Enter your query, example: how not cry when slicing onion or how to enter an Free Italian Sex Webcams?
Mazda 3 2005 imagenes Videos
Mustang 5.0 vs MazdaSpeed 3
User Comments
Boss 302
commented
on 27 Jan 2016
good run. ford & Mazda share the same engine. 2.3L it's most ford cars.
plus it's my 96 ford ranger too
chapmanmerchant
commented
on 13 Feb 2016
+Boss 302 um no that 2.3 has nothing to do with your ford motor. but i is a new motor from ford. Just so you know. its not the 134hp 2.3. Look it up
MrMooner1212
commented
on 14 Dec 2015
Mustang destroyed it every time.
Ryan Rohauer
commented
on 05 Mar 2016
+Timothy G. you also have to consider gearing
Timothy G.
commented
on 09 Jan 2016
You must not understand. The Mazda killed it as it is much lighter and has more torque at the power to weight ratio thus giving it a faster acceleration. I'm sorry but the mustang had no real opportunity here.
MrMooner1212
commented
on 08 Jan 2016
+Timothy Geiger well once the speed3 stopped being a dipshit and waited for the honks...yeah.
Timothy G.
commented
on 07 Jan 2016
lmao you're joking right?
Fox Gabanna
commented
on 05 Sep 2015
Ford makes the motor for the Mazadaspeed 3 anyway so Win/Win.
Ryan Rohauer
commented
on 05 Mar 2016
+Big FING Box RIGHT! just about all the eco boosts the engines come off the same assembly line as the mazda 2.3l t it was originaly a mazda design they just fell short with the assembly thats where ford came in
Big FING Box
commented
on 10 Sep 2015
+bigdezy419 actually thats a mazda engine. Infact ford now uses the speed3 engine in much of its "eco boost" cars.
TexasGunslinger9
commented
on 11 Aug 2015
That speed3 doesn't sound like any other speed I've ever heard.
scoobeydoooo
commented
on 21 Mar 2016
Not 100%... But I think it has upgraded equal length manifold, race pipe and everything else stock. No tune. Unless they were doing a 80-90mph dig which doesn't seem to be the case. Now the question is what are the Mustangs mod?
Derwin Rodriguez
commented
on 23 Jun 2015
A four cylinder with the same amount of power as a v8 is idiotic. Even if a
four cylinder is faster than a v6/v8, who cares. Look at the best cars in
the world; Lamborghini, Ferrari, Maserati, Buggati, Porsche, BMW, Mercedes,
etc. The majority of high end cars have bigger engines. Four cylinders are
made to be economical, you can make a Four cylinder car fast, but at the
end of the day, it is what it is just a little economical four.
Jerel Lee Alcantara
commented
on 20 Aug 2015
+Kelly Sullivan yeah that's what I told him he's only a little boy about 20 years of age I'm like 26 so I know and know how to drive better been driving ever since 14 give me any car or any stock car I prolly can make it win anytime lols
Kelly Sullivan
commented
on 13 Aug 2015
+Jerel Lee Alcantara if you're telling the truth, your friend needs his car taken away from him. Make him swap you. LOL.
Kelly Sullivan
commented
on 13 Aug 2015
+Jerel Lee Alcantara SXt? Like in 300 hp v6 SXt? I call BS. I walked a Challenger R//T in my mildly modded MS3. Certainly less mods than your friends. I've driven a a charger v6. The blind spots are worse than the engineering!
Jerel Lee Alcantara
commented
on 11 Aug 2015
yeps that's true, cause I actually beat my friends 2012 ms3 with e85 methanol Cobb accessport with stage 2 turbo with my 2014 dodge charger sxt plus and it only has aftermarket mopar air intake with resonator delete..so I don't know lols!! must be how the driver drives his car I guess
TheImmigrationDude
commented
on 10 Aug 2015
+Derwin Rodriguez That's not the point. It's easier and cheaper to buy and rebuild a little four banger to give it 600+ hp than it is to take your typical V-8 and get it to that same point.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on fsaved.com.
Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Already have an account? Sign in to comment