Adam should interview Dr. Judy Wood, a scientist with expertise in
experimental stress analysis, engineering mechanics and strength of
materials testing. She has written a book, WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO?, which
is by far the most comprehensive forensic investigation into the
destruction of SEVEN World Trade Center buildings in Manhattan.
Dr. Judy Wood has been virtually censored - worse yet, Mr. Gage, Dr. "Thermite Jones" & Alex Jones slander and try to smear her. But she has something they do't have...a Phd with the credentials in Mechanical Engineering to actually examine the evidence. I mean, it is what she is trained to do! Buy the book Where Did The Towers Go, your jaw will drop and you will never waste another second listening to the garbage Mr. Gage & Company push, once you look at ALL of the evidence.
+frostek Where has she stated this? I have read her book multiple times and she states no such thing.Where are you getting your information? Maybe you should actually read her book and look at the evidence rather than making assumptions.
WANTED FOR HIGH TREASON
Richard Gage, founder of A&Efor911Lies
$2.3 TRILLION REWARD - DEAD OR ALIVE
Other crimes include impersonating a high rise steel architect, sedition,
and scientific fraud
CAUTION - suspect is known to violate the laws of physics
Call 1-911-DEBUNKD to report the whereabouts of this treasonous shill
"Shills" confuse and degenerate the debate, kind of like you have...they don't collate the evidence and present it as simply as the can with little to no speculation.People are waking up to the techniques of the "Agents of Deception" you know? You can't just call someone a shill, offer no evidence, and expect to be taken seriously. Good day to you tho Mam.
+The WTC 6 Truth Movement"Dr.Wood's book "Where Did the Towers" go will show you all the evidence that has been hidden! "you LIED about 911.....admit it SHILL
+ctcole77 If you have the "twoof" on your side than it should be quite easy for you to back up your slander with evidence that I lied? Show us where I lied...I invite you to try? Evidence is not a 4-letter word btw.But You have nothing to say, or you would have said it by now. The truth does not take sides...one either has it, or they do not!
+ctcole77 I noticed you came to my page that I just set up and looked at most of the posts, yet offered no comments? Have you nothing to say? That was a rhetorical question btw...no need to answer!
+ctcole77 Lie? You are calling names without talking about evidence. If i were a liar, why would I waste time even lying to someone unwilling to debate the evidence? Best of luck to you. Liars don't put their position clearly on the record as I have done, and welcome any one, at anytime to come try to invalidate anything I have said. But you won't...name-callers don't have time to inconvenience themselves with facts!
+The WTC 6 Truth Movementyou can LIE all you want twoofer traitor tard....We know you work for Dr. Judy Wood.How much does she pay you per post?911 TRUTH = $$$$$
I think she would love to debate Gage Jones & Jones. Coward would not be a word I would associate with Dr. Wood. Gage won't even talk about all the evidence...let alone debate it.You think Dr. Wood is welcoem at any of the so called "Truth Conferences"? Andrew Johnson has not ven been invited back since the one in Madison in 2007. Morgaan Reynolds too...they have been blacklisted! Gage and company are the ones running scared!
+The WTC 6 Truth MovementWell maybe after 13 years of being a coward you can get Dr. Judy to debate......ANYONE.......EVER.Funny how she spreads soooooo much "truth and science" yet she REFUSES to debate ANYONE.
+ctcole77 I do not. I started my FB page 4 months ago bc if not me than who? I was shocked to find out all the evidence in her book that the so called Truth Movement is silent on...yet, they smear her! In full disclosure, I am working on a meeting with her, which hope will happen sooner than later. But there is no money in really telling the truth partner. One does it bc they have a conscience, and want more than anything to be able to look in the mirror and say I did my small part to confront evil!
+frostek The idea Thermite can explain all the evidence is indeed laughable. I mean, the paper did not burn...yet Mr. Gage claims the raining thermite droplets "can easily" account for the 1400 toasted/burnt cars. This guy is a charlatan!
+WOO BREAKER - Thanks so much for this information. I've heard this claim time and time again, and wondered what the story was. Unsurprisingly it seems to be another case of truthers twisting a claim to fit their preconceived notions!
+Kem RadovichAGAIN HERE ARE MY CHALLENGESPLEASE explain...1) how the stress levels coupled with elevated temperatures in the columns weren't high enough to trigger collapse2) differential equations for the crush-down/crush-up phases of gravitational collapse indicating that the Towers shouldn't have collapse the way they did3) how the temperatures and live loads created from impact and fire would not suffice to explain creep/bowing/buckling/viscoplastic deformation in exterior columns/floors within the impact zone.I'm waiting Twoof-seeker!Don't worry, Cole and I are ENGINEERS that can handle the math :)911 TRUTH=911 LIES
OMFG ROFLMAO..... Spelling police hoo.....I know you're is spelled like that but I use your.... you still understand it right otherwise you would not try and correct me....And as for you Woo/Shitcole....WTF are you talking about as a challenge?.... You haven't posted any challenge.....
+Kem RadovichWhat about my challenges?SEVEN times I've posted them to you and STILL zero attempts!Does THAT sound like a Truth-seeker to you?Not only are you a retard but you're also a COWARD!911 TRUTH=HIGH TREASON
+Kem Radovich What about my challenges that I've posted six times that you refuse to answer Hitler twoofer Youth?It's obvious you can't answer them. Why not come clean and admit that you don't know anything about science or engineering?911 TRUTH=911 NAZIS
+Kem RadovichDo you just sit around and wait for my posts?LMAO!I just got back from the bars!Kem Twoofer, why don't you kiss a girl, FOR THE FIRST TIME!
LOL got to love the patriot act.... The same one that reads nearly word for word as the NAZI Enabling Act of 1933.... You are a Nazi lol...Go and support your 9/11 Reichstag....Talk about putting me in a FEMA camp just like a good little Nazi would lol.....Every comment you make just proves how much of a Nazi you are....
+Kem RadovichYou're not fooling anyone. You hate Jews, you want the democratically elected govt. overthrown, you violate the laws of physics with your magical theories.......nothing says Nazi more then that!Nazis make up lies about "false flag operations", just like 911 twoofers.Nazis refuse to answer questions, just like 911 twoofers.Don't worry, we'll have all you 911 twoofer traitor tard Nazis in the FEMA camps soon enough :)God bless the Patriot Act!
You keep saying Nazi, Nazi, Nazi... Problem is you and your duhbunker friends represent Nazi's more than the truth movement.... As I said before Nazi's supported the official lie much like your position on 9/11....And as for being a troll no one trolls like a cut and paste person like you....And as for answering your questions you don't want an answer.... Otherwise you wouldn't be asking the same debunked questions over and over again... half of your questions can be answered with just some simple common sense.... Something you seem to be lacking....
+Kem RadovichSlow your roll gullible troll...Like ALL 911 twoofers you're afraid to answer the questions.Prove me wrong Nazi shill and ANSWER THE QUESTIONS.
LOL.... still fishing with your cookie cutter copy paste crap eh....Your not searching for the truth... You don't want to acknowledge the truth... You shy away from the truth like a cockroach from light....
+Kem RadovichI'm just searching for the truth....You're just stalling now....Please answer the questions uneducated gullible shill.911 TRUTH = 911 LIES
What's the point in giving you an answer again when five minutes later your going to spam another page with the same questions asking someone else to answer your questions.... You don't want people to answer your questions you just want to spam your copy paste questions in every truth video out there..... I answered each and everyone one of your questions on your home page years ago and what did I get in return ban and erase of my comments from your page....After that I realized you didn't want answers to your questions you want to just shove your copy paste question's into everyone's face like its something no one can answer.... I know your game and I will not play it.... period.....And oh yeh you got it wrong it was the NAZI's that where the gullible ones that followed Hitler without question.... Much like you and your duhbunker friends out there that don't question all the strange anomalies that happened on 9/11.... Just like the Nazi's didn't question the Reichstag's burning....So march to your fuhrer's song and lead the way mighty Duhbunkers....
+Kem RadovichSorry lying shill but 911 twoofers have NEVER answered the questions.Prove me wrong, why don't you answer the questions "again"?Put up or shut up gullible Nazi.911 TRUTH = 911 LIES
Problem is they have all been answered but you refuse to even acknowledge them.....Its like asking the question to answers you never want to see.... That doesn't make sense.... Then again nothing you do makes sense...
+ctcole77How did Kem Twoofer's tattoo artist spell "Twoof" wrong on his shitty back tat?//philly.barstoolsports.com/files/2013/08/911-inside-job-tattoo.jpg
+WOO BREAKERNOT FAIR :(You not allowed to ask 911 twoofers those questions.I mean......how are we going to get a new 911 twoofer investigation when you keep on asking questions that DEBUNK our magical theories?911 WAS AN OUTSIDE JOB!
+Kem Radovich"WOO you have no challenges..."5 times and counting...1) how the stress levels coupled with elevated temperatures in the columns weren't high enough to trigger collapse2) differential equations for the crush-down/crush-up phases of gravitational collapse indicating that the Towers shouldn't have collapse the way they did3) how the temperatures and live loads created from impact and fire would not suffice to explain creep/bowing/buckling/viscoplastic deformation in exterior columns/floors within the impact zone.I'm just searching for the twoof about 911 twoof :(
+Kem RadovichWOO.......Kem Twoofer like to answer questions :)WHY?How can someone call themselves a "truth seeker" but REFUSE to answer questions?911 TRUTH = 911 LIES
WOO you have no challenges...And shitcole your questions have all been answered a long time ago... You just keep deleting everyone's answers from your page when you don't like to see them....
LOL back to being spelling police again eh....When facts fail you make fun of the way he types eh.... Your not going to get any points that way lol....
+ctcole77 Kem Twoofer still can't differentiate between "your" and "you're".It will be at least another 911 years before Kem Twoofer can post his differential equations that I've asked him for soo many times :(911 TRUTH=HIGH TREASON
+Kem Radovich For the 4th time, please explain...1) how the stress levels coupled with elevated temperatures in the columns weren't high enough to trigger collapse2) differential equations for the crush-down/crush-up phases of gravitational collapse indicating that the Towers shouldn't have collapse the way they did3) how the temperatures and live loads created from impact and fire would not suffice to explain creep/bowing/buckling/viscoplastic deformation in exterior columns/floors within the impact zone.I'm just searching for the twoof about 911 twoof :(
ROFLMAO..... Now your at the same level as shitcole and terry.....Thank you for proving once again that a duhbunker can fall so low as you have done just now....
+ctcole77I've just asked some NSA guys that work in the cubicle next to us to hack into Kem Twoofer's hard drive and he said it's not looking good....Multiple pay stubs from Joseph Goebbels...Sad thing is that Goebbels only pays this shill $9.11 per hour to spread 911 twoofer lies 24/7/365.He must have failed out of 5th grade science, for sure!Oh, and John and Michael want to know if we're still on for beers after work tomorrow night to celebrate Michael Ruppert's death?1ST ROUND IS ON ME!
+Kem Radovich That has absolutely nothing to do with my post...Please explain...1) how the stress levels coupled with elevated temperatures in the columns weren't high enough to trigger collapse2) differential equations for the crush-down/crush-up phases of gravitational collapse indicating that the Towers shouldn't have collapse the way they did3) how the temperatures and live loads created from impact and fire would not suffice to explain creep/bowing/buckling/viscoplastic deformation in exterior columns/floors within the impact zone.AND..as a BONUS...Tell me how explosives or incendiaries could physically cause 3) to happen. Which, is NIST's general conclusion on what initiated the collapse (which you probably didn't even know).Or, you could just leave this thread :)
+ctcole77Did you see how bad I debunked Heinrich Himmler Kem Twoofer in my earlier post?I guess they don't teach you math and physics at Stormfront University?
+Kem Radovich3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM: Why did Dr. Steven Jones circumvent the peer review process by not showing his nanothermite paper to the chief editor and printing it without her approval? Why won't Kevin Ryan allow ANY of his precious dust samples to be tested by an independent laboratory? Why won't Niels Harrit, Steven Jones, or Kevin Ryan refute the recent truth seeking professional scientific study of the WTC dust performed by Dr. James Millette?
+Kem RadovichThat's ridiculous.Gravity alone suffices to explain the overall collapses of WTC1 and WTC2.WTC7's core/internal structure was already collapsed/collapsing by the time you watch the exterior "shell" (for a lack of better words) collapse in videos, viz. the north facade.The estimated period of free fall was measured from a single point on that facade. It wasn't global to WTC7. The point that reached and exceeded g was the point directly below the single point which NIST measured from.Got it? Good. If you disagree with this very simple (yet accurate) analysis then you will have to show to me (with math):1) how the stress levels coupled with elevated temperatures in the columns weren't high enough to trigger collapse2) differential equations for the crush-down/crush-up phases of gravitational collapse indicating that the Towers shouldn't have collapse the way they did3) how the temperatures and live loads created from impact and fire would not suffice to explain creep/bowing/buckling/viscoplastic deformation in exterior columns/floors within the impact zone.AND..as a BONUS...Tell me how explosives or incendiaries could physically cause 3) to happen. Which, is NIST's general conclusion on what initiated the collapse (which you probably didn't even know).Or, you could just leave this thread :)
"Where is your MATH lying shill?"That's the strange thing about showing the math... for years NIST cant even do that.... Because its considered national security?....
+Kem Radovich"Because it couldn't be explained without explosives"A general understanding of physics is enough to understand the collapse after initiation occurs (in WTC1 and WTC2). No explosives needed, buddy. Think I'm wrong? Where is your MATH lying shill?911 TRUTH=911 LIES
+Kem RadovichMORE LIES FROM 911 TWOOFNIST does indeed explain the collapse "speeds" dumb ass lying moron."The analyses of the video (both the estimation of the instant the roofline began to descend and the calculated velocity and acceleration of a point on the roofline) revealed three distinct stages characterizing the 5.4 seconds of collapse:Stage 1 (0 to 1.75 seconds): acceleration less than that of gravity (i.e., slower than free fall).Stage 2 (1.75 to 4.0 seconds): gravitational acceleration (free fall)Stage 3 (4.0 to 5.4 seconds): decreased acceleration, again less than that of gravity"//www.nist.gov/public_affairs/factsheet/wtc_qa_082108.cfm911 TRUTH DEBUNKED!
NIST also doesn't go into the speed of collapse whatsoever.... They stop their theory right at the start of collapse... Do you know why they cannot even go into the collapse of the towers let alone explain them?.... Because it couldn't be explained without explosives period....
+Kem RadovichYour interpretation of the period of free fall in WTC7 is entirely invalid.You've been reading too many 911 twoofer sites. Have you read NCSTAR 1A? No? I have. NIST does not say what you think they say. NIST also did NOT give us the most accurate estimate (< THIS is key) of the acceleration the NF went through for that brief span of time.Also, you keep saying "free fall speed". Free fall isn't a speed. You're an imbecile. No wonder you believe in 911 troofer fantasies.Do you want to regurgitate the woo you spouted off earlier so I can debunk it again, kook?
+ctcole77You see how bad I debunked Kem Twoofer's lies about "free fall speed"?This shill thinks it was GLOBAL to WTC7 and that "all supports in every floor would have to shatter at the exact same time".911 twoofer no know anything :(
+Kem Radovich 2.25 seconds of g from a SINGLE POINT ON THE FACADE.The part BELOW that single point on the facade reached AND exceeded g.WTC7 didn't collapse as a single homogenous structure - by the time the exterior collapses (the part you can see) the internal structure was already collapsed/collapsing.And, again, free fall isn't a "speed" lying loser.911 TRUTH=MAKING DUMB PEOPLE FEEL SMART SINCE 2004
NIST found that there was a 2.5 second free fall speed of building 7... This is around 8 floors... That would require every support in every floor to shatter at the same time.... That cannot happen in a progressive collapse period...Stop with your lies already.... This is public knowledge now so take the time to look it up instead of stating things you know nothing about...
+Kem RadovichSorry twoofer, but WTC7 only had a PERIOD of "free fall speed" from a single point measured on the FACADE.Oh, and that point EXCEEDED "free fall speed" when the internal collapsing structure pulled DOWN on the northern facade.It doesn't really matter, because you have NO proof that free fall is a necessary and sufficient factor for CD; nor can you prove that PERIODS of g cannot occur in "normal" building collapses.Oh, and BTW, free fall isn't even a "speed" lying and uneducated shill.LMAO!911 TRUTH=HIGH TREASON
Question 1... Do buildings that are demolished have inward bowing prior to demolition.... Depends on the type of demolition.... If one used cutter charges to weaken the main supports before taking out the primary columns then yes there can be bowing....Question 2... NIST had to admit free fall speeds from building 7 after years of ongoing debates they had to admit the truth.... In doing so not only proves the lack of investigation on NIST side or desire to find the truth but also validates the unofficial theory backed by photo testimony and video evidence of what happened on 9/11. As for building 1 and 2 yes video evidence does show free fall speeds and those beams that are projected at faster than free fall speeds only prove once more that there was a force that propelled them faster....Question 3.... Yes there are a lot of people that work in NIST.... But only a very few that get the final say on the matter.... Kind of like a news room... There are literally 20-50 people working on just one news cast but we only get to see one person talking.... This is why NIST is not peer reviewed and cannot be peer reviewed because the math and facts behind it couldn't hold up to a board of its peers... NIST's report has come under fire by literally thousands of professionals in the field of architect, fire and engineering...
+Kem Radovich HARD QUESTIONS FOR 911 TWOOFERS:If the Towers were brought down via explosives, please explain the inward bowing of exterior columns reported by NYPD aviation units only 8 minutes before they buckle and initiate the collapse?If the Towers fell at “free fall speed” on 911, please explain why the debris cloud and columns are falling faster than the collapsing buildings according to all photographs and videotapes?How could the NIST WTC investigation be considered completely non-independent when 125 of the 200+ experts who compiled the reports were from the private sector and academia?
Your not an engineer.....Nothing you posted even sounded like you where an engineer....Yeh and you work spamming the internet with your crap 24/7.... so theres no way you could have a job let alone be an engineer...If you where an engineer you would know for a fact 9/11 was an inside job.....
The government.....I'm on disability for serving in the US army......
Justin Winter Sotheby's International Realty: 107 Nine Bark Way
Five bedrooms and seven full washrooms plus one half-bath are thoughtfully arranged to accommodate both large and small groups of guests within 8900 ...
What's New with Autodesk InfraWorks 360 2016?
The ability to easily visualize a project's location and surroundings during the earliest stages of the design process can provide a number of long-term benefits.