Traffic lawyer noosa Videos

I'm a lawyer. I can't tell from this 3 minute clip what this man's purpose was, apart from it seeming to be his representing a case on behalf of someone else and wanting it to be dismissed. What is clear is that this man is very lucky he wasn't charged in contempt of court (a criminal offense for disrupting orderly court proceedings). He asked questions that were clearly vexatious (designed to annoy) - they were irrelevant to the resolution of his matter, and they were extremely unreasonable in the circumstances (asking the magistrate for her commission or some other proof of her authority to act - implying there was an impostor in her position unless proven otherwise. He has stepped into a court - what does he think?). When he asked these questions, the magistrate - to his great fortune - chose not to respond, but he persisted in interrupting her when she was still trying to resolve the matter with him. At that point, she - in her wisdom - saw there was no point in arguing with a fool. It's clear this man has no idea of the law, how courts work or how to achieve whatever he wanted to achieve. It seems the magistrate was willing to help him when she asked him what he came in for. But instead he indulged himself in 3 minutes of completely unproductive grandstanding. He saw the magistrate withdrawing as a victory, but her withdrawal had no legal effect - it certainly wasn't a concession that the case was over. 

When someone pleads not guilty then the Taxpayer is Hit in the ass this is why they made a scheme if you plead Guilty the judge gives you less sentence