Enter your query, example: how not cry when slicing onion or how to enter an Free Italian Sex Webcams?
Traffic ticket lawyer vancouver bc Videos
- 1. BC Government to Ditch Traffic Court
- 2. BT Vancouver: BC Court Of Appeal Holds Up Drunk Driving Laws
- 3. Don't Pay Any Traffic Ticket Before You Watch This Video
- 4. My review of a 3, 7, 30 or 90-day driving prohibition was unsuccessful, is there anything I can do?
- 5. Karl Lentz 14 - Using "shall" to beat tickets
- 6. How can there be any defence to a charge of driving while prohibited?
- 7. BC-drunk-driving-laws: What it takes to blow over the limit
- 8. Courts of BC - Provincial Court
- 9. Greg Dunn - Calgary Criminal Lawyer / Defending Out Of Province Drunk Driving Charges
BC Government to Ditch Traffic Court
The province wants to move traffic ticket disputes out of the court system. Drivers could still contest tickets, but before an administrative tribunal.
BT Vancouver: BC Court Of Appeal Holds Up Drunk Driving Laws
The appeal court has unanimously upheld tougher laws introduced in 2010. They laws were challenged by a group of drivers and the B-C Civil Liberties ...
Don't Pay Any Traffic Ticket Before You Watch This Video
Check out our newly renovated members site and public blog. //trafficticketguru.com/ For a limited time you can access our private members area for 30days ...
User Comments
Chris Rodriguez
commented
on 19 Feb 2015
is there an American version?
TrafficTicketGuru
commented
on 19 Feb 2015
Of the traffic ticket site? Is also valid for USA, see our faq.
My review of a 3, 7, 30 or 90-day driving prohibition was unsuccessful, is there anything I can do?
Mulligan Tam Pearson -- Criminal Lawyers Victoria //mtplaw.com Michael T. Mulligan answers the question: My review of a 3-day, 7-day, 30-day or 90-day ...
User Comments
jatygu
commented
on 24 Apr 2014
Good work guys
Karl Lentz 14 - Using "shall" to beat tickets
MP3 versions of the combination videos are now available to people who send a donation and request them at [email protected]. I know times are tough for ...
User Comments
erwin franklin
commented
on 10 May 2015
I asked a lawyer about shall and he said that the supreme Court ruled that
shall means the same as must. I tried to find that ruling and couldn't. Can
anyone else find it? If you do let me know! !!
bbruce995
commented
on 05 Feb 2016
+erwin franklin you are still not in breech of a contract, everything is contract, are you on the contract, did you sign the contract, is there two signatures on that contract ?... NO? no contract
Shawn Bradley
commented
on 27 Jan 2016
+erwin franklin no they ruled that you must use must instead of shall when rendering an obligation or in contracts.
Ken Johnson
commented
on 10 Sep 2015
+erwin franklin - as long as no rights are impared, it means must. See Blacks 5th
Celeste Garner
commented
on 04 Sep 2014
Not all codes use the word "shall." Many use "may not" as in "A person may
not drive a motor vehicle upon a highway, unless the person then holds a
valid driver’s license issued under this code." Furthermore, in statutes
"shall" is generally imperative or mandatory. If this method works for the
speaker, great, but people should understand it may not work for everyone.
Then what will you do? Better have a backup plan.
Celeste Garner
commented
on 26 Feb 2016
+Celeste Garner Good points in the below replies, but while I was going over the definitions, I was reminded that we are not parties to any constitution, nor subject to acts of any legislature. All legislative acts are for the regulation of the government itself, as evidenced by 1) the fact Man is subject to the higher laws of God, and 2) the definitions of the "persons" subject to the codes do not include Man. So the big question is, What do the words "may," "shall"' and "will" have to do with us?"
TheUnclehammy
commented
on 25 Feb 2016
+Angela Hilton Great points
Angela Hilton
commented
on 25 Feb 2016
+Celeste Garner strongly suggest everyone to view a legal dictionary or law dictionary. Its free to do so and the words: will, shall, may etc all imply FUTURE INTENT. That means that yesterday (when you received the offer to contract: ticket/citation/summons), and today, do not apply for the law, its always future intent. Must,now, are past and present intent!!!
TheUnclehammy
commented
on 21 Aug 2015
+Celeste Garner "MAY" is another fun word,,,,it doesn't say "CAN NOT",,,it says "may not",,,,that means "He might not be able to,,,,," and also the word PERSON like Ken Johnson below described,,,PERSON is not the same as people,,,all their codes, statutes, ordinances use the words PERSON or PERSONS,,,,Never man, woman, or people.... They even come from 2 different Latin words PERSON from PERSONA: the mask an actor wears on stage,,,,,people from Populum: the populace of men and women...
Ken Johnson
commented
on 17 Nov 2014
A person is not a man. A person is a fiction. They will try to say a person includes a natural person. A natural person is still not a man and in California, never judicially interpreted.They will also try to say in statute, shall. may and must is a word of command. That may be true to a person or corporate. However; shall, may and must is not a word of command to a man. Read the Declaration of Independence. All men are equal and the government must have our consent to govern.Read blacks law 5th; shall. may and must are "generally" a word of command, however, they may also be merely permissive or directory.If the government could tell us what to do, I am sure they would use words like mandatory, obliged, prohibited, etc.Your back up plan would be; you're and idiot. Look in blacks 5th. An idiot is a private man; one not in public office.If you get scared, just say you are an idiot and you don't understand.
Eric Bell
commented
on 14 Nov 2014
I am in Texas. In Texas our high courts have said there is NO such thing as a driverS Lic. Look at your so called lic. Do you see the word DriverS or do you see driver? A driver is 100% commercial. Are you?
How can there be any defence to a charge of driving while prohibited?
Mulligan Tam Pearson -- Criminal Lawyers Victoria //mtplaw.com Paul E. Pearson answers the question: How can there be any defence to a charge of ...
BC-drunk-driving-laws: What it takes to blow over the limit
With BC's new drunk driving laws, it doesn't take much to blow over the .05 limit. This basic breakdown gives you a ball park figure of what it might take to blow ...
User Comments
Farglesword
commented
on 05 Sep 2013
Hahahaha! That woman does not weigh 120 lbs, nor does the average woman!
Courts of BC - Provincial Court
User Comments
MIKE ZARZOUR
commented
on 01 Jun 2013
BC courts are the worst in North America, corrupt legal system, Crippled
justice system, judges handing out sentences not fit for the crimes
committed, merely a band aid punishment to keep the system going, and keep
their jobs. People in BC are sick of this justice system, than is worse
than Zambia's legal system. That is just disgusting.
maggieduncanrock
commented
on 27 Oct 2013
Very good explanation of the Provincial Court Role. Thank you.
Greg Dunn - Calgary Criminal Lawyer / Defending Out Of Province Drunk Driving Charges
Greg Dunn is a drunk driving lawyer in Calgary, Alberta. His Calgary criminal law firm provides dedicated service to individuals who are facing out of province ...
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on fsaved.com.
Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Already have an account? Sign in to comment