-This is "Spiritual death". Spiritual death is then followed by "Physical death" then Hell follows."Hell" is the place where you experience "everlasting death"(separated from God forever.) "Heaven" is the place where you experience "Eternal Life". The qualifications for "earning" your way to Heaven is to be "perfectly righteous".This is what it means to be "Holy". God is perfectly righteous(Holy), and God created man to be "perfectly righteous"(Holy) just like Himself. Sin is defined as "The transgression of the law of God". If you have committed even one sin than you are disqualified from inheriting eternal life because God has a duty to judge all(sin) transgression of His law or else He is not a just God.All men who die in there sin will inherit the wrath of God.
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-X9-kCWJdbGg/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAWQ/5h6m5QXPanE/photo.jpg?sz=64
+MaDkOrNfLaKeS lol i steal 500$ from my dad when i was 7 years old.
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-xJsIzQcJkyo/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAA9U/ZqCnxWgcHX8/photo.jpg?sz=64
He just ran up behind him and stole his "dignity".
https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-6cvaA6ECWaU/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAIY/iXDafBvu3mQ/photo.jpg?sz=64
+Purple Energy Win.
https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-RwXVEKXsHtc/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAADc/nU-1c8upcQA/photo.jpg?sz=64
COMMANDMENTS 2015 1. You shall never relinquish your critical thinking in favor of a conceptual entity the existence of which you cannot validate. (We must all recognize the fact that today, religion is the most serious impediment to any sensible management of the worlds peoples. Religion and belief in conceptual entities, divides humans into competing groups that will invariably argue, fight and kill each other's children over these unfounded beliefs. This has to stop as should the "polite tolerance" of totally implausible religious claims. It is time for us all to think. To think rationally; to think for ourselves. We must have the honesty, integrity and courage to admit when we do not know the answer and that the answers will not be found on our knees with our eyes closed.) 2. You shall never elevate your cause above your humanity. (Humans can be moral without a belief in a conceptual entity. Develop your empathy.) 3. You shall stop the practice of genital mutilation of your young for religious reasons and the presentation to them, of implausible religious claims, as absolute truth. (Hide your face and weep if you dare to harm a child.) 4. You shall not tolerate the subjugation and mistreatment of people, particularly women, based upon ancient or religious text. 5. You shall honor your father and your mother. 6. You shall not murder. 7. You shall not have sex irresponsibly, without consideration of it's consequences or without empathy and consideration for others and you will always insist upon safe sex practices. 8. You shall not steal and cannot escape judgment if you rob people with a false prospectus rather than with a weapon, nor will you "rip people off" in the name of religion. 9. You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor. 10. You shall not covet. (You shall learn to control your envy.) 11. You shall not condemn people on the basis of their ethnicity or their color but you should rigorously question their unfounded beliefs. (Contemplation is acceptable, unprovable assertions are not.) 12. You shall not condemn people for their inborn non-violent nature. (Why would God create so many homosexuals only in order to torture and destroy them?) 13. You shall not use people as private property, as owned, or as slaves. 14. You shall accept responsibility for what you do and shall not defer such to a conceptual entity, the existence of which we cannot validate. (Scapegoating, or having someone else die for your sin is not moral.) 15. You shall rigorously pursue a verifiable truth, develop your empathy and have respect. (Be aware that you, too, are an animal, and dependent upon the web of nature. Think and act accordingly.) 16. You shall strongly oppose all and any efforts to incorporate religion into government or the military, shall insist on the separation of Church and State and guard against religious literalism. 17. You shall wear clothes for protection, fashion or humor but not as a propitiation to a conceptual entity, the existence of which we cannot validate. 18. You shall refrain from dragging inappropriate, unverifiable and meaningless beliefs and rituals from the past, into the present and shall recognize that cultism is a damaging and corrosive pursuit. (Human beliefs and strange rituals are learned, they are not part of human DNA. It is time to understand that we can all get along if properly educated.) 19. You shall not present religious pseudoscience as education or as literal and will accept that we are mortal beings with finite lives, whose purpose is for us to collectively and individually determine. 20. Governments should discontinue tax exemption for religion and stop the support and perpetuation of implausible religious claims that cannot be validated. Some input courtesy of Christopher Hitchens
https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-RwXVEKXsHtc/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAADc/nU-1c8upcQA/photo.jpg?sz=64
+Michael MacDougall Religion has been responsible for so many things in the past such as the establishment of schools and was man's early attempt to understand and explain the world around him. Today religion should be regarded as a scaffold that has been in place for the construction of modern understanding. Once our modern understanding is established and sufficiently advanced,  the scaffold can, and should, be removed and the true splendour of the universe and our existence observed. Some societies are not advanced enough to allow for the removal of the scaffold and some have foolishly built the scaffold into the structure of their respective societies rendering its removal very difficult, painful and costly. Societies have to have the education, understanding and confidence, that their social structure if properly formed, can and will stand on its own.
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-XdUIqdMkCWA/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/4252rscbv5M/photo.jpg?sz=64
+RATIONALMIND001 You do realize that you have not proved that all religious belief is unverifiable or that any particular religious belief is false. You seem to hold this a priori. Regardless there is no reason in your post to agree or disagree so I will move on. You state that religious belief is irrational, are you aware that Universities, genetic inheritance, the periodic table and the big bang were all developed by religious orders or clergy? Rational thought which you say you esteem was transmitted and developed by religious orders throughout the Middle Ages and into the Renaissance. Science itself came from natural philosophy which was taught by religious institutions and developed throughout the Middle Ages. Granted many of their conclusions were wrong, but that is the nature of Science much of 19th century science is also incorrect. With science the process is its true genius and what allows to find the truth.Empathy is not relevant to ethics at all I am not sure why you mentioned it. Ethics is the determination of what the best action I can take in given set of circumstances. It could include helping another in need just as easily as physically stopping another from taking an action (theft, assault, etc). Am I supposed to empathize with burglar or the owner of the property he is breaking into? Even if I empathize with the burglar and his state in life I can and should still attempt to stop him from stealing.You discuss homosexuals and ask why God would create them just to suffer. First of all I have found that twin studies show that homosexuality is not genetic fairly adequately. However whether homosexuality is genetic does not answer any questions to its morality. Schizophrenia is definitely genetic but we would never allow an untreated schizophrenic to hurt people just because nature made him that way. The Bible does not censure people it censures action so God did not create homosexuals just to suffer even if I grant that homosexuality is genetic.You mention taxing Churches and also your belief in the separation of Church and State. Do you realize the former violates the latter? The separation of Church and State is a protection for Churches, not the State. It forbids the State from involving itself in religious matters where it invariably uses violence to enforce its opinions. The settlers of the United States left Britain for this reason.I know that Christopher Hitchens seem to think that religion is the source of all evil while ignoring the entire 20th century where numerous atheistic regimes from Hitler to Stalin to Mao slaughtered millions. I have found that Christopher Hitchens, Richard Dawkins are illiterate in history and poor philosophers (philosophy being the study of rationality at its very basis). They conclude that members of religious groups have done evil and some religions advocate evil, so therefore all religions advocate and all religious groups do evil. By that logic I can say that because of Mao all atheists want to slaughter millions and that makes no sense. Getting rid of religion will not bring peace. Mao, Lenin and Stalin demonstrate this point admirably. Evil people always have existed and always will exist. Good people must do what they can to stop them. Atheist or theist this has always been the case. I have tried to deal with a few points from your post if you wish deal with any of the points specifically let me know. Have a good day.
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-Q6_XwQeBuSA/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAACQ/a_Z-cq_-sg0/photo.jpg?sz=64
Two unmarried people can commit adultery. Having any sexual contact beyond the confines of the Institution of Marriage is adultery.
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-gpMz8uvonyY/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAIY/DtnnJTZNqRc/photo.jpg?sz=64
+Unix One No. There's not god who sees us when we are sleeping, and knows when we're awake, who knows if we've bad or good, so be good for goodness sake.
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-vtaCDdP8Q84/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAABow/LzQq7O_8QDk/photo.jpg?sz=64
+Unix One Modern definition and interpretation, not the one meant by the original hebrew.
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-Q6_XwQeBuSA/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAACQ/a_Z-cq_-sg0/photo.jpg?sz=64
+Perochka While I can't stop people from doing this, I still say that if you really want to "go at it" with someone, at least get married first. 
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-UQiJKH0kQXI/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAA8/2QhQHAS8sKY/photo.jpg?sz=64
+Unix One Rape is wrong, but it's one doing it to the other (unless it's a gang rape).
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-Q6_XwQeBuSA/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAACQ/a_Z-cq_-sg0/photo.jpg?sz=64
+Perochka Two unmarried people can commit sexual assault in various ways, would that not count as sin? 
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-UQiJKH0kQXI/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAA8/2QhQHAS8sKY/photo.jpg?sz=64
+Unix One That's fornication.
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-XdUIqdMkCWA/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/4252rscbv5M/photo.jpg?sz=64
I have to say something about "stealing intellectual property" first of all if we had to give all our intellectual property back to who we "stole" it from we would know nothing everything we learned in school from our (if you have one) collage education all the way back to Pre-k and even without illegally downloading anything Companies make it abundantly clear that YOU DO NOT OWN their software, video games, or movies your purchase is only permission for personal use of that movie (for example) so therefor if you had invited a friend over to watch that movie with you, that's not personal use you can believe what you will but I believe that in order for a sin to be a sin it MUST affect a real living person and by definition a corporation is it's own person by law but by not only religion but by common sense a corporation as a (legal) person does not have life or a soul, someone must run the corporation but the person who is running the corporation does not own what the corporation owns any more than a child owns what belongs to his/her parents so by that definition you can not steal from a corporation and downloading a movie or software program owned by a corporation or even shoplifting from a corporation's store, is Not a sin, however shoplifting (stealing) from a locally individually owned business is a sin. and using other people's words or copying information you learned to do something for yourself is not stealing because otherwise anyone who has a job of any kind at all would be "stealing" "intellectual property" from countless people in order to preform their job.
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-XdUIqdMkCWA/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/4252rscbv5M/photo.jpg?sz=64
Loophole!
Sign up for free to join this conversation on fsaved.com.
Already have an account? Sign in to comment